scholarly journals Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Docetaxel With or Without Gefitinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1405-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanassios Argiris ◽  
Musie Ghebremichael ◽  
Jill Gilbert ◽  
Ju-Whei Lee ◽  
Kamakshi Sachidanandam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose We hypothesized that the addition of gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to docetaxel would enhance therapeutic efficacy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients and Methods Patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2, or patients with ECOG performance status of 0 to 2 but were previously treated with chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive weekly docetaxel plus either placebo (arm A) or gefitinib 250 mg/d, orally (arm B) until disease progression. At the time of progression, patients in the placebo arm could receive single-agent gefitinib. EGFR, c-MET, and KRAS mutations and polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters were evaluated by pyrosequencing. Results Two hundred seventy patients were enrolled before the study was closed early at interim analysis (arm A, n = 136; arm B, n = 134). Median overall survival was 6.0 months in arm A versus 7.3 months in arm B (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.21; P = .60). An unplanned subset analysis showed that gefitinib improved survival in patients younger than 65 years (median 7.6 v 5.2 months; P = .04). Also, there was a trend for improved survival in patients with c-MET wild-type (5.7 v 3.6 months; P = .09) regardless of treatment. Grade 3/4 toxicities were comparable between the two arms except that grade 3/4 diarrhea was more common with docetaxel/gefitinib. Of 18 eligible patients who received gefitinib after disease progression in arm A, one patient had a partial response. Conclusion The addition of gefitinib to docetaxel was well tolerated but did not improve outcomes in poor prognosis but otherwise unselected patients with SCCHN.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Single-Agent Pemetrexed Versus Carboplatin and Pemetrexed in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 2

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (23) ◽  
pp. 2849-2853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro Zukin ◽  
Carlos H. Barrios ◽  
Jose Rodrigues Pereira ◽  
Ronaldo De Albuquerque Ribeiro ◽  
Carlos Augusto de Mendonça Beato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

Purpose To compare single-agent pemetrexed (P) versus the combination of carboplatin and pemetrexed (CP) in first-line therapy for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 2. Patients and Methods In a multicenter phase III randomized trial, patients with advanced NSCLC, ECOG PS of 2, any histology at first and later amended to nonsquamous only, no prior chemotherapy, and adequate organ function were randomly assigned to P alone (500 mg/m2) or CP (area under the curve of 5 and 500 mg/m2, respectively) administered every 3 weeks for a total of four cycles. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results A total of 205 eligible patients were enrolled from eight centers in Brazil and one in the United States from April 2008 to July 2011. The response rates were 10.3% for P and 23.8% for CP (P = .032). In the intent-to-treat population, the median PFS was 2.8 months for P and 5.8 months for CP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.63; P < .001), and the median OS was 5.3 months for P and 9.3 months for CP (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.83; P = .001). One-year survival rates were 21.9% and 40.1%, respectively. Similar results were seen when patients with squamous disease were excluded from the analysis. Anemia (grade 3, 3.9%; grade 4, 11.7%) and neutropenia (grade 3, 1%; grade 4, 6.8%) were more frequent with CP. There were four treatment-related deaths in the CP arm. Conclusion Combination chemotherapy with CP significantly improves survival in patients with advanced NSCLC and ECOG PS of 2.

scholarly journals Toxicity management of regorafenib in patients with gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in a tertiary cancer centre

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Chamberlain ◽  
Sheima Farag ◽  
Constance Williams-Sharkey ◽  
Cecilia Collingwood ◽  
Lucia Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

Abstract Background Regorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved as third line treatment for metastatic GIST. Dose limiting toxicities are frequently seen and many patients require dose reductions. This study aimed to evaluate regorafenib toxicities and their management in a real-world GIST population. Methods Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified 50 patients with GIST treated with regorafenib at our centre between March 2013 and September 2018. Results Median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months [interquartile range (IQR) 2.8–14.4 months]. Median overall survival (OS) from start of regorafenib to death or last follow up was 15.7 months (IQR 9.2–28.4 months). Baseline median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status on starting regorafenib was 1. The main reason for discontinuing regorafenib was progressive disease (PD) (31/50 [62%]) rather than toxicity (10/50 [20%]). Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were seen in 23/50 (46%) patients; palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was most frequently seen (9/50 (18%)). Two patients died whilst on treatment with regorafenib from multi-organ failure secondary to sepsis (4%). Dose reductions were required in 19/50 patients (38%) and 8/50 (16%) patients started regorafenib at a lower dose band than the recommended dose (160 mg) due to comorbidities or concern over a higher individual risk of toxicity. Conclusion Although PD was the main reason for discontinuing treatment, toxicity management and dosing of regorafenib remains critical. Median duration of treatment was longer compared to previous studies suggesting a durable clinical benefit with regorafenib with rigorous toxicity management.

A randomized, double-blind phase II study of the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) axitinib (AG-013736) in combination with docetaxel (DOC) compared to DOC plus placebo (PL) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1003-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. S. Rugo ◽  
A. Stopeck ◽  
A. A. Joy ◽  
S. Chan ◽  
S. Verma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Grade 3

1003 Background: Single-agent DOC is commonly used to treat MBC. Axitinib (AG) is a potent TKI of VEGFRs. A phase I lead-in study identified 80 mg/m2 q3wks of DOC in combination with 5 mg BID of AG as the recommended phase 2 dose. The primary objective was to determine whether the time to progression (TTP) of AG+DOC arm is superior to DOC+PL. Methods: Pts with no prior chemotherapy for MBC and =12 mos from adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT), measurable disease, ECOG performance status (PS) of 0–2, and no uncontrolled brain metastases were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive treatment with either DOC+AG or DOC+PL without prophylactic growth factor in cycle 1. Tumor measurements were performed q9wks. Pts were stratified according to estrogen receptor (ER) status, prior aCT and PS (0–1 or 2). Results: A total of 168 pts were randomized. 92 pts had received prior aCT, 27 of whom received a prior taxane. Treatment arms were well balanced for prior adjuvant and taxane therapy. A median of 7 cycles of AG+DOC (range: 1–18) and 7 cycles of DOC+PL (range: 1–23) were administered. The most common non-hematologic adverse events observed in the AG+DOC arm included diarrhea (60%), nausea (53%), alopecia (51%), fatigue (49%), stomatitis (44%) and vomiting (40%). Grade 3/4 adverse events that were increased with AG+DOC vs DOC included febrile neutropenia (16 vs 7%), fatigue (13 vs 5%), stomatitis (13 vs 2%), diarrhea (11 vs 0%) and hypertension (5 vs 2%). Other grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were similar in both arms. The median TTP (by RECIST) was 8.2 mo with AG+DOC arm and 7 mo with DOC+PL arm with a hazard ratio of 0.73 (prespecified, one-sided p=0.052). The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% for AG+DOC arm and 23% for DOC+PL arm (p=0.038). In a hypothesis-generating subgroup analysis, the median TTP in patients receiving prior aCT was 9.0 mo with AG+DOC arm and 6.3 mo with DOC+PL arm with a hazard ratio of 0.54 (p=0.012). Within this stratum, ORR was 45% for AG+DOC arm and 13% for DOC+PL arm (p=0.003). Conclusions: The anti-angiogenic TKI AG combined with DOC (80 mg/m2 q3wks) as first line therapy for MBC has an acceptable safety profile and promising anti-tumor activity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Final results of a phase II study of erlotinib, docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6013-6013 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. S. Kim ◽  
M. S. Kies ◽  
B. S. Glisson ◽  
A. Tsao ◽  
L. E. Ginsberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Egfr Signaling Pathway ◽  
Grade 3

6013 Background: Interrupting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway has shown promise in a variety of cancers and preclinical data has demonstrated possible synergy with platinums and taxanes. Treatment options for recurrent/metastatic HNSCC are limited. A study of cisplatin and docetaxel showed a response rate of 40% and 9.6 month median survival. Erlotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, had a 4.3% response rate as single agent in HNSCC. Because of the possible synergy and efficacy, we proposed to study the combination of cisplatin, docetaxel and erlotinib in advanced HNSCC. Methods: Patients (pts) were required to have adequate performance status, measurable disease, no prior EGFR therapy, and may have received prior induction, concomitant or adjuvant chemotherapy, but not for recurrent/metastatic disease. Sites of disease included squamous cell head and neck sites excluding nasopharynx and sinus. Treatment included docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks and erlotinib 150 mg by mouth daily. All agents were started on day 1. Pts were treated with growth factor support. Results: The trial has completed accrual to 50 pts. 47 pts are available for analysis at this time. Median age is 56 years (range 39–72). ECOG PS is 0, 1, 2 (6, 29, 2 pts). 43 pts are evaluable for efficacy. All responses were confirmed via RECIST. Complete responses have been in observed in 4 pts, partial responses in 25 pts and 12 pts have stable disease for an overall response rate of 67% and disease control rate of 95%. After a follow-up of 19 months, median overall survival was 11 months (8.61, 22.5, 95% CI) and progression free survival was 6.01 months (4.37, 8.25). 6 pts had grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia, 4 pts had grade 3/4 dehydration, 3 pts had grade 3 diarrhea, and 2 pts had grade 3/4 GI bleeding. The most common grade 1–2 toxicities were diarrhea, nausea, and rash. Conclusions: The combination of cisplatin, docetaxel and erlotinib is well tolerated and has very encouraging activity in recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. Tissues are being collected and analyzed for correlative markers including downstream EGFR pathway markers (p-akt, mek, k-ras). Final efficacy and biomarker results will be presented at the annual meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Cohort compassionate-use program (CUP) and early access program (EAP) with cabazitaxel (Cbz) plus prednisone (P; Cbz + P) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with docetaxel (D): Analysis by age group.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 109-109
Author(s):  
Zafar Malik ◽  
Giuseppe di Lorenzo ◽  
Sergio Bracarda ◽  
Alexandros Ardavanis ◽  
Mert Basaran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
World Population ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

109 Background: Cbz + P demonstrated an overall survival benefit vs mitoxantrone + P in pts with mCRPC in the Phase III TROPIC trial. The CUP (CABAZ_C_05005) and EAP (NCT01254279) (both funded by Sanofi) were established to allow access to Cbz ahead of commercial availability. The programs are also evaluating Cbz safety in a real-world population. Data analyzed by age group (≤75 and >75 years) are presented here. Methods: Expected enrolment across both programs is 1,450 pts from 236 centres worldwide. Pts received Cbz 25 mg/m2 IV Q3W + P 10 mg QD until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity or physician/pt decision. G-CSF is administered as per ASCO guidelines. Results: As of May 30, 2012, 1,301 pts have enrolled (≤75 years: 1,061 pts [81.6%]; >75 years: 240 pts [18.4%]). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and incidence of visceral metastases were generally balanced between treatment groups. The most frequent reasons for discontinuation were disease progression (46.8%) followed by adverse events (AEs; 24.4%) in pts ≤75 years, and AEs (36.4%) followed by disease progression (31.1%) in pts >75 years. Time from initial diagnosis to inclusion was greater in pts >75 years (median 79.66 months) than in pts ≤75 years (median 53.94 months), but time from mCRPC diagnosis to inclusion was approximately equivalent (>75 years: median 22.6 months; ≤75 years: median 20.94 months). G-CSF use was more frequent in pts >75 years (cycle 1: 62.9% of pts) compared with pts ≤75 years (cycle 1: 52.2% of pts). AEs of clinical concern were more frequent in the older age group (Grade ≥3 AEs: >75 years 64.2%; ≤75 years 54.8%). Grade ≥3 neutropenia was observed in 25.8% of pts >75 years and in 17.0% of pts ≤75 years. Conclusions: We observed several differences between age groups in baseline and on-treatment parameters, suggesting differences in the natural history of mCRPC (faster disease progression in pts ≤75 years than in pts >75 years) and secondary to treatment (AEs more frequent in pts >75 years compared with pts ≤75 years). Clinical trial information: NCT01254279.

Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine in Refractory or Relapsed Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 1597

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1550-1555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory A. Masters ◽  
Lieven Declerck ◽  
Charles Blanke ◽  
Alan Sandler ◽  
Russell DeVore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose: Gemcitabine has shown a broad range of activity in solid tumors, including previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The objective of this phase II trial was to investigate the activity of gemcitabine in patients with relapsed SCLC. Patients and Methods: SCLC patients with measurable disease who had experienced treatment failure with one prior chemotherapy regimen were considered eligible. Patients were required to have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2 and adequate organ function; signed informed consent was also required. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were stratified according to their previous response to first-line chemotherapy (primary refractory v primary sensitive disease). Results: Forty-six patients were enrolled onto this phase II trial (20 refractory and 26 sensitive patients). Forty-two of these patients were assessable for response and survival, and 44 were assessable for toxicity. Median patient age was 60 years, and median ECOG performance status was 1. Principal grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (27%) and thrombocytopenia (27%). The main grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were pulmonary (9%) and neurologic toxicity (14%). Objective responses occurred in 11.9% of patients overall, including one patient with refractory SCLC (5.6%) and four patients with sensitive SCLC (16.7%). Median survival for the overall group was 7.1 months. Survival was not significantly different for patients with refractory versus sensitive disease. Conclusion: Gemcitabine has modest activity in previously treated SCLC patients. The favorable toxicity profile warrants further investigation, either in combination chemotherapy regimens or with targeted biologic compounds.

Interim safety analysis of the randomized phase III PELICAN trial evaluating pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) versus capecitabine as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1118-1118
Author(s):  
S. Al-Batran ◽  
S. Saupe ◽  
M. Schmidt ◽  
R. Kreienberg ◽  
B. Otremba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3

1118 Background: Treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) focuses on relieving symptoms and extending life. Single-agent therapy is preferred in the first-line setting to reduce the risk of toxicity and maintain quality of life. The PELICAN trial was designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of first-line PLD vs capecitabine at standard approved dosages. Methods: PELICAN is an open-label, multinational, randomized, multicenter trial. MBC Patients (pts) were randomized to receive PLD (50 mg/m2 every 28 days) or capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 BID x 14 days every 21 days) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was to compare time to disease progression between treatment arms. Toxicity was evaluated continuously. Results: The study is still ongoing, but no longer recruiting. So far, 210 pts (PLD, 105; capecitabine, 105) were evaluated for safety, of whom 131 pts have already completed their treatment (83 for disease progression, 19 for toxicity, 5 died, 24 for other reasons). 90% of pts had ECOG performance status 1 or 2, and 79% were postmenopausal. Mean age was 61.5 years, and 34% received prior adjuvant anthracycline. Pts received a median of 4 cycles of PLD and a median of 5 cycles of capecitabine. Over 90% of pts in both groups experienced at least one adverse event (AE). Grade 3/4 AEs were reported in 99 patients (PLD, 44; capecitabine, 55). Hand foot syndrome (HFS) was the most common AE (grade 3: PLD 35%; capecitabine 19%), followed by diarrhea (grade 3/4: PLD, 0; capecitabine, 13%) and thromboembolic events (PLD, 0%; capecitabine, 9%). Other grade 3/4 AEs affected 1 week in 16%. Conclusions: Overall, first-line monotherapy with PLD or capecitabine at approved doses was maintainable for a median of about 4 months with manageable AEs. Interim safety results of the PELICAN trial show no unanticipated toxicity. Efficacy results will be available once all patients have completed their therapy. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of imatinib mesylate (I) in combination with docetaxel (D) in the treatment of patients (pts) with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16552-e16552
Author(s):  
L. Usha ◽  
M. L. Larson ◽  
N. Kazmi ◽  
T. O'Brien ◽  
L. A. Winkelman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Platinum Compound ◽  
Grade 3

e16552 Background: D has a known single-agent activity in advanced EOC with the response rate of at least 10%. I is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor shown in preclinical studies to decrease interstitial pressure in the tumor and facilitate influx of chemotherapeutic agents into the tumor. Methods: A single-institution trial was conducted in pts with advanced EOC in 2005–2007. The primary endpoint of the study was to determine a tumor response to the study combination. Pts were required to have received 1 or 2 prior chemotherapeutic regimens including a platinum compound and have performance status 0–2. Pts were to receive D 60 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks and I 400 mg/day by mouth continuously. Planned target accrual for the first stage of the study was 15 pts with the preset minimum of 3 responses to proceed to the second stage. Tumor response was evaluated by RECIST criteria after every 3 cycles of D. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Study was terminated early due to lack of response and significant toxicities. A total of 10 pts were enrolled. The age range of the pts was 55–79 with the mean age = 64. Five pts were evaluable for response and in all of them, cancer progression was observed after 3 cycles of combination therapy (0 responses). Five pts were taken off the study after 1 cycle of treatment either due to serious adverse events (SAEs) or disease progression. Among grade 3 and 4 SAE's observed in the study were 4 cases of hematological toxicity, 1 case of rash, 1 case of dizziness, and 1 case of deep venous thrombosis. The median progression-free survival for pts on the study was 7.5 weeks. Conclusions: Although the sample size of this study was small, the combination of I and D at the above doses appears ineffective in the population of moderately-pretreated women with advanced EOC. The majority of grade 3 and 4 SAE's were due to myelosuppression likely caused by D rather than I. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals A Population-Based Retrospective Study of Biliary Tract Cancers in Alberta, Canada

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 417-427
Author(s):  
Carissa Beaulieu ◽  
Arthur Lui ◽  
Dimas Yusuf ◽  
Zainab Abdelaziz ◽  
Brock Randolph ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Intrahepatic Bile Duct ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancers

Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are uncommon malignancies and are underrepresented in the literature. Methods: We performed a retrospective population-based review of adult patients with biopsy-confirmed BTC in Alberta from 2000 to 2015. Demographic data, risk factors, symptoms, treatment, and staging data were collected and analyzed. Survival analyses were completed. Results: A total of 1604 patients were included in our study, of which 766 (47.8%) were male. The median age at diagnosis was 68 (range 19–99). There were 374 (23.3%) patients with resectable tumors at diagnosis versus 597 (37.2%) with unresectable tumors. Of the patients, 380 (21.5%) received chemotherapy (CT) and 81 (5.0%) underwent radiation therapy. There was a clear trend with worsening stage and performance status associated with shorter median overall survival (OS). Ampulla of Vater tumors had the best median OS (25.69 months), while intrahepatic bile duct cancers had the worst (5.78 months). First-line palliative CT regimens included gemcitabine+cisplatin (OS 14.98 months (mo), n = 212), single agent gemcitabine (OS 12.42 mo, n = 22), capecitabine (OS 8.12 mo, n = 8), and capecitabine+gemcitabine (OS 6.93 mo, n = 13). Patients with advanced or metastatic disease who received first-line gemcitabine+cisplatin had a median OS of 11.8 months (n = 119). Conclusion: BTCs have poor survival. Worse outcomes occur in higher stage and poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status patients across all tumor subtypes. Tumor resectability at diagnosis was associated with better OS. Our study supports the use of gemcitabine+cisplatin as a combination first-line palliative CT, as patients treated in Alberta have a comparable OS to that reported in the ABC-02 phase III study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document