Phase I Study of Combination Topotecan and Carboplatin in Pediatric Solid Tumors

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uma H. Athale ◽  
Clinton Stewart ◽  
John F. Kuttesch ◽  
Albert Moghrabi ◽  
William Meyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Pediatric Solid Tumors ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I trial of escalating doses of topotecan (TOPO) in association with a fixed systemic exposure of carboplatin (CARBO) with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two separate cohorts of patients (pts) with solid tumors were studied: (A) pts with refractory or recurrent disease and (B) pts with no prior myelosuppressive therapy or newly diagnosed tumors for which there was no standard chemotherapy. CARBO was given on day 1 at an area under the curve of 6.5, followed by TOPO as a continuous infusion for 3 days; the starting dose of TOPO was 0.50 mg/m2/d. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. G-CSF was given at a dose of 5 μg/kg/d starting on day 4. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 51 pts were assessable for toxicity. In group A, dose-limiting myelosuppression persisted despite de-escalation of TOPO to 0.3 mg/m2/d and use of G-CSF. In group B, the maximum-tolerated dose of TOPO was 0.5 mg/m2/d for 3 days, and 0.6 mg/m2/d for 3 days with G-CSF. No significant nonhematologic toxicities were observed. Among 46 pts assessable for response, one had complete response, five had partial response, and 18 had stable disease. CONCLUSION: Although this combination possesses antineoplastic activity in pediatric solid tumors, hematologic toxicity precluded any meaningful TOPO dose escalation. The addition of G-CSF did not alter this. The potential for preservation of activity and diminution of toxicity with alternative sequences and schedules of administration (topoisomerase followed by alkylating or platinating agents) should be evaluated.

Phase I/II Study of Ipilimumab for Patients With Metastatic Melanoma

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (36) ◽  
pp. 5950-5956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey S. Weber ◽  
Steven O’Day ◽  
Walter Urba ◽  
John Powderly ◽  
Geoff Nichol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Profile ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Multiple Doses ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

PurposeThe primary objective of this phase I/II study was to determine the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of either transfectoma- or a hybridoma-derived ipilimumab. Secondary objectives included determination of a maximum-tolerated dose and assessment of clinical activity.Patients and MethodsEighty-eight patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma with at least one measurable lesion were treated. Mean age was 59 years, with 65% male and 35% female patients, and 79% of patients had received prior systemic therapy. Single doses of ipilimumab up to 20 mg/kg (group A, single dose), multiple doses up to 5 mg/kg (group A, multiple dose), and multiple doses up to 10 mg/kg (group B) were administered.ResultsSingle dosing up to 20 mg/kg of transfectoma antibody was well tolerated, as were multiple doses up to 10 mg/kg without a maximum-tolerated dose. In group B, dose-limiting toxicity was seen in six of 23 melanoma patients. Grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were observed in 14% of patients (12 of 88 patients), and grade 1 or 2 irAEs were seen in an additional 58%. The half-life of ipilimumab was 359 hours. In group B, there was one partial response (23+ months), one complete response (21+ months), and seven patients with stable disease (SD), for a disease control rate of 39%. Two patients in group B with SD had slow, steady decline in tumor burden that was ongoing at 1 year of observation.ConclusionIpilimumab has activity in patients with metastatic melanoma. Late responses were observed in patients with prolonged SD.

Phase I study of topotecan in combination with cyclophosphamide in pediatric patients with malignant solid tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 945-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
R L Saylors ◽  
C F Stewart ◽  
W C Zamboni ◽  
D A Wall ◽  
B Bell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Wilms Tumor ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Pediatric Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

PURPOSE To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity of topotecan when combined with cyclophosphamide in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory malignant solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 33 patients received cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2/dose) followed by topotecan in escalating doses (0.6 to 0.75 mg/m2/dose), each given as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days. A total of 154 fully assessable treatment courses were given to these patients. RESULTS Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity of the therapy at both topotecan dose levels. The addition of filgrastim allowed escalation of the topotecan dose to the 0.75-mg/m2 level with acceptable neutropenia. Other significant toxicities were anemia and thrombocytopenia. Nonhematopoietic toxicity of grades > or = 3 was not observed. Responses were reported in patients with Wilms' tumor (one complete response [CR], one partial response [PR]), neuroblastoma (one CR, one PR), rhabdomyosarcoma (one PR), and osteosarcoma (one PR). Pharmacokinetic studies indicate that cyclophosphamide administered on the schedule used in this study did not alter topotecan disposition on day 5. As with previous studies, a pharmacodynamic relation between systemic exposure and myelosuppression was noted. CONCLUSION The combination of topotecan and cyclophosphamide shows activity in a wide variety of pediatric solid tumors and can be given with acceptable hematopoietic toxicity with the use of filgrastim support. We recommend that pediatric phase II trials use cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 followed by topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 daily for 5 days with filgrastim for amelioration of neutropenia.

Cefixime Allows Greater Dose Escalation of Oral Irinotecan: A Phase I Study in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 563-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne L. Furman ◽  
Kristine R. Crews ◽  
Catherine Billups ◽  
Jianrong Wu ◽  
Amar J. Gajjar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effect ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Severe Diarrhea ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

PurposeIrinotecan is active against a variety of malignancies; however, severe diarrhea limits its usefulness. In our phase I study, the intravenous formulation of irinotecan was administered orally daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks (repeated every 21 days) to children with refractory solid tumors. Our objectives were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of oral irinotecan and to evaluate whether coadministration of cefixime (8 mg/kg/d beginning 5 days before irinotecan and continuing throughout the course) ameliorates irinotecan-induced diarrhea.Patients and MethodsIn separate cohorts, irinotecan doses were escalated from 15 to 45 mg/m2/d without cefixime and then from 45 to 60 and 75 mg/m2/d with cefixime.ResultsWithout cefixime, diarrhea was dose limiting at irinotecan 45 mg/m2/d. Myelotoxicity was not significant at any dose. The MTD was 40 mg/m2/d without cefixime but 60 mg/m2/d with cefixime. Systemic exposure to SN-38 at the MTD was significantly higher with cefixime than without cefixime (mean SN-38 area under the curve: 19.5 ng×h/mL; standard deviation [SD], 6.8 ng × h/mL v 10.4 ng × h/mL; SD, 4.3 ng × h/mL, respectively; P = .030).ConclusionCefixime administered with oral irinotecan is well tolerated in children and allows greater dose escalation of irinotecan. Because diarrhea is a major adverse effect of both intravenous and oral irinotecan, further evaluation of the use of cefixime to ameliorate this adverse effect is warranted.

scholarly journals Phase I and Correlative Biology Study of Cilengitide in Patients With Recurrent Malignant Glioma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 1651-1657 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Burt Nabors ◽  
Tom Mikkelsen ◽  
Steven S. Rosenfeld ◽  
Fred Hochberg ◽  
Narasimha S. Akella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Malignant Glioma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Toxicity Assessment ◽  
Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Recurrent Malignant Glioma ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri

Purpose This multi-institutional phase I trial was designed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of cilengitide (EMD 121974) and to evaluate the use of perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Patients and Methods Patients received cilengitide twice weekly on a continuous basis. A treatment cycle was defined as 4 weeks. Treatment-related dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity or grade 4 hematologic toxicity of any duration. Results A total of 51 patients were enrolled in cohorts of six patients to doses of 120, 240, 360, 480, 600, 1,200, 1,800, and 2,400 mg/m2 administered as a twice weekly intravenous infusion. Three patients progressed early and were inevaluable for toxicity assessment. The DLTs observed were one thrombosis (120 mg/m2), one grade 4 joint and bone pain (480 mg/m2), one thrombocytopenia (600 mg/m2) and one anorexia, hypoglycemia, and hyponatremia (800 mg/m2). The MTD was not reached. Two patients demonstrated complete response, three patients had partial response, and four patients had stable disease. Perfusion MRI revealed a significant relationship between the change in tumor relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) from baseline and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve after 16 weeks of therapy. Conclusion Cilengitide is well tolerated to doses of 2,400 mg/m2, durable complete and partial responses were seen in this phase I study, and clinical response appears related to rCBF changes.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Docetaxel and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (20) ◽  
pp. 3545-3552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinne Couteau ◽  
Marie-Laure Risse ◽  
Michel Ducreux ◽  
Florence Lefresne-Soulas ◽  
Alessandro Riva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and the dose at which at least 50% of the patients experienced a DLT during the first cycle, and to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with only one prior chemotherapy treatment (without taxanes or topoisomerase I inhibitors) for advanced disease were included in the study. Docetaxel was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion after premedication with corticosteroids followed immediately by irinotecan as a 90-minute IV infusion, every 3 weeks. No hematologic growth factors were allowed. RESULTS: Forty patients were entered through the following seven dose levels (docetaxel/irinotecan): 40/140 mg/m2, 50/175 mg/m2, 60/210 mg/m2, 60/250 mg/m2, 60/275 mg/m2, 60/300 mg/m2, and 70/250 mg/m2. Two hundred cycles were administered. Two MTDs were determined, 70/250 mg/m2 and 60/300 mg/m2; the DLTs were febrile neutropenia and diarrhea. Neutropenia was the main hematologic toxicity, with 85% of patients experiencing grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities in patients included late diarrhea (7.5%), asthenia (15.0%), febrile neutropenia (22.5%), infection (7.5%), and nausea (5.0%). Pharmacokinetics of both docetaxel and irinotecan were not modified with the administration schedule of this study. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan is 60/275 mg/m2, respectively. At this dose level, the safety profile is manageable. The activity of this combination should be evaluated in phase II studies in different tumor types.

Dose-intensive cyclophosphamide with etoposide and vincristine for pediatric solid tumors: a phase I/II pilot study by the Australia and New Zealand Childhood Cancer Study Group.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 522-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
L White ◽  
G McCowage ◽  
G Kannourakis ◽  
V Nayanar ◽  
L Colnan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Childhood Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Cancer Study ◽  
Cancer Study Group ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

PURPOSE This pilot study of the Australia and New Zealand Childhood Cancer Study Group investigated the effectiveness and toxicity of a regimen incorporating vincristine (VCR), etoposide, and divided-dose, escalating cyclophosphamide (CPA) (VETOPEC) in 23 patients aged 1 to 20 years with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventeen patients (group A) had recurrent or refractory tumors after prior multiagent therapy, and six patients (group B) with adverse prognostic indicators were treated at initial presentation. Treatment cycles were 21 to 28 days and consisted of vincristine (0.05 mg/kg) on days 1 and 14, with etoposide (2.5 mg/kg/d) plus escalating CPA on days 1, 2, and 3. The CPA dosage was escalated from 30 mg/kg/d in cycle no. 1 by 5 mg/kg/d in each cycle to a maximum of 55 mg/kg/d in cycle no. 6. RESULTS Of 20 patients assessable for tumor response, 19 (95%) responded after two to six cycles of VETOPEC: seven complete responses (CRs); eight very good partial responses (VGPRs); and four partial responses (PRs). In group A, 13 of 14 (93%) assessable patients responded (five CRs, four VGPRs, four PRs), and in group B, five stage IV and one stage III patient achieved two CRs and four VGPRs. The principal toxicity was myelosuppression. Grade IV neutropenia occurred after 98% of cycles, and the incidence of grade IV thrombocytopenia increased from 37% after cycle no. 1 to 91% after cycle no. 6 (P = .002). A total of 115 cycles delivered were followed by 62 febrile admissions (54%), and showed a significant rise with increasing cycles (P = .001). One patient died of septicemia. CONCLUSION This combination and scheduling produced a high response rate in patients with recurrent, refractory, or advanced solid tumors of childhood. Further studies of this regimen and of strategies to reduce hematologic toxicity are warranted.

Phase I study of temozolomide in children and adolescents with recurrent solid tumors: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 3037-3043 ◽  
Author(s):  
H S Nicholson ◽  
M Krailo ◽  
M M Ames ◽  
N L Seibel ◽  
J M Reid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

PURPOSE The Children's Cancer Group conducted a phase I trial of temozolomide stratified by prior craniospinal irradiation (CSI). PATIENTS AND METHODS Children and adolescents with recurrent or progressive cancer were enrolled. Temozolomide was administered orally daily for 5 days, with subsequent courses administered every 21 to 28 days after full hematologic recovery. Dose levels tested included 100, 150, 180, 215, 245, and 260 mg/m2 daily. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients on the non-CSI stratum were assessable for hematologic toxicity. During the first three dose levels (100, 150, and 180 mg/m2 daily), only grades 1 and 2 hematologic toxicity occurred. One patient at 215 mg/m2 daily had grade 3 hematologic toxicity. Three of eight patients (38%) treated at 245 to 260 mg/m2 daily had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which included both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Twenty-two patients on the CSI stratum were assessable for hematologic toxicity. Hematologic DLT occurred in one of six patients (17%) at 100 mg/m2 daily and in two of four patients (50%) at 215 mg/m2 daily. No nonhematologic DLT occurred; nausea and vomiting occurred in more than half of the patients. After two courses of temozolomide, 10 patients had stable disease (SD), and three patients had a partial response (PR), one of whom subsequently had a complete response (CR) that persists through 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide for children and adolescents without prior CSI is 215 mg/m2 daily and for those with prior CSI is 180 mg/m2 daily for 5 days, with subsequent courses that begin on day 28. Temozolomide is well tolerated and should undergo phase II testing in children and adolescents.

Phase I trial of paclitaxel in children with refractory solid tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2324-2329 ◽  
Author(s):  
C A Hurwitz ◽  
M V Relling ◽  
S D Weitman ◽  
Y Ravindranath ◽  
T J Vietti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Clonic Seizure ◽  
Fine Motor ◽  
Phase Ii Trials

PURPOSE A phase I study was performed to describe the principal toxicities and identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of Taxol (paclitaxel; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, Wallingford, CT) in children with therapy-resistant solid tumors. Additionally, the pharmacokinetic disposition of Taxol in children was studied, and preliminary evidence of the activity of Taxol against pediatric solid tumors was assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-four-hour continuous infusions of Taxol were administered every 21 days to children (median age, 12 years; range, 2 to 22) with refractory solid tumors. Doses ranged from 200 to 420 mg/m2, there was no intrapatient dose escalation. RESULTS A total of 62 courses of Taxol were administered to 31 patients. Two patients developed acute anaphylaxis during their second infusion of taxol at doses of 200 mg/m2 and 350 mg/m2, respectively. No other allergic reactions were documented. Myelosuppression occurred at all dose levels, but was of short duration (< or = 7 days) and did not appear to increase with consecutive courses or at higher dosage levels. A stocking-and-glove peripheral neuropathy became evident at doses > or = 290 mg/m2. Dose-limiting neurotoxicity occurred at 420 mg/m2 and comprised a significant fine-motor and peripheral neuropathy in one patient, and a tonic-clonic seizure in another. End-of-infusion plasma concentrations ranged from 0.40 to 6.4 mumol/L, and were not found to be dose-dependent over the range of doses studied. A complete response was documented in one patient, partial response in two, and minimal response in one for an overall response rate of 13%. CONCLUSION Neurotoxicity was dose-limiting when Taxol was administered by 24-hour continuous infusion to pediatric patients with relapsed solid tumors. In this population, the recommended dose for phase II trials is 350 mg/m2/d.

Final results from a phase I trial of ixabepilone in patients with advanced malignancies and lymphoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2039-2039
Author(s):  
C. Aghajanian ◽  
O. O’Connor ◽  
M. Cohen ◽  
R. Peck ◽  
H. Burris
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

2039 Background: Ixabepilone is the first analog in a new class of antineoplastic agents, the epothilones, which stabilizes microtubules and induces apoptosis. Ixabepilone has shown clinical activity in a broad range of tumors. Methods: This Phase I trial was designed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ixabepilone when administered as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically/cytologically confirmed non-hematologic cancer, or a pathologic diagnosis of relapsed/primary refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) or relapsed/primary refractory mantle cell lymphoma, with ≤CTC Grade 1 neuropathy. Ixabepilone doses ranged from 7.5–65 mg/m2. Response was assessed every 6 weeks using RECIST. DLT was defined as Grade 4 neutropenia and/or febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, ≥Grade 3 nausea/vomiting and non-hematologic toxicity, or treatment delay of >2 weeks due to delayed recovery. Results: Of 61 patients (median age 58, range 18–81), 75% had solid tumors; 25% had lymphoma. 98% and 67% of patients had received one or ≥ two prior chemotherapy regimens, respectively. The MTD of ixabepilone as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks was established as 50 mg/m2. The most common DLTs were neutropenia, myalgia, arthralgia and stomatitis/pharyngitis. A total of eight patients (13%) achieved a durable objective response. Complete responses were achieved in two patients with primary peritoneal cancer and NHL. A partial response was seen in six patients. The most common Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (only observed at doses ≥40 mg/m2) were sensory neuropathy (13%), fatigue (13%), myalgia (10%), arthralgia (7%), nausea (5%), febrile neutropenia (5%) and neutropenia (5%). Recovery to baseline or ≤Grade 1 neuropathy occurred in some patients. Conclusions: The recommended dose of ixabepilone for the initiation of Phase II studies based on this study is 50 mg/m2 over 1 hour every 3 weeks. Ixabepilone demonstrates promising safety in patients with solid tumors or lymphoma who have failed standard therapy. Encouraging activity was reported in several tumor types. [Table: see text]

Phase I evaluation of AZD2171, a highly potent and selective inhibitor of VEGFR signaling, in combination with selected chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3034-3034 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Lorusso ◽  
E. Heath ◽  
M. Valdivieso ◽  
M. Pilat ◽  
A. Wozniak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Selective Inhibitor ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

3034 Background: AZD2171 is an oral, potent, selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR). Trials have demonstrated that inhibition of the VEGF pathway, in combination with certain chemotherapy, provides benefit to patients with a broad range of solid tumors. Methods: This Phase I trial was conducted in heavily pretreated solid tumor patients. In a single protocol, escalating doses of AZD2171 were evaluated (20, 30 and 45 mg) in combination with four separate chemotherapy regimens: mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2; 5-FU 400 mg/m2; leucovorin 400 mg/m2 q2 weeks; Arm 1); irinotecan 300 mg/m2 q3 week (Arm 2); docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (Arm 3) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (Arm 4). The primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability of the combinations and secondary objective to evaluate pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction and clinical efficacy. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) toxicity was defined through two cycles. Results: 46 patients have been enrolled: 28/35 evaluable for efficacy/toxicity. The MTD has been reached in two arms: Arm 2 - 20 mg AZD2171 and Arm 4 - 30 mg AZD2171. Arm 3 enrollment continues at 45 mg AZD2171. Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in eight patients at 30 mg AZD2171 in Arm 1. Enrollment of an additional cohort of less heavily pre-treated patients is ongoing to determine the tolerability of 30 mg AZD2171 with FOLFOX. DLTs have included grade 3 fatigue in Arms 1, 2 & 4; grade 3 diarrhea in Arm 1; grade 3 hand-foot syndrome & grade 4 neutropenic fever in Arm 2; and grade 3 hypertension in Arm 4. AZD2171 did not appear to have a major effect on the PK profile of any chemotherapy regimen tested. Steady-state values are comparable with AZD2171 monotherapy. There have been 13 responses (minor response, n=5; partial response, n=6; complete response, n=2; stable disease ≥ 4 cycles, n=6) in heavily pretreated patients, some having demonstrated resistance to identical chemotherapies. Duration of response has been impressive (4-22+ cycles). Conclusions: AZD2171 combinations have been well tolerated with expected toxicities and encouraging responses. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document