Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Tipifarnib Compared With Gemcitabine Plus Placebo in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1430-1438 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Van Cutsem ◽  
H. van de Velde ◽  
P. Karasek ◽  
H. Oettle ◽  
W.L. Vervenne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose To determine whether addition of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib (Zarnestra, R115777; Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium) to standard gemcitabine therapy improves overall survival in advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients and Methods This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared gemcitabine + tipifarnib versus gemcitabine + placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma previously untreated with systemic therapy. Tipifarnib was given at 200 mg bid orally continuously; gemcitabine was given at 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously weekly × 7 for 8 weeks, then weekly × 3 every 4 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points included 6-month and 1-year survival rates, progression-free survival, response rate, safety, and quality of life. Results Six hundred eighty-eight patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two treatment arms. No statistically significant differences in survival parameters were observed. The median overall survival for the experimental arm was 193 v 182 days for the control arm (P = .75); 6-month and 1-year survival rates were 53% and 27% v 49% and 24% for the control arm, respectively; median progression-free survival was 112 v 109 days for the control arm. Ten drug-related deaths were reported for the experimental arm and seven for the control arm. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia grade ≥ 3 were observed in 40% and 15% in the experimental arm versus 30% and 12% in the control arm. Incidences of nonhematologic adverse events were similar in two groups. Conclusion The combination of gemcitabine and tipifarnib has an acceptable toxicity profile but does not prolong overall survival in advanced pancreatic cancer compared with single-agent gemcitabine.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (24) ◽  
pp. 3946-3952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Heinemann ◽  
Detlef Quietzsch ◽  
Frank Gieseler ◽  
Michael Gonnermann ◽  
Herbert Schönekäs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of gemcitabine plus cisplatin with single-agent gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were randomly assigned to receive either gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week cycle (GemCis arm) or gemcitabine alone at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week regimen (Gem arm). The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were progression-free survival, response rate, safety, and quality of life. Results One hundred ninety-five patients were enrolled and showed baseline characteristics well balanced between treatment arms. Combination treatment in the GemCis arm was associated with a prolonged median progression-free survival (5.3 months v 3.1 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.75; P = .053). Also, median overall survival was superior for patients treated in the GemCis arm as compared with the Gem arm (7.5 v 6.0 months), an advantage which did not, however, reach statistical significance (HR = 0.80; P = .15). Tumor response rates were comparable between treatment arms (10.2% v 8.2%). The rate of stable disease was, however, greater in the combination arm (60.2% v 40.2%; P < .001). Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity did not exceed 15% in both treatment arms. Conclusion These results support the efficacy and safety of an every-2-weeks treatment with gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were more favorable in the combination arm as compared with gemcitabine alone, although the difference did not attain statistical significance.

Erlotinib Plus Gemcitabine Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (15) ◽  
pp. 1960-1966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malcolm J. Moore ◽  
David Goldstein ◽  
John Hamm ◽  
Arie Figer ◽  
Joel R. Hecht ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Pancreatic Tumors ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase Iii Trial

PurposePatients with advanced pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis and there have been no improvements in survival since the introduction of gemcitabine in 1996. Pancreatic tumors often overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor type 1 (HER1/EGFR) and this is associated with a worse prognosis. We studied the effects of adding the HER1/EGFR-targeted agent erlotinib to gemcitabine in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic pancreatic cancer.Patients and MethodsPatients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive standard gemcitabine plus erlotinib (100 or 150 mg/d orally) or gemcitabine plus placebo in a double-blind, international phase III trial. The primary end point was overall survival.ResultsA total of 569 patients were randomly assigned. Overall survival based on an intent-to-treat analysis was significantly prolonged on the erlotinib/gemcitabine arm with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.99; P = .038, adjusted for stratification factors; median 6.24 months v 5.91 months). One-year survival was also greater with erlotinib plus gemcitabine (23% v 17%; P = .023). Progression-free survival was significantly longer with erlotinib plus gemcitabine with an estimated HR of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.92; P = .004). Objective response rates were not significantly different between the arms, although more patients on erlotinib had disease stabilization. There was a higher incidence of some adverse events with erlotinib plus gemcitabine, but most were grade 1 or 2.ConclusionTo our knowledge, this randomized phase III trial is the first to demonstrate statistically significantly improved survival in advanced pancreatic cancer by adding any agent to gemcitabine. The recommended dose of erlotinib with gemcitabine for this indication is 100 mg/d.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Carbon Ion Radiation in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Liermann ◽  
Patrick Naumann ◽  
Fabian Weykamp ◽  
Philipp Hoegen ◽  
Juergen Debus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Carbon Ion Radiotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Carbon Ion

PurposeEffective treatment strategies for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients are eagerly warranted. Recently, convincing oncological outcomes were demonstrated by carbon ion radiotherapy. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence for this modern radiation technique due to the limited number of carbon ion facilities worldwide. Here, we analyze feasibility and efficacy of carbon ion radiotherapy in the management of LAPC at Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT).MethodsBetween 2015 and 2020, 21 LAPC patients were irradiated with carbon ions with a total dose of 48 Gy (RBE) in single doses of 4 Gy (RBE). Three patients (14%) were treated with concomitant chemotherapy with gemcitabine 300 mg/m2 body surface weekly. Toxicity rates were extracted from the charts. Overall survival, progression free survival, local control, and locoregional control were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier estimates.ResultsOne patient developed ascites CTCAE grade III during radiotherapy, which was related to a later histologically confirmed metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis. No further higher-graded toxicity could be observed. The most common symptoms were nausea and abdominal pain. After a median estimated follow-up time of 19.1 months, the median progression free survival was 3.7 months, and the median overall survival was 11.9 months. The estimated 1-year local control and locoregional control rates were 89 and 84%, respectively.ConclusionCarbon ion radiotherapy of LAPC patients is safely feasible. Local tumor control rates were high. Nevertheless, compared to historical data, an overall survival improvement could not be observed. This could be explained by the poor prognosis of the selected underlying patients that mostly did not respond to prior chemotherapy as well as the early and frequent emergence of distant metastases that demonstrate the necessity of additional chemotherapy in further studies.

scholarly journals Pembrolizumab Plus Ipilimumab or Placebo for Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score ≥ 50%: Randomized, Double-Blind Phase III KEYNOTE-598 Study

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.03579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Boyer ◽  
Mehmet A. N. Şendur ◽  
Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu ◽  
Keunchil Park ◽  
Dae Ho Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Nsclc

PURPOSE Pembrolizumab monotherapy is standard first-line therapy for metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50% without actionable driver mutations. It is not known whether adding ipilimumab to pembrolizumab improves efficacy over pembrolizumab alone in this population. METHODS In the randomized, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-598 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03302234 ), eligible patients with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and no sensitizing EGFR or ALK aberrations were randomly allocated 1:1 to ipilimumab 1 mg/kg or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 18 doses; all participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 35 doses. Primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival. RESULTS Of the 568 participants, 284 were randomly allocated to each group. Median overall survival was 21.4 months for pembrolizumab-ipilimumab versus 21.9 months for pembrolizumab-placebo (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.37; P = .74). Median progression-free survival was 8.2 months for pembrolizumab-ipilimumab versus 8.4 months for pembrolizumab-placebo (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.30; P = .72). Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 62.4% of pembrolizumab-ipilimumab recipients versus 50.2% of pembrolizumab-placebo recipients and led to death in 13.1% versus 7.5%. The external data and safety monitoring committee recommended that the study be stopped for futility and that participants discontinue ipilimumab and placebo. CONCLUSION Adding ipilimumab to pembrolizumab does not improve efficacy and is associated with greater toxicity than pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and no targetable EGFR or ALK aberrations. These data do not support use of pembrolizumab-ipilimumab in place of pembrolizumab monotherapy in this population.

A phase II trial of gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in previously untreated metasetatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14685-e14685
Author(s):  
Sun Jin Sym ◽  
Junsik Hong ◽  
Minkyu Jung ◽  
Yang Seo Koo ◽  
Yeon Ho Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
One Year

e14685 Background: Treatment with single agent gemcitabine provides modest benefits in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.This study was performed to determine the efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patient with recurrent or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: This was a prospective, single-arm, single center study in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic or recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The primary endpoint was objective response. The study was designed as a Simons two-stage optimal design and was divided into two stages. The first stage was to recruit up to 18 patients. If at least two objective responses were obtained, then a further 25 patients would be enrolled into the study. If no more than two responses were obtained among these 18 patients, the study would be halted. The study patients received gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on day1, plus oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and capecitabine 800 mg/m2/day on days 1-7 every 14 days. Treatment was to be administered until disease progression or until withdrawal from the study due to unacceptable toxicity or other reasons. Results: Eighteen patients were enrolled. Median age was 63 years (range, 39-73 years). Among these 18 patients, only one patient (5.5%) achieved an objective response. Therefore, the accrual terminated. The median time to disease progression was 2.1 months, and the median overall survival duration was 4.9 months. One-year overall survival rates were 35.3%. The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events were asthenia (16.6%), and nausea (5.5%). There were no unexpected toxicities. Conclusions: The addition of oxaliplatin and capecitabine to gemcitabine did not improve objective response in the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer patients.

A phase Ib trial of IPI-926, a hedgehog pathway inhibitor, plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 213-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Anthony Richards ◽  
Joe Stephenson ◽  
Brian M. Wolpin ◽  
Carlos Becerra ◽  
John Turner Hamm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

213 Background: IPI-926 is a novel, natural product-derived small molecule that targets the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway by inhibiting smoothened. In preclinical models of pancreatic cancer, repressing activation of the Hh pathway diminishes tumor-associated desmoplasia and improves chemotherapy delivery. Methods: This is the final report of the Phase 1b portion of a Phase 1b/2 trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of IPI-926 plus gemcitabine. Eligible patients (pts) with untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer and ECOG status 0-1 were administered oral IPI-926 daily (QD) for 28-day cycles, in 3 to 6 pt dose cohorts. Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) was administered IV weekly for 3 weeks with 1 week off. DLTs were evaluated during Cycle 1. Results: 16 pts (median age 69 years; range 58-86) were enrolled at IPI-926 doses of 110, 130 or 160 mg QD (single agent MTD). Pts received a median of 5 cycles (1-13). Two pts remain on trial. No IPI-926-related serious AEs have been observed. One DLT of Grade 3 AST increase was observed (130 mg dose cohort) and was asymptomatic; it resolved with dose interruption, and did not recur with dose reduction. The most common AEs occurring were fatigue (75% total, 6% ≥ Grade 3), thrombocytopenia (63%, 25%), anemia (56%, 13%), nausea (50%, 0%), diarrhea (44%, 0%), vomiting (44%, 0%), peripheral edema (44%, 0%), pyrexia (44%, 0%), and AST increase (44%, 13%). Dose reductions of IPI-926 occurred in 3 (19%) pts. Dose reductions of gemcitabine occurred in 11 (69%) pts, primarily for thrombocytopenia (9 pts). One pt (6%) discontinued due to an AE (microangiopathic hemolytic anemia). Five (31%) radiographic partial responses were observed (1/3 at 110 mg, 2/6 at 130 mg, 2/7 at 160 mg). Median progression-free survival is > 7 months. 74% of pts were alive 6 months after study entry. Conclusions: IPI-926 plus gemcitabine is well tolerated in pts with untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer, with evidence of activity and no unexpected toxicity. Complete Phase 1b data, including final overall survival, will be presented. Clinical evaluation of this combination continues in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 portion of the trial.

A phase II trial of gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in previously untreated metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 344-344
Author(s):  
Sun Jin Sym ◽  
Junsik Hong ◽  
Minkyu Jung ◽  
Yang Seo Koo ◽  
Yeon Ho Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
One Year

344 Background: Treatment with single agent gemcitabine provides modest benefits in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. This study was performed to determine the efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patient with recurrent or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: This was a prospective, single-arm, single center study in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic or recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The primary endpoint was objective response. The study was designed as a Simons two-stage optimal design and was divided into two stages. The first stage was to recruit up to 18 patients. If at least two objective responses were obtained, then a further 25 patients would be enrolled into the study. If no more than two responses were obtained among these 18 patients, the study would be halted. The study patients received gemcitabine 800 mg/m2, plus oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 and capecitabine 800 mg/m2/day on days 1-7 every 14 days. Treatment was to be administered until disease progression or until withdrawal from the study due to unacceptable toxicity or other reasons. Results: Eighteen patients were enrolled. Median age was 63 years (range, 39-73 years). Among these 18 patients, only one patient (5.5%) achieved an objective response. Therefore, the accrual terminated. The median time to disease progression was 2.1 months, and the median overall survival duration was 4.9 months. One-year overall survival rates were 35.3%. The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events were asthenia (16.6%), and nausea (5.5%). There were no unexpected toxicities. Conclusions: The addition of oxaliplatin and capecitabine to gemcitabine did not improve objective response in the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer patients.

scholarly journals Network Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy and Target Therapy in the First-Line Setting of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun-I Lin ◽  
Jia-Lian Yang ◽  
Yu-Chao Lin ◽  
Che-Yi Chou ◽  
Jin-Hua Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
P Value ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

Both gemcitabine and fluoropyrimidine are recommended backbones in the first-line treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). To compare the efficacy and safety of these two therapeutic backbones, and to investigate the optimal therapies, we conducted a network meta-analysis. By retrospective analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT), the most preferred therapeutic regimen may be predicted. The eligible RCTs of the gemcitabine-based therapies and fluoropyrimidine-based therapies were searched up to 31 August 2019. In a frequentist network meta-analysis, treatments were compared and ranked according to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Thirty-two trials with 10,729 patients were included. The network meta-analyses results for overall survival and progression-free survival showed that fluoropyrimidine-based therapy seems to be the most effective treatment choice. Compared to gemcitabine combined with taxanes or immunotherapy, fluoropyrimidine-based therapy had comparable treatment effects (PFS: 0.67, p-Value = 0.11; 0.76, p-Value = 0.32; OS: 0.80, p-Value = 0.16; 0.77, p-Value = 0.21). Moreover, the combination of immunotherapy and gemcitabine had tolerable toxicities. Based on current evidence, fluoropyrimidine-based therapies and the combination of gemcitabine and taxanes were the most effective therapies in the advanced pancreatic cancer, and the combination of immunotherapy and gemcitabine can be developed into a new form of therapy.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Compared With Single-Agent Gemcitabine As First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: The GIP-1 Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1645-1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Colucci ◽  
Roberto Labianca ◽  
Francesco Di Costanzo ◽  
Vittorio Gebbia ◽  
Giacomo Cartenì ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
First Line Treatment

PurposeSingle-agent gemcitabine became standard first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer after demonstration of superiority compared with fluorouracil. The Gruppo Italiano Pancreas 1 randomized phase III trial aimed to compare gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT00813696).Patients and MethodsPatients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, age 18 to 75 years, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 50, were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine (arm A) or gemcitabine plus cisplatin (arm B). Arm A: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2weekly for 7 weeks, and, after a 1-week rest, on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Arm B: cisplatin 25 mg/m2added weekly to gemcitabine, except cycle 1 day 22. Primary end point was overall survival. To have 8% power of detecting a 0.74 hazard ratio (HR) of death, with bilateral α .05, 355 events were needed and 400 patients planned.ResultsFour hundred patients were enrolled (arm A: 199; arm B: 201). Median age was 63, 59% were male, 84% had stage IV, and 83% had KPS ≥ 80. Median overall survival was 8.3 months versus 7.2 months in arm A and B, respectively (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.35; P = .38). Median progression-free survival was 3.9 months versus 3.8 months in arm A and B, respectively (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.19; P = .80). The objective response rate was 10.1% in A and 12.9% in B (P = .37). Clinical benefit was experienced by 23.0% in A and 15.1% in B (P = .057). Combination therapy produced more hematologic toxicity, without relevant differences in nonhematologic toxicity.ConclusionThe addition of weekly cisplatin to gemcitabine failed to demonstrate any improvement as first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

Phase III Trial of Two Investigational Schedules of Ifosfamide Compared With Standard-Dose Doxorubicin in Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (21) ◽  
pp. 3144-3150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Lorigan ◽  
Jaap Verweij ◽  
Zsuzsa Papai ◽  
Sjoerd Rodenhuis ◽  
Axel Le Cesne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose Single-agent doxorubicin remains the standard treatment for advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Combining doxorubicin with standard-dose ifosfamide has not been shown to improve survival and is associated with a significantly increased toxicity; it is not known whether higher dose single-agent ifosfamide is superior to doxorubicin. Patients and Methods This randomized prospective multicenter phase III trial was designed to compare progression-free survival of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma receiving either regimen of standard doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 every 21 days, ifosfamide 9 g/m2 over 3 days continuous infusion, or ifosfamide 3 g/m2 per day in 3 hours over 3 days. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, response rate, and toxicity. Results The study included 326 patients. Grade 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and encephalopathy were more frequent in the ifosfamide arms. Progression-free survival, overall survival, and response rates were not significantly different between the three arms. An independent data monitoring committee reviewed the interim data and recommended early closure of the trial for futility (ie, no significant difference would be shown). Conclusion Single-agent doxorubicin remains the treatment of choice for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document