Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Oral Irinotecan Given Once Daily for 5 Days Every 3 Weeks in Combination With Capecitabine in Patients With Solid Tumors

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 889-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Otto Soepenberg ◽  
Herlinde Dumez ◽  
Jaap Verweij ◽  
Dorothee Semiond ◽  
Maja J.A. deJonge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Variability ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

Purpose To assess the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of oral irinotecan given in combination with capecitabine to patients with advanced, refractory solid tumors. Patients and Methods Patients were treated from day 1 with irinotecan capsules given once daily for 5 consecutive days (50 to 60 mg/m2/d) concomitantly with capecitabine given twice daily for 14 consecutive days (800 to 1,000 mg/m2); cycles were repeated every 21 days. Results Twenty-eight patients were enrolled and received 155 cycles of therapy (median, five cycles; range, one to 18 cycles). With irinotecan 60 mg/m2/d and capecitabine 2 × 800 mg/m2/d, grade 3 delayed diarrhea in combination with grade 2 nausea (despite maximal antiemetic support) and grade 3 anorexia and colitis, were the first-cycle dose-limiting toxicities in two of six patients, respectively. At the recommended doses (irinotecan 50 mg/m2/d; capecitabine 2 × 1,000 mg/m2/d), side effects were mostly mild to moderate and uniformly reversible. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that there was no interaction between oral irinotecan and capecitabine, and that body-surface area was not significantly contributing to the observed pharmacokinetic variability. Confirmed partial responses were observed in two patients with gallbladder carcinoma and in one patient with melanoma. Disease stabilization was noted in 16 patients. Conclusion The recommended phase II doses for oral irinotecan and capecitabine are 50 mg/m2/d for 5 consecutive days, and 2 × 1,000 mg/m2/d for 14 consecutive days repeated every 3 weeks, respectively.

A phase I dose escalation trial of the VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, PTK787/ ZK222584 (PTK/ZK), used in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors with pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14012-14012
Author(s):  
S. R. Malireddy ◽  
E. Chiorean ◽  
A. Foster ◽  
D. Jones ◽  
M. Waddell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Transaminase Elevation ◽  
Liver Transaminase ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

14012 Background: The aim of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for weekly paclitaxel administered in combination with daily PTK/ZK and assess for a potential PK drug interaction. Methods: 17 patients (pts) with refractory metastatic solid tumors, were enrolled. During cycle 1 (C1) paclitaxel was given on days 1 and 15 in combination with PTK/ZK on days 3 to 28. PTK/ZK was administered once daily each night. During cycle 2 (C2) and beyond, paclitaxel was given on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days. PTK/ZK was taken orally each night. A “3+3” design was used. In addition to the standard definitions of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurring in C1 and C2, the inability to give day 8 or 15 of paclitaxel or > 7 days of missed PTK/ZK due to toxicity was also deemed dose limiting. Therapy was given until disease progression. Results: 60 cycles (range: 1 to 8) have been administered to 16 evaluable pts. No DLTs were observed when 75 mg/m2 of paclitaxel was combined with PTK/ZK doses of 250 mg, 500 mg and 750 mg. Two of 5 pts treated with paclitaxel 85 mg/m2 and PTK/ZK 1,000 mg had Grade 3 transaminase elevation (defined DLT) in C1 after day 15. The MTD was therefore 75 mg/m2 paclitaxel and 750 mg PTK/ZK. Paclitaxel PK was obtained in 14 patients: 13 of 14 patients had a faster clearance (L/hr) of paclitaxel on C1 day 15 versus day 1 (average % increase: 79%, range 14–256%, SD: 69). Only one patient had a slower clearance: 26% decrease. Activity included 2 partial responses (prostate and esophageal cancer), and 8 pts had stable disease lasting 2–9+ months, including ovarian cancer pts previously treated with paclitaxel. Conclusion: The MTD for weekly paclitaxel plus daily PTK/ZK is 75 mg/m2 and 750 mg. DLTs were liver transaminase elevation. This combination was well tolerated, and responses and prolonged disease stabilization were seen. PK analysis revealed an increase in rate of paclitaxel clearance in most patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of estramustine phosphate and short infusions of paclitaxel in women with solid tumors.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 2959-2963 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Garcia ◽  
S Keren-Rosenberg ◽  
D Parimoo ◽  
M Rogers ◽  
S Jeffers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Estramustine Phosphate ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Ovarian Cancers ◽  
P Glycoprotein ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Pharmacologic Study

PURPOSE We sought to determine the tolerance of estramustine phosphate (EMP) combined with a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion in women with solid paclitaxel-pretreated solid tumors. Paclitaxel pharmacology was to be studied at the recommended phase II dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS Paclitaxel was administered to cohorts of at least three assessable patients at doses of 150, 180, 210, and 225 mg/m2, while EMP was given at 900 and 1,200 mg/m2/d in divided doses orally for 2 days preceding and on the day of paclitaxel. The pharmacologic study was performed at 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel given in the absence and 3 weeks later in the presence of EMP 900 mg/m2/d. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients received a total of 178 courses. Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were common at EMP 1,200 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 225 mg/ m2; this was considered the maximum-tolerated dose. Since these toxicities appeared related to EMP, the pharmacologic study used a dose of 900 mg/m2 of this agent with 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel. Antitumor activity was documented against breast and ovarian cancers at all levels. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics without and with EMP did not differ. CONCLUSION EMP 900 mg/m2 for 3 days and 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion are well tolerated; antitumor activity was seen in women with paclitaxel-pretreated solid tumors. This apparent enhancement of antitumor effects is unlikely to be mediated by P-glycoprotein.

A phase I dose escalation trial of ispinesib (SB-715992) administered days 1–3 of a 21-day cycle in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2026-2026 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. I. Heath ◽  
A. Alousi ◽  
J. P. Eder ◽  
M. Valdivieso ◽  
L. S. Vasist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Data ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

2026 Background: Ispinesib, a novel cytotoxic agent inhibiting the kinesin spindle protein (KSP) has demonstrated significant antitumor activity in multiple murine tumor models. The primary objectives of the study were to assess the safety and tolerability of SB-715992, to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Methods: Ispinesib was administered days 1–3 intravenously over 1 hour every 21 days, starting at a dose of 1 mg/m2/day. Traditional 3-patient cohort trial design was utilized with dose levels of 2, 4, 6, 8 mg/m2/day. Results: Twenty-seven patients (24 Caucasians, 3 African-Americans, 16 males, 11 females) with various tumor types were enrolled; colorectal (7), renal (5), bladder (2), lung (2), pharynx (2), pancreas (2), others (7). Grade 3/4 toxicities were noted starting at the 4 mg/m2 dose level with two patients developing grade 4 neutropenia; one for < 5 days, one for > 5 days (with grade 3 leukopenia). At the 6 mg/m2 dose level, grade 3 neutropenia and leukopenia were reported. At the 8 mg/m2 dose level, 3 of 3 patients had grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia. The 6 mg/m2 dose level was declared the MTD. Toxicities seen in the additional 6 patients included grade 1 fatigue (1/6), grade 1 infusion- related flushing (1/6), grade 3 febrile neutropenia (1/6), and grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia (1/6). The MTD cohort has been expanded to 10 evaluable patients for confirmation of tolerability and pharmacodynamic endpoints including phosphohistone 3 (PH3), cyclin E, and TUNEL assay on serial tumor biopsies. Preliminary pharmacokinetic data appear linear, but not dose proportional. As predicted, between days 1 and 3, accumulation ranged from 40 to 106%. Exposures appear comparable between cycles 1 and 2. Stable disease in 2 patients with renal cell carcinoma (4 and 5 cycles) and minor response in one patient with bladder cancer were seen. Conclusions: Treatment with ispinesib at the MTD of 6 mg/m2/day x 3 days in patients with advanced solid tumors was well tolerated with consistent dose limiting toxicity of myelosuppression. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase Ib/IIa study of GC1118 in combination with irinotecan or FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3592-3592
Author(s):  
Keun Wook Lee ◽  
Sae-Won Han ◽  
Ji-Won Kim ◽  
Dae-Won Lee ◽  
Yong Sang Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Skin Rash ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Stage Design ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stage 1

3592 Background: GC1118 is a novel anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody which has a unique binding epitope and superior ligand inhibition potential. It showed promising antitumor activity as a single agent in the phase I study. This study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of GC1118 in combination with irinotecan or FOLFIRI in metastatic solid tumors and evaluate the efficacy of GC1118 plus FOLFIRI as a second line therapy for RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Phase 1b part was designed to evaluate weekly GC1118 (starting from 3 mg/kg) in combination with biweekly irinotecan (180mg/m2) or FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180mg/m2, leucovorin 400mg/m2, 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus, and 5-FU 2400mg/m2 over 46hrs) in a 3+3 design. In the phase 2a part, the RP2D of GC1118 is administered in combination with FOLFIRI in a Simon’s two stage design with objective response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint. Results: 13 pts were enrolled in phase 1b and received 3mg/kg of GC1118 with irinotecan (N = 6) or FOLFIRI (N = 7). DLT occurred in 2 pts (G4 neutropenia, G2 rash) in irinotecan arm and 1pt (G3 neutropenia) in FOLFIRI arm with 3mg/kg of GC1118 and it was determined as MTD and RP2D. Adverse events (AE) of grade ≥ 3 included neutropenia (61.5 %), skin rash (15.4 %) and diarrhea (15.4%). Dose reductions due to GC1118-related AE were required in 6 (46.2%) patients. Among 10 response-evaluable pts in phase 1b, best overall response was PR in 3 and SD in 6, and median PFS was 12 months. In stage 1 of phase 2a (N = 9), 4 PR and 5 SD were observed (ORR 44.4%, 95% CI 13.7 – 78.8). We moved to stage 2, and are currently enrolling additional 20 pts. AE of grade ≥ 3 included neutropenia (66.7%), skin rash (22.2%) and diarrhea (11.1%). Updated data of the phase 2a part will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: The MTD and RP2D of weekly GC1118 in combination with irinotecan or FOLFIRI was 3mg/kg. Preliminary results of GC1118 and FOLFIRI as a 2nd line treatment in mCRC suggests promising antitumor activity and acceptable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT03454620 .

scholarly journals A Phase I Trial to Evaluate the Multiple-Dose Safety and Antitumor Activity of Ursolic Acid Liposomes in Subjects with Advanced Solid Tumors

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengzi Qian ◽  
Xianhuo Wang ◽  
Zheng Song ◽  
Huilai Zhang ◽  
Shiyong Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Ursolic Acid ◽  
Multiple Dose ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
The Body ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics

Ursolic acid liposome (UAL), a new antitumor drug, has potential therapeutic value. However, limited clinical data exists regarding multiple-dose safety, antitumor activity, and the recommended dose (RD) of UAL for subjects with advanced solid tumors. All subjects were intravenously administered UAL for 14 consecutive days of a 21-day treatment cycle. Twenty-one subjects were enrolled in 1 of 3 sequential cohorts (56, 74, and 98 mg/m2) to evaluate multiple-dose tolerability and efficacy. Eight additional subjects were treated with UAL (74 mg/m2) to evaluate multiple-dose pharmacokinetics. No ≥grade 3 adverse events (NCI-CTC) were observed. Sixty percent subjects achieved stable disease after 2 treatment cycles. Multiple-dose pharmacokinetic analysis suggested UAL does not accumulate in the body. This trial demonstrates that UAL was tolerable, had manageable toxicity, and could potentially improve patient remission rates. A large phase II study is recommended to confirm these results (i.e., RD of 98 mg/m2).

A phase I clinical trial of vorinostat in combination with sFULV2 in patients with refractory solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4083-4083
Author(s):  
M. G. Fakih ◽  
L. Pendyala ◽  
M. J. Egorin ◽  
G. Fetterly ◽  
I. Espinoza-Delgado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Phase I Clinical Trial ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Over Expression ◽  
Dose Dependent Fashion ◽  
Grade 3

4083 Background: Thymidylate synthase (TS) over-expression is associated with 5-FU resistance. Pre-clinical studies demonstrate that vorinostat down-regulates intra-tumor TS in a dose-dependent fashion and augments 5-FU antitumor activity in xenograft models. We conducted a phase I clinical trial of an intermittent schedule of QD x 3 vorinostat in combination with a fixed dose of fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients (pts) with refractory solid tumors. Methods: Vorinostat was escalated in a standard 3 x 3 design in combination with a fixed dose of 5-FU and LV (simplified de Gramont regimen, sFULV2). Vorinostat was given QD x 3 on an every-2-week cycle. sFULV2 started on day 2 of vorinostat and consisted of leucovorin 400 mg/m2 i.v. over 2 hrs followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus and 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 over 46 hrs. Results: 24 pts were enrolled: Male/Female: 11/13; ECOG 0/1: 6/18; Age: median 60 (range 42–77) yrs. 21 pts had colorectal cancer (CRC), 1 had gastric, 1 had esophageal, and 1 had anal cancer. Vorinostat dose-levels (DL) were 600 mg, 800 mg, 1000 mg, 1200 mg, 1400 mg, 1700 mg, and 2000 mg. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), consisting of fatigue and hand-and-foot syndrome (H&F), were seen in 2 of 3 pts at the 2000 mg DL. None of the 6 pts at the 1700 mg DL had a DLT. Cycle 1 grade 3/4 toxicities consisted of thrombocytopenia, GI bleeding, fatigue, and H&F in 2 pts at the 2000 mg DL and a non-DLT G3 diarrhea (lasted <24 hrs) in 1 pt at the 1700 mg DL. Grade 2 nausea, fatigue, and anorexia were common; especially at DL ≥ 1700 mg. Antitumor activity was noted in pts with CRC despite prior refractoriness to 5-FU and failure to oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and cetuximab in all pts. 12/21 CRC pts had a confirmed SD (11) or PR (1). CRC pts had a median PFS of 4 months, a ≥ 6 months PFS rate of 43%, and a ≥ 8 months PFS rate of 33%. Conclusions: The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat in combination with sFULV2 is 1700 mg PO QD x 3 every 2 weeks. This combination is associated with considerable activity in pts with 5-FU-refractory CRC and warrants further investigation. An expanded MTD cohort is accruing to investigate 5-FU-vorinostat PK interaction and intra-tumor TS down-regulation. (This work was supported by a grant from CTEP and the ACS.) No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I trial of micronized formulation carboxyamidotriazole in patients with refractory solid tumors: pharmacokinetics, clinical outcome, and comparison of formulations.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 1985-1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
E C Kohn ◽  
W D Figg ◽  
G A Sarosy ◽  
K S Bauer ◽  
P A Davis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Similar Frequency ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

PURPOSE Cytostatic agents targeted against angiogenesis and tumor cell invasive potential form a new class of investigational drugs. Orally administered carboxyamidotriazole (CAI) (NSC609974) is both antiangiogenic and antimetastatic. An encapsulated micronized powder formulation has been developed to optimize CAI administration. A phase I dose escalation trial with pharmacokinetic analysis has been performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-one patients with refractory solid tumors and good end organ function and performance status were enrolled onto the study. Patients received a test dose followed 1 week later by daily administration of CAI in the encapsulated micronized formulation at doses of 100 to 350 mg/m2. Patients remained on CAI until disease progression or dose-limiting toxicity. Plasma samples were taken to characterize the pharmacokinetic parameters of this formulation of CAI. RESULTS All patients were assessable for toxicity and 18 were assessable for pharmacokinetics and response analysis. Grade 1 and 2 gastrointestinal side effects were observed in up to 50% of patients. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in both patients treated at 350 mg/m2/d, consisting of reversible grade 2 to 3 cerebellar ataxia (n = 1) and confusion (n = 1). One minor response (MR) was observed in a patient with renal cell carcinoma and another nine patients had disease stabilization (MR + SD = 47%). Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated reduced bioavailability (58% reduction) compared with the PEG-400 liquid formulation previously reported. CONCLUSION The better toxicity profile of encapsulated micronized CAI with similar frequency of disease stabilization and ease of administration compared with the liquid or gelatin capsule, suggests that the micronized formulation is a preferable formulation for subsequent studies. A dose of 300 mg/m2/d is proposed for phase II investigations.

Clinical development of namitecan (ST1968), a novel camptothecin derivative with high antitumor activity: Phase I clinical data

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2570-2570 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Hess ◽  
S. Boehm ◽  
A. Delmonte ◽  
E. Gallerani ◽  
P. Barbieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Water Soluble ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Cohort Design ◽  
Blood And Urine Samples ◽  
High Antitumor Activity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

2570 Background: Namitecan is a new water-soluble camptothecin analogue which showed high antitumor activity in preclinical models. Aim of this trial was to determine safety, PK profile and activity in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: The dose escalation started at 2.5 mg i.v. on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle (D1, D8 Q21D) and increased according to 3+3 cohort design depending on the observed toxicity. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) definitions were: ANC <0.5x109/L for >5 days; PLT ≥ Grade 3 (CTC V3); grade ≥2 liver/renal toxicity not recovered by D22; any non-hematologic toxicity ≥ Grade 3; D8 dose skipping due to toxicity. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) were the primary end-points. Blood and urine samples were collected at cycle 1 for PK evaluation. Results: 31 pts (11 endometrial ca., 5 CRC, 5 ovarian ca., 2 NSCLC, 8 other) have been included, with 6 dose levels evaluated (2.5; 5; 10; 15; 17.5 and 20 mg). 17.5 mg was introduced later when 2/7 DLTs at 20 mg were observed (ANC G4>5days, one with D8 skipping). At 17.5mg 2/4 pts experienced DLTs (ANC G4; D8 skipped). Uncomplicated neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most relevant G3/4 hematological toxicities. Other toxicities were mild or moderate asthenia, fatigue and alopecia. The MTD was defined at 17.5 mg and the RD was 15 mg. Stable disease ≥ 6 cycles was recorded in 6 pts (2 stable diseases ≥ 10 cycles). PK was linear and data suggest an entero-hepatic recirculation. No metabolites were found in plasma and the product resulted poorly excreted into urine. Conclusions: The MTD and RD of D1, D8 Q21D schedule have been identified. The study will continue with the evaluation of MTD and RD of a single administration per cycle (D1 Q21D), to optimize the schedule of treatment. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Phase I Trial of MK-0752 in Children With Refractory CNS Malignancies: A Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (26) ◽  
pp. 3529-3534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Fouladi ◽  
Clinton F. Stewart ◽  
James Olson ◽  
Lars M. Wagner ◽  
Arzu Onar-Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Pediatric Brain Tumor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Population Pharmacokinetic ◽  
Gamma Secretase ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cns Malignancies

PurposeTo estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), describe dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and characterize pharmacokinetic properties of MK-0752, a gamma secretase inhibitor, in children with refractory or recurrent CNS malignancies.Patients and MethodsMK-0752 was administered once daily for 3 consecutive days of every 7 days at escalating dosages starting at 200 mg/m2. The modified continual reassessment method was used to estimate the MTD. A course was 28 days in duration. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed during the first course. Expression of NOTCH and hairy enhancer of split (HES) proteins was assessed in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) before and following treatment with MK-0752.ResultsTwenty-three eligible patients were enrolled: 10 males (median age, 8.1 years; range, 2.6 to 17.7 years) with diagnoses of brainstem glioma (n = 6), ependymoma (n = 8), medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (n = 4), glioblastoma multiforme (n = 2), atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (n = 1), malignant glioma (n = 1), and choroid plexus carcinoma, (n = 1). Seventeen patients were fully evaluable for toxicity. No DLTs occurred in the three patients enrolled at 200 mg/m2/dose. At 260 mg/m2/dose, DLTs occurred in two of six patients, both of whom experienced grade 3 ALT and AST. There were no grade 4 toxicities; non–dose-limiting grade 3 toxicities included hypokalemia and lymphopenia. Population pharmacokinetic values (% coefficient of variation) for MK-0752 were apparent oral clearance, 0.444 (38%) L/h/m2; apparent volume of distribution, 7.36 (24%) L/m2; and ka, 0.358 (99%) hr−1.ConclusionMK-0752 is well-tolerated in children with recurrent CNS malignancies. The recommended phase II dose using the 3 days on followed by 4 days off schedule is 260 mg/m2/dose once daily.

scholarly journals A Phase 1 Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study of Cediranib, an Orally Bioavailable Pan–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor, in Children and Adolescents With Refractory Solid Tumors

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (35) ◽  
pp. 5174-5181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Fox ◽  
Richard Aplenc ◽  
Rochelle Bagatell ◽  
Meredith K. Chuk ◽  
Eva Dombi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Thyroid Stimulating Hormone ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose To determine the toxicity profile, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of cediranib administered orally, once daily, continuously in children and adolescents with solid tumors. Patients and Methods Children and adolescents with refractory solid tumors, excluding primary brain tumors, were eligible. DLT at the starting dose of 12 mg/m2/d resulted in de-escalation to 8 mg/m2/d and subsequent re-escalation to 12 and 17 mg/m2/d. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were performed during cycle 1. Response was evaluated using WHO criteria. Results Sixteen patients (median age, 15 years; range, 8 to 18 years) were evaluable for toxicity. DLTs (grade 3 nausea, vomiting, fatigue in one; hypertension and prolonged corrected QT interval in another) occurred in patients initially enrolled at 12 mg/m2/d. Subsequently, 8 mg/m2/d was well tolerated in three patients. An additional seven patients were enrolled at 12 mg/m2/d; one had DLT (grade 3 diarrhea). At 17 mg/m2/d, two of four patients had DLTs (grade 3 nausea; intolerable grade 2 fatigue). Non–dose-limiting toxicities included left ventricular dysfunction, elevated thyroid stimulating hormone, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, weight loss, and headache. The MTD of cediranib was 12 mg/m2/d (adult fixed dose equivalent, 20 mg). At 12 mg/m2/d, the median area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) was 900 ng·h/mL, which is similar to adults receiving 20 mg. Objective responses were observed in patients with Ewing sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, and osteosarcoma. Conclusion The recommended monotherapy dose of cediranib for children with extracranial solid tumors is 12 mg/m2/d administered orally, once daily, continuously. A phase II study is in development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document