Psychological Impact of Genetic Testing for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1902-1910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen R. Gritz ◽  
Susan K. Peterson ◽  
Sally W. Vernon ◽  
Salma K. Marani ◽  
Walter F. Baile ◽  
...  

Purpose This study examines the impact of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) genetic test results on psychological outcomes among cancer-affected and -unaffected participants up to 1 year after results disclosure. Patients and Methods A total of 155 persons completed study measures before HNPCC genetic testing, and at 2 weeks and 6 and 12 months after disclosure of test results. Results Mean scores on all outcome measures remained stable and within normal limits for cancer-affected participants, regardless of mutation status. Among unaffected carriers of HNPCC-predisposing mutations, mean depression, state anxiety, and cancer worries scores increased from baseline to 2 weeks postdisclosure and decreased from 2 weeks to 6 months postdisclosure. Among unaffected noncarriers, mean depression and anxiety scores did not differ, but cancer worries scores decreased during the same time period. Affected and unaffected carriers had higher mean test-specific distress scores at 2 weeks postdisclosure compared with noncarriers in their respective groups; scores decreased for affected carriers and all unaffected participants from 2 weeks to 12 months postdisclosure. Classification of participants into high- versus low-distress clusters using mean scores on baseline psychological measures predicted significantly higher or lower follow-up scores, respectively, on depression, state anxiety, quality of life, and test-specific distress measures, regardless of mutation status. Conclusion Although HNPCC genetic testing does not result in long-term adverse psychological outcomes, unaffected mutation carriers may experience increased distress during the immediate postdisclosure time period. Furthermore, those with higher levels of baseline mood disturbance, lower quality of life, and lower social support may be at risk for both short- and long-term increased distress.

Author(s):  
Luqman Rosla ◽  
Salina Hussain ◽  
Farah Dayana Zahedi ◽  
Mohd Syazwan Mohamad Anuar

Introduction: Immunotherapy has proven its efficacy in multiple randomized control trials (RCT) in treating allergic rhinitis (AR) as it induces induces long term remission after discontinuation and prevent new sensitization. Objective: Our aim is to look into earliest improvement of quality of life (QOL) in AR patient treated with Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). Methodology: Patients who were sensitized to dust mites (Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Blomia tropicalis) were enrolled into the study. All patients were treated with SLIT for 6 months. The patients were assessed using rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaires (RQLQ) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) pre-treatment at 1, 3 and 6 months post SLIT. The usage of intranasal corticosteroids (INS) and antihistamine were documented in medication diary. The data for pre and post treatment for RQLQ results were analysed using paired T-test and medication diary were analysed using ANOVA test. Results: A total of 53 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean RQLQ score showed significant result at 3 and 6 months post SLIT (p<0.05). Significant improvement seen in the mean PNIF value pre-treatment (81.54 L/min ±29.36 ) compared to mean PNIF value at 3 months (92.0L/min ±29.03 ) and 6 months (96.13L/min ±26.67) post SLIT (p<0.05). The dependency of patients towards pharmacotherapy also showed a significant reduction at 3 and 6 months post SLIT (p<0.05). Conclusion: Our study showed a significant improvement of patients’ quality of life as early as 3 months of post SLIT treatment.


Author(s):  
Nina Simmons-Mackie

Abstract Purpose: This article addresses several intervention approaches that aim to improve life for individuals with severe aphasia. Because severe aphasia significantly compromises language, often for the long term, recommended approaches focus on additional domains that affect quality of life. Treatments are discussed that involve increasing participation in personally relevant life situations, enhancing environmental support for communication and participation, and improving communicative confidence. Methods: Interventions that have been suggested in the aphasia literature as particularly appropriate for people with severe aphasia include training in total communication, training of communication partners, and activity specific training. Conclusion: Several intervention approaches can be implemented to enhance life with severe aphasia.


2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Kammerer ◽  
M Höhn ◽  
AH Kiessling ◽  
S Becker ◽  
FU Sack

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Kluger ◽  
A Kirsch ◽  
M Hessenauer ◽  
M Granel ◽  
A Müller ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Thom ◽  
M. Carlson ◽  
J. Jacob ◽  
C. Driscoll ◽  
B. Neff ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document