Phase II Study of Doxorubicin and Bevacizumab for Patients With Metastatic Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (28) ◽  
pp. 7135-7142 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. D'Adamo ◽  
Sibyl E. Anderson ◽  
Karen Albritton ◽  
Jennifer Yamada ◽  
Elyn Riedel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Cardiac Toxicity ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Purpose To evaluate the antitumor activity and tolerability of bevacizumab and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). Patients and Methods Patients may have had up to one nonanthracycline line of therapy. Seventeen patients with metastatic STS were treated with doxorubicin at 75 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) push followed by bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks. Dexrazoxane was started for total doxorubicin dose exceeding 300 mg/m2. Results A total of 85 cycles of doxorubicin/bevacizumab were administered, median four cycles (range, one to 11), with three patients receiving one to four cycles of bevacizumab maintenance after reaching 600 mg/m2 doxorubicin. All 17 patients were assessable for response. Two partial responses (12%, 95% CI = 1% to 36%) were observed, lasting seven and 12 cycles of therapy. Eleven patients (65%) had stable disease for four cycles or more. Six patients developed cardiac toxicity grade 2 or greater, with four patients grade 2 (cumulative doxorubicin 75, 150, 300, 300 mg/m2, respectively), one grade 3 (total doxorubicin 591 mg/m2), and one grade 4 (total doxorubicin 420 mg/m2). One patient with extensive lung disease died of recurrent bilateral pneumothoraces, possibly treatment-related. Conclusion The 12% response rate for these patients was no greater than that observed for single-agent doxorubicin. However, the 65% of patients with stable disease lasting four cycles or longer suggests further study is warranted in STSs. The observed cardiac toxicity, despite close monitoring and standard use of dexrazoxane, obliges a change in the dose and/or schedule in future studies of this combination.

A phase II study of aflibercept (VEGF trap) in recurrent or metastatic gynecologic soft-tissue sarcomas: A study of the Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5591-5591
Author(s):  
C. Townsley ◽  
H. Hirte ◽  
P. Hoskins ◽  
R. Buckanovich ◽  
H. Mackay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Vascular Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Vegf Trap

5591 Background: Targeting angiogenesis and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) represents a promising approach to treat highly vascular tumors, like gynecologic sarcomas. Aflibercept, a long-acting inhibitor of VEGF signaling, potently binds and inactivates VEGF, thus blocking tumor angiogenesis and growth. Methods: This is a single-arm, open-label, two-stage phase II clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of aflibercept as treatment for patients (pts) with recurrent, or metastatic gynecologic soft tissue sarcoma. Aflibercept was administered at 4 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks and pts had radiologic imaging performed every 8 weeks. The primary endpoints were response rate and prolonged stable disease. Results: Twenty-five pts with leiomyosarcoma of the uterus and 13 pts with carcinosarcoma of the uterus were enrolled in 2 cohorts. In the leiomyosarcoma group, 24/25 pts had an ECOG of <1, most pts (22/25) had <1 previous lines of treatment and 7/25 pts had prior radiotherapy. A total of 149 cycles were administered for this group, with a median of 4 (range 2–28). In the carcinosarcoma group, 10/13 pts had an ECOG of <1, most pts (12/13) had <1 previous lines of treatment and 5/13 pts had prior radiotherapy. A total of 31 cycles were administered with a median of 3 (range 1–4). The most frequent adverse events experienced by all pts, of any grade, were fatigue 71% pts, constipation 53% and hypertension 39% . The most frequent grade 3 or higher, adverse events were hypertension 18%, fatigue 13% and lymphopenia 8%. Eight pts with leiomyosarcoma had stable disease (4pts > 6 mo). No reponses were seen in either cohort and no stable disease was seen in the carcinosarcoma group. Median overall survival was 15.1 mo (95% CI: 8.5 - not reached) for the leiomyosarcoma cohort and 3.1 mo for the carcinosarcoma cohort (95% CI: 1.9 - not reached). The requirements to proceed to stage 2, in leiomyosarcoma, were met after more than 2/21 patients had > 6 mo PFS. Carcinosarcoma cohort has not finished stage 1 and both cohorts continue accrual. Conclusions: VEGF-trap was well tolerated in this pt population with acceptable side effects. Initial efficacy data suggests modest activity, particularly in patients with leiomyosarcoma. [Table: see text]

Randomized comparison of doxorubicin alone versus ifosfamide plus doxorubicin or mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin against advanced soft tissue sarcomas.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1269-1275 ◽  
Author(s):  
J H Edmonson ◽  
L M Ryan ◽  
R H Blum ◽  
J S Brooks ◽  
M Shiraki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Significant Survival ◽  
Receive Treatment ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Group B ◽  
Survival Differences

PURPOSE This three-armed phase III study in adults with advanced soft tissue sarcomas was planned as a comparison of objective regression rates, toxicity, and survival of patients receiving doxorubicin alone, ifosfamide plus doxorubicin, and mitomycin plus doxorubicin plus cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between December 1987 and July 1990, 279 patients with histologically confirmed sarcomas were enrolled to receive treatment A (doxorubicin 80 mg/m2), treatment B (ifosfamide 7.5 g/m2 plus doxorubicin 60 mg/m2), or treatment C (mitomycin 8 mg/m2 plus doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2). RESULTS Of 262 assessable patients, 74 (29%) achieved objective tumor regression. Objective regression occurred in 20% of the 90 patients who received doxorubicin alone (complete remission [CR] rate, 2%), in 34% of the 88 who received ifosfamide plus doxorubicin (CR rate, 3%), and in 32% of the 84 who received mitomycin plus doxorubicin plus cisplatin (CR rate, 7%). With grade 3 or greater myelosuppression in 53% of group A, 80% of group B, and 55% of group C, regimen B was significantly more myelosuppressive than either regimen A or C (P = .01) with two, three, and one treatment-related deaths, respectively. Synovial sarcomas were responsive to ifosfamide plus doxorubicin, especially among patients younger than 40 years of age. CONCLUSION Ifosfamide plus doxorubicin produced a significantly higher regression rate (P = .03) than did doxorubicin alone; however, this was achieved at a level of myelosuppression significantly more intense than that produced by the single agent or by the three-drug combination. Mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin also appeared to be more active than the single agent; however, at a myelosuppression level similar to that of doxorubicin alone, this trend (P = .07) did not attain the usual level for significance. No significant survival differences were observed.

Experience with eribulin in pretreated patients with advanced liposarcoma: a case series

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1s) ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Paioli ◽  
Elisabetta Setola ◽  
Emanuela Palmerini ◽  
Marilena Cesari ◽  
Alessandra Longhi
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Case Series ◽  
First Case ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Grade 3

Systemic treatments for advanced soft tissue sarcoma are limited. Eribulin showed activity in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, particularly liposarcomas. Data from six patients with advanced liposarcoma that received eribulin as third- or fourth-line therapy are presented herein. Eribulin treatment was well tolerated; no grade 3–4 toxicity or therapy delay was observed. Two patients had a partial response; four had a prolonged stable disease. The first case, with pre-existing chronic renal dysfunction, achieved a 6-month stable disease with dose-reduced eribulin. The second case became resectable after eribulin treatment, with a 6-month complete surgical remission. The third case obtained a 7-month stable disease with eribulin and stereotactic body radiotherapy. The last three cases were ≥65 years old, and two of them had objective response with eribulin.

scholarly journals A Retrospective Analysis of Vinorelbine Chemotherapy for Patients With Previously Treated Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

Sarcoma ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 2006 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sibyl E. Anderson ◽  
Mary L. Keohan ◽  
David R. D'Adamo ◽  
Robert G. Maki
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Epithelioid Sarcoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Pretreated Group ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

Introduction. The role of vinorelbine in specific soft tissue sarcoma subtypes is unclear. We present retrospective single institution experience with single-agent vinorelbine in subjects with metastatic soft tissue malignancies.Methods. Fifty-eight patients were treated with single agent intravenous vinorelbine between April 1997 and December 2004. Doxorubicin had been administered previously to 53 subjects (91%), and the median number of lines of previous chemotherapy was 3 (range 0–7).Results. Patients received a median 6 doses of vinorelbine (range 1–65). The overall response rate was 6%(3 patients: 1 angiosarcoma, 1 epithelioid sarcoma, and 1 embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma). Fourteen patients (26%) experienced a best result of stable disease. Median time to progression was 1.8 months (95%confidence intervals 1.5–2.1 months, Kaplan-Meier estimate). Eight patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity, most commonly febrile neutropenia.Conclusion. Vinorelbine demonstrates limited activity in a heavily pretreated group of soft-tissue sarcoma patients. Prospective investigation may be considered for selected sarcoma subtypes.

scholarly journals A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Belinostat (PXD101) in Combination with Doxorubicin in Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Sarcoma ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Vitfell-Rasmussen ◽  
Ian Judson ◽  
Akmal Safwat ◽  
Robin L. Jones ◽  
Philip Blach Rossen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Deacetylase Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3

Background. Belinostat is a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor.Primary Objectives. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) of belinostat (Bel) in combination with doxorubicin (Dox) in solid tumours (phase I) and response rate (RR) in soft tissue sarcomas (phase II).Methods. Bel was administered as a 30-minute IV infusion on days 1–5 and on day 5 with Dox. The dose escalation schedule was as follows: cohort 1: Bel 600 mg/m2and 50 mg/m2Dox, cohort 2: Bel 600 mg/m2and 75 mg/m2Dox, cohort 3: Bel 800 mg/m2and 75 mg/m2Dox, and cohort 4: Bel 1000 mg/m2and 75 mg/m2Dox.Results. 41 patients were included (25 in phase I, 16 in phase II). Adverse events were fatigue (95%), nausea (76%), and alopecia (63%). There was one DLT, grade 3 rash/hand and foot syndrome. MTD was Bel 1000 mg/m2/d and Dox 75 mg/m2. Four responses were seen: 2 PR in phase I, RR of 8%; in phase II, 1 PR/1 CR, RR of 13%, and 9 patients (56%) with SD.Conclusion. The combination was well tolerated. Response rate was moderate but median time to progression was 6.0 months (95% CI, 1.6–9.7 months) which is superior to some reports of single-agent Dox.

Outcomes in the dedifferentiated liposarcoma cohort of SAR-096, a phase II trial of ribociclib in combination with everolimus in advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDL), and leiomyosarcoma (LMS).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11515-11515
Author(s):  
Margaret von Mehren ◽  
Sujana Movva ◽  
Elizabeth A. Handorf ◽  
Priscilla Merriam ◽  
Jeffrey A. Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma ◽  
Stage Design ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Ring Chromosomes ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

11515 Background: Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDL) is characterized by ring chromosomes of chromosone12, which includes amplification of MDM2 and CDK4. Exposure to CDK4 inhibitors in Rb+ leiomyosarcoma (LMS) cell lines leads to decreased cell proliferation, and increased senescence, and G0/G1-phase arrest. When combined, ribociclib a CDK4 inhibitor and everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor show synergistic growth inhibition in multiple tumor models. We hypothesized that this combination could lead to increased disease control in patients with DDL. Methods: This study enrolled patients (pts) into one of two cohorts: DDL or Rb+ LMS. LMS pts were required to have 1 prior line of therapy; DDL pts required no prior therapy. There were no limits to prior therapies in either group. Measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 was also required. Ribociclib was given at 300 mg daily for 21/28 days and everolimus was given continuously at 2.5 mg daily in 28 day cycles. The primary endpoint was progression free rate at 16 weeks. A Simon two-stage design was utilized and if at least 8 out of 24 pts were progression free at 16 weeks, the treatment was declared promising for the cohort. Here in we present data on the DDL cohort. Results: To date, 21 DDS pts, median age of 63 (range 40-79), of which 43% (n = 9) female were treated. Median prior lines of therapy was 1 (range 0-6). Of 19 pts with complete data, 8 (42%) met the primary endpoint of non-progression at 16 weeks. Confirmed partial response was seen in 2 pts (10%). Median PFS was 16 weeks, and stable disease occurring as best response in 11 (55%) pts. Grade 3-4 toxicities were uncommon except for lymphopenia (24%) and neutropenia (33%); no episode of neutropenic fever were observed. There was one death on study secondary to myocardial infarction, considered possibly related to therapy. Results of optional tissue biopsies pre and on therapy obtained to assess pharmacodynamic changes in PTEN, pAKT, CDK4, Rb and pS6 will be presented. Conclusions: The combination of ribociclib and everolimus demonstrates activity in DDL with prolonged stable disease (>16 weeks) meeting the primary protocol endpoint. Notably partial responses were also observed. The combination was well tolerated with acceptable side effects. Updated outcomes will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03114527.

A phase 1b, open-label, dose-escalation study to evaluate camidanlumab tesirine (Cami) as monotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2556-2556
Author(s):  
Igor Puzanov ◽  
Patricia LoRusso ◽  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
Christopher T. Chen ◽  
Yvan LeBruchec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Treatment Withdrawal ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3

2556 Background: Depletion of tumor-infiltrating CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), which inhibit tumor-specific immune responses, could contribute to tumor eradication. Cami (ADCT-301), an anti-CD25, pyrrolobenzodiazepine-based antibody-drug conjugate, targets CD25+ Tregs. A mouse surrogate has shown potent antitumor activity in solid tumor models. Here we report preliminary data from the monotherapy arm of a phase 1b trial of Cami in pts with selected advanced solid tumors. Methods: The monotherapy dose-escalation part of this open-label study enrolled pts (aged ≥18 years) with selected advanced solid tumors and no suitable existing therapy. The primary objective was to characterize safety and tolerability, and to identify the recommended phase 2 dose of Cami monotherapy. Secondary and exploratory objectives included evaluation of preliminary antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity. Pts received Cami every 3 weeks (1 cycle) with dose escalation per a 3+3 design. Disease control rate (DCR) was assessed (complete and partial responses [CR, PR] and stable disease). Results: At data cut-off (Dec 17, 2020), 44 pts were enrolled, with primary tumor types (stage IVA/B: 27 pts; 61.4%) of colorectal (15 pts; 34.1%), pancreatic (14 pts; 31.8%), head and neck, ovarian/fallopian tube, and renal cell carcinoma (all 3 pts; 6.8%), non-small cell lung cancer (2 pts; 4.5%), gastric, esophageal/GEJ, melanoma, and triple-negative breast cancer (each 1 pt; 2.3%). Median (range) age was 60.5 (33–82) years; median (range) number of prior systemic therapies was 4 (1–9). Pts received a median (range) of 2 (1–6) Cami cycles at doses of 20–150 µg/kg. Median (range) treatment duration was 22 (1–178) days. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. All-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in ≥20% pts were nausea (18 pts; 40.9%), decreased appetite and fatigue (each 16 pts; 36.4%), constipation (13 pts; 29.5%), abdominal pain (11 pts; 25%), and rash (10 pts; 22.7%). The only Grade ≥3 TEAE in ≥10% pts was anemia (5 pts; 11.4%). Grade 3 autoimmune AEs (colitis, immune-mediated AE, systemic inflammatory response syndrome) and neurologic AEs (dysphagia and asthenia, but not GBS) were reported in 3 (6.8%) and 2 (4.5%) pts, respectively. 1 (2.3%) Cami-related TEAE led to treatment withdrawal; no Cami-related TEAEs were fatal. DCR was 25% (95% CI: 11.1, 34.7); 11/44 pts attained stable disease. No pts had CR or PR. Conclusions: Dose escalation of Cami monotherapy is complete. The safety profile is encouraging and MTD was not reached. PK/PD data will be presented. 150 µg/kg is the highest dose investigated for single-agent Cami and the highest to be investigated combined with pembrolizumab in selected advanced solid tumors in the current protocol. Funding: ADC Therapeutics SA NCT03621982. Clinical trial information: NCT03621982.

Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Conventional-Dose Doxorubicin Plus Ifosfamide Versus High-Dose Doxorubicin Plus Ifosfamide Plus Recombinant Human Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (14) ◽  
pp. 2676-2684 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Le Cesne ◽  
I. Judson ◽  
D. Crowther ◽  
S. Rodenhuis ◽  
H.J. Keizer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Dose Regimen ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Macrophage Colony ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stimulating Factor

PURPOSE: This randomized multicenter study was designed to compare the activity of a high-dose doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy regimen with a conventional standard-dose regimen in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (ASTS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1992 and 1995, 314 patients were randomized to receive a standard-dose regimen (arm A), containing doxorubicin (50 mg/m2 on day 1) and ifosfamide (5 g/m2 on day 1), or an intensified regimen (arm B), combining doxorubicin (75 mg/m2 on day 1), the same ifosfamide dose, and recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF; sargramostim, 250 μg/m2 on days 3 to 16); all courses were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: The median age of the 294 eligible patients was 50 years. They received a median of five chemotherapy cycles. The median dose and relative doxorubicin dose-intensity achieved were 245 mg and 97% in arm A and 360 mg and 99% in arm B, respectively. Thirty-eight percent and 23% of patients presented with leiomyosarcomas and liver metastases, respectively. Objective responses were observed in 31 (21%) of 147 assessable patients in arm A and in 31 (23.3%) of 133 in arm B (P = .65). No change was observed in 41.6% and 46.2% of patients in arm A and B, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the intensive arm (P = .03). The median duration of the time to progression was 19 weeks in the conventional arm and 29 weeks in the intensified arm. There was no difference in overall survival (P = .98) between the two therapeutic arms. Toxicities were manageable in both arms. A grade 3/4 neutropenia and infection occurred in 92% and 4.6% of patients in arm A, respectively, and in 90% and 16.6% in arm B, respectively. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was more frequent in arm B. CONCLUSION: The use of rhGM-CSF allowed safe escalation of chemotherapy doses. Despite a 50% increase of the doxorubicin dose-intensity, the high-dose regimen failed to demonstrate any impact on survival in patients with ASTS. The low complete response rate, the high incidence of leiomyosarcomas, and liver metastases may in part explain these results. However, the lengthening of the PFS in the intensive arm, because of the quality of stable disease and inappropriate tumor evaluation policies that potentially lead to an underestimation of antitumor activity, does not definitively refute the use of a high-dose chemotherapy regimen in selected patients with ASTS.

Role of New Chemotherapy Agents in Soft Tissue Sarcoma

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-205
Author(s):  
Margaret von Mehren
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Serine Threonine Kinase ◽  
Threonine Kinase ◽  
Cell Cycle Activation ◽  
Metastatic Gist ◽  
Chemotherapy Agents

Medical management of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) has been restricted by the limited availability of active drugs. A plethora of new oncologic agents are now available, many of which have specific therapeutic targets. Gemcitabine and docetaxel is a combination of drugs that have limited single-agent activity. Yondelis, a novel chemotherapeutic that binds DNA and functions partially by inhibiting transcription, is being tested alone and in combination with doxorubicin. Inhibitors of mTOR, a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell cycle activation and cell growth, are also being tested. Growth factor receptor inhibitors are being evaluated in a variety of sarcomas that have been found to express the targets. In addition, a variety of agents are being assessed in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Single agents and agents combined with imatinib are being tested in imatinib-refractory and in metastatic GIST. The increased use of targeted agents underscores the need for understanding sarcoma biology.

Randomized comparison of three adriamycin regimens for metastatic soft tissue sarcomas.

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 840-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
E C Borden ◽  
D A Amato ◽  
C Rosenbaum ◽  
H T Enterline ◽  
M J Shiraki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
Response Frequency ◽  
Final Treatment ◽  
Subjective Judgement ◽  
Impact On Survival ◽  
The Individual

This study addressed two major questions regarding therapeutic use of Adriamycin ([Adr] Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) in adult soft tissue sarcomas: the influence of dosing schedule and the value of adding imidazole carboxamide (DTIC) to Adr. Patients with objectively measurable metastatic soft tissue sarcomas were randomized to Adr 70 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 1 and every 3 weeks (94 patients); Adr 20 mg/m2 IV day 1, 2, and 3, and 15 mg/m2 IV day 8 and weekly thereafter (89 patients); and Adr 60 mg/m2 IV day 1 and DTIC 250 mg/m2 days 1 to 5, repeated every 3 weeks (92 patients). The regimens using Adr as a single agent resulted in an equivalent response frequency (18% and 16%) and survival (median, 8.0 and 8.4 months). DTIC significantly increased (P less than .02) the overall response frequency of Adr to 30%. However, DTIC did not influence survival (median, 8.0 months) or increase the number of complete responses. The toxicities of the two single-agent regimens differed: Adr weekly resulted in more stomatitis (P = .09) and less hematologic toxicity (P less than .05). DTIC resulted in substantially increased toxicity, primarily gastrointestinal (P less than .002); overall, 98% of patients receiving Adr-DTIC experienced moderate or worse toxicity. To decrease the potential for error in interpretation of treatment results, histopathological confirmation of diagnosis was undertaken by a panel of reference pathologists; pathology slides were submitted on 97% of entered patients. The on-study clinical diagnosis was affirmed in 199 of 316 patients (63%) with a final review. In 23% of patients, the panel agreed with the diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma, but not with the type. In 14%, the panel concluded that a diagnosis of mesenchymal malignancy could not be affirmed. Final treatment results were based on the 275 pathologically confirmed, eligible patients. The most common histological subtype entered was leiomyosarcoma (99 patients). The response to Adr-DTIC of this subtype was higher (44%) than that of any other subtype. However, this difference alone was not responsible for the overall superiority of the combination. This confirmed that the combination of DTIC plus Adr adds to the response rate of Adr alone in soft tissue sarcomas. Whether the increased response frequency, without an impact on survival, is worth the significantly greater toxicity remains a subjective judgement that must be made within the context of the individual patient.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document