Randomized comparison of three adriamycin regimens for metastatic soft tissue sarcomas.

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 840-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
E C Borden ◽  
D A Amato ◽  
C Rosenbaum ◽  
H T Enterline ◽  
M J Shiraki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
Response Frequency ◽  
Final Treatment ◽  
Subjective Judgement ◽  
Impact On Survival ◽  
The Individual

This study addressed two major questions regarding therapeutic use of Adriamycin ([Adr] Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) in adult soft tissue sarcomas: the influence of dosing schedule and the value of adding imidazole carboxamide (DTIC) to Adr. Patients with objectively measurable metastatic soft tissue sarcomas were randomized to Adr 70 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 1 and every 3 weeks (94 patients); Adr 20 mg/m2 IV day 1, 2, and 3, and 15 mg/m2 IV day 8 and weekly thereafter (89 patients); and Adr 60 mg/m2 IV day 1 and DTIC 250 mg/m2 days 1 to 5, repeated every 3 weeks (92 patients). The regimens using Adr as a single agent resulted in an equivalent response frequency (18% and 16%) and survival (median, 8.0 and 8.4 months). DTIC significantly increased (P less than .02) the overall response frequency of Adr to 30%. However, DTIC did not influence survival (median, 8.0 months) or increase the number of complete responses. The toxicities of the two single-agent regimens differed: Adr weekly resulted in more stomatitis (P = .09) and less hematologic toxicity (P less than .05). DTIC resulted in substantially increased toxicity, primarily gastrointestinal (P less than .002); overall, 98% of patients receiving Adr-DTIC experienced moderate or worse toxicity. To decrease the potential for error in interpretation of treatment results, histopathological confirmation of diagnosis was undertaken by a panel of reference pathologists; pathology slides were submitted on 97% of entered patients. The on-study clinical diagnosis was affirmed in 199 of 316 patients (63%) with a final review. In 23% of patients, the panel agreed with the diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma, but not with the type. In 14%, the panel concluded that a diagnosis of mesenchymal malignancy could not be affirmed. Final treatment results were based on the 275 pathologically confirmed, eligible patients. The most common histological subtype entered was leiomyosarcoma (99 patients). The response to Adr-DTIC of this subtype was higher (44%) than that of any other subtype. However, this difference alone was not responsible for the overall superiority of the combination. This confirmed that the combination of DTIC plus Adr adds to the response rate of Adr alone in soft tissue sarcomas. Whether the increased response frequency, without an impact on survival, is worth the significantly greater toxicity remains a subjective judgement that must be made within the context of the individual patient.

Role of New Chemotherapy Agents in Soft Tissue Sarcoma

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-205
Author(s):  
Margaret von Mehren
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Serine Threonine Kinase ◽  
Threonine Kinase ◽  
Cell Cycle Activation ◽  
Metastatic Gist ◽  
Chemotherapy Agents

Medical management of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) has been restricted by the limited availability of active drugs. A plethora of new oncologic agents are now available, many of which have specific therapeutic targets. Gemcitabine and docetaxel is a combination of drugs that have limited single-agent activity. Yondelis, a novel chemotherapeutic that binds DNA and functions partially by inhibiting transcription, is being tested alone and in combination with doxorubicin. Inhibitors of mTOR, a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell cycle activation and cell growth, are also being tested. Growth factor receptor inhibitors are being evaluated in a variety of sarcomas that have been found to express the targets. In addition, a variety of agents are being assessed in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Single agents and agents combined with imatinib are being tested in imatinib-refractory and in metastatic GIST. The increased use of targeted agents underscores the need for understanding sarcoma biology.

Cellular DNA content and prognosis of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma: the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group experience.

1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 538-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
T A Alvegard ◽  
N O Berg ◽  
B Baldetorp ◽  
M Fernö ◽  
D Killander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Dna Content ◽  
Nuclear Dna ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Nuclear Dna Content ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Dna Aneuploidy

The nuclear DNA content of 148 high-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and trunk was determined by flow cytometry, using tumor material from paraffin-embedded tissue. The patients were part of a prospective randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of adjuvant single-agent chemotherapy with doxorubicin. Chemotherapy did not improve the metastasis-free survival (MFS). After a median follow-up time of 48 months (range, 2 to 97), a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for developing metastatic disease was performed. DNA aneuploidy was found to be an independent prognostic risk factor in addition to histologic malignancy grade IV, intratumoral vascular invasion, tumor size over 10 cm, and male sex. Patients with none or one risk factor had a 5-year MFS of 79%, with two risk factors 65%, with three risk factors 43%, and with four and five risk factors 0%. About one half (78 of 148) of the patients with three factors or less belonged to a group with a MFS over 60%. The combination of different risk factors, including DNA aneuploidy, seems to be a useful prognostic model for soft tissue sarcomas, which could be of value to select high-risk patients for further trials with adjunctive therapy.

Phase II Study of Doxorubicin and Bevacizumab for Patients With Metastatic Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (28) ◽  
pp. 7135-7142 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. D'Adamo ◽  
Sibyl E. Anderson ◽  
Karen Albritton ◽  
Jennifer Yamada ◽  
Elyn Riedel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Cardiac Toxicity ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Purpose To evaluate the antitumor activity and tolerability of bevacizumab and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). Patients and Methods Patients may have had up to one nonanthracycline line of therapy. Seventeen patients with metastatic STS were treated with doxorubicin at 75 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) push followed by bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks. Dexrazoxane was started for total doxorubicin dose exceeding 300 mg/m2. Results A total of 85 cycles of doxorubicin/bevacizumab were administered, median four cycles (range, one to 11), with three patients receiving one to four cycles of bevacizumab maintenance after reaching 600 mg/m2 doxorubicin. All 17 patients were assessable for response. Two partial responses (12%, 95% CI = 1% to 36%) were observed, lasting seven and 12 cycles of therapy. Eleven patients (65%) had stable disease for four cycles or more. Six patients developed cardiac toxicity grade 2 or greater, with four patients grade 2 (cumulative doxorubicin 75, 150, 300, 300 mg/m2, respectively), one grade 3 (total doxorubicin 591 mg/m2), and one grade 4 (total doxorubicin 420 mg/m2). One patient with extensive lung disease died of recurrent bilateral pneumothoraces, possibly treatment-related. Conclusion The 12% response rate for these patients was no greater than that observed for single-agent doxorubicin. However, the 65% of patients with stable disease lasting four cycles or longer suggests further study is warranted in STSs. The observed cardiac toxicity, despite close monitoring and standard use of dexrazoxane, obliges a change in the dose and/or schedule in future studies of this combination.

A novel approach to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for soft tissue sarcoma using cisplatin and adriamycin.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22515-e22515
Author(s):  
Ashley Brown ◽  
Christina Henson ◽  
Terence S. Herman ◽  
William C. Dooley ◽  
Alexis Schutz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Grading System ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Radiation Toxicity

e22515 Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are heterogeneous solid tumors of mesenchymal cell origin, often difficult to manage. Local recurrence of extremity STS with surgery alone ranges from 5-20% with amputation ; 40% with wide excision. Neoadjuvant therapies are used to improve surgical outcomes. There is currently no recognized optimal neoadjuvant chemoradiation regimen prior to resection of STS. At our institution, we have piloted a neoadjuvant regimen of daily Cisplatin with infusional Adriamycin concurrent with radiation to assess its impact on surgical outcomes and tumor control. Methods: Patients diagnosed with STS of any site were treated neoadjuvantly with Cisplatin 6mg/m2 IV over 3-5 mins given 20 to 30 minutes before radiation (5 days) for 6 weeks. Adriamycin was given in the inpatient setting at 12.5 mg/m2 IV over 24 hours on days 1-4, weeks 1 and 4. The radiation dose was 54 Gy in 30 fractions. More than 50% of patients were treated with IMRT planning. Results: Since 2011, 12 STS patients were treated preoperatively with this regimen. Of these patients, 9 underwent surgery. Six of the 9 surgical patients received this neoadjuvant protocol followed by resection in the upfront setting. All of the 6 upfront patients had negative surgical margins; all of these patients had grade 3 tumors. Necrosis was reported based on the FNCLCC grading system. The average percent of necrosis was 96.3% (95% confidence interval 50.4%, 99.8%). Toxicity: Reported according to the RTOG/EORTC Radiation toxicity grading system. Of all patients, grade 1-2 skin toxicity predominated (75%). No grade 4 toxicity reported. Hematologic toxicity: Of all patients, grade 2-3 hematologic toxicity during neoadjuvant chemotherapy was reported in 83% of patients; grade 4 in 1 patient. No febrile neutropenia occurred. Post-operative complications: Seroma/hematoma formation was the most common post-operative complication in the surgical patients. No severely delayed healing was noted. Survival:Nine of 12 patients were dead (6 of 9 surgical patients) at the time of this analysis, all of metastatic disease. Mean time to DM 7.4 months. Mean OS 10 months. Conclusions: Our novel regimen achieved high necrosis rates, and all surgical patients achieved negative margin status. These factors are prognostic and correlate with local control. The predominant pattern of failure was distant. With its acceptable toxicity, this regimen of neoadjuvant Cisplatin, Adriamycin and radiation should be examined in a randomized fashion versus neoadjuvant radiation alone to determine the long term outcomes.

scholarly journals Soft Tissue Sarcoma Guidelines

2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 364 ◽  
Author(s):  
_ _
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
The United States ◽  
Desmoid Tumors ◽  
Recent Version ◽  
Overall Mortality

Soft tissue sarcomas are the most frequent sarcomas; the annual incidence for 2007 in the United States is estimated at about 9220 cases, with an overall mortality rate of approximately 3560 cases per year. Important updates for the 2007 version of the guidelines include the addition of epirubicin (single agent) and the combination of epirubicin, ifosfamide, and mesna as generally accepted systemic therapy. Imatinib was added as an option for desmoid tumors. For the most recent version of the guidelines, please visit NCCN.org

Disparities in Amputation Rates for Non-metastatic Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas and the Impact on Survival

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 576-584
Author(s):  
Joshua C. Dilday ◽  
Daniel W. Nelson ◽  
Trevan D. Fischer ◽  
Melanie Goldfarb
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Impact On Survival ◽  
The Impact

A randomized phase II trial of cabozantinib combined with PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11583-TPS11583
Author(s):  
Vanessa Anne Eulo ◽  
Breelyn A. Wilky ◽  
Jingqin Luo ◽  
Angela C. Hirbe ◽  
Mia C. Weiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Metastatic Setting

TPS11583 Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignancies with poor prognosis in the metastatic setting. Current standard therapy includes anthracycline based chemotherapy. Cabozantinib is a multikinase inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy in solid tumors such as renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A phase II study of cabozantinib in advanced STS is underway. Cabozantinib in combination with immune checkpoint blockade has shown clinical benefit in several tumor types including HCC, RCC, non-small cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma. Since cabozantinib may alter PD-1 expression in regulatory T-cells and promote an immune permissive environment, we hypothesize that combining cabozantinib with immune checkpoint inhibition is a therapeutic strategy that will be more effective than cabozantinib alone. Additionally, the design of the trial will allow assessment of whether pretreatment with cabozantinib will enhance the efficacy of nivolumab and ipilimumab alone. Methods: This is an open label, multicenter, randomized phase II clinical trial of cabozantinib (60mg orally daily as a single agent, 40mg in combination) with or without combination Ipilimumab (ipi, 1mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses) and Nivolumab (nivo, 3mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for four doses, then 480mg IV every 4 weeks) in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic STS refractory to up to two lines of chemotherapy. 105 pts with non-translocation driven sarcomas will be enrolled at three US sites and randomized 2:1 to the combination group. Pts will be stratified by prior pazopanib use and balanced for histologies. Patients who progress on arm A will cross over to combination therapy (arm B). The primary efficacy endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. 35 patients in Cohort A (cabozantinib alone) and 70 patients in Cohort B (cabozantinib plus ipi/nivo) will be required to detect an increase of the ORR from 10% in cohort A to 30% in cohort B with 81% power with a one-sided alpha level of 10%. Key eligibility criteria include: at least 18 years of age, ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, ≤2 prior lines of therapy and measurable disease. Exclusion criteria include: translocation-driven sarcoma except alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), prior immunotherapy, and chronic use of corticosteroids or other immunosuppression. Secondary endpoints are safety, overall and progression free survival, disease control rate, and response rate to ipilimumab and nivolumab after cabozantinib pretreatment. Mandatory tumor biopsies pre-treatment and at 6 weeks will be obtained. Peripheral blood will be collected for circulating immune phenotyping. Enrollment will occur at 3 participating institutions and is expected to be completed in 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04551430.

Feasibility of Preoperative Chemotherapy With or Without Radiation Therapy in Localized Soft Tissue Sarcomas of Limbs and Superficial Trunk in the Italian Sarcoma Group/Grupo Español de Investigación en Sarcomas Randomized Clinical Trial: Three Versus Five Cycles of Full-Dose Epirubicin Plus Ifosfamide

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (31) ◽  
pp. 3628-3634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Palassini ◽  
Stefano Ferrari ◽  
Paolo Verderio ◽  
Antonino De Paoli ◽  
Javier Martin Broto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Preoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose We report on feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy (RT) in the context of a phase III randomized clinical trial involving localized, high-risk, soft tissue sarcomas. Patients and Methods Of 321 eligible patients, 161 were randomly assigned to three preoperative cycles of epirubicin 120 mg/m2 plus ifosfamide 9 g/m2, and 160 were randomly assigned to three preoperative plus two postoperative cycles. Among them, 303 patients were included in this analysis; 169 were male and 134 were female, with a median age of 48 years (range, 15 to 79 years). One hundred fifty-two patients received concurrent RT preoperatively at a total dose of 44 to 50 Gy. Preoperative chemotherapy-related hematologic toxicity and early postoperative complications were reported. The influence of RT, age, and sex on hematologic grade 3 or 4 toxicities and wound complications was analyzed. Chemotherapeutic dose intensity (DI) was analyzed. Results Among the patients, 61.4%, 22.4%, and 23.8% experienced, grade 4 leucopenia, grade 3 or 4 anemia, and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, respectively. Respective rates were 66.4%, 24.3%, and 31.6% when RT was added preoperatively, and 56.3%, 20.5%, and 15.9% when preoperative chemotherapy was administered alone. Patient age affected grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 4 leucopenia and grade 3 or 4 anemia presented 2.5 times more frequently in female patients than in male patients. Wound complications were observed in 13.5% of patients: 17% with preoperative RT and 10% without. Chemotherapeutic DI was greater than 90%, even in patients receiving preoperative RT and in patients age 65 years or older. Conclusion This preoperative chemotherapy is feasible and can also be proposed for selected elderly patients. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was common, but DI was excellent. Concurrent preoperative RT is safe, although an increased rate of grade 4 thrombocytopenia and limited increase in wound complications may be observed.

Randomized comparison of doxorubicin alone versus ifosfamide plus doxorubicin or mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin against advanced soft tissue sarcomas.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1269-1275 ◽  
Author(s):  
J H Edmonson ◽  
L M Ryan ◽  
R H Blum ◽  
J S Brooks ◽  
M Shiraki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Significant Survival ◽  
Receive Treatment ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Group B ◽  
Survival Differences

PURPOSE This three-armed phase III study in adults with advanced soft tissue sarcomas was planned as a comparison of objective regression rates, toxicity, and survival of patients receiving doxorubicin alone, ifosfamide plus doxorubicin, and mitomycin plus doxorubicin plus cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between December 1987 and July 1990, 279 patients with histologically confirmed sarcomas were enrolled to receive treatment A (doxorubicin 80 mg/m2), treatment B (ifosfamide 7.5 g/m2 plus doxorubicin 60 mg/m2), or treatment C (mitomycin 8 mg/m2 plus doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2). RESULTS Of 262 assessable patients, 74 (29%) achieved objective tumor regression. Objective regression occurred in 20% of the 90 patients who received doxorubicin alone (complete remission [CR] rate, 2%), in 34% of the 88 who received ifosfamide plus doxorubicin (CR rate, 3%), and in 32% of the 84 who received mitomycin plus doxorubicin plus cisplatin (CR rate, 7%). With grade 3 or greater myelosuppression in 53% of group A, 80% of group B, and 55% of group C, regimen B was significantly more myelosuppressive than either regimen A or C (P = .01) with two, three, and one treatment-related deaths, respectively. Synovial sarcomas were responsive to ifosfamide plus doxorubicin, especially among patients younger than 40 years of age. CONCLUSION Ifosfamide plus doxorubicin produced a significantly higher regression rate (P = .03) than did doxorubicin alone; however, this was achieved at a level of myelosuppression significantly more intense than that produced by the single agent or by the three-drug combination. Mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin also appeared to be more active than the single agent; however, at a myelosuppression level similar to that of doxorubicin alone, this trend (P = .07) did not attain the usual level for significance. No significant survival differences were observed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document