scholarly journals A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Belinostat (PXD101) in Combination with Doxorubicin in Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Sarcoma ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Vitfell-Rasmussen ◽  
Ian Judson ◽  
Akmal Safwat ◽  
Robin L. Jones ◽  
Philip Blach Rossen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Deacetylase Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3

Background. Belinostat is a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor.Primary Objectives. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) of belinostat (Bel) in combination with doxorubicin (Dox) in solid tumours (phase I) and response rate (RR) in soft tissue sarcomas (phase II).Methods. Bel was administered as a 30-minute IV infusion on days 1–5 and on day 5 with Dox. The dose escalation schedule was as follows: cohort 1: Bel 600 mg/m2and 50 mg/m2Dox, cohort 2: Bel 600 mg/m2and 75 mg/m2Dox, cohort 3: Bel 800 mg/m2and 75 mg/m2Dox, and cohort 4: Bel 1000 mg/m2and 75 mg/m2Dox.Results. 41 patients were included (25 in phase I, 16 in phase II). Adverse events were fatigue (95%), nausea (76%), and alopecia (63%). There was one DLT, grade 3 rash/hand and foot syndrome. MTD was Bel 1000 mg/m2/d and Dox 75 mg/m2. Four responses were seen: 2 PR in phase I, RR of 8%; in phase II, 1 PR/1 CR, RR of 13%, and 9 patients (56%) with SD.Conclusion. The combination was well tolerated. Response rate was moderate but median time to progression was 6.0 months (95% CI, 1.6–9.7 months) which is superior to some reports of single-agent Dox.

A phase I/II study of combination therapy of S-1 and irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15023-e15023
Author(s):  
Y. Choi ◽  
T. Kim ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
H. Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Recurrent Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Level I ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

e15023 Background: To investigate S-1 and irinotecan (CPT-11) combination as an alternative to infusional 5- fluorouracil/leucovorin plus CPT-11, we performed a phase I/II trial to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), efficacy and toxicity in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer. In addition, we evaluated the association between genotypes of candidate genes and phenotypes. Methods: S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 70 mg/m2 (level I-III) or 80 (IV and V) from day 1 to 14. CPT-11 was given i.v. on day 1, stepping up to 175 (level I), 200 (II), 225 (III and IV) or 250 (V) mg/m2 . The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. The association of the UGT1A1 genotypes (*6, *28, and *60) and CYP2A6 genotypes (*4, *7, and *9) with toxicities or efficacy were analyzed in patients who participated in phase II portion. Results: Twenty-three patients entered the phase I and 30 enrolled in phase II study. The MTD of S-1 and CPT-11 was considered to be 80 mg/m2 and 250 mg/m2, respectively. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were diarrhea and neutropenia. The recommended dose (RD) was determined at a S-1 dose of 80 mg/m2 and a CPT- 11 dose of 225 mg/m2. The overall response rate was 66.7% (95% CI, 48.7–84.6) at the RD level. Median time to progression was 7.6 months (95 % CI, 5.7–9.5). Median survival time was not reached. Grade3–4 neutropenia was observed in 53.4% of the patients. Grade 3–4 nonhematologic toxicities were diarrhea (16.7%) and asthenia (6.7%). The frequencies of UGT1A1*60, *28, and *6 allele were 25.8%, 10.3%, and 15.5%, respectively. Homozygous for *28 or *6 were not observed. All three double heterozygous for *28 and *6 experienced grade 3–4 neutropenia. The allele frequencies of CYP2A6*4, *7, and *9 were 15.5%, 8.6%, and 29.3%, respectively. There were no association between CYP2A6 genotypes and response rates or toxicities. Conclusions: The combination of S-1 and CPT-11 was effective and had manageable toxicities in patients with metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

High-dose ifosfamide in bone and soft tissue sarcomas: results of phase II and pilot studies--dose-response and schedule dependence.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 2378-2384 ◽  
Author(s):  
S R Patel ◽  
S Vadhan-Raj ◽  
N Papadopolous ◽  
C Plager ◽  
M A Burgess ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of high-dose ifosfamide (HDI) at a total dose of 14 g/m2 per cycle with mesna in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in adult patients with sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between July 1991 and February 1994, 74 patients with sarcomas (37 bone and 37 soft tissue) were treated on two simultaneous phase II studies that evaluated HDI given as a continuous infusion over 74 hours. G-CSF was started on day 5 at 5 microg/kg/d until recovery of granulocyte count. Additionally, between March 1993 and March 1994, 15 similar patients with previously treated bone or soft tissue sarcomas were treated on a pilot study in which the same total dose of ifosfamide was administered by a bolus schedule, along with mesna and G-CSF. Patients were treated until maximal response, and where possible, surgical resection of gross disease was performed. RESULTS Seventy-two patients from the phase II study using continuous infusion are assessable for response. Four complete responses (CRs) and 17 partial responses (PRs) were noted, for an overall response rate of 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19% to 39%). The response rate was 40% (95% CI, 24% to 56%) for bone sarcomas and 19% (95% CI, 6% to 32%) for soft tissue sarcomas. Fourteen patients from the pilot study that used a bolus schedule are assessable for response. One CR and seven PRs were noted, for an overall response rate of 57% (95% CI, 31% to 83%) and a response rate of 45% for soft tissue sarcomas. Two patients developed grade 3 to 4 renal toxicity, three developed grade 3 CNS toxicity, one had possible grade 3 cardiac toxicity, and two developed severe painful peripheral neuropathy. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION HDI at 14 g/m2 with mesna and G-CSF is an active salvage regimen for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas. There is a definite positive dose-response curve, and bolus administration appears to be more active than continuous infusion.

A randomized phase II trial of cabozantinib combined with PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11583-TPS11583
Author(s):  
Vanessa Anne Eulo ◽  
Breelyn A. Wilky ◽  
Jingqin Luo ◽  
Angela C. Hirbe ◽  
Mia C. Weiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Metastatic Setting

TPS11583 Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignancies with poor prognosis in the metastatic setting. Current standard therapy includes anthracycline based chemotherapy. Cabozantinib is a multikinase inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy in solid tumors such as renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A phase II study of cabozantinib in advanced STS is underway. Cabozantinib in combination with immune checkpoint blockade has shown clinical benefit in several tumor types including HCC, RCC, non-small cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma. Since cabozantinib may alter PD-1 expression in regulatory T-cells and promote an immune permissive environment, we hypothesize that combining cabozantinib with immune checkpoint inhibition is a therapeutic strategy that will be more effective than cabozantinib alone. Additionally, the design of the trial will allow assessment of whether pretreatment with cabozantinib will enhance the efficacy of nivolumab and ipilimumab alone. Methods: This is an open label, multicenter, randomized phase II clinical trial of cabozantinib (60mg orally daily as a single agent, 40mg in combination) with or without combination Ipilimumab (ipi, 1mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses) and Nivolumab (nivo, 3mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for four doses, then 480mg IV every 4 weeks) in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic STS refractory to up to two lines of chemotherapy. 105 pts with non-translocation driven sarcomas will be enrolled at three US sites and randomized 2:1 to the combination group. Pts will be stratified by prior pazopanib use and balanced for histologies. Patients who progress on arm A will cross over to combination therapy (arm B). The primary efficacy endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. 35 patients in Cohort A (cabozantinib alone) and 70 patients in Cohort B (cabozantinib plus ipi/nivo) will be required to detect an increase of the ORR from 10% in cohort A to 30% in cohort B with 81% power with a one-sided alpha level of 10%. Key eligibility criteria include: at least 18 years of age, ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, ≤2 prior lines of therapy and measurable disease. Exclusion criteria include: translocation-driven sarcoma except alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), prior immunotherapy, and chronic use of corticosteroids or other immunosuppression. Secondary endpoints are safety, overall and progression free survival, disease control rate, and response rate to ipilimumab and nivolumab after cabozantinib pretreatment. Mandatory tumor biopsies pre-treatment and at 6 weeks will be obtained. Peripheral blood will be collected for circulating immune phenotyping. Enrollment will occur at 3 participating institutions and is expected to be completed in 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04551430.

scholarly journals ACTR-01. PHASE I/II STUDY OF TEMOZOLOMIDE PLUS NIMUSTINE CHEMOTHERAPY FOR RECURRENT MALIGNANT GLIOMAS: KYOTO NEURO-ONCOLOGY GROUP

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi12-vi12
Author(s):  
Tomokazu Aoki ◽  
Yoshiki Arakawa ◽  
Tetsuya Ueba ◽  
Masashi Oda ◽  
Namiko Nishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Malignant Gliomas ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

Abstract The objective of this phase I/II study was to examine the efficacy and toxicity profile of temozolomide (TMZ) plus nimustine (ACNU). Patients who had received a standard radiotherapy with one or two previous chemoregimens were enrolled. In phase I, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) by TMZ (150 mg/m2/day) (Day 1–5) plus various doses of ACNU (30, 35, 40, 45 mg/m2/day) (Day 15) per 4 weeks was defined on a standard 3 + 3 design. In phase II, these therapeutic activity and safety of this regimen were evaluated. Forty-nine eligible patients were enrolled. The median age was 50 years-old. Eighty percent had a KPS of 70–100. Histologies were glioblastoma (73%), anaplastic astrocytoma (22%), anaplastic oligodendroglioma (4%). In phase I, 15 patients were treated at four cohorts by TMZ plus ACNU. MTD was TMZ (150 mg/m2) plus ACNU (40 mg/m2). In phase II, 40 patients were treated at the dose of cohort 3 (MTD). Thirty-five percent of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities, mainly hematologic. The overall response rate was 11% (4/37). Sixty-eight percent (25/37) had stable disease. Twenty-two percent (8/37) showed progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 6 and 12 months were 24% (95% CI, 12–35%) and 8% (95% CI, 4–15%). Median PFS was 13 months (95% CI, 9.2–17.2 months). Overall survival (OS) at 6 and 12 were 78% (95% CI, 67–89%) and 49% (95% CI, 33–57%). Median OS was 11.8 months (95% CI, 8.2–14.5 months). This phase I/II study showed a moderate toxicity in hematology and may has a promising efficacy in OS, without inferiority in PFS.

scholarly journals CTNI-32. PHASE I/II STUDY OF TEMOZOLOMIDE PLUS NIMUSTINE CHEMOTHERAPY FOR RECURRENT MALIGNANT GLIOMAS: KYOTO NEURO-ONCOLOGY GROUP

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii49-ii50
Author(s):  
Tomokazu Aoki ◽  
Yoshiki Arakawa ◽  
Tetsuya Ueba ◽  
Masashi Oda ◽  
Namiko Nishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Malignant Gliomas ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

Abstract The objective of this phase I/II study was to examine the efficacy and toxicity profile of temozolomide (TMZ) plus nimustine (ACNU). Patients who had received a standard radiotherapy with one or two previous chemo-regimens were enrolled. In phase I, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) by TMZ (150 mg/m2/day) (Day 1–5) plus various doses of ACNU (30, 35, 40, 45 mg/m2/day) (Day 15) per 4 weeks was defined on a standard 3 + 3 design. In phase II, these therapeutic activity and safety of this regimen were evaluated. Forty-nine eligible patients were enrolled. The median age was 50 years-old. Eighty percent had a KPS of 70–100. Histologies were glioblastoma (73%), anaplastic astrocytoma (22%), anaplastic oligodendroglioma (4%). In phase I, 15 patients were treated at four cohorts by TMZ plus ACNU. MTD was TMZ (150 mg/m2) plus ACNU (40 mg/m2). In phase II, 40 patients were treated at the dose of cohort 3 (MTD). Thirty-five percent of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities, mainly hematologic. The overall response rate was 11% (4/37). Sixty-eight percent (25/37) had stable disease. Twenty-two percent (8/37) showed progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 6 and 12 months were 24% (95% CI, 12–35%) and 8% (95% CI, 4–15%). Median PFS was 13 months (95% CI, 9.2–17.2 months). Overall survival (OS) at 6 and 12 were 78% (95% CI, 67–89%) and 49% (95% CI, 33–57%). Median OS was 11.8 months (95% CI, 8.2–14.5 months). This phase I/II study showed a moderate toxicity in hematology and may has a promising efficacy in OS, without inferiority in PFS.

scholarly journals EPCT-19. A PHASE I STUDY OF RIBOCICLIB AND EVEROLIMUS FOLLOWING RADIATION THERAPY IN CHILDREN WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED NON-BIOPSIED DIFFUSE PONTINE GLIOMAS (DIPG) AND RB+ BIOPSIED DIPG AND HIGH GRADE GLIOMAS (HGG)

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii307-iii307
Author(s):  
Mariko DeWire ◽  
James Leach ◽  
Christine Fuller ◽  
Peter de Blank ◽  
Trent Hummel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Grade Gliomas ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Abstract Genomic aberrations in the cell cycle and mTOR pathways have been reported in diffuse pontine gliomas (DIPG) and high-grade gliomas (HGG). Dual inhibition of CDK4/6 (ribociclib) and mTOR (everolimus) has strong biologic rationale, non-overlapping single-agent toxicities, and adult clinical experience. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase two dose (RP2D) of ribociclib and everolimus administered during maintenance therapy following radiotherapy was determined in the phase I study as a rolling 6 design. Ribociclib and everolimus were administered once daily for 21 days and 28 days, respectively starting two-four weeks post completion of radiotherapy. All HGG patients and any DIPG patient who had undergone biopsy were screened for RB protein by immunohistochemistry. Eighteen eligible patients enrolled (median age 8 years; range: 2–18). Six patients enrolled at dose levels 1,2, and 3 without dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Currently, five patients are enrolled at dose level 3 expansion cohort. The median number of cycles are 4.5 (range: 1–20+). Among the expansion cohort, one dose limiting toxicity included a grade 3 infection and one patient required a dose reduction in course 3 due to grade 3 ALT and grade 4 hypokalemia. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia. Preliminary pharmacokinetic studies on 12 patients suggest an impact of ribociclib on everolimus pharmacokinetics. The MTD/RP2D of ribociclib and everolimus following radiotherapy in newly diagnosed DIPG and HGG is anticipated to be 170 mg/m2/day x 21 days and 1.5 mg/ m2/day every 28 days which is equivalent to the adult RP2D.

Combination of Oxaliplatin Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Gastrointestinal Tumors: Results of Two Independent Phase I Studies With Pharmacokinetics

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1751-1751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Wasserman ◽  
Caroline Cuvier ◽  
François Lokiec ◽  
François Goldwasser ◽  
Salima Kalla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Phase I Studies ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Minute Period ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Febrile Episodes

PURPOSE: Two phase I studies of the oxaliplatin and irinotecan combination were performed in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients to characterize the safety and pharmacokinetics of the regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a performance status (PS) of ≤2 and normal hematologic, hepatic, and renal functions received oxaliplatin (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed 1 hour later by irinotecan administered over a 30-minute period, every 3 weeks. Dose levels that were explored ranged from 85 to 110 mg/m2 for oxaliplatin and 150 to 250 mg/m2 for irinotecan. Plasma pharmacokinetics of total and ultrafiltrable platinum, irinotecan, SN-38, and its glucuronide, SN-38G, were determined. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas (24 with colorectal cancer [CRC], four with pancreas cancer, four with gastric cancer, three with hepatocarcinoma, and four with other) received 216 treatment cycles. Median age was 54 years (range, 21 to 72 years); 95% had PS of 0 to 1; all but six had failed fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The maximum-tolerated dose was oxaliplatin 110 mg/m2 plus irinotecan 200 mg/m2 in one study and oxaliplatin 110 mg/m2 plus irinotecan 250 mg/m2 in the other study. Grade 3 to 4 diarrhea and febrile neutropenia were dose-limiting toxicities; other toxicities included emesis and dose-cumulative neuropathy. Recommended dose for phase II studies is oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and irinotecan 200 mg/m2. At this dose (12 patients, 65 cycles), grade 3 and 4 toxicities per patient included the following: emesis in 42% of patients, neutropenia in 33% (febrile episodes in 17%), peripheral neuropathy in 25%, delayed diarrhea in 17%, and thrombocytopenia in 8%. Two patients with Gilbert's syndrome experienced severe irinotecan toxicity. No plasmatic pharmacokinetic interactions were detected. Seven partial responses were observed in 24 CRC patients. CONCLUSION: This combination is feasible, with activity in 5-FU–resistant CRC patients. Phase I studies that explore the every-2-weeks schedule, in addition to phase II studies of this schedule (as well as in combination with 5-FU) as second-line therapy of metastatic CRC, are ongoing.

Phase II Study of Doxorubicin and Bevacizumab for Patients With Metastatic Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (28) ◽  
pp. 7135-7142 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. D'Adamo ◽  
Sibyl E. Anderson ◽  
Karen Albritton ◽  
Jennifer Yamada ◽  
Elyn Riedel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Cardiac Toxicity ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Purpose To evaluate the antitumor activity and tolerability of bevacizumab and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). Patients and Methods Patients may have had up to one nonanthracycline line of therapy. Seventeen patients with metastatic STS were treated with doxorubicin at 75 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) push followed by bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks. Dexrazoxane was started for total doxorubicin dose exceeding 300 mg/m2. Results A total of 85 cycles of doxorubicin/bevacizumab were administered, median four cycles (range, one to 11), with three patients receiving one to four cycles of bevacizumab maintenance after reaching 600 mg/m2 doxorubicin. All 17 patients were assessable for response. Two partial responses (12%, 95% CI = 1% to 36%) were observed, lasting seven and 12 cycles of therapy. Eleven patients (65%) had stable disease for four cycles or more. Six patients developed cardiac toxicity grade 2 or greater, with four patients grade 2 (cumulative doxorubicin 75, 150, 300, 300 mg/m2, respectively), one grade 3 (total doxorubicin 591 mg/m2), and one grade 4 (total doxorubicin 420 mg/m2). One patient with extensive lung disease died of recurrent bilateral pneumothoraces, possibly treatment-related. Conclusion The 12% response rate for these patients was no greater than that observed for single-agent doxorubicin. However, the 65% of patients with stable disease lasting four cycles or longer suggests further study is warranted in STSs. The observed cardiac toxicity, despite close monitoring and standard use of dexrazoxane, obliges a change in the dose and/or schedule in future studies of this combination.

A Phase I/II Study of Bortezomib and Low Dose Intravenous Melphalan (BM) for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Popat ◽  
Heather E. Oakervee ◽  
Nicola Foot ◽  
Samir Agrawal ◽  
Patricia Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles

Abstract Background: Bortezomib as a single agent has known efficacy in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma. The overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) was 35% in the SUMMIT study and 46% in the APEX study. In-vitro studies including our own have demonstrated potent synergy with other chemotherapeutic agents such as melphalan. It therefore follows that responses to bortezomib may be further improved by the combination of such drugs. Aims: The primary objectives of this Phase I/II study was to assess the safety, tolerability and response rates in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma; secondary objectives being time to progression (TTP) and overall surival (OS). Methods: This was a multi-centre, non-randomised trial for patients with relapsed myeloma. Patients received bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on days 1,4,8 and 11 of each 28 day cycle with melphalan on day 2 at increasing dose levels. This was initially at 10mg/m2, but due to cytopenias subsequently at 2.5 and 5mg/m2 (levels 1a, 1 and 2) and we plan to escalate to 7.5mg/m2. Up to 8 cycles were given with dexamethasone added for stable or progressive disease after 4 or 2 cycles respectively. Responses were determined by EBMT criteria. Results: To date, 18 patients have been enrolled (12 male 6 female; median age 60 [range 44–73]; median number of prior therapies 3 [range 1–5] of which 17 have had at least one autologous stem cell procedure with high dose melphalan; 10 prior thalidomide and 2 prior bortezomib). 12 patients received melphalan at 10mg/m2 but due to unacceptable delays predominantly due to thrombocytopaenia, subsequent treatment levels commenced at 2.5mg/m2. The median number of cycles completed thus far is 4 (range 0–8) and of the 16 evaluable, the overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) across all treatment levels was 50% rising to 75% following the addition of dexamethasone as per protocol. At level 1a (melphalan 10mg/m2 ,N=12, median number of cycles completed =5) the best responses (with dexamethasone as indicated) were: 1CR, 1 VGPR, 5 PR, 2 MR; at level 1 (melphalan 2.5mg/m2, N=4) 1 PR, 2 MR (after 2 cycles only). The median time to any response was 1 cycle (range 1–3 ). Three patients have progressive disease, but the median TTP and OS have not yet been reached (median follow-up 3 months). Non-haematological toxicities have been modest with 7 SAEs reported of which only 1 was possibly drug related (myocardial infarction), and 4 episodes of Grade 3 neuropathy (2 resulting in study withdrawal). The commonest grade 3–4 haematological toxicity was thrombocytopaenia (N=10) complicated by bleeding in one patient, followed by neutropenia (N=6). Summary: The combination of bortezomib and intravenous melphalan can be given safely to patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and dose escalation is ongoing. Myelosupression was the commonest grade 3–4 adverse event. A response rate of 50% was seen, which was further improved to 75% with the addition of dexamethasone. This combination may therefore result in higher responses than single agent bortezomib in heavily pretreated patients.

A Phase I/II Trial of Bortezomib, Low Dose Intravenous Melphalan and Dexamethasone for Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3542-3542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Popat ◽  
Catherine Williams ◽  
Mark Cook ◽  
Charles Craddock ◽  
Supratik Basu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Bortezomib is an effective treatment for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma with an overall response rate (MR+PR+CR) of 46% and time to progression of 6.2 months (APEX study). We and others have previously demonstrated potent in-vitro synergy with chemotherapeutic agents such as melphalan and it is likely that this will translate into improved responses in the clinical setting. Methods: This was a multi-centre, non-randomised Phase I/II clinical trial for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 was given on Days 1,4,8 and 11 of a 28 day cycle, and intravenous melphalan on Day 2 for a maximum of 8 cycles. In the Phase I component melphalan was given at 2.5, 5,7.5 and 10mg/m2 in a dose escalation scheme and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 7.5mg/m2 was taken forward to an expanded Phase II component. Dexamethasone 20mg on the day of and the day after each dose of bortezomib was permitted for progressive or stable disease after 2 or 4 cycles respectively. Responses were classified by EBMT criteria. Results: To date 39 patients have been enrolled (median age 61years [range 40–77]) with a median of 3 lines of prior therapy [range 1–5] of which 26 (67%) have had one previous autologous stem cell procedure and 4 (10%) have had two. 23 (59%) have had prior exposure to thalidomide and 4 (10%) to bortezomib. 36 have now completed at least 1 cycle and are therefore evaluable for response. The overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) across all treatment levels was 75% rising to 81% (CR 11%; nCR 3%; VGPR 8%; PR 39%; MR 19%) with the addition of dexamethasone in 13 cases for suboptimal response. Rapid responses were seen with the median time to response being 1 month [range 1–6]. The median time to progression is 10.1 months and the median overall survival has not yet been reached at a median follow-up of 7.4 months. Of the patients that have had disease progression 7 (35%) had responses of longer duration than their previous therapy. The MTD was defined by unacceptable delays in administering treatment due to myelosuppresion. The toxicities have been acceptable with 13 SAEs reported of which 8 were hospitalisation due to infection. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were: thrombocytopenia (53%), infections (25%), neutropenia (17%) and neuropathy (17%). Three grade 3 cardiac events were seen (myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation and cardiac failure) and GCSF was administered to 13 patients as treatment and prophylaxis of grade 4 neutropenia. 13 patients were withdrawn from the study due to toxicity of which 7 were for neuropathy and 3 for delayed haematological recovery. Of note, 11 patients (28%) had pre-existing grade 1 neuropathy prior to starting therapy. Summary: The combination of bortezomib, low dose intravenous melphalan and dexamethasone appears to be highly effective in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma where a response rate of 81% is seen with 14% achieving nCR/CR. The toxicity profile associated is predictable, manageable and predominantly haematological. Recruitment is ongoing to a total of 53 patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document