Hypertensison is a significant adverse effect of bevacizumab treatment

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14134-14134 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Lowery ◽  
D. G. Power ◽  
A. T. Behbehani ◽  
D. N. Carney ◽  
J. A. McCaffrey

14134 Introduction: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is upregulated in many tumours. Bevacizumab (BV) is a recombinant, humanised monoclonal antibody against the VEGF receptor and has shown promising results in phase II / III trials in colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and breast cancer. Hypertension (HT) has been reported in all studies involving BV and management of this is not well established. Methods: The records of patients treated with BV in our institution were analyzed from January to August 2006. Indications for BV therapy, incidence and management of HT, and resulting outcomes were assessed. Results: 71 patients (45 male, 28–84 years) were treated with BV, at a dose of 5mg/kg every two weeks. 87% (n=60) had colon cancer. Lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and pancreatic cancer accounted for the rest. 20% (n=14) had pre-existing HT. In all of these cases HT was well controlled with medication. 10 patients developed new-onset HT, and 7 patients experienced exacerbation of existing HT. Using the CTCAE(v3.0) guidelines for grading of HT, 5 had grade II and 10 had grade III. HT developed after a median of 15 weeks of BV (range 6–36 weeks), and a median cumulative BV dose of 20mg/kg (range 10 - 85 mg/kg). In the new onset HT cases 8 patients were controlled (BP= 140/90) with a single anti-HT, and one patient needed two or more agents (BP<160/100). In the pre-existing HT cases who needed an adjustment of anti-hypertensives, 3 were controlled (BP=160/100) with two or more agents and 4 patients required dose escalation of a single agent. In 2 patients BV was permanently discontinued. Anti-HT agents used included beta-blockers, ACE-inhibitors and Ca++- channel blockers. Conclusions: HT may develop at any point during treatment with BV. BP should be measured regularly. In this study 14% of patients developed HT de novo, and 50% experienced exacerbation of pre-existing HT. Median time to BV-induced HT was 15 weeks. There is currently no data to define which anti-HT is the best to use. BV is now becoming widely used, and as with all new targeted therapies, it is important that oncologists recognise relatively unusual side effects, and develop appropriate practice guidelines. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2011 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Ploussard ◽  
Damien Chambade ◽  
Paul Meria ◽  
François Gaudez ◽  
Edouard Tariel ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kartolo ◽  
J. Sattar ◽  
V. Sahai ◽  
T. Baetz ◽  
J. M. Lakoff

Purpose We aimed to elucidate predictive factors for the development of immune-related adverse events (iraes) in patients receiving immunotherapies for the management of advanced solid cancers.Methods This retrospective study involved all patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or inoperable melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, or renal cell carcinoma receiving immunotherapy at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario. The type and severity of iraes, as well as potential protective and exacerbating factors, were collected from patient charts.ResultsThe study included 78 patients receiving ipilimumab (32%), nivolumab (33%), or pembrolizumab (35%). Melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma accounted for 70%, 22%, and 8% of the cancers in the study population. In 41 patients (53%) iraes developed, with multiple iraes developing in 12 patients (15%). In most patients (70%), the iraes were of severity grade 1 or 2. Female sex [adjusted odds ratio (oradj): 0.094; 95% confidence interval (ci): 0.021 to 0.415; p = 0.002] and corticosteroid use before immunotherapy (oradj: 0.143; 95% ci: 0.036 to 0.562; p = 0.005) were found to be associated with a protective effect against iraes. In contrast, a history of autoimmune disease (oradj: 9.55; 95% ci: 1.34 to 68.22; p = 0.025), use of ctla-4 inhibitors (oradj: 6.25; 95% ci: 1.61 to 24.25; p = 0.008), and poor kidney function of grade 3 or greater (oradj: 10.66; 95% ci: 2.41 to 47.12; p = 0.025) were associated with a higher risk of developing iraes. A Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test demonstrated that the logistic regression model was effective at predicting the development of iraes (chi-square: 1.596; df = 7; p = 0.979).Conclusions Our study highlights several factors that affect the development of iraes in patients receiving immunotherapy. Although future studies are needed to validate the resulting model, findings from the study can help to guide risk stratification, monitoring, and management of iraes in patients given immunotherapy for advanced cancer.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. R. Latypov ◽  
O. S. Popov ◽  
V. N. Latypova ◽  
M. Yu. Grishchenko

Background. The adrenal glands are one of the most common sites of metastases in malignant disease, particularly lung cancer. The frequency of adrenal metastasis in patients with breast cancer and lung cancer reaches 39 and 35 % respectively.Materials and methods. A total of 156 patients with adrenal tumors underwent surgical treatment in the Siberian State Medical University between December 1998 and July 2017. The study included 16 (10.2 %) patients (9 males and 7 females) with adrenal metastases. The mean age of study participants was 57.6 years (range: 44–73 years).Results. By the moment of surgery, the mean metastatic adrenal tumor size was 4.9 ± 3.0 cm (range: 1.0–10.2 cm). Thirteen out of 16 patients had adrenal metastases from renal cell carcinoma, one patient – from colon cancer, one patient – from lung cancer, and one patient – from breast cancer. Nine patients had left-sided adrenal metastases, whereas six patients had right-sided adrenal metastases. Synchronous adrenal metastasis was detected in two cases: one patient had adrenal metastasis at the side of the renal tumor; the other one had bilateral renal cell carcinoma with both adrenal glands affected.We identified three main variants of the disease course according to prevailing clinical manifestations of adrenal metastasis: no manifestations, pain syndrome, and arterial hypertension.Seven participants had no clinical manifestations; of them, 6 patients had renal cell carcinoma, whereas 1 patient had breast cancer. The mean time between surgical removal of the primary tumor and detection of adrenal metastases was 24.1 months; the mean tumor size was 4.5 cm.Pain syndrome was observed in 5 patients. In three of them, adrenal metastases derived from renal cell carcinoma, in one patient – from lung cancer, and in one patient – from colon cancer. The mean time between removal of the primary tumor and detection of adrenal metastases was 19.8 months; the mean tumor size was 5.4 cm.Arterial hypertension was diagnosed in four patients. The mean time between removal of the primary tumor and identification of adrenal metastases was 27.3 months; the mean tumor size was 4.1 cm. The five-year overall survival rate in operated patient was 47.8 %.Conclusion. Regular examinations of patients after surgical treatment of malignant tumors are needed to detect adrenal metastases; surgery can extend the patient’s life. can extend the patient’s life.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 62-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haibo Nie ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Yongbin Zhao ◽  
Xiaoming Zhang ◽  
Yuansong Xiao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 323-323
Author(s):  
Maria Isabel Carlo ◽  
Kyrollis Attalla ◽  
Sujata Patil ◽  
Samuel J. Murray ◽  
Ying-Bei Chen ◽  
...  

323 Background: Immunotherapy improves survival in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but has no established role for perioperative use in patients with localized RCC. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is a promising strategy in several cancers, and may leverage the primary tumor as antigen source. Methods: We conducted a single institution pilot study of neoadjuvant nivolumab in patients with RCC undergoing nephrectomy with curative intent. Patients were eligible if their risk of metastatic recurrence within the first 12 years was >20% by an established nomogram. After confirmatory biopsy and renal MRI, patients were treated with standard dose nivolumab every 2 weeks for 4 treatments, with a follow-up renal MRI prior to nephrectomy. The primary end points of the study were safety and feasibility defined as being able to complete 3/4 treatments without surgical delay. We evaluated adverse events by CTCAE, surgical safety by Clavien-Dindo classification, and tumor radiographic response by RECIST 1.1. Results: Eighteen (11 men, 7 women; median age 60) were enrolled. All patients had clear cell RCC, median tumor size at baseline was 8.8cm (range 6.4-14.2cm). Median predicted 12-year probability of recurrence was 45% (range 25-71%). All received at least 1 dose of nivolumab; 16/18 patients completed all 4 doses. 17/18 (94%) patients completed at least 3 doses. No patient had notable delay in the timing of their nephrectomy. 4 patients had surgical complications per Clavien-Dindo classification, including 2 with grade 3a chylous ascites after lymphadenectomy. Two patients had nivolumab discontinued for immune-related adverse events, including grade 3 transaminitis and grade 2 arthralgias; a third patient developed grade 4 colitis 4 months after completing nivolumab. All patients had stable disease as the best response prior to surgery. Recurrence-free survival at 2 years was 0.74 (95%CI 0.45-0.90). We analyzed an additional 21 patients with metastatic RCC (20 ccRCC, 1 epithelioid AML) who subsequently had nephrectomy after standard immunotherapy. 15 patients had received ipilimumab+nivolumab, 6 received single-agent PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. 3 (14%) patients achieved a near or complete pathologic response, including a patient with epithelioid AML. Analysis of radiologic and pathologic biomarkers of response are ongoing and will be presented at conference. Conclusions: In this pilot study, there were no new safety signals or delays in surgery with preoperative nivolumab. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy shows preliminary evidence of safety, feasibility and efficacy; biomarker studies may help identify individuals who may have a higher likelihood of response. Clinical trial information: NCT02595918 .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document