Results of semimonthly 5-florouracil/leucovorin combined with paclitaxel and oxaliplatin in treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15045-15045
Author(s):  
R. Lin ◽  
N. Fan ◽  
Z. Guo ◽  
X. Wang ◽  
Q. Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Chemotherapy Regimen ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Patient Choice ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy Regimen ◽  
Ambulatory Pump ◽  
Grade 3

15045 Background: At present there is still no standard chemotherapy regimen for AGC, the progress of AGC exhibits a pessimistic result with a median survival of less than 9 months. The purpose of this trial was designed to enhance the treatment efficacy for AGC by using semimonthly FU/LV combined with paclitaxel and oxaliplatin. Methods: Patients chosen with histologically proven diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction, locally advanced (i.e., unresectable) or metastatic and measurable disease. The chemotherapy regimen was comprised of a 3-hour infusion of 135 mg/m2 of paclitaxel followed by oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and LV 400 mg/m2, administered simultaneously as a 2-hour infusion, then continued a 46-hour infusion of FU 2.4 g/m2 using an ambulatory pump. Treatment was continued until disease progressed, unacceptable toxicity, or patient choice. The primary endpoint was response rate. Results: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled onto this study in our center between September 19, 2005 and December 25, 2006. The median patient age was 51 years (range, 28 to 66 years), 21 were males and 6 were females. All patients received the chemotherapy between at least two cycles and maximum eight cycles with a median of three. Four CRs of 27 enrolled patients, fifteen PRs and eight SDs were observed. Nineteen patients were chemonaive within enrolled patients: Four CRs, eleven PRs. At a median follow-up of 8.7 months, the median survival was 6.8 months. Frequent grade 3 to 4 toxicities were: neutropenia (37.0%), stomatitis (7.4%), nausea (7.4%), vomiting (7.4%), hepatic dysfunction (3.7%), paresthesia (18.5%). No treatment-related death occurred. Conclusion: Semimonthly FU/LV combined with paclitaxel and oxaliplatin appears to be of well efficacy and is well tolerated in patients with AGC. Currently, this regimen is being tested in the phase III trial involving patients with AGC on the basis of well result. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Updated analysis of SWOG 0023: A randomized phase III trial of gefitinib versus placebo maintenance after definitive chemoradiation followed by docetaxel in patients with locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7513-7513 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Kelly ◽  
K. Chansky ◽  
L. E. Gaspar ◽  
J. R. Jett ◽  
Y. Ung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Alternative Hypothesis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Logrank Test ◽  
Ideal Agent ◽  
Thoracic Radiation ◽  
Grade 3

7513 Background: Early clinical studies with gefitinib (G) showed promising efficacy and mild toxicity in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. Thus, G was an ideal agent to evaluate in a maintenance setting in stage III disease following definitive treatment. Methods: Untreated pts with stage III NSCLC, a PS of 0–1 and adequate organ function were eligible. Patients received the SWOG 9504 core regimen (cisplatin 50 mg/m2, d1 & 8 plus etoposide 50 mg/m2 day 1–5, every 28 days for 2 cycles with concurrent thoracic radiation, 1.8–2 Gy fractions/day, total dose 61 Gy, followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m2). Non- progressing pts were randomized to G 250 mg per day or placebo (P) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or 5 years. The planned sample size was 672, to confer power of 0.89 to detect a 33% increase over the expected median survival of 21 months (one-sided 0.025 level logrank test). Randomization was stratified by stage and histology. Results: Enrollment began in July 2001. An unplanned interim analysis prompted by outside data was conducted in April 2005 and the alternative hypothesis of improved survival was rejected at the 0.0015 level for 243 randomized patients. The study closed and preliminary results were reported (ASCO 2005). Now with a median follow up of 27 months, median survival for the G arm (n=118) was 23 months and was 35 months for the P arm (n=125) (two sided p=0.013). Overall survival for the 571eligible patients was 19 months. ≥ Grade 3 toxicities in the G arm were rash (7%), diarrhea (7%) and pneumonitis (3%). Conclusion: In this unselected population G did not improve survival. Decreased survival was due to cancer not G toxicity. Three year survival estimates will be presented. Molecular studies of the EGFR pathway are underway and will be correlated with outcomes. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A single-arm, phase II feasibility study of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy in potentially resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 96-96
Author(s):  
M. Ryu ◽  
Y. Choi ◽  
B. Kim ◽  
Y. Park ◽  
H. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

96 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction. Methods: Forty-one patients with clinical stage T3-4N0M0 or T2-4N+M0 determined by CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and laparoscopy were enrolled between DEC 2008 and MAR 2010. Gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was conducted after 3 cycles of DOS chemotherapy. DOS chemotherapy consists of docetaxel 50 mg/m2 iv (day1), oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 iv (day1), and S-1 40 mg/m2 po bid (days1-14) at 3 weeks interval. After curative gastrectomy, the patients were given 1 year of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (40 mg/m2 D1-28, every 6 weeks). Results: All patients finished the planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-three (56%) patients achieved a partial response, and the remaining 18 patients had stable disease by CT scan after 3 cycles of DOS chemotherapy. No disease progression was observed during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A median 4.7 weeks (range, 4.0-7.6) after the start of the 3rd cycle of DOS chemotherapy, 39 (95%) patients underwent R0 resection with no pathologic residual disease in 4 (10%) patients. Hematologic toxicities were common including grade 4 neutropenia (32%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (17%), and febrile neutropenia (10%). However, hematologic toxicities were generally transient and manageable. There were no grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities with frequency > 5% of patients. With all toxicities taken together, 21 (51%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities (except grade 3 neutropenia). There was no treatment-related death, and surgical complications included only mild wound problem in 4 (10%) patients. Conclusions: In this study, neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy could induce a sufficient down-staging and R0 resection of locally advanced gastric cancer with mild and manageable toxicities. A phase III randomized trial is planned for evaluating the benefit of neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. [Table: see text]

Results of a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pegfilgrastim (PEG) in patients (pts) receiving first-line FOLFOX or FOLFIRI and bevacizumab (B) for colorectal cancer (CRC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3575-3575
Author(s):  
Tamas Pinter ◽  
Esteban Abella ◽  
Alvydas Cesas ◽  
Adina Croitoru ◽  
Jochen Decaestecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Grade 3

3575 Background: The literature reports that adding biologics to chemotherapy (ctx) may increase the incidence of clinically significant neutropenia. his trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of PEG in reducing the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in pts with locally-advanced (LA) or metastatic (m)CRC receiving first-line treatment with either FOLFOX/B or FOLFIRI/B. Methods: Key eligibility: ≥ 18 years old; measurable, nonresectable CRC per RECIST 1.1. Pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to either placebo or 6 mg PEG ~24 h after ctx/B. The study treatment period included four Q2W cycles, but pts could continue their assigned regimen until progression. Pts were stratified by region (North America vs rest of world), stage (LA vs mCRC), and ctx (FOLFOX vs FOLFIRI). Estimated sample size (N = 800) was based on the expected incidence of grade 3/4 FN (primary endpoint) across the first 4 cycles of ctx/B, powered for PEG superiority over placebo. Other endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: 845 pts were randomized (Nov 2009 to Jan 2012) and received study treatment; 783 pts completed 4 cycles of ctx/B. Median age was 61 years; 512 (61%) pts were male; 819 (97%) had mCRC; 414 (49%) received FOLFOX, and 431 (51%) received FOLFIRI. Grade 3/4 FN (first 4 cycles) for placebo vs PEG was 5.7% vs 2.4%; OR 0.41; p = 0.014. A similar incidence of other ≥ grade 3 adverse events was seen in both arms (28% placebo; 27% PEG). See table for additional results. Conclusions: PEG significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3/4 FN in this pt population receiving standard ctx/B for CRC. Follow-up is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00911170. [Table: see text]

DeCIDE: A phase III randomized trial of docetaxel (D), cisplatin (P), 5-fluorouracil (F) (TPF) induction chemotherapy (IC) in patients with N2/N3 locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5500-5500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ezra E. W. Cohen ◽  
Theodore Karrison ◽  
Masha Kocherginsky ◽  
Chao H Huang ◽  
Mark Agulnik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Distant Failure ◽  
Grade 3

5500 Background: IC is associated with lower distant failure (DF) rates in SCCHN but an improvement in overall survival (OS) has not been validated. The goal of this trial was to determine whether IC prior to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves survival compared to CRT alone. Methods: In this phase 3, open-label trial, subjects with pathologically confirmed SCCHN; N2/N3 disease without metastases; no prior therapy; KPS ³ 70%; and intact organ function were randomized to CRT alone (CRT arm) [5 days of D (25 mg/m2), F (600 mg/m2), hydroxyurea (500 mg BID), and RT (150 cGy BID) followed by a 9 day break] or to 2 cycles of IC [D (75 mg/m2), P (75 mg/m2), F (750 mg/m2 day 1-5)] followed by the same CRT (IC arm). Primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included DF free survival, failure pattern, and recurrence-free survival (RFS). 280 subjects provided 80% power to detect a hazard ratio HR=0.5 for OS (a=0.05). Results: 280 subjects were accrued from 2004-09 with minimum follow-up 24 months. Of 142 patients randomized to IC, 91% received 2 cycles and 87% continued to CRT. Treatment adherence during CRT was high for docetaxel and hydroxyurea, but fewer than 75% of the patients received target dose of 5FU in both arms. RT was delivered without major deviations in 94% and 95% of patients on IC and CRT arms, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities during IC were febrile neutropenia (9%) and mucositis (8%), and during CRT (both arms combined) they were mucositis (45%), dermatitis (19%), and leukopenia (17%). Only grade 3-4 leukopenia and neutropenia rates were significantly higher in IC (p=0.002 and p=0.02, respectively). Table shows efficacy. Conclusions: High survival rates were observed in both arms. Further analysis and follow-up may provide insight into why the significant decrease in DF did not translate into improved OS. [Table: see text]

Results of a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pegfilgrastim (PEG) in patients (pts) receiving first-line FOLFOX or FOLFIRI and bevacizumab (B) for colorectal cancer (CRC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA445-LBA445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamas Pinter ◽  
Steve Abella ◽  
Alvydas Cesas ◽  
Adina Croitoru ◽  
Jochen Decaestecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Grade 3

LBA445 Background: The literature reports that adding biologics to chemotherapy (ctx) may increase the incidence of clinically significant neutropenia. This trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of PEG in reducing the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in pts with locally advanced (LA) or metastatic (m)CRC receiving first-line treatment with either FOLFOX/B or FOLFIRI/B. Methods: Key eligibility: ≥ 18 years old; measurable, nonresectable CRC per RECIST 1.1. Pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to either placebo or 6 mg PEG ~24 h after ctx/B. The study treatment period included four Q2W cycles, but pts could continue their assigned regimen until progression. Pts were stratified by region (North America vs rest of world), stage (LA vs mCRC), and ctx (FOLFOX vs FOLFIRI). Estimated sample size (N = 800) was based on the expected incidence of grade 3/4 FN (primary endpoint) across the first 4 cycles of ctx/B, powered for PEG superiority over placebo. Other endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: 845 pts were randomized (Nov 2009 to Jan 2012) and received study treatment; 783 pts completed 4 cycles of ctx/B. Median age was 61 years; 512 (61%) pts were male; 819 (97%) had mCRC; 414 (49%) received FOLFOX, and 431 (51%) received FOLFIRI. Grade 3/4 FN (first 4 cycles) for placebo vs PEG was 5.7% vs 2.4%; OR 0.41; p = 0.014. A similar incidence of other ≥ grade 3 adverse events was seen in both arms (28% placebo; 27% PEG). See Table for additional results. Conclusions: PEG significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3/4 FN in this pt population receiving standard ctx/B for CRC. Follow-up is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00911170. [Table: see text]

Phase III, randomized study of first-line trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) ± pertuzumab (P) vs. trastuzumab + taxane (HT) treatment of HER2-positive MBC: Final overall survival (OS) and safety from MARIANNE.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1003-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith A. Perez ◽  
Carlos H. Barrios ◽  
Wolfgang Eiermann ◽  
Masakazu Toi ◽  
Young-Hyuck Im ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Grade 3

1003 Background: In MARIANNE (NCT01120184), patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer were randomized to trastuzumab + docetaxel or paclitaxel (HT; n=365), T-DM1 + placebo (T-DM1; n=367), or T-DM1 + P (T-DM1 + P; n=363) as first-line therapy. In the primary analysis, T-DM1–based treatment exhibited noninferior, but not superior, progression-free survival relative to HT (Perez EA, et al. J Clin Oncol 2016). OS was similar between treatments in the first interim analysis. Here we report OS from the final descriptive analysis. Methods: Enrolled patients had centrally assessed HER2-positive (IHC3+ or ISH+) progressive/recurrent locally advanced breast cancer or previously untreated MBC with a ≥6-month interval since (neo)adjuvant treatment with taxanes or vinca alkaloids. Results: At the clinical cutoff date of May 15, 2016, median follow-up was 54 months and 512 patients had died. Median OS was 50.9, 53.7, and 51.8 months with HT, T-DM1, and T-DM1 + P, respectively (Table). A sensitivity analysis in which HT-treated patients who received T-DM1 and/or P after disease progression (n=85) were censored prior to treatment switch found similar results. There were numerically fewer grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) with T-DM1. Conclusions: With this longer follow-up, the T-DM1 safety profile was consistent with the primary analysis and prior experience. While OS was similar across treatment arms, a median OS of 53.7 months and fewer grade ≥3 AEs (vs other arms) supports T-DM1 as an effective and tolerable alternative first-line treatment for HER2-positive MBC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01120184. [Table: see text]

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201) in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma: Final overall survival (OS) results from a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study (DESTINY-Gastric01).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4048-4048
Author(s):  
Kensei Yamaguchi ◽  
Yung-Jue Bang ◽  
Satoru Iwasa ◽  
Naotoshi Sugimoto ◽  
Min-Hee Ryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

4048 Background: T-DXd is an antibody–drug conjugate comprising an anti-HER2 antibody, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a topoisomerase I inhibitor. DESTINY-Gastric01 (DS8201-A-J202; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03329690) is an open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase 2 trial of T-DXd in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (GC) or GEJ adenocarcinoma. In the primary analysis (101 OS events; median survival follow-up, 12.3 mo), T-DXd showed statistically significant benefit vs standard chemotherapy in objective response rate (ORR) and OS (Shitara K, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2419-2430); here, we present the final OS analysis as well as updated efficacy and safety. Methods: Patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic, centrally confirmed HER2-positive (IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+ on archival tissue) GC or GEJ cancer that had progressed after ≥2 previous lines of therapy including trastuzumab were randomly assigned 2:1 (T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg Q3W or physician’s choice [PC] irinotecan [I] or paclitaxel [P]). Pts were stratified by country, ECOG performance status (0, 1), and HER2 status. Primary end point was ORR by independent central review. Key secondary end points were OS, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), confirmed ORR, and safety. Final OS analysis was performed at 133 OS events. Results: 187 pts received T-DXd (n = 125) or PC (n = 62 [55 I; 7 P]); 79.7% of pts were Japanese and 20.3% were Korean. Pts had a median of 2 prior lines of therapy, and 44.4% had ≥3. At data cutoff (June 3, 2020), 8% of T-DXd and 0% of PC pts remained on treatment (median survival follow-up, 18.5 mo). OS was improved with T-DXd vs PC (median OS, 12.5 vs 8.9 mo; hazard ratio [HR], 0.60 [95% CI, 0.42-0.86]); 12-month OS, 52.2% vs 29.7%. ORR was 51.3% (61/119; 11 CR; 50 PR) with T-DXd vs 14.3% (8/56; all PR) with PC ( P < 0.0001); confirmed ORR, 42.0% (50/119; 10 CR; 40 PR) vs 12.5% (7/56; all PR) ( P = 0.0001); DCR, 86.6% vs 62.5% ( P = 0.0003); confirmed median DOR, 12.5 vs 3.9 mo; median PFS, 5.6 vs 3.5 mo (HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.31-0.71]; P = 0.0003). Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 85.6% of T-DXd pts vs 56.5% with PC; the most common were neutrophil count decreased (49.6%, 22.6%), anemia (38.4%, 22.6%), and white blood cell count decreased (20.8%, 11.3%). 16 pts (12.8%) had T-DXd–related interstitial lung disease (ILD; 13 grade 1/2, 2 grade 3, 1 grade 4, no grade 5) vs 0 with PC. As reported in the primary analysis, there was 1 T-DXd–related death from pneumonia (non-ILD). Conclusions: With additional follow-up after the primary analysis, T-DXd continued to demonstrate OS benefit and clinically relevant improvement in ORR compared with standard chemotherapy, and a manageable safety profile, in HER2-positive advanced GC or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Clinical trial information: NCT03329690.

Phase IIb trial of fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and paclitaxel (POF) compared with fluorouracil, feucovorin, and irinotecan (IF) as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15642-e15642
Author(s):  
R. Lin ◽  
Q. Chen ◽  
N. Fan ◽  
Y. Ye ◽  
Z. Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Patient Choice ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Peripheral Neurotoxicity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

e15642 Background: Primary results of POF as 1st and 2nd line treatment for AGC have been presented at ASCO 2007 and 2008. We report here data on the feasibility and the toxicity of POF versus IF(Dank, et al, ASCO 2005) in 1st line treatment of AGC. Methods: Patients with previously untreated, advanced, unresectable, and histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the gastric or gastroesophageal junction were randomly assigned to POF or IF regiment. Treatment was continued until disease progressed, unacceptable toxicity, or patient choice. Results: 25 patients were entered in this study between March 2007 and July 2007: 13 in the POF group and 12 in the IF group. The median patient age was 55 years (range, 36 to 67 years), 18 were males and 7 were females. No complete response was observed. The response rate was 62.5% (POF) and 33.3% (IF) respectively. At a median follow-up of 285 days, 7(POF) versus 6(IF) patients were still alive. Hematological toxicity was the most frequent toxicity in both groups. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia were 38.5% (POF) versus 8.3% (IF). Diarrhea was found 0% and 8.3% in POF and IF group respectively. No grade 3 peripheral neurotoxicity was observed. Conclusions: Compared with IF regiment, POF could also be used as first-line treatment for AGC with acceptable safety profile, good efficacy, and more encouraging results. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I/II Study of Biweekly Paclitaxel and Radiation in Androgen-Ablated Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (18) ◽  
pp. 2973-2978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Sanfilippo ◽  
Samir S. Taneja ◽  
Abraham Chachoua ◽  
Herbert Lepor ◽  
Silvia C. Formenti
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

Purpose To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of concurrent paclitaxel and radiation therapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Eligible patients had T2-4 tumors with Gleason scores greater than 7 and/or PSA levels greater than 10 ng/mL and/or had tumors with pathologic stage TxN1. Hormonal ablation was initiated 3 months before RT and was given for 9 months. RT was delivered daily (1.8 Gy) with concurrent twice-weekly paclitaxel (30 mg/m2). The whole pelvis was irradiated to 39.6 Gy. The radiation dose was escalated as follows: 63 Gy, 66.6 Gy, 70.2 Gy, and 73.8 Gy. The last RT dose level was fixed at 73.8 Gy. Results Between January 2000 and October 2006, 22 patients were enrolled. The median age was 59 years (range, 48 to 72 years); the median PSA level was 22.4 ng/mL (range, 2.8 to 113 ng/mL). The number of patients per stage was as follows: three with T1, eight with T2, 11 with T3, and five with pN1 = 5. No grade 3 toxicities occurred at 63 Gy. Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in three patients at 66.6 Gy. The protocol then was amended to treat the prostate volume first followed by the whole pelvis. No grade 3 toxicities were observed at 70.2 Gy. One patient experienced grade 3 diarrhea at 73.8 Gy. Five additional patients were treated to 73.8 Gy without grade 3 toxicity, which established the MTD for combined paclitaxel and RT at 73.8 Gy. At 38 months median follow-up (range, 9 to 87 months), 21 (95%) of 22 patients are alive. Six (27%) of 22 experienced recurrence. Conclusion Concurrent biweekly paclitaxel with RT is feasible, with an MTD of 73.8 Gy. Recovery of gonadal function occurs in the majority of patients. These results encourage testing in a phase III setting.

SHARED: Efficacy and safety of sintilimab in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in patients with locally advanced gastric (G) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4040-4040
Author(s):  
Jia Wei ◽  
Xiaofeng Lu ◽  
Qin Liu ◽  
Yao Fu ◽  
Song Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Clinical Benefits ◽  
D2 Surgery ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

4040 Background: PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy have shown significant clinical benefits in 1L-treatment of G/GEJ. While it is not clear for locally advanced stage. The aim of this single-arm phase Ib trial is to assess the feasibility of sintilimab (PD-1 inhibitor) in combination with cCRT in locally advanced GC. Methods: Patients (pts) with initial histopathologically confirmed G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, diagnosed as locally advanced III-IVA per AJCC 8th and ECOG PS of 0-1 were eligible. Sintilimab (200mg, iv, Q3W) was given with CRT sandwich in sequence of one induction chemotherapy (S-1+Nab-PTX), weekly Nab-PTX(80-100mg/m2, d1, d8, d15, d22), concurrent radiotherapy (45Gy/1.8Gy*25f), and one consolidation chemotherapy (S-1+Nab-PTX). Pts received three additional combinations of sintilimab and chemotherapy after surgery or investigator’s best choice for unresectable pts after planned therapy. The primary endpoint was pCR and a Simon two-stage was employed at first 9 pts. This interim analysis was pre-planned after finishing stage I assessment. Accrual is ongoing with another 25 in next stage. Results: In the first stage, 5 out of 9 pts achieved pCR and passed to next stage. As of 7th Feb 2021, 28 pts met inclusion criteria with median age 67 yrs (range 47-81), men 86%, PS 1 25%, cT3/4a/4b 28%/54%/18%, cN1/N2/N3 7%/50%/43% and Borrmann II/III/IV 57%/18%/25%. The location on GEJ and G was 14% and 86%. Of 23 pts completed neoadjuvant, all were evaluated as D2-surgery feasibility. 19 pts had completed gastrectomy (4 pts waiting for surgery) with pCR 42.1% (8/19), MPR (≤10% viable tumor cells) 73.7% (14/19) and R0 resection 94.7% (18/19). Down-staging to pT0 and pN0 were both observed in 42.1%. The median follow-up was 5.8m unavailable for survival evaluation at present. Grade (gr) 3-4 TRAE occurred in 39.3% (11/28) pts with most common events as myelosuppression (39.3%) and increased transaminase (10.7%). IrAEs occurred in 21.4% (6/28) pts with one gr 4 hepatitis and others gr 1-2. Peri-operative complications occurred in 3 pts with gr 1-2 pneumonia, increased transaminase, and ileus. No death or unexpected toxicity observed. Conclusions: SHARED interim analysis demonstrated a promising feasibility of sintilimab in combination with cCRT with preliminary impressive pCR & MPR and acceptable toxicity in phase III-IVA G/GEJ cancer. These results warrant further accrual and evaluation. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900024428.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document