Inmunophenotypic profiles of male breast cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21180-21180
Author(s):  
T. Martin Gomez ◽  
B. Torio ◽  
I. Ruiz ◽  
F. Arranz ◽  
A. Arizcun

21180 Background: Recently, inmunophenotypic characterization methods have allowed identification of female breast carcinomas into separate groups showing different behaviour and response to therapy: luminal A phenotype (RE +, HER2-neu - ), luminal B (RE +, HER2- neu + ), basal like (RE -, HER2-neu - ). In this study, we used immunohistochemistry to investigate the inmunophenotypic profile distribution of male breast cancer. Methods: all the male breast cancers were obtained from the files of the Departments of Pathology of Hospital Río Carrión in Palencia, Spain, since 1996. A total of 9 cases were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis and to characterize each tumour. The following CK immunohistochemistry was performed: 8/18 and 5 (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) in a Dako autostainer. ER was interpreted as positive if > 10% of the cells were staining. Normal skin and tonsils were used as positive controls for the CK and a known breast cancer for the ER immunohistochemistry. Results: five cases expressed RE and were HER2-neu negative, so they have a luminal-A phenotype. The four cases that expressed the luminal-B pehnotype expressed RE and HER2-neu; we demonstrated gene amplification of the HER-neu gene using fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) in those cases. Respect the CKs profile, all cases were positive for CK 8/18 and negative with CK 5, vimentin and p63, characteristic of luminal-like CK expression profile, according wiht the literature. Conclusions: this is the first case series of male breast cancer patients that provides inmunophenotypic profile data on this rare disease in only one center in Spain. We comunicate that the vast majority of these tumours express the phenotype of luminal-like CKs. None of our patients were basal-like tumours. The percentage expression of Her-2 parallels the finding in female breast cancers and this should be analysed for its predictive significance, according to new specific biological treatments. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2003 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Muir ◽  
R. Kanthan ◽  
S. C. Kanthan

Abstract Context.—The rate of male breast cancer is a small fraction of that observed in females, thus severely limiting our understanding of the pathogenesis of this condition. It remains unclear whether the biological behavior and tumor progression associated with male breast cancer parallel that of the female form. Objectives.—To evaluate the immunohistochemical profile of male breast carcinomas and to compare this profile with that of stage-matched female breast cancers. Design.—Seventy-five cases of primary male breast cancer were identified using the records of the Saskatchewan Cancer Foundation over a period of 26 years (1970–1996). Fifty-nine of these cases had formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks available for the purposes of this study. All cases were reviewed and a standardized modified Bloom-Richardson grading criterion was applied. Estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, c-Erb-B2 expression, p53 expression, and Bcl-2 expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Results from 240 consecutive cases of stage-matched female breast cancers analyzed in the same laboratory were used as a standard set for comparison. Results.—Male breast cancers tended to be high grade (85% grade 3) in comparison with the female breast cancers (50% grade 3). In descriptive analysis across all stages of disease, male carcinomas were more frequently estrogen receptor positive (81% vs 69%) than their female counterparts. Despite their high grade, they were less likely to overexpress p53 (9% vs 28%) and Erb-B2 (5% vs 17%) than the female counterparts. There was no significant difference in either progesterone receptor (63% vs 56%) or Bcl-2 (79% vs 76%) overexpression. Stratified analysis by stage-matched controls showed no statistically significant differences among the men and women with stage I disease. However, in stage II–matched samples, statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups. The male cancers were more likely to overexpress estrogen receptor (81.6% vs 64.4%, P = .04), progesterone receptor (71.1% vs 47.5%, P = .01), and Bcl-2 (78.9% vs 69.4%, P = .20). They also showed statistically significant lower expression of p53 (7.9% vs 36.3%, P = .001) and Erb-B2 (5.3% vs 23.8% P = .01). Conclusion.—Male breast cancers display distinct immunophenotypic differences from those occurring in women, implying a different pathogenesis in the evolution and progression of this disease. Such differences may play key roles in therapeutic management, warranting different treatment strategies in comparison to female breast cancers.


2012 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Andrew Y Shuen ◽  
William D Foulkes ◽  
◽  

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Gene expression profiling has demonstrated the existence of at least five ‘intrinsic’ subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor-2 receptor (HER2), normal-like, and basal-like. While the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 remain the most important prognostic markers and predictors of response to therapy, interrogating thousands of genetic transcripts more accurately captures the biological complexity and clinical heterogeneity of this disease. Target identification through massively parallel sequencing is likely to bear fruit in the coming years. Attention to basal-like breast cancers has grown substantially due to their generally poor prognosis, lack of targeted therapies, and connection withBRCA1-related cancers. In this article, we discuss the basal-like subgroup with respect to its cellular origins, relationship toBRCA1, and associated epidemiological risk factors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kadam SS ◽  
◽  
Kadam T ◽  

Background: Breast cancer in male is a very rare condition but some of the reported case series had shown that its incidence is increasing over the last 25 years. The etiology of breast cancer in males differs from that of females in many ways. The literature lacks the prospective randomized evidences supporting the treatment of male breast cancer. Only retrospective evidences are available and all guidelines are extrapolated from the best available data of treatment of female breast cancer. Therefore, we have reviewed, compiled and tried to present the best available literature which highlights the treatment of male breast cancer .The reported incidence of breast cancer in men is around 1.2%-2% of all cancers in males and less than 1% of all breast cancers in both sexes. If it involves both breasts then it becomes an extremely uncommon condition which accounts for only 1% of all male breast cancer. Elderly males are most commonly diagnosed with breast cancer and they are approximately 5 to 10 years older than the women. The most common reason of breast cancer in males is excess of estrogen in the body and all conditions which leads to hyperestrogenism are responsible for increasing the risk of cancer.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Anderson ◽  
Ismail Jatoi ◽  
Julia Tse ◽  
Philip S. Rosenberg

Purpose Because of its rarity, male breast cancer is often compared with female breast cancer. Patients and Methods To compare and contrast male and female breast cancers, we obtained case and population data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program for breast cancers diagnosed from 1973 through 2005. Standard descriptive epidemiology was supplemented with age-period-cohort models and breast cancer survival analyses. Results Of all breast cancers, men with breast cancer make up less than 1%. Male compared with female breast cancers occurred later in life with higher stage, lower grade, and more estrogen receptor–positive tumors. Recent breast cancer incidence and mortality rates declined over time for men and women, but these trends were greater for women than for men. Comparing patients diagnosed from 1996 through 2005 versus 1976 through 1985, and adjusting for age, stage, and grade, cause-specific hazard rates for breast cancer death declined by 28% among men (P = .03) and by 42% among women (P ≈ 0). Conclusion There were three intriguing results. Age-specific incidence patterns showed that the biology of male breast cancer resembled that of late-onset female breast cancer. Similar breast cancer incidence trends among men and women suggested that there are common breast cancer risk factors that affect both sexes, especially estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer. Finally, breast cancer mortality and survival rates have improved significantly over time for both male and female breast cancer, but progress for men has lagged behind that for women.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Uzoigwe J. Chukwuma ◽  
Nzegwu M. Arinze ◽  
Onyishi N. Thaddeus ◽  
Ekwedigwe C. Kenneth ◽  
Edegbe O. Felix ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is a disease with heterogeneous nature that may have different prognosis and respond to therapy differently despite similarities in histological type, grade and stage. It is common among women in both developed and developing countries of the world.  MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a 2-year retrospective study involving a systematic analysis of all the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks previously diagnosed as breast cancers. The study occurred at the Department of Morbid Anatomy, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu. We retrieved all the archived tissue blocks and subjected them to further ancillary testing using the immunohistochemistry monoclonal antibodies: (Oestrogen receptors (ER), Progesterone receptors (PR) and Her-2 neu antibodies). RESULTS: Out of 417 cases of breast cancer analysed, four hundred and Ten (410) were females representing 98.3%, seven (7) were males representing 1.7%. The mean age of all subjects in this study was 45.1±10.2 SD (years). The age of patients ranged from20 to 70 years. The age group 31 to 40 years showed the highest number of cases, 133 (32.4%). The cases positive for ER were 157 (37.6%), while 260 (62.4%) were negative. The cases positive for PR were 144 (34.5%) and 273 (65.5%) were negative. Fifty-four cases (12.9%) were HER2-neu positive, 15 (3.6%) were equivocal and could not be further analysed due to lack of the facility to do Fluorescence in-situ hybridisation, and 348 (83.5%) were HER-neu negative. Phenotypic classification based on ER, PR, and Her2 immunohistochemistry showed 113 cases (27.1%) were Luminal A, 45 cases (10.8%) were Luminal B, 23 cases (5.5%) were Her2 Enriched, 236 cases (56.6%) were Basal-like/Triple-negative, and none (0%) was Normal-like. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study shows that Basal-like/Triple-negative breast cancers are most common and are seen more in premenopausal women in Enugu.


2021 ◽  
pp. BMT56
Author(s):  
Natalia Camejo ◽  
Cecilia Castillo ◽  
Andrea Schiavone ◽  
Ana L Alfonso ◽  
Dahiana Amarillo ◽  
...  

Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare condition which, while sharing some similarities with breast cancer in women, has a unique disease profile of its own. Aim: To understand the characteristics of MBC and its management in Uruguay. Patients & methods: Retrospective observational study that included patients diagnosed with MBC. Results: 22 cases of MBC were found. The median age at diagnosis was 62.5 years. Symptoms included self-detected lump in 17 patients (77.3%) and nipple retraction in seven (22.7%). Ductal carcinomas of histological grade 2–3 were found in 20 patients (90.9%) and stage I–II disease was most commonly encountered (15 patients, 68.1%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy and tamoxifen were offered to 16 (73%), 12 (54.5%), 17 (65.4%) and 20 (90.9%) patients, respectively. Conclusion: MBC behaves and is treated in many aspects like postmenopausal breast cancer. Further multi-institutional, prospective studies are needed for better understanding and management of male breast cancers.


Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 269
Author(s):  
Gianluca Tedaldi ◽  
Michela Tebaldi ◽  
Valentina Zampiga ◽  
Ilaria Cangini ◽  
Francesca Pirini ◽  
...  

Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare tumor, accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancers. In MBC, genetic predisposition plays an important role; however, only a few studies have investigated in depth the role of genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2. We performed a Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) analysis with a panel of 94 cancer predisposition genes on germline DNA from an Italian case series of 70 patients with MBC. Moreover, we searched for large deletions/duplications of BRCA1/2 genes through the Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) technique. Through the combination of NGS and MLPA, we identified three pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 gene and six in the BRCA2 gene. Besides these alterations, we found six additional pathogenic/likely-pathogenic variants in PALB2, CHEK2, ATM, RAD51C, BAP1 and EGFR genes. From our study, BRCA1 and BRCA2 emerge as the main genes associated with MBC risk, but also other genes seem to be associated with the disease. Indeed, some of these genes have already been implicated in female breast cancer predisposition, but others are known to be involved in other types of cancer. Consequently, our results suggest that novel genes could be involved in MBC susceptibility, shedding new light on their role in cancer development.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Bayani ◽  
Coralie Poncet ◽  
Cheryl Crozier ◽  
Anouk Neven ◽  
Tammy Piper ◽  
...  

AbstractMale breast cancer (BCa) is a rare disease accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancers and 1% of all cancers in males. The clinical management is largely extrapolated from female BCa. Several multigene assays are increasingly used to guide clinical treatment decisions in female BCa, however, there are limited data on the utility of these tests in male BCa. Here we present the gene expression results of 381 M0, ER+ve, HER2-ve male BCa patients enrolled in the Part 1 (retrospective analysis) of the International Male Breast Cancer Program. Using a custom NanoString™ panel comprised of the genes from the commercial risk tests Prosigna®, OncotypeDX®, and MammaPrint®, risk scores and intrinsic subtyping data were generated to recapitulate the commercial tests as described by us previously. We also examined the prognostic value of other risk scores such as the Genomic Grade Index (GGI), IHC4-mRNA and our prognostic 95-gene signature. In this sample set of male BCa, we demonstrated prognostic utility on univariate analysis. Across all signatures, patients whose samples were identified as low-risk experienced better outcomes than intermediate-risk, with those classed as high risk experiencing the poorest outcomes. As seen with female BCa, the concordance between tests was poor, with C-index values ranging from 40.3% to 78.2% and Kappa values ranging from 0.17 to 0.58. To our knowledge, this is the largest study of male breast cancers assayed to generate risk scores of the current commercial and academic risk tests demonstrating comparable clinical utility to female BCa.


1970 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-82
Author(s):  
M Dayem Uddin ◽  
ABM Abdul Hannan

Male breast cancer is rare. It accounts for 0.2% of all cancers, and 1% all breast cancers. Most patients present late for several reasons, including the absence of early signs and symptoms, and reduced awareness of the existence of such pathology among patients and physicians, Reporting these cases from among the Bangladeshi population, we tried to observe any differences in clinical manifestation from those reported in the literature, and aimed to increase the value assigned to male breast as a source of pathology among patients and physicians as well.   doi: 10.3329/taj.v21i1.3226 TAJ 2008; 21(1): 80-82


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document