18F-FDG PET changes management and improves prognostic stratification in patients with colorectal cancer: results of a prospective, multi-centre study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4025-4025
Author(s):  
A. M. Scott ◽  
D. Gunawardana ◽  
B. Kelly ◽  
J. Stuckey ◽  
A. Byrne ◽  
...  

4025 Background: The aims were to: 1) examine the impact of PET in changing management in patients with proven or suspected recurrence of colorectal cancer and, 2) assess the impact of management change on disease free survival. Methods: Symptomatic patients (Group A) with a residual structural lesion suspicious for recurrent tumour, or patients (Group B) with pulmonary or hepatic metastases, which were potentially resectable as determined by conventional imaging, underwent PET scans. Pre- and post-PET management plans were documented blinded to PET results. Patients were followed for 12 months to determine actual management and to assess clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 191 patients (118M:73F, mean age 66 yrs) were recruited. PET detected additional sites of disease in 48.4% of Group A and 43.9% of Group B patients. Importantly, a change in planned management was documented in 65.6% of Group A and 49.0% of Group B patients. Follow-up confirmed implementation of management plans in 96% of patients. Analysis of follow-up data to 12 months post- PET showed that in Group A progressive disease was identified in 60.5% of patients with additional lesions detected on PET compared with conventional imaging, and 36.2% patients with no additional lesions detected by PET (p=0.0364); in Group B progressive disease was identified in 65.9% of patients with additional lesions detected on PET and 39.2% patients with no additional lesions detected by PET (p=0.0198). Patient follow-up also showed that PET provided valuable prognostic information in patients stratified into curative/palliative intent groups. Conclusions: These data unequivocally demonstrate the significant impact of PET on management and outcomes in patients with suspected recurrent colorectal cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 616-616
Author(s):  
Igor Shchepotin ◽  
Andrii Lukashenko ◽  
Olena Kolesnik ◽  
Anton Burlaka

616 Background: Surgical treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer remains the only method that improves overall 5-year survival. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcome and survival benefit between synchronous and staged resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Methods: Clinicopathologic data, treatments, and postoperative outcomes from 110 patients who underwent simultaneous (48 patients, group A) or staged (62 patients, group B) colorectal and hepatic resections at clinic of National cancer institute in period of 2008-2013 were reviewed. Results: Postoperative complications in patients with simultaneous resections (group A) were observed in 13 cases (27.1%), including 5, 1, 4, 2, 0, and 1 of grades I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IV, and V, respectively. Similar results have been reported in group B after staged resections, where overall postoperative complications registered in 16 patients (25.8 %), including 4, 3, 6, 3, 0 of grades I, II, IIIa, IIIb, and IV respectively. Overall level of post-operative complications in the groups A and B after surgical stages finishing did not differ statistically (p=0.96). Shorter operative intervention duration was registered in the group A – (311±10.1) min, whereas in the group B it was (496.6±16.2) min (р<0.001). Patients after staged resection stayed in clinic for a longer time – 23.9±0.8 bed-days, when simultaneous resections provided with shorter recovery terms in post-operative period – 9.8±0.5 bed-days (p<0.001). Overall 3-year survival in the group of patients with simultaneous resections (group А) was 42 % and in the group B 55 % (р=0.22). Conclusions: Analysis of our research indicated necessity of the development of differentiated approach in management of synchronous colorectal liver metastatic cancer. Simultaneous resections of colorectal cancer primary lesions and hepatic metastases were safe and could serve as a primary option for selected patients. Subsequent research should be directed towards study of prognosis factors and criteria for patients’ selection for surgical treatment groups, assessment of economic effect, and patients life quality.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Verrua ◽  
Emanuele Ferrante ◽  
Marcello Filopanti ◽  
Elena Malchiodi ◽  
Elisa Sala ◽  
...  

Acromegaly guidelines updated in 2010 revisited criteria of disease control: if applied, it is likely that a percentage of patients previously considered as cured might present postglucose GH nadir levels not adequately suppressed, with potential implications on management. This study explored GH secretion, as well as hormonal, clinical, neuroradiological, metabolic, and comorbid profile in a cohort of 40 acromegalic patients considered cured on the basis of the previous guidelines after a mean follow-up period of 17.2 years from remission, in order to assess the impact of the current criteria. At the last follow-up visit, in the presence of normal IGF-I concentrations, postglucose GH nadir was over 0.4 μg/L in 11 patients (Group A) and below 0.4 μg/L in 29 patients (Group B); moreover, Group A showed higher basal GH levels than Group B, whereas a significant decline of both GH and postglucose GH nadir levels during the follow-up was observed in Group B only. No differences in other evaluated parameters were found. These results seem to suggest that acromegalic patients considered cured on the basis of previous guidelines do not need a more intensive monitoring than patients who met the current criteria of disease control, supporting instead that the cut-off of 0.4 mcg/L might be too low for the currently used GH assay.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xian Wang ◽  
Yifan Zhu ◽  
Wen Chen ◽  
Liangpeng Li ◽  
Xin Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Mild preoperative renal dysfunction (RD) is not rare in patients receiving isolated cardiopulmonary coronary artery bypass grafting (CCABG). However, there are not too many studies about the impact of mild preoperative RD on in-hospital and follow-up outcomes after isolated CCABG. This single-centre, retrospective propensity score matching study designed to study the impact of mild preoperative RD on in-hospital and long-term outcomes after first isolated CCABG. Methods After propensity score matching, 1144 patients with preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of more than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 receiving first isolated CCABG surgery from January 2012 to December 2015 entered the study, who were divided into 2 groups: A group (eGFR ≥90 ml/min/1.73 m2, n = 572) and B group (eGFR of 60–89 ml/min/1.73 m2, n = 572). The in-hospital and long-term outcomes were recorded and analyzed. The mean follow-up time was 54.4 ± 10.7 months. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined and classified according to the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria. Results The 2 propensity score-matched groups had similar baseline and procedure except the baseline eGFR. There were 8 patients died in A group (mortality is 1.4%) and 14 died in B group (mortality is 2.5%) during the in hospital and 30-day postoperatively(χ2 = 1.159, p = 0.282). There were totally 38 patients lost to follow-up, 18 in group A and 20 in group B. 21 patients died in group A and 37 died in group B during the follow-up, and long-term survival in group A was higher than in group B (96.2% vs 93.1%, χ2 = 4.336, p = 0.037). Comparing with group A, group B was associated with an increased rates and severity of AKI postoperatively (total AKI: 62 vs 144. AKIN stageI: 54 vs 113; AKIN stageII: 6 vs 22; AKIN stageIII: 2 vs 9, p<0.0001). During follow-up, group B also had a higher rate of new onset of dialysis (0 vs 6, χ2 = 4.432, p = 0.039). Multivariable logistic regression showed that comparing with A group, the HR for long-term mortality and new onset of dialysis in B group was 1.67 and 1.52 respectively (95%CI 1.09–2.90, p = 0.035; 95%CI 1.14–2.49, p = 0.027). Conclusions Comparing with normal preoperative renal function, patients with mild preoperative RD had a similar in-hosptial mortality, but with an increased in-hosptial rates and severity of AKI, and with a decreased long-term survival and increased long-term new onset of dialysis.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15572-15572 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. K. Kollmannsberger ◽  
D. Y. Heng ◽  
N. Murray ◽  
K. N. Chi

15572 Background: Previously, immunotherapy agents such as IFN were the only treatments available for mRCC. Sunitinib has demonstrated prolonged progression free survival in a phase III trial but overall survival benefit has yet to be determined and few patients (pts) with poor MSKCC prognostic profiles were included. Methods: The province-wide BC Cancer Agency Registry was cross-referenced to the central pharmacy database to identify all pts with the diagnosis of mRCC who were treated with IFN and/or sunitinib. Sunitinib became available after October 2005 under an expanded access program or as standard treatment. Three groups of pts were identified: Group A consisted of pts who received IFN alone between January 2003 to October 2005, Group B was all pts who progressed on first-line IFN after October 2005 and subsequently were treated with second-line sunitinib and Group C was all pts treated with first-line sunitinib. Baseline characteristics and overall survival were collected on all patients. Results: A total of 75 patients were identified with 36 patients in Group A, 23 patients in Group B, and 16 patients in Group C. Data are reported from the initiation of IFN in Group A and the initiation of sunitinib in Groups B and C. Median follow-up was 6.0 months in group A, 7.6 months in group B, and 6.2 months in group C. Median age of treatment initiation (62y vs. 60y vs. 62y), number of metastatic sites (>1 site in 63% vs. 61% vs. 56%), and Karnofsky performance status (79 vs. 86 vs. 81) were similar between groups A, B and C, respectively. The MSKCC prognostic profiles were favorable, intermediate and poor in 26%, 51% and 23% in group A, 17%, 65% and 17% in group B and 31%, 38% and 31% in group C, respectively. The estimated 6-month overall survival in groups A, B and C was 56%, 72% and 100%, respectively (log rank A vs C p=0.009; log rank B vs C p=0.042). Conclusion: With the limitations of retrospective analysis and preliminary follow-up, the introduction of sunitinib as standard treatment into the general population of patients with mRCC appears to be associated with a longer overall survival compared to patients treated with IFN alone. Population-based analysis on the impact of the introduction of sunitinib therapy is ongoing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14594-e14594
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Yildiz ◽  
Fatma Sen ◽  
Leyla Kilic ◽  
Serkan Keskin ◽  
Rumeysa Ciftci ◽  
...  

e14594 Background: High body mass index (BMI) is a well known risk factor in the development and recurrence of several solid tumors including colorectal cancer (CRC). Obesity is associated with increased serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Bevacizumab is the main targeted therapy inhibiting tumor angiogenesis by blocking VEGF receptor. We evaluated the effect of BMI on time to tumor progression (TTP) in patients who received bevacizumab based therapy due to advanced colorectal cancer in our institution. Methods: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have been treated with fluoropyrimidine-based combination chemotherapy with bevacizumab were included in the study. Data of patients’ clinical treatment characteristics were obtained from the medical records. The height and weight measured during the initiation of bevacizumab were used to assign the patients to group A (BMI<25 kg/m2) and group B (BMI≥25 kg/m2). The time to tumor progression was defined as the day of initiation of bevacizumab based threpay to the date of first documented progressive disease, the date of death regardless of its course or the date of last follow up if no disease progression or no death occured at this time. Results: 236 patients (median age 57, range 27-79 years) were treated withfluoropyrimidine-based combination chemotherapy with bevacizumab between April 2007 and June 2011. 127 (51.3%) patients had a BMI <25 kg/m2 and 115 (48.7%) patients were found to have a BMI ≥25 kg/m2. One hundred ninety-three patients (82.1%) had first line bevacizumab therapy, and 44 patients (22.8%) had second-line bevacizumab therapy. Tumors of 68.4% of patients in group A and 69,1% of patients in group B progressed during a median 10 months (3-57 months) follow up. The median TTP was 9.5 months in the BMI <25 group and 8.2 months in the BMI >25 group.In multivariate analysis, high BMI (≥25 kg/m2) was associated with significantly shorter TTP (p: 0.002; HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.26–2.88). Conclusions: High BMI is a relevant prognostic factor in predicting the time to tumor progression in metastatic colon cancer patients treated with bevacizumab.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3776-3776
Author(s):  
Dolores Puente ◽  
Cecilia Colorio ◽  
Roxana Ratto ◽  
Martin Descalzo ◽  
Andrea Rossi ◽  
...  

Abstract Previous studies have shown that anemia is frequently associated with higher morbidity and mortality in HF pts. Our aim was to determine the impact of anemia in pts hospitalized with congestive HF at our hospital. We analyzed data from 277 pts with diagnosis of HF admitted between 1 June 2004 and 31 December 2005, with a follow up of at least 6 months. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin (Hb) &lt;11,5 g/dl. HF was classified according to Framingham criteria. Previous history of arterial hypertension, diabetes, dislipemia, chronic renal insufficiency and ACE inhibitors treatment was recorded. Ischaemic and non- ischaemic etiology of cardiopathy was established. Renal disfunction was defined as creatinin concentraction &gt;1.9 mg/dl. Pts with HF were assigned to group A (with anemia) or B (control). Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson’s Chi square, Spearman’s rho, Fisher test and Kaplan Meyer survival function. Results: We evaluated 229 (82,7%) pts with a median follow up of 594 days (range: 1–1129 days). Mean age was 68,02 years (median 71, range: 17–91). 143/229 (62,4%) were male. In 75 /229 (32.75%) cases a Hb &lt; 11,5 g/dl was measured at admission. The mean Hb was 13,1 g/dl for the entire group. Anemia pts showed a mean Hb of 10.6 g/dl. Demographic, clinical and outcome features are shown in table 1.Group A showed a higher number of readmissions because of HF and other cardiac. Conclussions: In our analysis the prevalence of anemia was 33% in pts hospitalized for HF. There was no significant differences among clinical variables between anemic and non-anemic pts. Anemia was associated with worse clinical outcome (Group A pts required more readmissions for HF and other cardiological causes)and all cause mortality. Mean survival was longer in Group B pts.according to Kaplan Meyer analysis. TABLE 1: RESULTS GROUP A (n=75) GROUP B (n= 154) p Male 42 (56%) 101 (65.5%) Mean age (years) 70.38 (R:20–90) 67.1 (R:17–91) Mean Hb (g/dl) 10.6 14.3 Ischaemic cardiopathy 38(50,6%) 78(50.6%) Non ischaemic cardiopathy 41(54,6%) 78 Arterial hypertension 54(72%) 106(68.8%) Diabetes 24(32%) 33(21.4%) Dislipaemia 35(46.6%) 64(41.5%) Chronic renal insufficiency 18(24%) 19(12.3%) 0.03 Previous ACE inhibitors treatment 25(33%) 71(46%) 0.08 Acute pulmonary edema 12(16%) 15(9.7%) Creatinin concentration &gt; 1.9 mg/dl 16(21.3%) 18 (11.6%) Hospitalization days (mean) 9.6 (R: 1–51) 8.1(R:1–59) Readmission for HF 37 190 0.001 Readmission for other cardiologic causes 20 109 0.017 Readmission for non cardiologic diseases 18 58 Mean survival (days) 499 (R:1–1091) 658 (r=1–1129) 0.166 Global mortality 25 (33%) 32(21%) 0.05 HF related mortality 13 (20.9%) 24 (14.3%) Figure Figure


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3582-3582 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. G. Alexopoulos ◽  
A. A. Kotsori

3582 Background: The current policy concerning the duration of chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC) varies considerably (Clin Oncol 1997;9:248) while no benefit of continuous versus intermittent 5-FU was found in a published randomized study (Lancet 2003;361:457). Serious cumulative toxicity is not usually a problem with long-term 5-FU/FA, but this is not the case with contemporary triple regimens (FOLFIRI, FOLFOX). We, therefore, performed a randomized study of continuous versus intermittent FOLFIRI as first line chemotherapy in MCC. Methods: Patients with MCC and ECOG 0–2 were given 6 biweekly courses of FOLFIRI (Irinotecan 180mg/m2 + De Gramont). Patients with response or stable disease were randomized to continue with another 6 FOLFIRI (group A) or discontinue until relapse when 6 FOLFIRI were readministered (group B). Time to progression (TTP) was calculated from study entrance until 1st progression for group A, and 2nd progression for group B, and overall survival (OS) from study entrance until death. Results: Fifty eight (M=38, F=20) patients entered into the study. Two (3.4%) withdrew before evaluation, 1 (1.7%) died of stroke, 1 (1.7%) was lost to FU and 15 (26%) progressed before or at the completion of 6 FOLFIRI. Thirty nine (67%) patients (M=25, F=14), median age 69 (38–79) responded (21=54%) or had stable disease (18=46%) and were randomized: 19 (49%) to group A and 20 (51%) to group B. Median TTP was 8 months 95% CI: 5.3–10.7) for group A and 9 (95% CI: 7.8–10) for group B (p=NS). 10/19 (52%) in group A received 2nd line chemotherapy vs 7/20 (35%) in group B (p=NS). With a median follow-up of 13 months, 21 patients are alive (12 in group A and 9 in group B). Median OS was 21 months (95% CI: 15 - 26.7) in group A vs 15 (95% CI: 12.6 - 17.3) in group B (p=NS), and 18 months (95% CI: 15.5 - 21) for all 39 patients. Conclusions: In MCC, when response or stability has been achieved after 6 courses ofFOLFIRI there seemstobe little more benefit from continuing chemotherapy than from retreating patients at relapse No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282110164
Author(s):  
Mario D’Oria ◽  
Georgios A. Pitoulias ◽  
Giovanni F. Torsello ◽  
Apostolos G. Pitoulias ◽  
Stefano Fazzini ◽  
...  

Objective To evaluate early and follow-up outcomes following bilateral use of iliac branch devices (IBD) for aortoiliac endografting and assess the impact of center volume. We used data from the pELVIS international multicentric registry. Methods For the purpose of this study, only those patients receiving concomitant bilateral IBD implantation were analyzed. To assess the impact that procedural volume of bilateral IBD implantation could have on early and follow-up outcomes, participating institutions were classified as Site(s) A if they had performed >10 and/or >20% concomitant bilateral IBD procedure, otherwise they were classified as Site(s) B. Endpoints of the analysis included early (ie, 30-day) mortality and morbidity, as well as all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality during follow-up. Additional endpoints that were evaluated included IBD-related reinterventions, IBD occlusion or stenosis requiring reintervention (ie, loss of primary patency), and IBD-related type I endoleak. Results Overall, 96 patients received bilateral IBD implantation (out of 910 procedures collected in the whole pELVIS cohort), of whom 65 were treated at Site A (ie, Group A) and 31 were treated at Site(s) B (ie, Group B). In total, only 1 death occurred within 30 days from bilateral IBD implantation, and 9 patients experienced at least 1 major complication without any significant difference between subjects in Group A versus those in Group B (10.8% vs 6.5%, p=0.714). In the overall cohort, the 2-year freedom from IBD-related type I endoleaks and IBD primary patency were 96% and 92%, respectively; no significant differences were seen in those rates between Group A or Group B (95% vs 100%, p=0.335; 93% vs 88%, p=0.470). Freedom from any IBD-related reinterventions was 83% at 2 years, with similar rates between study groups (85% vs 83%, p=0.904). Conclusions Within the pELVIS registry, concomitant bilateral IBD implantation is a safe and feasible technique for management of aortoiliac aneurysms in patients with suitable anatomy. Despite increased technical complexity, effectiveness of the repair is satisfactory with low rates of IBD-related adverse events at mid-term follow-up. Procedural volume does not seem to affect technical or clinical outcomes after bilateral use of IBD, which remains a favorable treatment option in selected patients.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (22) ◽  
pp. 4888-4896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Kemeny ◽  
William Jarnagin ◽  
Philip Paty ◽  
Mithat Gönen ◽  
Lawrence Schwartz ◽  
...  

Purpose To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of concurrent systemic oxaliplatin (Oxal) combinations plus hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods Thirty-six patients (89% previously treated) with unresectable liver metastases were treated with concurrent HAI and systemic Oxal plus irinotecan (CPT-11; group A) or Oxal, fluorouracil (FU), and leucovorin (LV; group B). Systemic chemotherapy was administered every 2 weeks concurrent with 2 weeks of HAI floxuridine (FUDR) and dexamethasone (Dex) every 28 days. Results The MTD for patients in group A was Oxal 100 mg/m2, CPT-11 150 mg/m2, and FUDR 0.12 mg/kg × 30 mL divided by pump flow rate. The MTD for group B was Oxal 100 mg/m2, LV 400 mg/m2, and FU 1,400 mg/m2 by continuous infusion over 48 hours, with the same FUDR dose as in group A. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities in groups A and B included diarrhea (24% and 20%), neutropenia (10% and 7%), neurotoxicity (24% and 20%), and bilirubin more than 3 mg/mL (5% and 7%, respectively). The complete and partial response rate totaled 90% for group A and 87% for group B. Median survival time was 36 and 22 months for groups A and B, respectively. Seven patients in group A were ultimately able to undergo liver resection. Conclusion Combination therapy with HAI FUDR and Dex plus systemic Oxal combinations may be safely administered to patients with colorectal cancer. The high response rate (88%) and the possibility of conversion to resectability, despite disease progression on prior systemic regimens, suggest that these combinations should be evaluated in larger studies as first- or second-line therapy in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.


Author(s):  
Mohammad El Tahlawi ◽  
Mohammad Morsy ◽  
Mohammad Elawady ◽  
Mahmoud Abdelaziz ◽  
Ahmed Eldamanhory

Background: Congenital pulmonary stenosis (PS) is a progressive disease. Balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty (BPV) is the treatment of choice in valvular PS. Aim: We aim to study the relationship between biomarkers and echocardiographic markers in valvular PS and to assess the impact of BPV on these markers. Patients & Methods Patients with moderate and severe valvular PS amenable for BPV were recruited. Serum troponin I was measured. Echocardiographic assessment of PS and right ventricular (RV)function were done. All patients underwent BPV. Troponin level and echocardiographic data were re-assessed two weeks & six months after BPV. Results: Fifty patients with valvular PS were recruited. There was significant correlation between peak SPG and troponin (p < 0.001). Troponin was significantly decreased 2 weeks after BPV. Similarly, there was an initial improvement in RV function. After 6 months of follow up, we divided patients into 2 groups: Group-A: 36 patients with no restenosis. Group-B: 14 patients with restenosis. There were high significant differences between both groups regarding troponin level and RV functions with re-elevated troponin in group-B that correlated with peak PG (r= 0.9, p < 0.001). RV function parameters in group-B became significantly worse 6 months after BPV than those after the initial 2 weeks. Conclusion Troponin correlates with the severity of PS and associates with RV dysfunction. Both troponin & RV functions improved with BPV. Recurrent elevation of troponin and impairment of RV function are associated with PV restenosis and could be set as an indication for repeated balloon dilatation of PV.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document