The pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of ABT-751 in children with recurrent neuroblastoma or other solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9557-9557
Author(s):  
E. Fox ◽  
B. C. Widemann ◽  
J. M. Maris ◽  
S. L. Cohn ◽  
H. Xiong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Parent Drug ◽  
Molar Ratio ◽  
Primary Metabolite ◽  
Drug Concentrations ◽  
Apparent Clearance ◽  
Major Route ◽  
Microtubule Formation ◽  
Sulfate Conjugate

9557 Background: ABT-751 is an orally administered agent that binds to the colchicine site on β-tubulin and blocks microtubule formation. We studied the PK and PD of ABT-751 and its sulfate and glucuronide conjugates in children enrolled on a phase 1 trial in solid tumors and a pilot study in neuroblastoma. Methods: Seventy-two children (2–18 yrs) received ABT-751 on a once, daily × 7d or daily × 21d schedule. Sixty had PK plasma sampling (53 sets analyzed), and 41 had a 24h urine collection after the first dose. Drug concentrations were quantified with a LC/MS/MS assay. Results: Median (range) plasma PK parameters are shown in the table . ABT-751 was rapidly absorbed (Tmax , 2h), and the Cmax and AUC0-8 increased in proportion to dose. The median molar ratio of the sulfate plasma AUC0-8 to glucuronide plasma AUC0-8 was 1.5. The median (range) percent of the administered dose excreted in urine as ABT-751, glucuronide, or sulfate conjugates was 0.09 (0–0.4)%, 10.2 (1.0–38.5)%, and 12.6 (2.3–50.9)%, respectively. The median ABT-751 AUC0-8 was higher in patients with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) compared to those without DLT on the 7d (118 vs. 74.5 μg·h/mL; P=0.014) and 21d (73.8 vs 49.3 μg·h/mL; P=0.049) schedules. In 28 patients with neuroblastoma, the AUC0-8 did not correlate with time to progression. Apparent clearance (CL/F) did not correlate with age or gender. Conclusions: PK samples were obtained from 83% (60/72) of children enrolled. The ABT-751 AUC0-8 was dose proportional; inter- and intra-patient variability was low. Patients who experienced DLT had higher ABT-751 AUC0-8. The mean CL/F of ABT-751 was similar to that observed in adults (40 mL/min/m2) but did not correlate with age or gender. The sulfate conjugate was the primary metabolite in plasma and urine. Urinary excretion was not a major route of elimination of the parent drug. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Evaluation of the safety of C-1311 administered in a phase 1 dose-escalation trial as a 1-hour infusion once every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12005-12005 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Thomas ◽  
A. Anthoney ◽  
S. Ahmed ◽  
M. Drouin ◽  
A. Major ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Active Member ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Advanced Malignancy ◽  
Drug Concentrations

12005 Background: C-1311 (Symadex) is the most active member of a new series of anti-cancer agents, the imidazoacridinones, specially designed compounds developed from research on the structure-activity relationships of existing cancer therapies. This clinical trial was designed to assess the safety profile of ascending doses of C-1311 and to determine the recommended dose when administered every 3 weeks (Q3W). Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to conventional therapy were enrolled. The dose escalation scheme was divided into 2 phases with different schedules. Initially, C-1311 was given as a 1-hour daily infusion over 5 consecutive days. Following review of pre-clinical data, coupled with preliminary results of a parallel weekly study, a day 1 only schedule was explored. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is defined as the dose at which 2/3 or 2/6 pts experience a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The recommended dose (RD) is defined as the dose level below the MTD, confirmed by expansion of the RD cohort to 9 pts. Results: The first 5 patients were treated at doubling doses of 6, 12, 24, 48 and 96 mg/m2 on a schedule of 1-hour daily infusions over 5 consecutive days, repeated every 3 weeks; no DLTs were seen. The 6th pt received the same total dose as the 5th (480 mg/m2) but on day 1 only, following which a modified Fibonacci design with cohorts of 3 pts and 33% dose increments was utilized. Subsequently, pts received C-1311 at doses of 640 mg/m2 (3 pts), 850 mg/m2 (3 pts) and 1100 mg/m2 (5 pts); 2/5 pts treated at 1100 mg/m2 experienced an identical DLT (grade 4 neutropenia for ≥7 days with grade 4 thrombocytopenia), defining this as the MTD. The 850 mg/m2 cohort was expanded to confirm this as the RD. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia and fatigue have been reported as drug-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs). Grade 1 or 2 AEs most commonly described as drug-related are fatigue, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Stable disease was observed in two patients with advanced malignancy. A pt had a stable disease over 8 cycles and one over 6 cycles. Plasma drug concentrations are linear and proportional to dose. Conclusions: A C-1311 dose of 850 mg/m2 administered once every 3 weeks offers a predictable and tolerable safety profile. [Table: see text]

Phase I trial and pharmacokinetic (PK) study of satraplatin in children and young adults with refractory solid tumors including brain tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2554-2554
Author(s):  
Srivandana Akshintala ◽  
Leigh Marcus ◽  
Katherine E. Warren ◽  
Robert F. Murphy ◽  
Wendy J. Goodspeed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Gliomatosis Cerebri ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Resistant Cell ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Apparent Clearance ◽  
Orally Bioavailable ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Enzyme Elevation

2554 Background: Satraplatin is an orally bioavailable platinum analog. Based on pre-clinical activity (IC500.02-8 µg/ml) including activity in cisplatin resistant cell lines, and clinical activity without neuro-, nephro-, or ototoxicity in adults with refractory tumors, we developed a phase 1 trial to determine the toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and PKs of satraplatin in children with refractory solid tumors. Methods: Satraplatin (10 and 50 mg capsules) was administered orally once daily on days 1 - 5 of a 28 day cycle to cohorts of 3-6 patients (pts) at 60 mg/m2/dose (DL 1) and 80 mg/m2/dose (DL 2). Plasma ultrafiltrate (PUF) platinum was measured using atomic absorption spectroscopy during cycle 1 for PK analysis. Results: 9 pts [5 male, 4 female, median age 17 years (range 8-19)] with malignant glioma (n=4), ependymoma (n=2), medulloblastoma (n=1), osteosarcoma (n=1), or hepatoblastoma (n=1) received 1-10+ cycles (median 2). The MTD was exceeded at DL 2 as 2/4 pts had dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of delayed and prolonged myelosuppression (grade 3 thrombocytopenia, n=1; grade 3-4 neutropenia, n=2). 0/5 pts at DL 1 had DLTs. Grade 1 ototoxicity was seen in 1 pt at cycle 10. Non-DLTs included myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicities, fatigue, headache, liver enzyme elevation, and electrolyte abnormalities. No objective responses were observed, but 1 pt with gliomatosis cerebri has had radiographic stable disease through cycle 10+. Satraplatin mean exposure (AUC) and peak concentration (Cmax) were similar at both dose levels [day 1 PUF AUC0-24h 1.22 ± 0.55 µg/ml*h at DL1 (n=3), 1.02 ± 0.45 µg/ml*h at DL2 (n=3); Cmax0.17 ± 0.08 µg/ml at DL 1 (n=3), 0.16 ± 0.05 µg/ml at DL 2 (n=3)]. Terminal half-life was 14 ± 6 h and apparent clearance was 76 ± 29 L/h (n=6). Conclusions: The MTD of oral satraplatin in children with solid tumors is 60 mg/m2/dose daily x 5 q28 days. The toxicity profile was similar to adults, and delayed myelosuppression was DLT. Satraplatin exposure appears higher in pediatric pts compared to adults (PUF AUC0-24h 0.25-0.47 µg/ml*h at 60-80 mg/m2/dose). DL 1 will be expanded to gain additional experience regarding toxicities and PKs in a broader age range. Clinical trial information: NCT01259479.

Endoxifen, an Estrogen Receptor Targeted Therapy: From Bench to Bedside

Endocrinology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 162 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Swaathi Jayaraman ◽  
Joel M Reid ◽  
John R Hawse ◽  
Matthew P Goetz
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Parent Drug ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

Abstract The selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulator, tamoxifen, is the only endocrine agent with approvals for both the prevention and treatment of premenopausal and postmenopausal estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer as well as for the treatment of male breast cancer. Endoxifen, a secondary metabolite resulting from CYP2D6-dependent biotransformation of the primary tamoxifen metabolite, N-desmethyltamoxifen (NDT), is a more potent antiestrogen than either NDT or the parent drug, tamoxifen. However, endoxifen’s antitumor effects may be related to additional molecular mechanisms of action, apart from its effects on ER. In phase 1/2 clinical studies, the efficacy of Z-endoxifen, the active isomer of endoxifen, was evaluated in patients with endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer as well as in patients with gynecologic, desmoid, and hormone-receptor positive solid tumors, and demonstrated substantial oral bioavailability and promising antitumor activity. Apart from its potent anticancer effects, Z-endoxifen appears to result in similar or even greater bone agonistic effects while resulting in little or no endometrial proliferative effects compared with tamoxifen. In this review, we summarize the preclinical and clinical studies evaluating endoxifen in the context of breast and other solid tumors, the potential benefits of endoxifen in bone, as well as its emerging role as an antimanic agent in bipolar disorder. In total, the summarized body of literature provides compelling arguments for the ongoing development of Z-endoxifen as a novel drug for multiple indications.

scholarly journals 417 Design and rationale of a phase 1 study evaluating AMG 256, a novel, targeted, IL-21 receptor agonist and anti-PD-1 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A443-A443
Author(s):  
Gregory Durm ◽  
Sophia Frentzas ◽  
Erik Rasmussen ◽  
Saltanat Najmi ◽  
Nooshin Sadraei
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Immunity ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
List Type ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Drug Study ◽  
Interleukin 21

BackgroundCheckpoint inhibitors are a promising therapy for patients with solid tumors; however, many patients require additional therapies to maximize clinical benefit or overcome resistance.1 The type-1 cytokine interleukin-21 (IL-21) is a promising candidate for combination and has shown clinical activity in melanoma and renal cell cancer.2 IL-21 has also shown improved efficacy when combined with anti-programmed death (PD)-1 antibodies in preclinical models.3 4 AMG 256 is a mutated IL-21 cytokine fused to an anti-PD-1 antibody to combine IL-21 pathway stimulation with checkpoint inhibition—a strategy that is designed to prime and extend the activity of cytotoxic and memory T cells and induce anti-tumor immunity. This first-in-human (FIH) study will assess safety, tolerability, and estimated dosing of AMG 256 monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.MethodsThis is a FIH, multicenter, non-randomized, open-label, phase 1 study (NCT04362748) of AMG 256 in patients with advanced solid tumors. The planned sample size is approximately 100 patients in two parts: part 1 will evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), part 2 will evaluate the MTD determined in part 1 to further characterize the safety profile and preliminary tumor response. AMG 256 will be delivered by intravenous (IV) infusion. Enrollment criteria include adults with life expectancy of > 3 months, ECOG performance status ≤ 2, histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors not amenable to curative treatment with surgery or radiation, and at least one measurable lesion ≥ 10 mm that has not undergone biopsy within 3 months of screening scan. Exclusion criteria include primary brain tumor, untreated or symptomatic brain metastases, currently receiving treatment in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 28 days since ending treatment on another investigational device or drug study, history of solid organ transplantation or major surgery within 28 days of study day 1, live vaccine therapy within 4 weeks prior to study day 1, and active infection requiring oral or IV therapy. The primary endpoints are incidence of dose-limiting toxicities and adverse events, MTD, and recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives will evaluate PK parameters, preliminary antitumor activity (objective response, duration of response, progression-free survival, disease control rate, duration of stable disease, overall survival), and immunogenicity of AMG 256 via incidence of anti-AMG 256 antibodies.ResultsN/AConclusionsN/AAcknowledgements• The authors thank the investigators, patients, and study staff who are contributing to this study.• The study was sponsored and funded by Amgen Inc. • Medical writing support was provided by Christopher Nosala (Amgen Inc.).Trial RegistrationNCT04362748Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by all institutional ethics boards.ReferencesKluger HM, Tawbi HA, Ascierto ML, et al. Defining tumor resistance to PD-1 pathway blockade: recommendations from the first meeting of the SITC Immunotherapy Resistance Taskforce. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8:e000398.Thompson JA, Curti BD, Redman BG, et al. Phase I study of recombinant interleukin-21 in patients with metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:2034–2039.Lewis KE, Selby MJ, Masters G, et al. Interleukin-21 combined with PD-1 or CTLA-4 blockade enhances antitumor immunity in mouse tumor models. Oncoimmunology. 2017;7:e1377873.Shen S, Sckisel G, Sahoo A, et al. Engineered IL-21 cytokine muteins fused to anti-PD-1 antibodies can improve CD8+ T cell function and anti-tumor immunity. Front Immunol 2020;11:832.

scholarly journals A first-in-human, phase 1 study of the NEDD8 activating enzyme E1 inhibitor TAS4464 in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noboru Yamamoto ◽  
Toshio Shimizu ◽  
Kan Yonemori ◽  
Shigehisa Kitano ◽  
Shunsuke Kondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Function ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Open Label Phase

SummaryBackground This open-label, phase 1 study investigated TAS4464, a potent NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor, in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (JapicCTI-173,488; registered 13/01/2017). The primary objective was dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was investigated using an accelerated titration design. Methods The starting 10-mg/m2 dose was followed by an initial accelerated stage (weekly dosing; n = 11). Based on liver function test (LFT) results, a 14-day, 20-mg/m2 dose lead-in period was implemented (weekly dosing with lead-in; n = 6). Results Abnormal LFT changes and gastrointestinal effects were the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs). DLTs with 56-mg/m2 weekly dosing occurred in 1/5 patients; five patients had grade ≥ 2 abnormal LFT changes at 40- and 56-mg/m2 weekly doses. Further dose escalation ceased because of the possibility of severe abnormal LFT changes occurring. DLTs with weekly dosing with lead-in occurred in 1/5 patients at a 56-mg/m2 dose; MTD could not be determined because discontinuation criteria for additional enrollment at that particular dose level were met. As no further enrollment at lower doses occurred, dose escalation assessment was discontinued. Serious treatment-related AEs, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, and DLTs were all related to abnormal LFT changes, suggesting that TAS4464 administration could affect liver function. This effect was dose-dependent but considered reversible. Complete or partial responses to TAS4464 were not observed; one patient achieved prolonged stable disease. Conclusions MTD could not be determined due to TAS4464 effects on liver function. Further evaluation of the mechanism of NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor-induced abnormal liver function is required. Trial registration number JapicCTI-173,488 (registered with Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center). Registration date 13 January 2017

403 Early results from a phase 1 study to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of AMG 404, a programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A428-A428
Author(s):  
Timothy Price ◽  
Sant Chawla ◽  
Gerald Falchook ◽  
Hans Prenen ◽  
Iwona Lugowska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors

BackgroundEnhancement of antitumor immunity through inhibition of the checkpoint PD-1 receptor has been effective in the treatment of many malignancies. AMG 404 is a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting PD-1. This phase 1, open-label, multicenter first-in-human study (NCT03853109) will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of AMG 404 monotherapy in adult patients with advanced solid tumors.MethodsThe primary study endpoint is dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and safety; key secondary endpoints include pharmacokinetic parameters, objective response rate (assessed Q8W), duration of response, and progression-free survival. Key inclusion criteria include histologically or cytologically proven metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors not amenable to curative treatment with surgery or radiation for which standard therapies have been exhausted or not available. Prior anti-PD-(L)1 or other checkpoint inhibitors were not allowed. Five dose-finding cohorts, including 2 expansion cohorts, ranged from 3–20 patients each. AMG 404 was given until disease progression, intolerance, or consent withdrawal.ResultsAs of the data cutoff date of May 4, 2020, 62 patients received at least 1 dose of AMG 404 and were included in the safety and efficacy analysis sets. Fifty percent were men, 72% had ECOG 1 performance status, median age was 62 years (range: 28–83), and 42% had ≥3 lines of prior anticancer therapy. Median AMG 404 exposure was ~3 months (maximum: ~12 months). No DLTs were observed. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported for 29 patients (47%): those reported for ≥2 patients were fatigue (n=7); hypothyroidism (n=6); increased blood thyroid stimulating hormone and nausea (n=4 each); increased aspartate aminotransferase, decreased appetite, and pyrexia (n=3 each); and increased alanine aminotransferase, arthralgia, diarrhea, and increased weight (n=2 each). AEs leading to withdrawal of AMG 404 were reported for 3 patients (5%); all were serious and considered to be not related to AMG 404. Sixteen (26%) patients died on study; no deaths were considered related to AMG 404. Preliminary pharmacokinetic results were consistent with those of other therapeutic anti-PD-1 mAbs. Three patients had a confirmed partial response (pancreatic cancer, clear cell cancer, and pleomorphic sarcoma); an additional 4 patients had one scan with a partial response and are pending a confirmatory scan (clear cell renal carcinoma, undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma, sarcomatoid carcinoma of unknown primary, and colon cancer).ConclusionsAMG 404 is tolerable at the tested doses with no DLTs reported. All observed TRAEs are consistent with other anti-PD-1 therapies. Encouraging anti-tumor activity has been observed in heavily pretreated patients. The study is continuing enrollment into additional cohorts.Trial RegistrationNCT03853109Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by the Ethics Board of each institution involved in this study and can be produced upon request.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document