Endoxifen, an Estrogen Receptor Targeted Therapy: From Bench to Bedside

Endocrinology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 162 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Swaathi Jayaraman ◽  
Joel M Reid ◽  
John R Hawse ◽  
Matthew P Goetz

Abstract The selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulator, tamoxifen, is the only endocrine agent with approvals for both the prevention and treatment of premenopausal and postmenopausal estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer as well as for the treatment of male breast cancer. Endoxifen, a secondary metabolite resulting from CYP2D6-dependent biotransformation of the primary tamoxifen metabolite, N-desmethyltamoxifen (NDT), is a more potent antiestrogen than either NDT or the parent drug, tamoxifen. However, endoxifen’s antitumor effects may be related to additional molecular mechanisms of action, apart from its effects on ER. In phase 1/2 clinical studies, the efficacy of Z-endoxifen, the active isomer of endoxifen, was evaluated in patients with endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer as well as in patients with gynecologic, desmoid, and hormone-receptor positive solid tumors, and demonstrated substantial oral bioavailability and promising antitumor activity. Apart from its potent anticancer effects, Z-endoxifen appears to result in similar or even greater bone agonistic effects while resulting in little or no endometrial proliferative effects compared with tamoxifen. In this review, we summarize the preclinical and clinical studies evaluating endoxifen in the context of breast and other solid tumors, the potential benefits of endoxifen in bone, as well as its emerging role as an antimanic agent in bipolar disorder. In total, the summarized body of literature provides compelling arguments for the ongoing development of Z-endoxifen as a novel drug for multiple indications.

2002 ◽  
pp. 267-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Morris ◽  
A Wakeling

Since its introduction more than 30 years ago, tamoxifen has been the most widely used endocrine therapy for the treatment of women with advanced breast cancer. More recently, a number of alternative endocrine treatments have been developed, including several selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and, most recently, fulvestrant ('Faslodex'). Fulvestrant is an estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist, which, unlike the SERMs, has no known agonist (estrogenic) effect and downregulates the ER protein. Tamoxifen is effective and well tolerated, although the non-steroidal AIs, anastrozole and letrozole, are more effective treatments for advanced disease than tamoxifen. Fulvestrant has recently gained US Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following antiestrogen therapy. In two global phase III clinical trials fulvestrant was at least as effective and as equally well tolerated as anastrozole for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced and metastatic breast cancer. In a retrospective analysis of the combined data from these trials, mean duration of response was significantly greater for fulvestrant compared with anastrozole. These new hormonal treatments expand the choice of endocrine therapy for women with advanced breast cancer and offer new options for sequencing and combining treatments.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas P. McAndrew ◽  
Richard S. Finn

The natural history of hormone receptor–positive breast cancer tends to be more favorable than other subtypes such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–amplified and triple-negative. In addition, the natural dependence on steroid hormone signaling has allowed for therapeutic targeting of this pathway and significant improvements in survival while maintaining quality of life: the two main goals in management of the disease. The sequential use of endocrine agents including the selective estrogen receptor modulators (tamoxifen), aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane) and the selective estrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant has been the backbone of management for years. In the past decade, the introduction of molecularly targeted agents against intracellular targets such as mammalian target of rapamycin (everolimus), cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib), and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (alpelisib) has offered patients effective nonchemotherapy-based options, which are improving outcomes. Although knowledge gaps still exist in regard to the optimal sequencing of these new regimens, they have expanded our repertoire of options for patients and have shifted the need for cytotoxic chemotherapy and its associated complications to later lines. Still, formatting a plan for these patients includes taking into account traditional prognostic factors such as menopausal status, previous treatments, disease-free interval for those patients with early breast cancer that has recurred, and tumor burden. To assist in developing this treatment plan, we will review the current data with systemic agents in the management of these patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3557-3557 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Chow ◽  
Z. Jiang ◽  
R. Epstein ◽  
I. Bondarenko ◽  
A. Awada ◽  
...  

3557 Background: Neratinib (HKI-272) is a potent irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase receptors, erbB-1,-2 and -4. In this phase 1 study, a combination dose of neratinib plus paclitaxel that is tolerable was determined in patients (pts) with solid tumors, and safety and preliminary efficacy were assessed in pts with erbB-2+ metastatic breast cancer. Methods: In this open label, 2-part study, ascending multiple daily oral doses of neratinib (160 mg, 240 mg) were administered in combination with IV paclitaxel 80 mg/m2, if tolerable, or 70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15. Pts with solid tumors and pts with only metastatic erbB-2+ breast cancer are enrolled in part 1 and 2, respectively. Tumor measurements were made at screening and at every 8 weeks (2 cycles) by modified RECIST criteria. Timed blood samples were collected for neratinib and paclitaxel plasma concentration determination, and PK analyses were performed using a noncompartmental method. Results: Data for 54 pts as of 30 Oct 2008 are presented (median age [range] of 51.5 [20–74] yrs; 91% female; 26 % with prior trastuzumab treatment of median duration [range] 32.5 [10–52] wks; 15% with prior lapatinib treatment). Tumor types in part 1 included breast, endometrial, cervical, colorectal and esophageal cancer. There were no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at the 240 mg neratinib-80 mg/m2 paclitaxel dose, and as standard doses of neratinib and paclitaxel were reached, there was no reason for further escalation. Neratinib-related AEs, any grade in ≥10% of pts included diarrhea (50%), neutropenia (17%), rash (13%), nausea (11%) and vomiting (11%). Neratinib- related AEs, grade ≥3 in ≥2% of pts were diarrhea (20%), neutropenia (9%) and dehydration (4%). Only 2 pts (at the 240 mg neratinib-80 mg/m2 paclitaxel dose) had dose reductions due to diarrhea. In 35 efficacy evaluable pts, 5 had confirmed partial response (PR). Confirmed clinical benefit (PR and prolonged disease stabilization) was seen in 2 pts in part 1, 1 pt with endometrial cancer and 1 pt with cervical cancer. Conclusions: This combination of 240 mg neratinib and 80 mg/m2 paclitaxel was tolerable with a toxicity profile similar to that observed for neratinib, and had promising antitumor activity in pts with solid tumors and erbB-2 + breast cancer. [Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudipa Saha Roy ◽  
Ratna K. Vadlamudi

Metastatic breast cancer is a life-threatening stage of cancer and is the leading cause of death in advanced breast cancer patients. Estrogen signaling and the estrogen receptor (ER) are implicated in breast cancer progression, and the majority of the human breast cancers start out as estrogen dependent. Accumulating evidence suggests that ER signaling is complex, involving coregulatory proteins and extranuclear actions. ER-coregualtory proteins are tightly regulated under normal conditions with miss expression primarily reported in cancer. Deregulation of ER coregualtors or ER extranuclear signaling has potential to promote metastasis in ER-positive breast cancer cells. This review summarizes the emerging role of ER signaling in promoting metastasis of breast cancer cells, discusses the molecular mechanisms by which ER signaling contributes to metastasis, and explores possible therapeutic targets to block ER-driven metastasis.


2020 ◽  
pp. clincanres.2878.2020
Author(s):  
Alexej Ballhausen ◽  
Jennifer J. Wheler ◽  
Daniel D. Karp ◽  
Sarina A. Piha-Paul ◽  
Siqing Fu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document