scholarly journals Durable Long-Term Remission With Chemotherapy Alone for Stage II to IV Laryngeal Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1976-1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Christopher Holsinger ◽  
Merrill S. Kies ◽  
Eduardo M. Diaz ◽  
Ann M. Gillenwater ◽  
Jan S. Lewin ◽  
...  

Purpose For patients with stage II to IV laryngeal cancer, radiation therapy (RT) either alone or with concurrent chemotherapy provides the highest rate of organ preservation but can be associated with functional impairment. Thus, we studied the use of induction chemotherapy with or without conservation laryngeal surgery (CLS). Our objectives were to study the sensitivity of laryngeal cancer to platinum-based chemotherapy alone and to highlight the efficacy of CLS in this setting. Patients and Methods Thirty-one previously untreated patients with laryngeal cancer (T2-4, N0-1, M0), who were resectable with CLS, were enrolled. Patients received three to four cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) chemotherapy, and response was assessed histologically. Patients with partial response (PR) proceeded to CLS. Patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) received an additional three cycles of TIP and no other treatment. Results Thirty patients were assessable for response. With TIP chemotherapy alone, 11 patients (37%) achieved pCR, 10 of whom (33%) remain alive with durable disease remission and no evidence of recurrence over a median follow-up time of 5 years. Nineteen patients (63%) treated with TIP alone achieved PR. The overall laryngeal preservation (LP) rate was 83%, and only five patients (16%) required postoperative RT. No patient required a gastrostomy tube or tracheotomy. Conclusion Chemotherapy alone in selected patients with T2-4, N0-1 laryngeal cancer can provide durable disease remission at 5 years. For patients with PR, CLS provides a high rate of LP. This prospective study suggests that chemotherapy alone may cure selected patients with laryngeal cancer, warranting further prospective investigation.

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 1989-1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyne Martin ◽  
Robert J. Ginsberg ◽  
Ennapadam S. Venkatraman ◽  
Manjit S. Bains ◽  
Robert J. Downey ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Assessment of long-term results of combined-modality therapy for resectable non–small-cell lung cancer is hampered by insufficient follow-up and small patient numbers. To evaluate this, we reviewed our collective experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review recording demographics, tumor stage, treatment, and outcome of consecutive patients undergoing surgery. Survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier, and prognostic factors were analyzed by log-rank and Cox regression. RESULTS: From January 1993 to December 1999, 470 patients were treated, with follow-up in 446: 27 stage I, 55 stage II, 316 stage III, 43 stage IV (solitary M1), and five uncertain. Chemotherapy was mitomycin/vinblastine/cisplatin (174 patients [39.0%]), carboplatin/paclitaxel (148 [33.2%]), and other combination (124 [27.8%]); 75 patients (16.8%) received induction radiation. Resection was complete in 77.4%, incomplete in 8.3%, attempted but with gross residual disease afterward in 1.8%, and not performed in 12.6%. Pathologic complete response occurred in 20 patients (4.5%). With median follow-up of 31.0 months for patients still alive, median and 3-year survival for pathologic stages 0, I, II, III, and IV were more than 90 months, 73%; 42 months, 52%; 23 months, 35%; 16 months, 28%; and 16 months, 23% (P < .001). In a multivariate analysis, age, complete resection, pathologic stage, and pneumonectomy, but not induction regimen, significantly influenced survival. CONCLUSION: Although pathologic complete response outside the protocol setting is low, survival of this large patient cohort is comparable to that of patients in published combined-modality trials. Survival is significantly influenced by patient age, complete resection, pathologic stage, and pneumonectomy. These results can help guide standard clinical practice and emphasize the need for novel induction regimens.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
William M. Sikov ◽  
Donald A. Berry ◽  
Charles M. Perou ◽  
Baljit Singh ◽  
Constance T. Cirrincione ◽  
...  

Purpose One third of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). CALGB 40603 (Alliance), a 2 × 2 factorial, open-label, randomized phase II trial, evaluated the impact of adding carboplatin and/or bevacizumab. Patients and Methods Patients (N = 443) with stage II to III TNBC received paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 once per week (wP) for 12 weeks, followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide once every 2 weeks (ddAC) for four cycles, and were randomly assigned to concurrent carboplatin (area under curve 6) once every 3 weeks for four cycles and/or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks for nine cycles. Effects of adding these agents on pCR breast (ypT0/is), pCR breast/axilla (ypT0/isN0), treatment delivery, and toxicities were analyzed. Results Patients assigned to either carboplatin or bevacizumab were less likely to complete wP and ddAC without skipped doses, dose modification, or early discontinuation resulting from toxicity. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were more common with carboplatin, as were hypertension, infection, thromboembolic events, bleeding, and postoperative complications with bevacizumab. Employing one-sided P values, addition of either carboplatin (60% v 44%; P = .0018) or bevacizumab (59% v 48%; P = .0089) significantly increased pCR breast, whereas only carboplatin (54% v 41%; P = .0029) significantly raised pCR breast/axilla. More-than-additive interactions between the two agents could not be demonstrated. Conclusion In stage II to III TNBC, addition of either carboplatin or bevacizumab to NACT increased pCR rates, but whether this will improve relapse-free or overall survival is unknown. Given results from recently reported adjuvant trials, further investigation of bevacizumab in this setting is unlikely, but the role of carboplatin could be evaluated in definitive studies, ideally limited to biologically defined patient subsets most likely to benefit from this agent.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15093-15093
Author(s):  
T. J. Fillos ◽  
P. Hentschel ◽  
K. Watkins ◽  
M. S. Karpeh ◽  
A. Meek ◽  
...  

15093 Background: EC is a highly lethal disease with 5 year survival less than 15%. Surgery offers a chance for cure in early disease. Still, fewer than 20% of pts treated with surgery alone are alive at 5 years. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation offers the theoretical advantage of increasing R0 resections and reducing early local and distal metastases which may translate into improved survival. Several clinical trials have resulted in pathologic complete response (pCR) rates of 20–30%. Methods: Newly diagnosed pts with EC Stage 2A (T3) to 4 received weekly Docetaxel (D)25–30mg/m2 and Cisplatin (C)25–30mg/m2.for 6–8 weeks concurrently with radiation, 5040 cGy in 28 fractions. Cetuximab (E) 200mg/m2 was added after it became accepted treatment in head and neck cancers. Pts were scheduled 4 - 6 weeks later for surgery followed by the same chemotherapy for total of 16 weeks of treatment. Pts were assessed for time to progression, overall survival and toxicities. Results: Fifteen pts treated in 2005–6 underwent IRB approved evaluation; 11 male and 4 female, median age of 62(range 44–78) . Four had squamous cell (SCC) and 11 adenocarcinomas. Nine pts had Stage II, 4 pts stage III and 2 pts stage IV disease. Seven pts underwent surgery, all R0 resections. Four of them had pCR, one pPR (downstaged from T3 to T1) and two pts had stable disease. An additional 3 pts had radiological and endoscopic proven CR (medically not surgical candidates) for an objective response (CR+PR) in 8 out of 15 pts (3 SCC and 5 adenoca). Five out of 9 receiving DC had an objective response while 3 of 6 receiving DCE responded. Five pts progressed prior to surgery. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 2, nausea in 3, and 1 pt experienced Grade 3 dehydration. Four patients required dose reductions by 20%. Six patients had one cycle and 2 had 3 cycles delayed by one week each. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment with weekly Docetaxel and Cisplatin ± Cetuximab is tolerable with high rate of CRs. There was no observed difference in response with the addition of cetuximab. A Phase III study is suggested. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6034-6034 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. W. Choong ◽  
D. J. Haraf ◽  
E. E. Cohen ◽  
K. M. Stenson ◽  
E. A. Blair ◽  
...  

6034 Background: Preclinical data supports inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to improve tumor radiosensitivity. Phase I data demonstates that BFHX was tolerable in HNC (Seiwert, pASCO2006). Here we present preliminary toxicity data from a randomized phase II trial in pts with PS 0–2, stage II-IV (T2–4 N0–1 M0) HNC. Methods: Pts were randomized (2:1) to receive either BFHX or FHX. Planned sample size is 72pts. Chemotherapy consists of 5- FU (600 mg/m2/day continuous infusion for 120 hrs), hydroxyurea (500 mg PO q12 hours for 11 doses) with or without bevacizumab (10 mg/kg IV on day 1), concurrently with twice daily RT on a week on-week off schedule. Results: 21pts (BFHX 14pt and FHX 7pt) have completed therapy and are evaluable for toxicity. Pt characteristics in the BFHX and FHX arms are: median age 61 vs. 55 yrs, males 78% vs. 85%, stage II-III 57% vs. 86% and IV 43% vs. 14%. All pts have PS 0–1. 20 pts are evaluable for toxicity. Two episodes of gr3 leukopenia and one episode of gr 3 neutropenia were observed in the BFHX arm; whereas no gr3 hematologic toxicities were seen in the FHX arm. Mucositis (Gr3 - BFHX 85% vs. FHX 86%) and dermatitis (Gr3 - 0% vs. 14%) were observed in every pt. Other common non- hematologic toxicities were pain (100% vs. 86%), fatigue (77% vs. 86%) and anorexia (62% vs. 51%). No hemorrhagic events were observed. In the BFHX arm, one episode of deep venous thrombosis and one non-neutropenic death from sepsis were observed. Pathologic complete response rates were 92% and 100% in the BFHX and FHX arms, respectively. Conclusions: Preliminary results support the tolerability of BFHX. Toxicity appears to be similar to FHX with an apparent increase in leukopenia consistent with prior reports. Bleeding complications were not increased with BFHX. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14535-e14535
Author(s):  
Christina Sing-Ying Wu ◽  
Lai Wei ◽  
Katherine Glass ◽  
John Wilson ◽  
Sherif Abdel-Misih ◽  
...  

e14535 Background: Pts with stage II/III rectal cancers are treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical resection followed by adjuvant CT per practice guidelines. It is unclear whether adjuvant CT provides survival benefit, and the purpose of this study was to measure outcome in pts who did and did not receive adjuvant CT. Methods: We used a prospectively collected database for pts treated at The Ohio State University and analyzed overall survival (OS), time to recurrence (TTR), pt characteristics, tumor features, and treatments. Survival curves were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Age was compared using the Wilcoxon test, and other categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Results: Between August, 2005 to July, 2011, 110 pts were identified and 71 pts had received adjuvant CT. There was no significant difference in sex, race, pathologic tumor (T) stage, and pathologic complete response between the two groups. Pts receiving adjuvant CT were significantly younger (median age 54.3 vs. 62 years, p=0.01) and had more advanced pathologic nodal (N) stage (43 vs. 19% N1 or N2, p=0.02). Median OS was 72.6 months with CT vs. 36.4 months without CT (p=0.0003). Median TTR has not yet been reached. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, adjuvant CT was associated with a longer OS despite more advanced pathologic nodal staging. Prospective randomized studies are warranted to determine whether adjuvant CT provides a survival benefit for pts across the spectrum of stage II and III rectal cancer. [Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 518-518
Author(s):  
Christina Sing-Ying Wu ◽  
Lai Wei ◽  
Katherine Glass ◽  
John Wilson ◽  
Sherif Abdel-Misih ◽  
...  

518 Background: Pts with stage II/III rectal cancers are treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical resection followed by adjuvant CT per practice guidelines. It is unclear whether adjuvant CT provides survival benefit, and the purpose of this study was to measure outcome in pts who did and did not receive adjuvant CT. Methods: We used a prospectively collected database for pts treated at The Ohio State University, and analyzed overall survival (OS), time to recurrence (TTR), pt characteristics, tumor features, and treatments. Survival curves were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Age was compared using the Wilcoxon test, and other categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Results: Between August 2005 to July 2011, 110 pts were identified and 71 pts had received adjuvant CT. There was no significant difference in sex, race, pathologic tumor (T) stage, and pathologic complete response between the two pt groups. Pts receiving adjuvant CT were significantly younger (median age 54.3 vs. 62 years, p=0.01) and had more advanced pathologic nodal (N) stage (43 vs. 19%, p=0.02). Median OS was 72.6 months with CT vs. 36.4 months without CT (p=0.0003). Median TTR has not yet been reached. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, adjuvant CT was associated with a longer OS despite more advanced pathologic nodal staging. Prospective randomized studies are warranted to determine whether adjuvant CT provides a survival benefit for pts across the spectrum of stage II and III rectal cancer. [Table: see text]


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 133-133
Author(s):  
Haruhiko Cho ◽  
Takaki Yoshikawa

133 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after D2 gastrectomy has become a standard treatment for stage 2/3 gastric cancer in Japan and Korea; however, the results remain unsatisfactory due to insufficient risk reduction in patients with stage 3 disease and low compliance. Although the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a promising approach associated with a high rate of compliance and a downstage effect, the long-term survival benefits of this modality are unclear. Moreover, the impact of the pathological response on survival has not been evaluated. Based on the hypothesis that the pathological response grade is associated with survival, we conducted a search for reports of a pathological complete response (pCR) obtained with NAC. Methods: A total of 27 gastric cancer patients who achieved a pCR following NAC therapy were identified using PubMed and the Japanese medical search engine “Ichu-shi,” with the search words “gastric cancer,” “NAC,” and “pCR.” A questionnaire regarding the patients’ prognoses was posted in 23 institutions in Japan in July 2013. Results: Answers regarding 22 patients were obtained from 20 institutions. The subjects included 13 males and nine females. The mean age was 67.5 years. Tumors with stage 3/4 (95.4%: 21/22) and a diffuse-type histology (61.9%: 13/21) were dominant. S1/CDDP was the most frequently selected NAC regimen. A total of 77.2% (17/22) of the patients required combined resection of adjacent organs, and all patients underwent R0 resection and D2 lymphadenectomy. At present, 86.3% (19/22) of the patients are alive without recurrence; none of the ten patients who received postoperative AC demonstrated any recurrence, while three of twelve patients who did not receive postoperative AC developed recurrence, and two patients died of the disease after surgery (at 71 months and nine months, respectively). The overall and recurrence-free survival rates at three/five years were 95.5%/85.1% and 90.9%/75.1%, respectively. Conclusions: Patients with gastric cancer who achieve a pCR with NAC are rare; however, their prognoses are excellent. It is therefore important to develop a NAC regimen focusing on a high pCR rate.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 676-676
Author(s):  
Jerome Doyen ◽  
Eric Francois ◽  
Anne-Claire Frin ◽  
Karen Benezery ◽  
Fuxiang Zhou ◽  
...  

676 Background: Organ preservation (avoiding TME surgery) for T2 T3 a-b rectal cancer is a field of active clinical research. Contact X Ray CXB combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) ± concurrent chemotherapy (CRT) is an attractive method to achieve clinical complete response (cCR) and consequently rectal preservation. We report an overview of 120 patients treated with CXB+EBRT over a 25 year period in Lyon since 1986 and then in Nice until 2012. Methods: Between 1986 and 2012, 120 patients presenting rectal adenocarcinoma T2 T3a-b (distal rectum: 87; middle rectum: 33) were treated with CXB +EBRT with conservative intent. In Lyon (1986-2001), 80 patients median age: 73y; T2:52; T3:28) risk were treated using CXB (80-110 Gy/3-4 fr/4-6 weeks) followed by EBRT (39 Gy/13 fr/18 days) and 192 Iridium implant boost (20 Gy). When cCR was achieved, close surveillance was proposed. In Nice (2002-2012), 40 patients (median age 81y; T2:22; T3:18) received CXB same regimen as in Lyon (using new Papillon 50 machine since 2009) + EBRT (45-50 Gy/5weeks) with concurrent chemotherapy (5-FU or Capecitabine). When cCR was achieved close surveillance was proposed or local excision (13 pts). Results: Median follow-up time 58 months in both groups. Local relapse occurred mainly in the 2 first years. Isolated lymph node recurrence <5%. Bowel function good or excellent when rectum preserved. Main clinical outcomes in table (some improved results in Nice possibly due to better treatment approach and patient selection). Conclusions: CXB with EBRT and concurrent capecitabine achieve safely high rate of cCR with organ preservation. The OPERA randomized trial will reproduce Lyon R 96 trial (Gerard JP, JCO 2004;22:2404) and test the superiority of CXB boost for organ preservation. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document