A phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor gefitinb in completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): NCIC CTG BR.19.

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA7005-LBA7005 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. D. Goss ◽  
I. Lorimer ◽  
M. S. Tsao ◽  
C. J. O'Callaghan ◽  
K. Ding ◽  
...  

LBA7005 Background: In meta-analyses, platinum-based adjuvant (adj) chemotherapy (CT) in completely resected NSCLC increased cure rate by ∼5%. At BR.19 initiation, adj study results with third-generation agents were unavailable. Gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, showed activity in monotherapy trials. We report a trial of adj gefitinib versus placebo after complete resection of NSCLC. Methods: Patients (pts) with stage IB-IIIA NSCLC were stratified by sex, stage, histology, post-op radiation, and after Jan 2003, adj CT. Pts were randomized to gefitinib 250 mg or placebo daily x 2 years. Study endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), toxicity, preplanned correlative studies. Study closed prematurely in Apr. 2005. Trial committee and NCIC CTG staff remained blinded to study drug. Results: 503 pts randomized (Sep 2002-Apr 2005); median age 67, males 54%, PS 0 54%; stage IB 49%, II 38%, III 13%; adenocarcinoma 59%, squamous 28%; ever smokers 89%; adj CT 17%; lobectomy 82%. Commonest grade 3/4 toxicities = fatigue 5%, rash 4% and diarrhea 5%. grade 3+ pneumonitis in 7 (1.4%) pts and led to death in 1. Median follow-up is 4.7 yrs; median treatment time is 4.8 mos. For gefitinib versus placebo, median DFS is 4.2 yrs versus not yet reached (NYR) HR1.22 (95% C.I. 0.93-1.61), p=0.15 and median OS 5.1 yrs versus NYR HR 1.24 (95% C.I. 0.94-1.64), p=0.14. In multivariate analysis, tumor size >4cm was predictive of poor DFS (p<0.0001) and never smoking for better OS with gefitinib (p=0.02). Results for KRAS and EGFR copy are available on 350 and 348 pts respectively. KRAS mutations were neither prognostic HR 1.12 (95% C.I. 0.67-1.86), p=0.66 nor predictive of gefitinib benefit (p = 0.16) on OS. EGFRcopy whether low/high polysomy or amplification was neither prognostic (p=0.77) nor predictive of OS benefit from gefitinib. Conclusions: Adjuvant gefitinib after complete resection of early stage NSCLC did not confer DFS or OS advantage in overall population. KRAS and EGFR copy were neither prognostic nor predictive of benefit from gefitinib. EGFR mutational analysis will be presented. [Table: see text]

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 810-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Melosky ◽  
Helen Anderson ◽  
Ronald L. Burkes ◽  
Quincy Chu ◽  
Desiree Hao ◽  
...  

Purpose Erlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor approved for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose epidermal growth factor receptor expression status is positive or unknown. Although it is efficacious, erlotinib can cause skin toxicity. This prospective, randomized phase III trial examined the effect of prophylactic treatment of erlotinib-induced skin rash. Patients and Methods Patients receiving erlotinib in the second- or third-line setting for advanced NSCLC were randomly assigned to prophylactic minocycline (100 mg twice per day for 4 weeks), reactive treatment (after rash developed, per grade of rash), or no treatment unless severe (grade 3). Rash incidence and severity, time to maximal rash, time to resolution, and overall survival (OS) were compared among treatment groups. Results In all, 150 patients were randomly assigned, 50 to each of three treatment arms. The incidence of skin toxicity was 84% regardless of treatment arm. Prophylactic treatment with minocycline significantly lengthened the time to the most severe grade of rash. Grade 3 rash was significantly higher in the no-treatment arm. OS was not significantly different among treatment arms, but patients receiving prophylactic or reactive treatments had a longer OS (7.6 and 8 months, respectively) than those who received no rash treatment (6 months). Rash was not self-limiting. Conclusion The incidence of all grades of rash did not differ statistically among the three arms, so the trial was negative. The incidence of grade 3 skin toxicities was reduced in patients who were treated with prophylactic minocycline or reactive treatment. Efficacy was not compromised. Prophylactic minocycline and reactive treatment are both acceptable options for the necessary treatment of erlotinib-induced rash in the second- or third-line setting of metastatic NSCLC.


2012 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 93-92
Author(s):  
Alexander Kretzschmar

Vandetanib ist ein oraler Hemmer des RET-Kinase-, VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor)- und EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor)-Signalwegs. In einer zulassungsrelevanten, randomisierten, doppelblinden, placebokontrollierten Phase- III-Studie verlängerte der Tyrosinkinasehemmer das progressionsfreie Überleben (PFS) signifikant länger als Placebo.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8123-TPS8123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Mok ◽  
Kazuhiko Nakagawa ◽  
Rafael Rosell ◽  
Yi Long Wu ◽  
Carl Trygstad ◽  
...  

TPS8123 Background: D is an orally available, potent and selective irreversible small molecule inhibitor of all catalytically active members of the HER (human epidermal growth factor receptor) family tyrosine kinases that has shown activity in preclinical studies on EGFR mutant cell lines, including those resistant to G. In a phase II trial of NSCLC pts who received 1st-line D, 75.6% of 45 pts with confirmed EGFR exon 19 or 21 sensitizing mutations (m) experienced a partial response (PR). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.2 mo, and the PFS rate at 1 yr was 76.5% (preliminary data; Mok et al APLCC 2012). Methods: Based on the phase II data, a phase III randomized, open label trial (ARCHER 1050; NCT01774721) was designed to compare the efficacy of 1st line D with G in pts with adv EGFR m-positive NSCLC. Eligible pts (N=440) have pathologically confirmed stage IIIB/IV NSCLC with at least one activating EGFR m, either exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R m. Concurrent m in exon 20 T790M is permitted. Pts must have radiologically measurable disease, ECOG PS 0–1 and no prior systemic therapy. Pts will be randomized (1:1) to receive D 45 mg or G 250 mg orally once daily. The primary endpoint is PFS by Independent Radiologic Review. Secondary endpoints include PFS by investigator assessment, overall survival (OS), OS at 30 mo, best overall response, duration of response, and safety and tolerability. Pt-reported outcomes (HRQoL and disease/treatment-related symptoms) were also assessed. Randomization will be stratified by race (Japanese vs mainland Chinese vs other East Asian vs nonEEast Asian), and EGFR m status (exon 19 deletion vs exon 21 L858R m). A minimum of 268 PFS events is required for 90% power to detect a PFS improvement of ≥50% in D vs G recipients using the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis population (HR ≤0.667). A significant (0.025 significance level) 1-sided stratified log-rank test for PFS at the final PFS analysis will be indicative of a positive study outcome. An interim analysis is planned to assess safety and whether early discontinuation of the trial is required for futility. Clinical trial information: NCT01774721.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (31) ◽  
pp. 4722-4729 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Sampson ◽  
Amy B. Heimberger ◽  
Gary E. Archer ◽  
Kenneth D. Aldape ◽  
Allan H. Friedman ◽  
...  

Purpose Immunologic targeting of tumor-specific gene mutations may allow precise eradication of neoplastic cells without toxicity. Epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII) is a constitutively activated and immunogenic mutation not expressed in normal tissues but widely expressed in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and other neoplasms. Patients and Methods A phase II, multicenter trial was undertaken to assess the immunogenicity of an EGFRvIII-targeted peptide vaccine and to estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of vaccinated patients with newly diagnosed EGFRvIII-expressing GBM with minimal residual disease. Intradermal vaccinations were given until toxicity or tumor progression was observed. Sample size was calculated to differentiate between PFS rates of 20% and 40% 6 months after vaccination. Results There were no symptomatic autoimmune reactions. The 6-month PFS rate after vaccination was 67% (95% CI, 40% to 83%) and after diagnosis was 94% (95% CI, 67% to 99%; n = 18). The median OS was 26.0 months (95% CI, 21.0 to 47.7 months). After adjustment for age and Karnofsky performance status, the OS of vaccinated patients was greater than that observed in a control group matched for eligibility criteria, prognostic factors, and temozolomide treatment (hazard ratio, 5.3; P = .0013; n = 17). The development of specific antibody (P = .025) or delayed-type hypersensitivity (P = .03) responses to EGFRvIII had a significant effect on OS. At recurrence, 82% (95% CI, 48% to 97%) of patients had lost EGFRvIII expression (P < .001). Conclusion EGFRvIII-targeted vaccination in patients with GBM warrants investigation in a phase III, randomized trial.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document