Oral vinorelbine (NVBo) at 3-weekly flat-dose intakes (FDI) as single agent or with cisplatin (CDDP) concomitantly with thoracic radiotherapy (RT) in stage III NSCLC: Escalation-dose phase I trial results.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7045-7045
Author(s):  
D. M. Kowalski ◽  
M. J. Krzakowski ◽  
K. Zajda ◽  
C. Lucas
2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17544-e17544
Author(s):  
Nimit Singhal ◽  
Kenneth B. Pittman ◽  
Christos Stelios Karapetis ◽  
Sonya Stephens ◽  
Martin Borg

e17544 Background: Chemoradiation is standard of care for the treatment of stage III NSCLC. Vinorelbine has been widely used for the treatment in NSCLC and it has been established, either as single agent or in combination with platinum, as one of the standard reference treatments. Oral vinorelbine is a new formulation which has achieved comparable results to the IV vinorelbine. The present trial is evaluating combination of oral vinorelbine, cisplatin with radical radiation for management of stage III NSCLC. Methods: Patients with diagnosis of stage III NSCLC with PS 0-1 and adequate cardio-respiratory function. Primary objective: progression-free survival. Secondary objectives: response rate, overall survival and safety profile. Treatment - chemotherapy (2 cycles q 21 days): vinorelbine oral 50 mg/m2 d1, d8. Cisplatin 100 mg/m2/ cycle (given as either 20mg/m2 D1-5 or 50mg/m2 D1 and D8) - radiotherapy: 60 Gy in 30 fractions at 2 Gy/ fraction to the isocentre, treating all fields daily, 5 days a week over 6 weeks using 10 MV photons and 3-D CRT. Results: Since May 2008, 33 patients have been enrolled with 31 patients having completed treatment so far. The data is presented for these 25 patients. 16 were male with age ranging from 50-89. The median age was 66. 13 patients had stage IIIa. There were 11 squamous cell carcinoma and 10 adenocarcinoma. The side effects were generally mild and included Gr I, II nausea, constipation and esophagitis. Serious adverse events requiring admission included dehydration, fever with grade I neutropenia, atrial fibrillation and UTI in one patient each. One patient had tracheo-esophageal fistula resulting in death within 30 days of completing chemoRT and was attributed to treatment. The confirmed radiological response assessment is available for 22 patients with 1 CR, 13 PR, 7 SD and 1 PD giving a total response rate of 64%. Conclusions: Two cycles of chemotherapy with oral vinorelbine and cisplatin plus radical radiation appears to be well tolerated with significant activity in stage III NSCLC.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20067-e20067
Author(s):  
Susana Gomez Garcia ◽  
Marinha Costa Rivas ◽  
Mª Carmen Areses Manrique ◽  
Natalia Fernández Núñez ◽  
Jorge Garcia ◽  
...  

e20067 Background: Platinum-based CChRT is recommended as the evidence-based approach for the management of patients (p) with locally advanced stage III NSCLC and a good performance status, although a clearly superior regimen has not been identified. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicities of CChRT with Cisplatin (C) and intravenous and oral vinorelbine (V) and thoracic radiotherapy. Methods: 39 p with histologically confirmed inoperable locally advanced NSCLC, stage IIIA (T4 or N2)/IIIB, PS 0-1 and adequate lung function (FEV1 > 1.1, V20 < 30%) were included in CChRT with: C 80 mg/m2 day 1 and intravenous V 25 mg/m2 day 1 and oral V 60 mg/m2 day 8 for three cycles, during conformal radical thoracic radiotherapy (66 Gys, 180 cGy/day). The primary objective was overall survival (OS); secondary objectives were progression free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and toxicity. Median follow-up: 20,4 months. Results: The p characteristics were: mean age 69,8 years (44-75); male/female: 33/6; ECOG PS 0/1: 7/32; adeno/squamous/large cell carcinoma: 20/13/6; stage IIIA 19 p and stage IIIB 20 p. All p were evaluable for response and toxicity. RR: 3 CR, 27 PR (RR 77%; 95% CI: 64-90), 5 SD (12.8%) and 4 PD (10.2%). The median PFS was 12 months (95% CI: 7-17) and median OS was 36 months (95% CI: 14-58). The PFS at 1/3 years were 46%/22% and the OS at 1/3 years were 75%/47%. Main toxicities (NCI-CTC 4.0) per p in CChRT (109 cycles of chemotherapy, 2.9 per p; mean doses RT: 65,3 Gys) grade 1-2/3-4 (%) were: neutropenia 32.4/25.6; anemia 32.4/10.8; thrombocytopenia 13.5/2.7; nausea/vomiting 27/2.7; fatigue 28.2/0; esophagitis 43.5/5.4 and pneumonitis 17.9/0; hospitalizations were necesary in 13 p: the most important were febrile neutropenia (6 p) and grade 3 esophagitis (2 p). Conclusions: CChRT with Cisplatin and intravenous and oral Vinorelbine during thoracic radiotherapy is a feasible treatment option for inoperable locally advanced stage III NSCLC, showing good clinical efficacy and tolerability with excellent long-term survival.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8585-TPS8585
Author(s):  
Farastuk Bozorgmehr ◽  
Jessica Juergens ◽  
Michaela Hammer-Hellmig ◽  
Christian Meyer Zum Bueschenfelde ◽  
Johannes Classen ◽  
...  

TPS8585 Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cause of cancer death worldwide highlighting the importance of improving current therapeutic options. In particular, elderly and frail patients are not only underrepresented in clinical trials, but also frequently do not receive standard treatment regimens due to comorbidities. For example, patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who are unfit for chemotherapy (CHT) do not benefit from the recent seminal therapy algorithm change for this disease, i.e. consolidation therapy with the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) durvalumab after combined radiochemotherapy (RChT). Instead, these patients are treated with radiotherapy only, raising the serious concern of undertreatment. This issue is addressed by the TRADE-hypo clinical trial that investigates a novel therapy option for NSCLC stage III patients not capable of receiving CHT. To this end, thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) is administered together with durvalumab, employing the synergism created by the combination of restoring anti-tumor immune response by the ICI with the induction of immunogenicity by irradiation. The latter effect has been suggested to be further boosted by hypofractionated radiotherapy, which could also be more practicable for the patient. Taken these considerations into account, the TRADE-hypo trial addresses safety and efficacy of durvalumab therapy combined with either conventional or hypofractionated TRT. Methods: The TRADE-hypo trial is a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicentric phase II trial. Eligible patients are diagnosed with unresectable stage III NSCLC and not capable of receiving sequential RChT due to high vulnerability as reflected by a poor performance status (ECOG 2 or ECOG1 and CCI≥ 1) and/or high age (≥ 70)]. Two treatment groups are evaluated: Both receive durvalumab (1,5000 mg, Q4W) for up to 12 months. In the CON-group this is combined with conventionally fractionated TRT (30 x 2 Gy), while in the HYPO-group patients are treated with hypofractionated TRT (20 x 2.75 Gy). In the HYPO-arm, a safety stop-and-go lead-in phase precedes full enrollment. Here, patients are closely monitored with regard to toxicity (i.e., pneumonitis grade ≥ 3 within 8 weeks after TRT) in small cohorts of 6. The primary objective of the trial is safety and tolerability. As a primary efficacy endpoint, the objective response rate after 3 months will be evaluated. Further endpoints are additional parameters of safety and efficacy, as well as the comprehensive collection of biomaterials to be analyzed regarding treatment-induced changes and potential novel biomarkers. As of February 10, 2021, 9 patients of planned 88 patients have been enrolled in the TRADE-hypo trial. Clinical trial information: NCT04351256.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv421
Author(s):  
E.L. Cohen-Jonathan Moyal ◽  
C. Massabeau ◽  
T. Filleron ◽  
A. Modesto ◽  
J. Bachaud ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4528-4528
Author(s):  
Richard Sposto ◽  
Elizabeth A. Raetz ◽  
Charles P. Reynolds ◽  
Paul S. Gaynon

Abstract Background: Single agent phase I trials with conventional methodology may not be suitable for children with relapsed leukemia. Accrual of children with ALL in relapse to single-agent phase I trials is poor due to clinical urgency and a &gt; 30% likelihood of complete response (CR) with a variety conventional agents combinations (Br J Haematol.2005; 131(5): 579) with the option of hematopoietic stem cell transplant in remission. As most drugs are ultimately used in combination, a Phase I trial testing a new agent in combination with conventional agents would seem most useful and might increase accrual. However, with conventional phase I methodologies determination of a maximum tolerated dose is complicated by the toxicities of the accompanying conventional agents and by the background morbidity of relapsed leukemia. Methods: The Children’s Oncology Group (COG) study, AALL01P2, employed vincristine, prednisone, doxorubicin, and pegylated asparaginase for children with ALL in first marrow relapse. We determined the incidence of conventional non-hematologic dose limiting toxicities (DLT’s) and modeled the impact on a hypothetical phase I trial of a candidate agent with no additional toxicity. Results: Among 111 patients on AALL01P2, 19% had conventional non-hematologic DLT’s. Induction therapy was judged clinically acceptable. With a traditional Phase I escalation scheme that accepts 0/3 and 1/6 DLT’s at a dose-level and rejects 2/3 and 2/6 DLT’s, an agent that adds no morbidity would be rejected as too toxic at any dose 30% of the time. Conclusion: Background morbidity confounds identification of an acceptable dose of a non-toxic new agent tested in combination with conventional drugs for recurrent ALL. We propose a modification to the traditional Phase I design that increases the DLT thresholds to 1/3 and 2/6, which effectively compensates for background toxicity and reduces the chance of falsely rejecting an acceptable agent.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 858-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah A. Thomas ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Wendy Stock ◽  
Leonard Heffner ◽  
Alexandra Tredinnick ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Vincristine sulfate (VCR) is a lipophilic, cell-cycle specific, antineoplastic agent that inhibits cell division by specifically binding to tubulin in mitotic spindles. The activity of VCR is dose and time-dependent, but central and peripheral neuropthy prohibits its use beyond doses of 1.4 mg/m2 (capped at 2 mg). Marqibo is a formulation of VCR encapsulated in a sphingomyelin/cholesterol liposome (OPTISOME) with a longer half-life than VCR. In murine models using L1210 or P388 lymphoid leukemia cell lines, Marqibo demonstrated greater anti-tumor activity compared with VCR. Marqibo was therefore an appropriate agent to study in relapsed or refractory ALL. Methods: Two clinical trials have been completed. First, a phase II trial of single agent Marqibo given at 2 mg/m2 (no dose capping) every 2 weeks enrolled 16 patients (pts) [Thomas et al, Cancer 106:120, 2006]. A multicenter dose escalation phase I trial using weekly Marqibo (1.5, 1.825, 2.0, 2.25, 2.4 mg/m2) in combination with pulse dexamethasone followed. There were no restrictions on the number of prior therapies. Subjects with grade 2 or greater central or peripheral neuropathy were ineligible. Results: In total, 52 pts with relapsed or refractory ALL were treated in the two studies combined. Median age was 34 years (range, 19–77), 31 males/21 females, with a median number of prior salvage regimens of 2 (range, 1–3). Nine pts had confirmed Philadelphia positive disease (8 in the pre-imatinib era, 1 resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy). All pts had previously received conventional VCR therapy. There were 8 complete remissions and 3 partial remissions for an overall response rate of 21% [95% CI, 11, 35]. An additional 12 pts (23%) achieved hematological improvements (e.g., clearance of marrow blasts, platelet transfusion independence). Five responders were able to undergo allogeneic stem cell transplantation following therapy with Marqibo. The maximum tolerated dose in the phase I trial was 2.25 mg/m2 owing to grade 3 motor neuropathy, grade 4 seizure, and grade 4 hepatotoxicity observed in 1 patient each at the 2.4 mg/m2 dose level. Grade 1–2 peripheral neuropathy was manageable with dose modifications and anti-neuralgia agents such as gabapentin. Commonly observed toxicities included febrile neutropenia, myelosuppression, abdominal pain, nausea, constipation, diarrhea, fatigue, and infusion-related pyrexia. Conclusions: In reviewing the clinical experience to date, Marqibo with or without pulse dexamethasone has provided clinically meaningful activity in heavily pre-treated adults with ALL. A multicenter trial of single agent Marqibo in the setting of second salvage therapy for adults with relapsed ALL is underway. A phase III multicenter trial of Marqibo in combination with standard chemotherapy for de novo elderly ALL is in the planning phase.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document