Conventional chemoimmunotherapy (R-CHOEP-14) or high-dose therapy (R-Mega-CHOEP) for young, high-risk patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma: Final results of the randomized Mega-CHOEP trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphona Study Group (DSHNHL).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8002-8002 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Schmitz ◽  
M. Nickelsen ◽  
M. Ziepert ◽  
M. Haenel ◽  
P. Borchmann ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 404-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Schmitz ◽  
Maike Nickelsen ◽  
Marita Ziepert ◽  
Matthias Haenel ◽  
Peter Borchmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 404 Comparison of conventional chemotherapy with high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) administered to young, high-risk patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma as part of first-line therapy gave conflicting results; none of the randomized studies used rituximab (R) in combination with conventional or HDT. In March 2003 we started a randomized phase III study for young (18-60 years), high-risk (age-adjusted IPI 2 or 3) patients with aggressive lymphoma. For patients with B-cell lymphomas this study compared 8 cycles of CHOEP-14 (CHOP + etoposide 300 mg/m2 given every 2 weeks) with MegaCHOEP. The MegaCHOEP program used cyclophoshamide (1500 mg/m2 in cycle 1; 4500 mg/m2 in cycles 2 and 3; 6000 mg/m2 in cycle 4), doxorubicin (70 mg/m2 in all cycles), vincristine (2 mg, all cycles), etoposide (600 mg/m2 , cycle 1; 960 mg/m2 , cycles 2 and 3; 1480 mg/m2, cycle 4), and prednisone (500 mg, all cycles) to be administered every 21 days. Hematopoietic stem cells were harvested after cycles 1 and 2 and reinfused after HDT cycles 2, 3, and 4. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of MegaCHOEP + / - R have been described (Glass et al. Blood 2006 and BMT 2006). The phase III study originally had four arms (8 × CHOEP – 14, 8 × CHOEP – 14 and 6 × R, MegaCHOEP, and MegaCHOEP and 6 × R). Treatment arms without R were closed in June 2004 because other studies (e.g the MInT study) had shown major improvement in outcome parameters when R was added to chemotherapy. The study continued comparing 8 × CHOEP – 14 and 6 × R (375 mg/m2) with MegaCHOEP and 6 × R (375 mg/m2). At the time of this analysis 346 patients (pts) had been recruited; 216 pts. (median age 48 years, LDH > N 97 %, stage III or IV 96%, ECOG > 1 35%) had been randomized until 07 / 07 and were availabel for this planned interim analysis ( 8 × CHOEP – 14 + 6 × R, n = 91; MegaCHOEP + 6 × R, n = 94; 8 × CHOEP – 14, n = 15; MegaCHOEP, n = 16). Major toxicities included mucositis, diarrhea, and infections all of which were significantly more frequent in the MegaCHOEP arm of the study. Treatment – related deaths occurred in 5 / 94 pts. ( 5.3%) in the MegaCHOEP arm and in 1 / 91 pts. (1.1 %) in the R – CHOEP arm (p = 0.211). Surprisingly, the 3 – year event – free survival ( EFS : time from randomization to either disease progression, no CR / CRu at the end of treatment, initiation of salvage therapy, relapse or death from any cause) was better after conventional than after HDT / ASCT: 71.0% after 8 × CHOEP-14 + 6 × R vs. 56.7 % after MegaCHOEP + 6 × R (p = 0.050). After a median observation time of 29 months the estimated 3-year overall survival was 83.8 % after 8 × CHOEP – 14 + 6 × R and 75.3 % after MegaCHOEP + 6 × R (p = 0.142). Progression – free survival was 76.0 % after 8 × CHOEP – 14 + 6 × R and 64.6 % after MegaCHOEP + 6 × R (p = 0.119). A comparison of the rituximab-containing treatment arms (8 × CHOEP 14 + 6 × R and Mega CHOEP + 6 × R) with the chemotherapy – only arms (8 × CHOEP -14 and MegaCHOEP) revealed a 27.1 % difference in the 3-year EFS-rate ( p = 0.003 ) pointing to the unexpectedly high efficacy of R particularly in untreated, young, high-risk patients with aggressive B-NHL. These data were presented to the members of the study group and the data safety and monitoring committee who decided to stop the MegaCHOEP arm of the study. In conclusion, 8 × CHOEP -14 + 6 × R gave excellent results in young, high-risk patients with untreated aggressive B cell lymphoma. The 3-year EFS and OS are the best ever reported for this group of patients. MegaCHOEP + 6 × R was no better than aggressive conventional chemotherapy regarding any of the study endpoints; EFS (primary endpoint of the study) was significantly worse. Because of higher toxicity and inferior survival the MegaCHOEP arm was discontinued. HDT / ASCT has no role to play as part of first-line therapy for patients with high-risk aggressive B cell lymphoma if rituximab is combined with aggressive conventional chemotherapy. Disclosures: Schmitz: Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Nickelsen:Roche: Honoraria. Trümper:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Pfreundschuh:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Glass:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2708-2708
Author(s):  
Olga A. Gavrilina ◽  
Eugene E. Zvonkov ◽  
Elena N. Parovichnikova ◽  
Vera V. Troitskaya ◽  
Nelly G. Gabeeva ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Approximately 50% of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) are defined as high-grade by IPI. They are characterized by aggressive course and poor response to standard chemotherapy (CT): 5-years overall survival (OS) rate of less than 30%. R-DA-EPOCH has demonstrated very optimistic results (overall and progression-free survival (PFS) were 90%), but high-risk patients (IPI 3-4) showed only 43% of OS and PFS [1]. The addition of high-dose AraC (12 g/m2) to the upfront therapy of high-risk DLBCL has significantly improved the outcome on Hyper-CVAD/HMA and mNHL-BFM-90 protocols [2, 3]. But high toxicity of these protocols restricts their application. We suggested that addition of courses R-HMA in rotation with R-DA-EPOCH could improve the treatment outcome and decrease toxicity. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of R-DA-EPOCH/R-HMA protocol in patients with untreated high-grade diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Patients and Methods: 33 untreated DLBCL patients from 4 centers were enrolled in a prospective study between August 2013 - July 2015; stage II-IV; ECOG 0-3; median age 55 years (27-76); age ≥60y/<60y 50%/50%; M/F 60%/40%; IPI: 48% high-intermediate and 52% high risk; 15% with bone marrow involvement. All patients underwent 4-8 courses (2-4 cycles) of chemotherapy: R-DA-EPOCH (standard dose and scheme), R-HMA (R 375 mg/m2 d1, MTX 1000 mg/m2 24 hours d 2, AraC 3000 mg/m2 q 12 hrs d 3-4). For patients older than 60 year dose of R-HMA was reduced (R 375 mg/m2 d1, MTX 500 mg/m2 24 hours d 2, AraC 1000 mg/m2 q 12 hrs d 3-4). In 4 cases of DLBCL with bone marrow involvement BEAM conditioning and autologous stem cell transplantation were applied. Results: The median follow-up is 12 months (4-24). There was no mortality associated with toxicity. The main non-hematological toxicities of R-HMA were infections (mucositis, pneumonia, sepsis, enteropathy) grades 1-2 and 3-4 in 90% and 10%, respectively. Hematological toxicity grade 4 for less than 4 days we observed only after courses R-HMA. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 29 (88%) patients. In 2 patients we observed progression of the disease after first cycle of chemotherapy, in another 2 cases - partial remission after 2-3 cycles and following progression of disease. In patients older than 60 years with doses reduction in R-HMA failures were absent, except one later relapse after 13 month CR. With a median follow 12 months overall and disease-free survival of 33 patients constituted 90,5% and 74% , respectively. In a group of patients older than 60 years results of therapy seemed to be better than in young patients: OS were 100% vs 85,6% (p=0,1), DFS were 80% vs 74,9% (p=0,2), respectively. So the combination of R-DA-EPOCH/R-HMA may be considered as optimal intensive approach in the older patients. Conclusions: TheR-DA-EPOCH/R-HMA protocol demonstrated acceptable toxicity and high efficacy in patients with high-grade DLBCL. This protocol has shown optimistic results in the elderly patients and it could be recommended for further investigation in that group. Ññûëêè: 1. Salit RB, Fowler DH, Wilson WH, et al. Dose-adjusted EPOCH-rituximab combined with fludarabine provides an effective bridge to reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with lymphoid malignancies.J Clin Oncol. 2012. 10;30(8):830-6. 2. Oki Y, Westin JR, Vega F, et al. Prospective phase II study of rituximab with alternating cycles of hyper-CVAD and high-dose methotrexate with cytarabine for young patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2013; 163(5):611-20. 3. Magomedova AU, Kravchenko SK, Kremenetskaia AM, et al. Nine-year experience in the treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphosarcoma. Ter Arkh. 2011;83(7):5-10. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 207-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corrado Tarella ◽  
Manuela Zanni ◽  
Michele Magni ◽  
Fabio Benedetti ◽  
Tiziano Barbui ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The outcome of B-cell lymphoma has definitely improved since the introduction of the anti-CD20 Rituximab, which can be effectively combined into conventional chemotherapy regimens. Rituximab can also be added to high-dose chemotherapy programs with autograft. However, the clinical benefit of combining Rituximab and autograft-based programs has not been proved yet. This issue is addressed in the present study. Patients and Methods: Data have been retrospectively collected on 957 B-cell lymphoma patients receiving a high-dose sequential (HDS) chemotherapy program, at 10 Italian Centers associated to GITIL (Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innovative nei Linfomi). Although the HDS schedule has been introduced almost 20 yrs. ago, most patients were treated in the last decade. They received most frequently either the HDS scheme adapted for follicular lymphoma (Tarella C et al. Leukemia 2000) or the hd-Ara-C-supplemented scheme developed for mantle-cell and diffuse large cell lymphoma (Magni M et al, Blood 2000; Cuttica A et al., Cancer 2003); overall, Rituximab was added to HDS (R+) in 483 (50.5%) patients, the remaining 474 (49.5%) received Rituximab-free HDS (R−). All patients entered the HDS-protocols due to high-risk prognostic features, their median age was 49 yrs. (range 17–70). The series included 403 patients (232 R+) with low-grade and 554 (251 R+) with intermediate/high grade B-cell lymphoma subtypes; HDS was delivered to 542 (259 R+) patients at diagnosis and to 415 (224 R+) at first or subsequent relapse. Results: at a median follow-up of 5 yrs, the 5-yr Overall Survival (OS) and Event-free Survival (EFS) projections were 66% and 55%, respectively, with a significantly better outcome for patients treated at diagnosis (5-yr OS: 72%, EFS: 61%) compared to patients at relapse (5-yr OS: 56%, EFS: 45%). In all instances, Rituximab addition was associated with significant improvements; in particular, the 5-yr EFS projections were:patients at diagnosis: 68% for R+ vs. 57% for R−;patients at relapse: 59% for R+ vs. 34% for R−;low-grade subtypes: 65% for R+ vs. 41% for R− (Figure 1A);intermediate/high-grade subtypes: 64% for R+ vs. 52% for R− (Figure 1B). In the Cox multivariate survival analysis, two factors had a significant impact on the EFS, i.e. relapse status at HDS (HR: 1.74, c.i.: 1.43–2.13) and Rituximab addition to HDS (HR: 0.60, c.i.: 0.49–0.75). Conclusions: the addition of Rituximab to high-dose programs with autograft may improve response and long-term outcome in high-risk B-cell lymphoma patients. Figure 1. EFS according to Rituximab [R] administration, in (A) low-grade and (B) intermediate/high-grade, B-cell lymphoma patients treated with a HDS program Figure 1. EFS according to Rituximab [R] administration, in (A) low-grade and (B) intermediate/high-grade, B-cell lymphoma patients treated with a HDS program


2018 ◽  
Vol 184 (5) ◽  
pp. 760-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birte Friedrichs ◽  
Maike Nickelsen ◽  
Marita Ziepert ◽  
Bettina Altmann ◽  
Mathias Haenel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document