Disease-specific survival outcomes in lymph node–positive patients with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 182-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Crehange ◽  
V. K. Weinberg ◽  
A. Izaguirre ◽  
C. C. Hsu ◽  
I. J. Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Androgen Ablation ◽  
Disease Free

182 Background: Involvement of regional lymph nodes (LN+) at the time of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis is widely regarded as an adverse prognostic factor associated with poor outcome. No commonly utilized treatment, composed of any combination of androgen ablation, surgery and radiation, has proven to be superior for survival. This study will evaluate the clinical survival outcomes of patients (pts) with newly diagnosed LN+ PCa at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF). Methods: All newly diagnosed LN+ PCa pts treated with External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) as primary therapy or after surgery, each with and without androgen ablation between 1987 and 2009 were included. All pts had confirmed pathologic or radiologic LN+ whereas none had evidence of metastases on the work up. Cause Specific Survival (CSS), Disease Free survival (DFS) and biochemical control were measured from the start of treatment. PSA failure was determined by the Phoenix definition after EBRT and by a confirmed PSA >1 ng/mL following RP+EBRT. Results: A retrospective analysis identified 91 pts with LN+ at the time of diagnosis (75.8% high risk pts) with disease follow-up. Thirty-four (37%) were managed with exclusive EBRT alone (eRT), 18 pts (20%) with a combination of radical prostatectomy (RP) and adjuvant EBRT (RP+aRT) and 39 pts (43%) were treated with a combination of RP + salvage RT (RP+sRT). Overall 78% of patients also received hormone therapy (HT): 74.0% with eRT, 89% with RP+aRT and 79% with RP+sRT. The 10 years CSS estimates was 89% for eRT, 0% after RP+aRT and 88% after RP+sRT. The 10 years DFS estimates was 33% for eRT, 0% after RP+aRT and 75% after RP+sRT. Among pts remaining disease free the median follow-up is 38 mos for eRT, 26 mos for RP+aRT and 64 mos for RP+sRT. The last PSA for these patients was <0.1 for 85% of all patients which included 47% following eRT, 100% after RP+aRT and 97% after RP+sRT. There were 7 deaths due to PCa occurring between 5 and 73 mos from the start of EBRT. Conclusions: The results of the current analysis indicate that some pts with LN+ from PCa have prolonged disease free outcomes; and for these men, aggressive treatment may be appropriate. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Biochemical Disease-Free Survival in Men Younger Than 60 Years With Prostate Cancer Treated With External Beam Radiation

2002 ◽  
pp. 536-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHARLES J. ROSSER ◽  
RAMSAY CHICHAKLI ◽  
LAWRENCE B. LEVY ◽  
DEBORAH A. KUBAN ◽  
LEWIS G. SMITH ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Biochemical Disease-Free Survival in Men Younger Than 60 Years With Prostate Cancer Treated With External Beam Radiation

2002 ◽  
Vol 168 (2) ◽  
pp. 536-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles J. Rosser ◽  
Ramsay Chichakli ◽  
Lawrence B. Levy ◽  
Deborah A. Kuban ◽  
Lewis G. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Prostate-specific antigen nadir: the optimum level after irradiation for prostate cancer.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 2893-2900 ◽  
Author(s):  
F A Critz ◽  
A K Levinson ◽  
W H Williams ◽  
D A Holladay
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Psa Nadir ◽  
Disease Free Survival Rate ◽  
Disease Free

PURPOSE The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir that reflects potential cure of prostate cancer by irradiation has not been established. This report attempts to demonstrate the PSA nadir goal for radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 1984 through April 1994, 536 stage T1T2NO prostate cancer patients were treated with radioactive iodine 125 (125I) prostate implants followed by external-beam radiation. All were staged node-negative: 68% by pelvic node dissection and the remainder by computed tomographic (CT) scan. The mean pretreatment PSA level was 12.4 ng/mL (median, 8.4 ng/mL; range, 0.3 to 188 ng/mL). The median follow-up duration is 40 months (range, 12 to 138). An increasing posttreatment PSA level defined recurrence. RESULTS Patients who achieved a PSA nadir < or = 0.5 ng/mL had a 95% (+/- 4%) 5-year and an 84% (+/- 12%) 10-year disease-free survival rate, compared with a 5-year disease-free survival rate of 29% (+/- 30%) for those who reached a nadir of 0.6 to 1.0 ng/mL (P = .0001). All patients with a nadir greater than 1.0 ng/mL ultimately failed. Eighty percent of all 536 patients are projected to achieve a nadir < or = 0.5 ng/mL and 90% of patients who achieve this PSA level do so within 48 months of treatment (median, 18 months). Compared with pretreatment PSA level and histologic grade, the PSA nadir is the most significant factor associated with disease-free survival. CONCLUSION For most patients to be successfully treated for prostate cancer with radiotherapy, at least with this combination technique, the PSA nadir should become undetectable (< or = 0.5 ng/mL), similar to that after radical prostatectomy. A PSA nadir of < or = 0.5 ng/mL after radiotherapy for prostate cancer may be used as a reasonable indicator of 10-year disease-free survival.

Impact of dose-escalated radiation on overall survival in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 28-28
Author(s):  
Anusha Kalbasi ◽  
Jiaqi Li ◽  
Abigail T. Berman ◽  
Samuel Swisher-McClure ◽  
Marc C. Smaldone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Treatment Groups

28 Background: Infive publishedRCTs, dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer resulted in improved biochemical and local control. However, the question of whether dose escalation improves overall survival (OS) remains unanswered. We examined OS among men with non-metastatic prostate cancer undergoing EBRT in the modern era. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we conducted non-randomized comparative effectiveness studies of dose-escalated versus standard-dose EBRT in men diagnosed from 2004-2006 in three analytic cohorts defined by NCCN risk category: low- (N=12,848), intermediate- (N=14,966) or high-risk (N=14,587) prostate cancer. We categorized patients in each risk cohort into 2 treatment groups: standard-dose (68.4 Gy to <75.6 Gy) or dose-escalated (≥75.6 Gy to 90 Gy) EBRT. The primary outcome was time to death from any cause, measured from diagnosis to NCDB date of death or end of follow-up (December 31, 2011). We compared OS between treatment groups in the three analytic cohorts using Cox proportional hazard models. Inverse probability weighted propensity score methods were used to balance differences between treatment groups in age, race, year of diagnosis, AJCC T- and N-stage, PSA, Gleason score, androgen deprivation therapy, IMRT use, comorbid disease, income, insurance, urban/rural location, facility type and facility volume. In secondary analyses, we evaluated dose response for survival by categorizing dose in approximately 2 Gy increments. Results: Median follow up for survivors was between 73 and 74 months in all three risk cohorts. Dose-escalated EBRT was associated with improved survival in the intermediate-risk (adjusted HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.77 and 0.85, p<0.0001) and high-risk groups (aHR 0.85, 95% CI 0.81 and 0.89, p<0.0001), but not the low-risk group (aHR 0.99, 95% CI 0.92-1.06, p=0.803). For every incremental ~2Gy increase in dose, there was a 9% (95% CI 6% – 11%, p<0.0001) and 7% (95% CI 3% - 10%, p=0.004) reduction in the hazard of death for intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. Conclusions: Dose-escalated EBRT is associated with improved survival in men with intermediate- and high-risk, but not low-risk, prostate cancer.

125I Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single Institution Experience

2013 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessia Guarneri ◽  
Angela Botticella ◽  
Andrea Riccardo Filippi ◽  
Fernando Munoz ◽  
Giancarlo Beltramo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Genitourinary Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Disease Free

Aims and background To evaluate the clinical outcome of a cohort of localized prostate cancer patients treated with 125I permanent brachytherapy at the University of Turin. Methods and study design A retrospective analysis was carried out on 167 consecutive patients with early stage prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent 125I brachytherapy between January 2003 and December 2010. A minimum follow-up of ≥12 months was mandatory for inclusion. Biochemical disease-free survival (defined on the basis of the ASTRO definition and the ASTRO-Phoenix definition) was chosen as the primary end point. Secondary end points were gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity (acute and late, defined according to the RTOG scale). Results With a median follow-up of 42 months (range, 13.5–90.7), biochemical disease-free survival at 3 and 5 years was respectively 91.1% and 85.7%, according to the ASTRO definition and 94.5% and 85.1% according to ASTRO-Phoenix definition (for statistical purposes, only the ASTRO definition was used). Hormone treatment and nadir PSA (cutoff of 0.35 ng/ml) were the only factors affecting biochemical disease-free survival both on univariate ( P = 0.02 and P = 0.001, respectively) and multivariate analysis (HR 0.024; P = 0.021 and HR 21.6; P = 0.006, respectively). Only 3.6% of patients experienced ≥grade 3 acute urinary toxicity and 5% ≥grade 3 late urinary toxicity. Prior transurethral prostate resection was the only independent predictor of grade 3 late urinary toxicity on multivariate analysis (HR 0.13; P = 0.009). Conclusions This mono-institutional series confirmed that brachytherapy is an effective and safe treatment modality for localized prostate cancer, with acceptable short- and long-term morbidity rates.

scholarly journals The relationship between overactive bladder and prostate cancer: A scoping review

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asher Khan ◽  
R. Trafford Crump ◽  
Kevin V. Carlson ◽  
Richard J. Baverstock
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
General Population ◽  
Overactive Bladder ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
The Relationship

Introduction: The relationship between prostate cancer (PCa) and overactive bladder (OAB) is poorly understood. PCa and OAB are frequently diagnosed in elderly populations, so it could be expected that both conditions would be observed in older patients. Whether PCa and OAB occur independently with age, or the presence of PCa leads to the onset of OAB/lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) has not been explored. This review aimed to investigate whether men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) are more likely to have overactive bladder (OAB) compared to the general population, and if the various treatment modalities for PCa are likely to impact the incidence or exacerbation of OAB. Methods: The University of Calgary’s databases for Medline and PubMed were searched for relevant publications. No restrictions were placed on the study design reported. Any publications reporting OAB and a PCa diagnosis and/or observation relating to PCa diagnosis and rates of OAB/LUTS in an adult population were included for full review. Results: Of the studies examining the relationship between PCa and LUTS, results varied, but frequently indicated an inverse association between PCa and LUTS in which patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer were more unlikely to have LUTS compared to the general population. Following treatment, brachytherapy resulted in a higher prevalence of OAB symptoms compared to surgical treatment and external beam radiation therapy. Conclusions: Diverse evidence was found regarding the relationship between the prevalence of pre-treatment OAB and PCa diagnosis. However, limited evidence, as well as uncertainty regarding pre-treatment symptoms and their impact on post-treatment outcomes, restricts potential conclusions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document