scholarly journals Pilot Study of Nelarabine in Combination With Intensive Chemotherapy in High-Risk T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (22) ◽  
pp. 2753-2759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly P. Dunsmore ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
Stephen B. Linda ◽  
Michael J. Borowitz ◽  
Naomi Winick ◽  
...  

Purpose Children's Oncology Group study AALL00P2 was designed to assess the feasibility and safety of adding nelarabine to a BFM 86–based chemotherapy regimen in children with newly diagnosed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). Patients and Methods In stage one of the study, eight patients with a slow early response (SER) by prednisone poor response (PPR; ≥ 1,000 peripheral blood blasts on day 8 of prednisone prephase) received chemotherapy plus six courses of nelarabine 400 mg/m2 once per day; four patients with SER by high minimal residual disease (MRD; ≥ 1% at day 36 of induction) received chemotherapy plus five courses of nelarabine; 16 patients with a rapid early response (RER) received chemotherapy without nelarabine. In stage two, all patients received six 5-day courses of nelarabine at 650 mg/m2 once per day (10 SER patients [one by MRD, nine by PPR]) or 400 mg/m2 once per day (38 RER patients; 12 SER patients [three by MRD, nine by PPR]). Results The only significant difference in toxicities was decreased neutropenic infections in patients treated with nelarabine (42% with v 81% without nelarabine). Five-year event-free survival (EFS) rates were 73% for 11 stage one SER patients and 67% for 22 stage two SER patients treated with nelarabine versus 69% for 16 stage one RER patients treated without nelarabine and 74% for 38 stage two RER patients treated with nelarabine. Five-year EFS for all patients receiving nelarabine (n = 70) was 73% versus 69% for those treated without nelarabine (n = 16). Conclusion Addition of nelarabine to a BFM 86–based chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated and produced encouraging results in pediatric patients with T-ALL, particularly those with a SER, who have historically fared poorly.

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda L Cleaver ◽  
Alex H Beesley ◽  
Martin J Firth ◽  
Nina C Sturges ◽  
Rebecca A O'Leary ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 1185-1192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magnus Borssén ◽  
Zahra Haider ◽  
Mattias Landfors ◽  
Ulrika Norén‐Nyström ◽  
Kjeld Schmiegelow ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter Van Vlierberghe ◽  
Alberto Ambesi-Impiombato ◽  
Kim De Keersmaecker ◽  
Michael Hadler ◽  
Elisabeth Paietta ◽  
...  

Key Points Integrated genomic profiling identifies high-risk adult T-ALL patients with poor response to intensified chemotherapy.


Hematology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (1) ◽  
pp. 580-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Raetz ◽  
David T. Teachey

Abstract T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is biologically distinct from its B lymphoblastic (B-ALL) counterpart and shows different kinetic patterns of disease response. Although very similar regimens are used to treat T-ALL and B-ALL, distinctions in response to different elements of therapy have been observed. Similar to B-ALL, the key prognostic determinant in T-ALL is minimal residual disease (MRD) response. Unlike B-ALL, other factors including age, white blood cell count at diagnosis, and genetics of the ALL blasts are not independently prognostic when MRD response is included. Recent insights into T-ALL biology, using modern genomic techniques, have identified a number of recurrent lesions that can be grouped into several targetable pathways, including Notch, Jak/Stat, PI3K/Akt/mTOR, and MAPK. With contemporary chemotherapy, outcomes for de novo T-ALL have steadily improved and now approach those observed in B-ALL, with approximately 85% 5-year event-free survival. Unfortunately, salvage has remained poor, with less than 25% event-free and overall survival rates for relapsed disease. Thus, current efforts are focused on preventing relapse by augmenting therapy for high-risk patients, sparing toxicity in favorable subsets and developing new approaches for the treatment of recurrent disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document