Efficacy and safety of panobinostat (LBH-589), a histone-deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), in patients (pts) with advanced, previously treated soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and sex cord tumors (SCT): A study from the French Sarcoma Group.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10027-10027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Alexandre Cassier ◽  
Anne Lefranc ◽  
Nicolas Penel ◽  
Christine Chevreau ◽  
Binh Bui Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Type I ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Open Label ◽  
End Point ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3

10027 Background: Treatment options are limited for pts with advanced pretreated STS. HDACi have shown activity in preclinical models of STS and SCT Methods: Pts with advanced pretreated STS and SCT were enrolled in this open label, single arm, multicenter phase II study. Panobinostat was given orally, 40 mg thrice per week. The primary end-point was 3-month progression-free rate according to RECIST 1.1 using central review. Fleming-A’Hern single-stage design for phase II trials was used, and assuming a type I error alpha of 5% with 90% power, 15/47 pts were needed to be progression free at 3 months to reject a rate of 20%. Results: Fifty three pts were enrolled between January 2010 and January 2011. Median age was 59 (range 21-79) years, and 22 (42%) pts were males, 13 had translocation-related sarcoma (TRS) and 4 had SCT. All but 5 pts had metastatic disease. The most common sites were the lung and the liver. All but one pt had documented disease progression prior to study entry. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range 1-7). Panobinostat dose was lowered to 20 mg thrice a week after 11 pts were enrolled based on the recommendation of an independent safety committee. Fifty-two pts were evaluable for toxicity (1 pt never received treatment), 48 pts (92%) reported at least one adverse event (AE) and 22 (42%) reported at least one treatment-related grade 3 or 4 AE. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia, fatigue and anemia. Fifty pts were evaluable for the primary end-point, of these, 12 pts (24%, 95%CI[13-38%]) were progression-free at 3 months, including 4/13 pts (31%, 95%CI[9-61%]) with TRS and 2/4 pts (50%, 95%CI[7-93%]) with SCT. No CR was seen, two patients (4%) with SCT had a PR and 19 pts (37%) had SD as their best response. Seven pts were progression-free at 6 months: 2 pts with SCT, 2 with TRS, 1 with liposarcoma, 1 with malignant solitary fibrous tumor and 1 with leiomyosarcoma. Conclusions: Panobinostat was poorly tolerated at 40 mg thrice a week. Efficacy in unselected advanced STS was limited although some patients had prolonged SD. Activity in pts with SCT warrants further investigation.

Regorafenib in patients with refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer: a Phase II study (RESOUND)

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (35) ◽  
pp. 4009-4017
Author(s):  
Silvia Bozzarelli ◽  
Lorenza Rimassa ◽  
Laura Giordano ◽  
Simona Sala ◽  
Maria Chiara Tronconi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
End Point ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

Aim: Regorafenib may be active in different cancer types. This Phase II trial included patients with various refractory cancer types treated with regorafenib. Here, we report the results of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma cohort. Methods: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 8 weeks; further investigation of regorafenib would be warranted with a PFS rate ≥50%. Results: A total of 20 patients were enrolled. The best response was stable disease in four patients (20%). The 8-week PFS rate was 25% with a median PFS of 1.7 months (95% CI: 1.5–2.0). A total of 13 patients (65%) experienced grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events. Conclusion: The study did not meet its primary end point. Further investigation of regorafenib monotherapy in this setting is not recommended. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02307500

Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone In Myeloma Refractory to Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: Comparison of Two Dosing Strategies In Dual-Refractory Disease

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 863-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Lacy ◽  
Sumithra Mandrekar ◽  
Morie Abraham A Gertz ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
Kristen Detweiler Short ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Therapeutic Benefit ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Dosing Strategies ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 863 Background: Patients with MM who have progressed after multiple novel agents have limited treatment options. Pomalidomide (CC4047) is the newest immunomodulatory (IMiD) agent. Pom/dex using a dose of 2 mg/day has demonstrated response rates (≥PR) of 63% in relapsed MM (Lacy, JCO 2009, 27:5008-5014) and 32% in a lenalidomide-refractory cohort (Lacy, Leukemia, in press). The maximum tolerated dose has been determined to be 4 mg/day for 21 of 28 days (Richardson, ASH, 2009), We opened two sequential phase II trials using the Pom/dex regimen at differing doses to study the efficacy of this regimen in patients who have failed both lenalidomide and bortezomib. Methods: Patients refractory to both lenalidomide and bortezomib therapy; defined as relapsing on or within 60 days of stopping each regimen, were enrolled. Pomalidomide was given orally 2 mg daily (Cohort A) or 4mg daily (Cohort B) on days 1–28 of a 28-day cycle with oral dexamethasone given 40 mg daily on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. Response was assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria. All patients received aspirin 325 mg daily for DVT prophylaxis. Results: 35 patients with relapsed and resistant/refractory to both lenalidomide and bortezomib were enrolled in each cohort. The median age was 62 years (range, 39–77) in Cohort A and 61 (range, 45–77) years in Cohort B. The median time from diagnosis to enrollment was 57 months for Cohort A (range 12–249) and 72 months(range, 13–183) for Cohort B. 15 patients had high risk molecular markers in Cohort A and 16 in Cohort B. The median number of prior regimens was 6 in both groups. The median (range) duration on treatment was 5(1-13) and 2(0-6) cycles in cohorts A and B respectively. Toxicity at least possibly attributed to drug consisted primarily of myelosuppression: grade 3/4 neutropenia (37% Cohort A vs. 55% Cohort B); grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11% Cohort A vs. 13% Cohort B); and grade 3/4 anemia (9% Cohort A vs. 16% Cohort B). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities occurred in 23% Cohort A vs. 13% Cohort B. Grade 1 or 2 fatigue was the most common non-hematologic toxicity seen in 43% Cohort A vs. 52% Cohort B. Grade 1 or 2 neuropathy occurred in 17% Cohort A vs. 16% Cohort B. Other non-hematologic toxicities occurring in <5% included pneumonitis, hyperglycemia, renal failure, thrombosis. One patient in cohort B had grade 4 hepatitis. Confirmed responses in Cohort A consisted of VGPR 14%, PR 11%, and MR 24% (ORR 49%, 95% CI: 31–66), and responses in Cohort B consisted of VGPR 9%, PR 20%, and MR 12% (ORR 40%, 95% CI: 23–58). The median follow-up on alive patients was 7.5 months, and 3 months in Cohorts A and B, respectively. The median PFS in cohorts A and B are respectively 6.4 months (95% CI: 4.7-NR) and 3.3 months (95% CI: 2.3-NR). Conclusions: Pom/dex is remarkably active and well tolerated in this heavily pre-treated population of dual bortezomib/lenalidomide-refractory MM patients. The majority of patients have not progressed and objective responses (MR or better) are seen in 40–49%. This study confirms therapeutic benefit for Pom/dex in patients relapsing after other novel therapies. These studies do not show an advantage for the 4 mg/day on days 1–28 of each 28 day cycle did not show an advantage over the 2 mg/day on days 1–28 of each 28 day cycle. Disclosures: Lacy: Celgene: Research Funding. Gertz:Celgene: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dispenzieri:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Binding Site: Honoraria. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding. Fonseca:Genzyme: Consultancy; Medtronic: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; AMGEN: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Celegene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Intellikine: Consultancy; Cylene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; FISH probes prognostication in myeloma: Patents & Royalties. Bergsagel:Celgene: Consultancy; Centocor: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Stewart:Celgene: Honoraria.

A phase II study of sunitinib in recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma: A trial of the PMH Phase II Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5576-5576
Author(s):  
S. Welch ◽  
H. J. Mackay ◽  
H. Hirte ◽  
G. F. Fleming ◽  
R. Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

5576 Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) overexpression in EC correlates with poor outcome, thus targeting VEGF is a rational therapeutic approach. We have conducted a two-stage open-label phase II study in advanced EC with sunitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple VEGF receptors. Methods: Eligible pts have recurrent or metastatic EC and have received up to 1 prior chemotherapy (CT) regimen for metastatic disease. Sunitinib is given at 50 mg daily (OD) for 4 consecutive weeks (wks) followed by 2 wks off. Dose could be reduced to 37.5 mg OD and then 25 mg OD in the setting of toxicity. Imaging is repeated every 12 wks. Primary objectives are objective response rate (ORR by RECIST) and rate of 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). If 1 or more responses occur in the first 15 evaluable pts, the study would continue to a second stage (total = 30 pts). Secondary objectives are time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: We report the results of the first stage of this study. Sixteen pts have been treated (median age: 63; range 41–74) with 37 cycles of sunitinib (median 2; range: 1–7). Baseline ECOG PS was 0 (7 pts), 1 (8 pts), or 2 (1 pt). Histology was endometrioid (7 pts), serous (5 pts), clear cell (1 pt), or mixed/other (3 pts). Most pts had high-grade histology (G3: 8; G2: 4; G1: 2; GX: 2). Nine pts had prior adjuvant CT, 8 pts had 1 prior CT for advanced EC, 4 pts had prior hormones and 7 pts had prior radiotherapy. Partial response was achieved by 2 pts (ORR = 12.5%), and 2 other pts had a best response of stable disease; 3 of these pts remained progression-free > 6 months. Median TTP = 2.5 months (95% CI: 2.47-NR), and median OS = 6.2 months (95% CI: 5.1-NR). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) in >10% of pts were fatigue (7 pts, 44%) and hypertension (5 pts, 31%). Dose reduction was required for 11 of 16 pts (69%). Two pts were inevaluable after receiving <2 cycles due to AE (grade 4 hyponatremia; grade 3 fatigue) and 1 other pt has yet to complete 2 cycles. Conclusions: Sunitinib shows preliminary activity in EC. This trial will proceed to a second stage of accrual to further explore the efficacy and safety of sunitinib in advanced EC. [Table: see text]

Impact of gender on multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) toxicity in patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs): A pooled analysis of two phase II trials with pazopanib and lenvatinib.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4109-4109
Author(s):  
Jorge Hernando-Cubero ◽  
Enrique Grande ◽  
Daniel E. Castellano ◽  
Toni Ibrahim ◽  
Nicola Fazio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Liver Toxicity ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

4109 Background: Retrospective data in some cancer types suggested a possible different toxicity profile with chemotherapy and targeted therapies according to gender. However, data from prospective studies are still very limited, especially in infrequent tumors such as NETs. Methods: Pts with advanced pancreatic and gastrointestinal NETs treated with pazopanib or lenvatinib in the multicenter open-label phase II studies PAZONET and TALENT respectively, were included in the analysis. Both studies were performed by Spanish Task Force Group for Neuroendocrine Tumors (GETNE). All toxicity grades with an incidence higher than 5% were considered for univariate review. Additionally, all grade 3-4 toxicities were analyzed separately. Results: 155 pts (47.7% female) with 1213 adverse events (AEs) (20% G3-4) divided in 121 categories were included. In female patients, liver toxicity, headache, pyrexia, nausea/vomiting, hair/skin disorders and dizziness were significantly more common (table). The only toxicity with higher incidence in men was dysphonia (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.2-0.9, p 0.02). There were no gender differences in grade 3-4 toxicities. Conclusions: We observed significant differences in toxicity AEs by gender in two prospective phase II studies with MKIs in NETs patients. Potential different approach to manage toxicity may be adopted based on gender. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Rational Clinical Experiment: Assessing Prior Probability and Its Impact on the Success of Phase II Clinical Trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (26) ◽  
pp. 2914-2919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Halperin ◽  
J. Jack Lee ◽  
Cecile Gonzales Dagohoy ◽  
James C. Yao
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Prior Probability ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Drug Approval ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Type I ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Therapeutic Decisions

Purpose Despite a robust clinical trial enterprise and encouraging phase II results, the vast minority of oncologic drugs in development receive regulatory approval. In addition, clinicians occasionally make therapeutic decisions based on phase II data. Therefore, clinicians, investigators, and regulatory agencies require improved understanding of the implications of positive phase II studies. We hypothesized that prior probability of eventual drug approval was significantly different across GI cancers, with substantial ramifications for the predictive value of phase II studies. Methods We conducted a systematic search of phase II studies conducted between 1999 and 2004 and compared studies against US Food and Drug Administration and National Cancer Institute databases of approved indications for drugs tested in those studies. Results In all, 317 phase II trials were identified and followed for a median of 12.5 years. Following completion of phase III studies, eventual new drug application approval rates varied from 0% (zero of 45) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma to 34.8% (24 of 69) for colon adenocarcinoma. The proportion of drugs eventually approved was correlated with the disease under study (P < .001). The median type I error for all published trials was 0.05, and the median type II error was 0.1, with minimal variation. By using the observed median type I error for each disease, phase II studies have positive predictive values ranging from less than 1% to 90%, depending on primary site of the cancer. Conclusion Phase II trials in different GI malignancies have distinct prior probabilities of drug approval, yielding quantitatively and qualitatively different predictive values with similar statistical designs. Incorporation of prior probability into trial design may allow for more effective design and interpretation of phase II studies.

scholarly journals Multicenter phase II trial (SWOG S1609, cohort 51) of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma: a substudy of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e002990
Author(s):  
Michael J Wagner ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Sandip P Patel ◽  
Chris Ryan ◽  
Ashish Sangal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Mutation Burden ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeAngiosarcoma is a rare aggressive endothelial cell cancer with high mortality. Isolated reports suggest immune checkpoint inhibition efficacy in angiosarcoma, but no prospective studies have been published. We report results for angiosarcoma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab as a cohort of an ongoing rare cancer study.MethodsThis is a prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II clinical trial of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks) plus nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) for metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include progression-free (PFS) and overall survival, and toxicity. A two-stage design was used.ResultsOverall, there were 16 evaluable patients. Median age was 68 years (range, 25–81); median number of prior lines of therapy, 2. Nine patients had cutaneous and seven non-cutaneous primary tumors. ORR was 25% (4/16). Sixty per cent of patients (3/5) with primary cutaneous scalp or face tumors attained a confirmed response. Six-month PFS was 38%. Altogether, 75% of patients experienced an adverse event (AE) (at least possibly related to drug) (25% grade 3–4 AE); 68.8%, an immune-related AE (irAE) (2 (12.5%), grade 3 or 4 irAEs (alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase increase and diarrhea)). There were no grade 5 toxicities. One of seven patients in whom tumor mutation burden (TMB) was assessed showed a high TMB (24 mutations/mb); that patient achieved a partial response (PR). Two of three patients with PDL1 immunohistochemistry assessed had high PDL1 expression; one achieved a PR.ConclusionThe combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab demonstrated an ORR of 25% in angiosarcoma, with three of five patients with cutaneous tumors of the scalp or face responding. Ipilimumab and nivolumab warrant further investigation in angiosarcoma.Trial registration numberNCT02834013.

scholarly journals Romiplostim for temozolomide-induced thrombocytopenia in glioblastoma

Neurology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (19) ◽  
pp. e1799-e1806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilie Le Rhun ◽  
Patrick Devos ◽  
Caroline Houillier ◽  
Stéphanie Cartalat ◽  
Olivier Chinot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Receptor Agonist ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Type I ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Thrombopoietin Receptor ◽  
Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonist ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Grade 3

ObjectiveTo determine the efficacy of the thrombopoietin receptor agonist romiplostim for the prevention of temozolomide-induced thrombocytopenia in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.MethodsIn the PLATUM phase II open-label, multicenter, single-arm trial, patients diagnosed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia during chemoradiotherapy received weekly subcutaneous romiplostim injections. PLATUM aimed at demonstrating that the percentage of thrombocytopenic patients treated with romiplostim able to complete 6 cycles of maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy exceeded 10% (p0 = 0.10; pA = 0.35). Using type I error equal to 0.05% and 95% power, 31 patients had to be recruited. According to a Fleming 2-step design with a preplanned interim analysis after recruitment of 20 patients (step 1), the trial was terminated early for success.ResultsTwenty patients were enrolled in step 1. Median age was 61 years (range 33–73). Twelve patients received 6 temozolomide cycles, corresponding to a success rate of 60% (95% confidence interval 36%–81%). Four patients discontinued temozolomide because they did not respond to romiplostim, 2 for progression, and 2 for adverse events unrelated to romiplostim.ConclusionThe thrombopoietin receptor agonist romiplostim improves exposure to chemotherapy in patients with glioblastoma experiencing temozolomide-induced thrombocytopenia.Clinicaltrials.gov identifierNCT02227576.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with glioblastoma and thrombocytopenia, romiplostim is effective for the secondary prophylaxis of temozolomide-induced thrombocytopenia.

A phase II study of a novel anti-tubulin, E7389, in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7106-7106
Author(s):  
A. Das ◽  
A. Spira ◽  
N. Iannotti ◽  
M. Savin ◽  
E. Zang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Synthetic Analog ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Best Response

7106 Background: E7389, a synthetic analog of halichondrin B that was isolated from a marine sponge, has broad anti-proliferative activity at nanomolar levels and a unique profile of tubulin interactions. Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm, stratified phase II study of E7389 in patients with measurable, recurrent and/or metastatic NSCLC who progressed during or after platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. E7389 (1.4 mg/m2) was administered as a bolus IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle to 72 patients (cohort 1) in stratum I (55 taxane pretreated patients) and stratum II (17 taxane-naive patients) and on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle (cohort 2), providing an additional 22 patients in stratum I. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate to E7389 monotherapy. Results: As of 9 December 2005, 94 evaluable patients received E7389. Nineteen tumors were classified as squamous cell carcinomas, 39 as adenocarcinomas, and 36 were large cell carcinomas or unclassified. The median number of cycles completed was 3. Fifteen patients completed 6 or more cycles and 75 patients underwent tumor assessments after cycle 2. Major toxicities related to study drug included myelosuppression, nausea, fatigue, dehydration, arthralgias, dyspnea, and peripheral neuropathy. Based on RECIST criteria, 6 partial responses (PR) were observed among 94 evaluable patients (PR rate = 6.4%, 95% CI: 2.8%, 12.8%). For 33 patients the best response was stable disease (SD rate = 35.1%, 95% CI: 25.5%, 45.1%). Disease control rate (PR + SD) was 41.5% (95% CI: 31.4%, 51.7%). For cohort 1, the 12-week progression free survival rate was 57.2%. As of 9 December 2005, median PFS time was 108 days (95% CI = 55, min-max = 1–239+). Cohort 2 is being followed to estimate their 12-week PFS. The correlation of beta tubulin isotype, stathmin, microtubule-associated protein 4 (MAP4) and tau protein mRNA expression with tumor responses is on-going. Conclusions: Based on this data, E7389 has been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of NSCLC patients. Updated information and results of molecular correlations of responses will be presented. [Table: see text]

Second-line therapy of KRAS-mutated (KRASm) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) with the MEK inihibitor selumetinib ([SEL], AZ6244, ARRY-142886) in combination with irinotecan (IRI): An AGICC study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 380-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard S. Hochster ◽  
Wells A. Messersmith ◽  
Bert H. O'Neil ◽  
Susan G. Groshen ◽  
Deirdre Jill Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Gi Bleed ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

380 Background: 2nd-line therapy of KRASm CRC is limited; targeting downstream signal transduction enzymes is rational here. Use of the MEK inhibitor SEL is supported by preclinical and clinical evidence. We designed a dose-finding/phase II study of IRI plus SEL in KRASm CRC. Methods: Eligibility included: KRASm or BRAFm CRC with measurable disease progressing after 1st-line therapy with an oxalipatin-based chemo + bevacizumab regimen, PS 0-1, acceptable organ function. Patients were treated with IRI 180 mg/m2 iv q2w and SEL 50-75 mg po bid. First 3 patients of run-in portion were treated with SEL 50 mg and if no DLTs, next 3-6 patients at 75 mg po bid. If no DLTs, then phase II dose of SEL 75 mg po bid would be used. Primary endpoint was RECIST 1.0, investigator determined response rate (RR). As compared to the historical RR of 4% (and median PFS 2.5 mos) for 2nd-line FOLFIRI (Tournigand), with alpha 0.10 & beta 0.90, a sample size of 45 would have the power to detect improvement in RR to 15%, and 79% power to demonstrate improved med PFS to 4.0 mos. Early stopping would occur for responses of 0 of 20 patients. Results: 32 patients were entered and treated. Median age was 54 (40-71) yrs, 18 were male and 22 Caucasian, all KRASm. The first 3 tolerated SEL 50 mg bid without SAE and the remaining 29 were treated at 75 bid. Median number of cycles on study was 3.5 and median TTP approximately 4.0 months. Observed grade 3 AEs included: diarrhea 3, fatigue 2, neutropenia 2, and 1 each PLTS, enteritis, GI bleed, rash; one grade 4 ANC. Grade 2 AEs: diarrhea 12, rash 8 pts. Best response (investigator reported) included 3 (9%) confirmed PR and 15 (47%) SD [including 2 unconfirmed PR] of 32 entered. Six patients were on study for > 6 months (6, 6, 8, 9, 12.5, 14.5 months). The study was terminated early due to non-protocol considerations. These data are not yet verified. Conclusions: Despite early termination, the higher RR and PFS noted for 32 patients with KRASm CRC treated with IRI and SEL as 2nd-line therapy of CRC (and treated for up to 14.5 months), are promising compared with historical controls. The strategy of MEK inhibition in KRAS mutated CRC should be explored further. Clinical trial information: NCT01116271.

ABOUND.70+: Safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin (nab-P/C) in elderly patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9059-9059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey J. Langer ◽  
Eric C. Anderson ◽  
Robert M. Jotte ◽  
Jonathan Wade Goldman ◽  
Daniel Ernest Haggstrom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Type I ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3

9059 Background: Treatment (tx) of elderly pts with NSCLC is challenging. nab-P/C demonstrated efficacy in a subset of pts with NSCLC ≥ 70 y in a phase III trial. ABOUND.70+ was designed to determine whether a 1-week break can further improve tolerability of nab-P/C in pts ≥ 70 y with NSCLC. Safety and efficacy were evaluated and are reported. Methods: Pts ≥ 70 y with tx-naive locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC were randomized (1:1) nab-P 100 mg/m2 d 1, 8, 15 + C AUC 6 d 1 q3w (Arm A) or the same nab-P/C dose q3w followed by a 1-week break (Arm B). Primary endpoint: percentage of pts with either grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy (PN) or grade ≥ 3 myelosuppression AEs. Key secondary endpoints: PFS, ORR, OS, for which statistical analyses do not control for type I error ( Pvalues unadjusted). Results: At interim evaluation, the primary endpoint was similar across arms, resulting in early closure of enrollment. In Arms A and B, 71 and 72 pts were randomized; median age was 76 and 75 y, majority of pts were male (57.7% vs 55.6%) and had ECOG PS 1 (70.4% vs 72.2%). There were no differences in histology across tx arms. See table for primary endpoint data. Median number of tx cycles for Arms A and B was 4.0 and 5.5, median cumulative nab-P dose was 875.0 and 1287.5 mg/m2, and median weekly dose intensity was 62.0 and 54.1 mg/m2. nab-P dose modifications (Arms A and B): ≥ 1 dose reduction in 64.7% and 58.6%, ≥ 1 dose delay in 58.8% and 48.6%, and ≥ 1 missed dose in 80.9% and 72.9%, respectively. Median PFS (Arms A and B) 3.9 vs 7.0 mo (HR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30 - 0.79; P = 0.003), confirmed ORR 23.9% vs 40.3% ( P = 0.037), and median OS 15.2 vs 16.2 mo (HR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.46 - 1.26; P= 0.292). Conclusions: Incidence of grade ≥ 2 PN or grade ≥ 3 myelosuppression AEs was similar between the 2 nab-P/C schedules in pts ≥ 70 y with advanced NSCLC. There appears to be a signal of improvement in PFS and ORR observed in Arm B, potentially due to increased tx exposure. NCT02151149 Clinical trial information: NCT02151149. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document