The effect of melatonin on appetite and other symptoms in patients with advanced cancer and cachexia: A double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9062-9062
Author(s):  
Egidio Del Fabbro ◽  
Rony Dev ◽  
David Hui ◽  
J. Lynn Palmer ◽  
Eduardo Bruera
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Test Statistic ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

9062 Background: Patients with advanced cancer experience anorexia and weight loss which impairs their quality of life. Prior studies suggest melatonin, a frequently used integrative medicine may attenuate weight loss, anorexia, fatigue, and depression. These studies were limited by a lack of blinding and absence of placebo controls. The primary objective of this study was to compare melatonin to placebo for appetite in patients with cachexia. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, 28 day trial of melatonin 20mg vs. placebo in patients with advanced lung or gastrointestinal cancer, appetite scores >3 on a 0 to 10 scale (10 = worst appetite) and a history of weight loss ≥ 5% within 6 months. Patients unable to maintain oral intake, thyroid or adrenal dysfunction, or with a karnofsky <40 were excluded from the study. The assessments included weight, symptom severity by Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and quality of life by the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT).Differences between groups from baseline to day 28 were analyzed using one-sided two sample t tests (appetite, pain and well-being) or Wilcoxon two-sample tests for the other variables. Interim analysis at half point had a Lan-DeMets monitoring boundary with an O’Brien-Fleming stopping rule. The decision boundaries for the interim test was to accept the null hypothesis of no treatment difference (futility) if the test statistic Z < 0.39 (p ≥ 0.348). Results: After interim analysis of 48 patients, the study was closed by the Data Safety Monitoring Board for futility. There were no significant differences between groups in appetite (p=0.78), weight (p= 0.17), FAACT score (p=0.95), insomnia (p=0.62) or other symptoms measured by the ESAS from baseline to day 28.No significant toxicities were observed. Conclusions: In cachectic patients with advanced cancer, 20mg oral Melatonin at night does not improve appetite, weight or quality of life compared to placebo.

scholarly journals Effects of Melatonin on Appetite and Other Symptoms in Patients With Advanced Cancer and Cachexia: A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1271-1276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Egidio Del Fabbro ◽  
Rony Dev ◽  
David Hui ◽  
Lynn Palmer ◽  
Eduardo Bruera
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

Purpose Prior studies have suggested that melatonin, a frequently used integrative medicine, can attenuate weight loss, anorexia, and fatigue in patients with cancer. These studies were limited by a lack of blinding and absence of placebo controls. The primary purpose of this study was to compare melatonin with placebo for appetite improvement in patients with cancer cachexia. Patients and Methods We performed a randomized, double-blind, 28-day trial of melatonin 20 mg versus placebo in patients with advanced lung or GI cancer, appetite scores ≥ 4 on a 0 to 10 scale (10 = worst appetite), and history of weight loss ≥ 5%. Assessments included weight, symptoms by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, and quality of life by the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT) questionnaire. Differences between groups from baseline to day 28 were analyzed using one-sided, two-sample t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests. Interim analysis halfway through the trial had a Lan-DeMets monitoring boundary with an O'Brien-Fleming stopping rule. Decision boundaries were to accept the null hypothesis of futility if the test statistic z < 0.39 (P ≥ .348) and reject the null hypothesis if z > 2.54 (P ≤ .0056). Results After interim analysis of 48 patients, the study was closed for futility. There were no significant differences between groups for appetite (P = .78) or other symptoms, weight (P = .17), FAACT score (P = .95), toxicity, or survival from baseline to day 28. Conclusion In cachectic patients with advanced cancer, oral melatonin 20 mg at night did not improve appetite, weight, or quality of life compared with placebo.

Testosterone replacement for fatigue in male hypogonadic patients with advanced cancer: A preliminary double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19643-e19643
Author(s):  
Kalyan Pulivarthi ◽  
Rony Dev ◽  
Jose Garcia ◽  
J. Lynn Palmer ◽  
Eduardo Bruera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
T Test ◽  
Testosterone Replacement ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

e19643 Background: Hypogonadism affects two thirds of men with advanced cancer. Uncontrolled studies show fatigue, anorexia, depression,and insomnia are associated with low testosterone in men with cancer. Testosterone replacement improves quality of life and diminishes fatigue in patients with non-cancer conditions. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of testosterone replacement on fatigue in hypogonadal males with advanced cancer, by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F)at day 29. Methods: Randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled at two centers. Clinic outpatients with advanced cancer, bioavailable testosterone (BT) <70ng/dL, hemoglobin>9g/dL, and moderate to severe fatigue assessed by a score >3/10 on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) were eligible.Contraindications to testosterone therapy or other causes of fatigue such as hypothyroidism, hypercalcemia, or chronic kidney disease excluded subjects. Weight-based intra-muscular testosterone or a sesame seed oil placebo administered every 14 days to achieve a BT level 70-270ng/dL. Initial sample size was for fifty evaluable patients per group. One-sided t test was used to analyze differences in FACIT scores between arms. Results: Accrual was slower than anticipated with a final total of 43 eligible males randomized to testosterone(19) or placebo(24). Neither age nor site was statistically significant (<0.05) between arms. 14 placebo and 12 testosterone treated patients were evaluable for the primary outcome.No statistically significant difference was found for FACIT-F total scores between arms, with a trend for testosterone to improve scores (-5.5±19 for placebo, 3.9±14 for testosterone, p=0.09) using a one-sided t test. Adverse events were similar between groups. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes of ESAS scores, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, hand-grip or 6 minute walk. Conclusions: Testosterone replacement in hypogonadal male patients with advanced cancer had a trend to improve fatigue and quality of life in this preliminary trial.

A placebo-controlled trial of Sertraline's effects on symptoms, well-being and survival in advanced cancer: The ZEST Trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9002-9002 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. R. Wilcken ◽  
D. Goldstein ◽  
A. K. Nowak ◽  
P. J. Beale ◽  
M. Jefford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses

9002 Background: Depression, anxiety, fatigue and impaired well-being are common, important and closely related in advanced cancer. We sought to determine the effects of sertraline (a well-tolerated, SSRI antidepressant) on these symptoms and survival in a broad cross-section of people with advanced cancer but without major depression. Methods: 189 participants (pts) were randomly allocated to sertraline 50 mg daily or placebo. Assessments were at baseline; months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12; and, then 3-monthly. Outcome measures rated by pts included the: Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D); Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A, HADS-D); and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General and Fatigue scales (FACT-G and FACT-F). Clinicians completed Spitzer's Quality of Life Index (SQLI). Outcomes on all scales are expressed from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The primary analyses of sertraline's effects on quality of life were based on scores at 4 and 8 weeks adjusted for baseline scores using generalised estimating equations. Efficacy analyses are by intention to treat; toxicity analyses by treatment received. P-values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are 2-sided. Results: Recruitment was stopped after the first planned interim analysis of 150 pts showed a trend in overall survival favouring placebo (univariable logrank p=0.04; multivariable Cox model hazard ratio 1.61, CI 1.1 to 2.5, p=0.02). This trend was weaker at the final analysis including all 189 patients and longer follow-up (univariable logrank p=0.09); and, after accounting for baseline factors (multivariable Cox model hazard ratio 1.27, CI 0.87 to 1.8, p=0.2). Sertraline had no significant effects (scale: benefit over placebo, 95% CI) on depression (CES-D: 0.4, −2.6 to 3.4), anxiety (HADS-A: 2.0, −1.5 to 5.5), fatigue (FACT-F: 0.3, −4.3 to 4.9), overall quality of life (FACT-G: 1.7, −1.3 to 4.7) or clinicians’ ratings (SQLI: 2.0, −2.5 to 6.5). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses also excluded significant benefits. Sertraline was discontinued more often and earlier than placebo (logrank p = 0.03). The trial was closed for lack of benefit. Conclusions: Sertraline did not improve symptoms, well-being or survival and should be reserved for those with a proven indication. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Reduction of Cancer-Related Fatigue With Dexamethasone: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Patients With Advanced Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (25) ◽  
pp. 3076-3082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sriram Yennurajalingam ◽  
Susan Frisbee-Hume ◽  
J. Lynn Palmer ◽  
Marvin O. Delgado-Guay ◽  
Janet Bull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Symptom Distress ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Total Quality ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Cancer Related Fatigue ◽  
Dexamethasone Group ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

Purpose Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most common symptom in patients with advanced cancer. The primary objective of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to compare the effect of dexamethasone and placebo on CRF. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced cancer with ≥ three CRF-related symptoms (ie, fatigue, pain, nausea, loss of appetite, depression, anxiety, or sleep disturbance) ≥ 4 of 10 on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to either dexamethasone 4 mg or placebo orally twice per day for 14 days. The primary end point was change in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness–Fatigue (FACIT-F) subscale from baseline to day 15. Secondary outcomes included anorexia, anxiety, depression, and symptom distress scores. Results A total of 84 patients were evaluable (dexamethasone, 43; placebo, 41). Mean (± standard deviation) improvement in the FACIT-F subscale at day 15 was significantly higher in the dexamethasone than in the placebo group (9 [± 10.3] v 3.1 [± 9.59]; P = .008). The improvement in FACIT-F total quality-of-life scores was also significantly better for the dexamethasone group at day 15 (P = .03). The mean differences in the ESAS physical distress scores at day 15 were significantly better for the dexamethasone group (P = .013, respectively). No differences were observed for ESAS overall symptom distress (P = .22) or psychological distress score (P = .76). Frequency of adverse effects was not significantly different between groups (41 of 62 v 44 of 58; P = .14). Conclusion Dexamethasone is more effective than placebo in improving CRF and quality of life in patients with advanced cancer.

scholarly journals Parenteral Hydration in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Bruera ◽  
David Hui ◽  
Shalini Dalal ◽  
Isabel Torres-Vigil ◽  
Joseph Trumble ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

Purpose The vast majority of patients with cancer at the end of life receive parenteral hydration in hospitals and no hydration in hospice, with limited evidence supporting either practice. In this randomized controlled trial, we determined the effect of hydration on symptoms associated with dehydration, quality of life, and survival in patients with advanced cancer. Patients and Methods We randomly assigned 129 patients with cancer from six hospices to receive parenteral hydration (normal saline 1 L per day) or placebo (normal saline 100 mL per day) daily over 4 hours. The primary outcome was change in the sum of four dehydration symptoms (fatigue, myoclonus, sedation and hallucinations, 0 = best and 40 = worst possible) between day 4 and baseline. Secondary outcomes included Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS), Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (NuDESC), Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale (UMRS), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT-F), Dehydration Assessment Scale, creatinine, urea, and overall survival. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted to examine the change by day 4 ± 2 and day 7 ± 2 between groups. Results The hydration (n = 63) and placebo (n = 66) groups had similar baseline characteristics. We found no significant differences between the two groups for change in the sum of four dehydration symptoms (−3.3 v −2.8, P = .77), ESAS (all nonsignificant), MDAS (1 v 3.5, P = .084), NuDESC (0 v 0, P = .13), and UMRS (0 v 0, P = .54) by day 4. Results for day 7, including FACIT-F, were similar. Overall survival did not differ between the two groups (median, 21 v 15 days, P = .83). Conclusion Hydration at 1 L per day did not improve symptoms, quality of life, or survival compared with placebo.

scholarly journals Quality of life support in advanced cancer—web and technological interventions: systematic review and narrative synthesis

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002820
Author(s):  
Kathleen Kane ◽  
Fiona Kennedy ◽  
Kate L Absolom ◽  
Clare Harley ◽  
Galina Velikova
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Narrative Synthesis ◽  
Monitoring Tools ◽  
Technological Interventions ◽  
Cancer Trajectory ◽  
Interactive Health Communication

BackgroundAs treatments continue to progress, patients with advanced cancer are living longer. However, ongoing physical side-effects and psychosocial concerns can compromise quality of life (QoL). Patients and physicians increasingly look to the internet and other technologies to address diverse supportive needs encountered across this evolving cancer trajectory.Objectives1. To examine the features and delivery of web and technological interventions supporting patients with advanced cancer. 2. To explore their efficacy relating to QoL and psychosocial well-being.MethodsRelevant studies were identified through electronic database searches (MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science and ProQuest) and handsearching. Findings were collated and explored through narrative synthesis.ResultsOf 5274 identified records, 37 articles were included. Interventions were evaluated within studies targeting advanced cancer (13) or encompassing all stages (24). Five subtypes emerged: Interactive Health Communication Applications (n=12), virtual programmes of support (n=11), symptom monitoring tools (n=8), communication conduits (n=3) and information websites (n=3). Modes of delivery ranged from self-management to clinically integrated. Support largely targeted psychosocial well-being, alongside symptom management and healthy living. Most studies (78%) evidenced varying degrees of efficacy through QoL and psychosocial measures. Intervention complexity made it challenging to distinguish the most effective components. Incomplete reporting limited risk of bias assessment.ConclusionWhile complex and varied in their content, features and delivery, most interventions led to improvements in QoL or psychosocial well-being across the cancer trajectory. Ongoing development and evaluation of such innovations should specifically target patients requiring longer-term support for later-stage cancer.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018089153.

scholarly journals Adjunctive Garcinia mangostana Linn. (Mangosteen) Pericarp for Schizophrenia: A 24-Week Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Efficacy Trial: Péricarpe d’appoint Garcinia mangostana Linn (mangoustan) pour la schizophrénie : un essai d’efficacité de 24 semaines, à double insu, randomisé et contrôlé par placebo

2020 ◽  
pp. 070674372098243
Author(s):  
Alyna Turner ◽  
Andrea Baker ◽  
Olivia M. Dean ◽  
Adam J. Walker ◽  
Seetal Dodd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Schizoaffective Disorder ◽  
Negative Symptoms ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
Adjunctive Treatment ◽  
Garcinia Mangostana ◽  
Double Blind

Objectives: Garcinia mangostana Linn. (“mangosteen”) pericarp contains bioactive compounds that may target biological pathways implicated in schizophrenia. We conducted a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of adjunctive mangosteen pericarp, compared to placebo, in the treatment of schizophrenia. Methods: People diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder ( Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition), recruited across 2 sites (Brisbane and Victoria, Australia), were randomized to receive 24 weeks of adjunctive mangosteen pericarp (1,000 mg/day) or matched placebo. The primary outcome measure was the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale total score. Secondary outcomes included positive and negative symptoms, general psychopathology, clinical global severity and improvement, participant reported overall improvement, depressive symptoms, functioning, quality of life, and safety data at 24 and 28 weeks (4 weeks postdiscontinuation). Data were collected from July 2016 to February 2019. Results: Baseline assessments were conducted on 148 people (mangosteen = 74, placebo = 74); data analyses were conducted on 136 (92%) participants with postbaseline data. The treatment group had significantly higher symptom severity compared to placebo, and both groups significantly improved on all symptom, functioning, and quality of life measures over time. No between-group differences were found for the rate of change between baseline and 24 or 28 weeks. Conclusion: Despite promising preclinical and clinical work, our results do not support mangosteen pericarp extract as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

scholarly journals Amelioration of mild and moderate depression through Pranic Healing as adjuvant therapy: randomised double-blind controlled trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Rajagopal ◽  
Srikanth N Jois ◽  
Sumanth Mallikarjuna Majgi ◽  
MN Anil Kumar ◽  
HB Shashidhar
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Antidepressant Drug ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Average Decrease ◽  
Moderate Depression ◽  
Post Assessment

Objectives: Depression is a mental disorder, affecting the quality of life. Our study explores the efficacy of Pranic Healing (PH), as an adjuvant therapy in treating depression Methods: In this randomised double-blind controlled trial, 52 participants with a mean age of 34.4 years, with mild to moderate depression were assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating (HAM-D) scale during the 5-week study. Both Medication + PH (MedPH) and Medication + Mock PH (MedMockPH) groups comprising 26 members received Pranic and mock healing lasting 20 minutes per session respectively once a week for 4 weeks, along with the antidepressant drug. Results: The average decrease in HAM-D score in MedPH was median 11 (Interquartile Range (IQR) 7–12) and was significantly higher compared with the MedMockPH group median 6.5 (IQR 3–9). At pre-assessment, both groups had 8 cases of mild and 18 cases of moderate depression. At post-assessment, HAM-D showed that the improvement in depression category was seen in 69.2% of participants in the MedMockPH group and 100% in MedPH group. Conclusions: These results give first the evidence that PH can aid as an adjuvant therapy for depressed people.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document