Mixed metabolic response on PET/CT in patients with metastatic breast cancer as an early predictor of disease progression.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11522-e11522
Author(s):  
Urmi Sen ◽  
Huichung Tina Ling ◽  
Akansha Chhabra ◽  
Kent P Friedman ◽  
Amy Tiersten

e11522 Background: It has been observed that patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) may demonstrate a mixed metabolic treatment response on FDG PET (MMTR) while maintaining stable disease on CT (SDCT). The purpose of this study is to determine (1) the clinical outcome of MBC patients demonstrating MMTR+SDCT who were maintained on the same treatment regimen and (2) the behavior of oncologists when faced with a report of MMTR+SDCT. Methods: All FDG PET/CT scan reports performed at one institution between 2006-2011 were searched and studies describing a MMTR also containing the term “breast cancer” were identified. MBC patients without other active malignancies were extracted from the search and scans were re-analyzed. MMTR was defined as a PET/CT scan demonstrating a minimum of 2 lesions with a SUVmax change of +25% or more combined with at least 2 lesions demonstrating a SUVmax change of -25% or more. The subset of patients with MMTR+SDCT (by anatomical RECIST criteria) who were maintained on their current treatment regimen was further examined to identify time to progression (TTP). Results: Thirty-two cases were identified that demonstrated MMTR+SDCT in metastatic breast cancer patients. No change in therapy occurred within 3 months of the scan in 9/32 patients. Of the 9 patients who were maintained on their current treatment regimen, 5 patients demonstrated subsequent disease progression at 3 (n=2), 5 (n=2), and 11 (n=1) months (mean TTP = 5.4 months, range 3-11 months). One patient remains stable at 16 months and 3 patients have insufficient follow-up. Therapy was changed immediately after the scan in the remaining 22 patients for various reasons including preference of the treating oncologists, treatment toxicities, increase in tumor markers, or clinical progression. Conclusions: MMTR+SDCT in patients with MBC predicted subsequent disease progression within 6 months in the majority of individuals. Oncologists commonly alter treatment regimen when faced with a report of MMTR+SDCT. Based on the observation of outcomes in patients who did not change therapy, this practice seems justified.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. e0199529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edouard Depardon ◽  
Salim Kanoun ◽  
Olivier Humbert ◽  
Aurélie Bertaut ◽  
Jean-Marc Riedinger ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 572-573
Author(s):  
Priscilla Guglielmo ◽  
Mariachiara Paderno ◽  
Federica Elisei ◽  
Luca Guerra ◽  
Claudio Landoni ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S498
Author(s):  
M. Vogsen ◽  
F. Harbo ◽  
N.M. Jakobsen ◽  
H.J. Nissen ◽  
S.E. Dahlsgaard-Wallenius ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothée Goulon ◽  
Hatem Necib ◽  
Brice Henaff ◽  
Caroline Rousseau ◽  
Thomas Carlier ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 450-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Mortazavi-Jehanno ◽  
Anne-Laure Giraudet ◽  
Laurence Champion ◽  
Florence Lerebours ◽  
Elise Le Stanc ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fredrik Helland ◽  
Martine Hallin Henriksen ◽  
Oke Gerke ◽  
Marianne Vogsen ◽  
Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen ◽  
...  

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with integrated computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) can be used for response evaluation in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this study, we aimed to review literature comparing the PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) in patients with MBC. We made a systematic search in Embase, PubMed/Medline, and Cochrane Library using a modified PICO model. The population was MBC patients and the intervention was PERCIST or RECIST. Quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 checklist. A total of 1975 articles were identified. After screening by title/abstract, 78 articles were selected for further analysis of which 2 duplicates and 33 abstracts/out of focus articles were excluded. The remaining 43 articles provided useful information, but only one met the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria. This was a retrospective study of 65 patients with MBC showing one-year progression-free survival for responders versus non-responders to be 59% vs. 27% (p = 0.2) by RECIST compared to 64% vs. 0% (p = 0.0001) by PERCIST. This systematic literature review identified a lack of studies comparing the use of RECIST (with CE-CT) and PERCIST (with FDG-PET/CT) for response evaluation in metastatic breast cancer. The available sparse literature suggests that PERCIST might be more appropriate than RECIST for predicting prognosis in patients with MBC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document