Impact of diabetes on site-specific oncologic outcome in stage I-III colorectal cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14114-e14114
Author(s):  
Justin Y Jeon ◽  
Deok Hyun Jeong ◽  
Min Keun Park ◽  
Jennifer A. Ligibel ◽  
Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
Survival Outcome ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
All Cause Mortality

e14114 Background: Background: Conflicting results have been reported whether pre diagnosis diabetes mellitus (DM) influence survival of colorectal cancer patients or not. Therefore, we determine the influence of DM on long-term outcomes of stage 1-3 patients with resected colon and rectal cancer. Methods: This prospective study include a total of 4,131 participants who were treated for cancer between 1995 and 2005 in South Korea in a single hospital (Non DM: 3,614 patients, DM: 517 patients) with average follow up period of 12 years. We analyzed differences in all cause mortality, disease free survival (DFS), recurrence free survival (RFS) and colorectal cancer-specific mortality between colorectal patients with DM and those without DM. Results: After adjustment for potential confounders, pre-diagnosis DM significantly associated with increased all cause mortality (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.11-1.92), and recurrence free survival reduced DFS (HR: 1.45, 95%CI: 1.15-1.84) and RFS (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.98-1.76) in colon cancer patients but not in rectal cancer patients. In colon cancer patients, DM negatively affects the survival outcome of proximal colon cancer (HR: 2.08, 95%CI: 1.38-3.13), but not of distal cancer (HR:1.34, 95% CI: 0.92-1.96). Conclusions: To our knowledge, the current study first reported the effects of pre-diagnosis DM on survival outcome of colorectal cancer are site specific (proximal colon, distal colon and rectum). The current study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (KRF) (No. 2011-0004892) and the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (1120230). [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Subsite-Specific Dietary Risk Factors for Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Cohort Studies

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anette Hjartåker ◽  
Bjarte Aagnes ◽  
Trude Eid Robsahm ◽  
Hilde Langseth ◽  
Freddie Bray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Distal Colon ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
Risk Estimates ◽  
Specific Risk ◽  
Dietary Components

Objective. A shift in the total incidence from left- to right-sided colon cancer has been reported and raises the question as to whether lifestyle risk factors are responsible for the changing subsite distribution of colon cancer. The present study provides a review of the subsite-specific risk estimates for the dietary components presently regarded as convincing or probable risk factors for colorectal cancer: red meat, processed meat, fiber, garlic, milk, calcium, and alcohol.Methods. Studies were identified by searching PubMed through October 8, 2012 and by reviewing reference lists. Thirty-two prospective cohort studies are included, and the estimates are compared by sex for each risk factor.Results. For alcohol, there seems to be a stronger association with rectal cancer than with colon cancer, and for meat a somewhat stronger association with distal colon and rectal cancer, relative to proximal colon cancer. For fiber, milk, and calcium, there were only minor differences in relative risk across subsites. No statement could be given regarding garlic. Overall, many of the subsite-specific risk estimates were nonsignificant, irrespective of exposure.Conclusion. For some dietary components the associations with risk of cancer of the rectum and distal colon appear stronger than for proximal colon, but not for all.

scholarly journals Clinicopathological Factors Influencing Lymph Node Yield in Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Orsenigo ◽  
Giulia Gasparini ◽  
Michele Carlucci
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Lymph Node Yield ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Lymph Node Retrieval

Many colorectal resections do not meet the minimum of 12 lymph nodes (LNs) recommended by the American Joint Committee on Cancer for accurate staging of colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate factors affecting the number of the adequate nodal yield in colorectal specimens subject to routine pathological assessment. We have retrospectively analysed the data of 2319 curatively resected colorectal cancer patients in San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, between 1993 and 2017 (1259 colon cancer patients and 675 rectal cancer patients plus 385 rectal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy). The factors influencing lymph node retrieval were subjected to uni- and multivariate analyses. Moreover, a survival analysis was carried out to verify the prognostic implications of nodal counts. The mean number of evaluated nodes was 24.08±11.4, 20.34±11.8, and 15.33±9.64 in surgically treated right-sided colon cancer, left-sided colon cancer, and rectal tumors, respectively. More than 12 lymph nodes were reported in surgical specimens in 1094 (86.9%) cases in the colon cohort and in 425 (63%) cases in the rectal cohort, and patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation were analysed separately. On univariate analysis of the colon cancer group, higher LNs counts were associated with female sex, right colon cancer, emergency surgery, pT3-T4 diseases, higher tumor size, and resected specimen length. On multivariate analysis right colon tumors, larger mean size of tumor, length of specimen, pT3-T4 disease, and female sex were found to significantly affect lymph node retrieval. Colon cancer patients with 12 or more lymph nodes removed had a significantly better long-term survival than those with 11 or fewer nodes (P=0.002, log-rank test). Rectal cancer patients with 12 or more lymph nodes removed approached but did not reach a statistically different survival (P=0.055, log-rank test). Multiple tumor and patients’ factors are associated with lymph node yield, but only the removal of at least 12 lymph nodes will reliably determine lymph node status.

Tumor cancer stem cell genetic profile as predictor of relapse in stage II and III radically resected colon cancer patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 429-429
Author(s):  
Riccardo Giampieri ◽  
Mario Scartozzi ◽  
Cristian Loretelli ◽  
Alessandra Mandolesi ◽  
Alessandro Bittoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Genetic Profile ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Group A ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
Risk Of Relapse

429 Background: Although disease stage is the most relevant factor influencing treatment choice in locally advanced radically resected colon cancer, it is not uncommon to observe disease relapse in patients with apparent low risk stage that are usually excluded from an adjuvant therapy. On the contrary we also know that some patients with high risk stage are not likely to relapse, independently from medical treatment received. Preclinical data suggested that cancer stem cells may influence the biological behaviour of many solid tumours including colorectal cancer, we then tested a panel of genetic markers of stemness in resected Dukes stage B and C colorectal cancer patients in order to define a prognostic profile. Methods: We performed k-means unsupervised clustering (K=2) using the mRNA expression data of 66 genes. The algorithm divided the patients into two groups (A and B). Most patients clustered in a manner consistent with relapse free survival, defined as the time between primary surgery and first radiological sign of metastatic involvement or patients death, whichever came first. Results: A total of 62 patients were analysed (36, 58% stage II and 26, 41% stage III), 36 (58%) patients relapsed during the follow-up period (range 1.63-86.5 months). Respectively 12 (19%) and 50 (81%) patients were allocated into group A and B. A significantly different median relapse-free survival was observed between the 2 groups (22.18 vs 42.85 months, p=0.0296). Interestingly, even if group A had a worse outcome in terms of risk of relapse, an higher proportion of stage II patients could be found in this group (83%) when compared with the group B (52%). Among tested genes, those with the highest capability in determining allocation into one of the two groups were CD44, ALCAM, DTX2, HSPA9, CCNA2, PDX1, MYST1, COL1A1 and ABCG2. Conclusions: This analysis supports the idea that, other than (or maybe more than) stage, biological variables, such as expression levels of colon cancer stem cell genes, may be relevant in determining an increased risk of relapse in resected colorectal cancer patients. Our findings may also be relevant for new treatment strategies targeting tumour stem cells genetic profile.

scholarly journals Pathological Response Has Survival Benefits for Rectal Cancer following Neoadjuvant Therapy

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Chih Chen ◽  
Li-Jen Kuo ◽  
Chia-Che Chen ◽  
Po-Li Wei ◽  
Yu-Min Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
N Stage

Abstract Background Studies reporting the results of associated factors of pathological completed response (PCR) and tumor regression response in patients with rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) are inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to identify the prognostic factors of tumor response and outcome in rectal cancer patients.Methods The study was a retrospective analysis. Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer underwent nCRT followed by surgery from 2010 to 2014 with 5 years of follow-up. The primary outcomes were associated factors of pathological completed response and downstaging. The risk factors of survival outcome and disease recurrence were also observed.Results A total of 169 rectal cancer patients were included. The PCR rate was 17.8%, and the downstaging rate was 60.9%. Patients with a histology type of adenocarcinoma associated with PCR, and patients positive for clinical N stage were associated with downstaging. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the PCR group performed better to a statistically significant level both in overall survival and disease recurrence free survival than the no PCR group (p= 0.033 & 0.025, respectively). Patients with a downstaging response also showed better overall survival benefits and disease recurrence free survival benefits than their counter-parts (both p<0.001). After controlling confounding variables, the risk factors of overall survival were downstaging [Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% CI: 0.21-0.74], male, abnormal post-nCRT CEA level and abnormal Hb level. In addition, the protective factors of recurrence were downstaging and having adjuvant chemotherapy.Conclusions Among rectal cancer patients who received the neoadjuvant therapy, histology type and clinical N stage were associated with PCR and downstaging, respectively. Downstaging was an important protective factor for better overall survival and recurrence free survival.

Bevacizumab effectiveness and primary tumor location in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 683-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-zhuo He ◽  
Qiong Yang ◽  
Chang Jiang ◽  
Fang-xin Liao ◽  
Shou-sheng Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
First Line ◽  
Primary Tumor Location ◽  
Colon Cancers

683 Background: There is currently no consensus about whether bevacizumab effectiveness is associated with the primary tumor location of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The aim of this study was to assess whether the primary tumor location was a predictor for bevacizumab treatment. Methods: From 2004 to 2013, 740 patients with mCRC treated with oxaliplatin / 5-FU / leucovorin (mFOLFOX6) or irinotecan / 5-FU / leucovorin (FOLFIRI) (CT group) and 244 patients treated with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI (CT + B group) as first-line setting were included from Sun yat-sen university cancer center. Right-side colon cancers included those occurring in the cecum, ascending colon or transverse colon. Left-side colon cancers included those from descending or sigmoid colon. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests were used to detect difference. All statistical tests were two sided. Results: 222 right-side colon, 259 left-side colon and 259 rectal cancer patients were included in CT group while 78 right-side colon, 86 left-side colon and 80 rectal cancer patients were included in CT + B group. Patients in CT + B group had similar OS compare with CT group only when the primary tumor located at right-side colon (median OS was 19.6 months for CT + B group versus 19.5 months for CT group, P = 0.269). For left-side colon cancer, significantly longer OS were observed in CT + B than CT group (22.3 months versus 21.9 months, P = 0.014). For rectal cancer patients, those in CT + B group also had longer OS than CT group (25.9 months versus 21.1 months, P = 0.005). Conclusions: Our data suggested that patients with right-side colon cancer could not get survival benefit from the addition of bevacizumab to first-line chemotherapy. Further data from randomized trials are needed to test our hypothesis. [Table: see text]

Clinical lymph node staging by imaging in colorectal cancer: A flip of the coin?

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15160-e15160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelleke Pietronella Maria Brouwer ◽  
Rutger Carel Hubert Stijns ◽  
Lemmens Valery ◽  
Iris D. Nagtegaal ◽  
Regina GH Beets-Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Lymph Node Staging ◽  
Preoperative Treatment ◽  
Positive Lymph Nodes

e15160 Background: Clinical lymph node staging by MRI and CT is important in stratification for neoadjuvant therapy in colorectal cancer. Overstaging may result in unnecessary neoadjuvant therapy, but understaging may refrain patients from adequate preoperative treatment. This study aims to provide insight in current daily practice in clinical lymph node staging in CRC in the Netherlands. Methods: All patients with primary CRC, diagnosed between 2003-2014, who underwent lymph node dissection were selected from the nationwide population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry (n=100,211). Trends in patient- and tumor-characteristics, and lymph node staging were analyzed. For the years 2011-2014, sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for clinical lymph node staging, with histology as the gold standard. Only patients without preoperative treatment were analyzed. Since prospective studies have shown that 5x5 Gy radiotherapy (RT) followed by total mesorectal excision within 10 days does not lead to nodal downstaging, an additional analysis was performed in this group. Results: The proportion clinically positive lymph nodes increased significantly between 2003-2014; from 7% to 22% for colon cancer and from 7% to 53% for rectal cancer. The proportion histological positive lymph nodes remained fairly stable over time (±35% colon, ±33% rectum). During 2011-2014, clinical lymph node staging was available in the registry in 86% of colon cancer patients, 92% of rectal cancer patients without neoadjuvant treatment and 95% of rectal cancer patients with 5x5 Gy RT. The parameters based on data from this period are presented in table 1. Conclusions: With a sensitivity and PPV of approximately 50%, clinical lymph node staging is about as accurate as flipping a coin. This leads to overtreatment in patients with rectal cancer with neoadjuvant RT. Acceptable specificity and NPV limit the risk of undertreatment. [Table: see text]

Oncologic outcome and morbidity for elderly rectal cancer patients compared to younger patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery: A multi-institutional and case-matched control study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 736-736
Author(s):  
Soo Yoon Sung ◽  
Jong Hoon Lee ◽  
Sung Hwan Kim
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Late Complication ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Younger Patients

736 Background: To elucidate the toxicity and survival outcome of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by curative total mesorectal excision (TME) in elderly rectal cancer patients compared to younger patients. Methods: A total of 1232 rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant CRT and curative surgery were collected from 7 tertiary institutions. After propensity-score matching, 310 patients of < 70 years for younger arm and 310 patients of ≥ 70 years for elderly arm were identified, respectively and matched with 1:1 manner. Treatment response and toxicity, surgical outcome, recurrence, and survival were assessed and compared between two arms. Results: The two younger (< 70 years) and elderly (≥ 70 years) arms were well-matched and had similar baseline characteristics. Median ages were 58 years for younger arm and 74 years for elderly arm, respectively. Pathologic complete response rates were not significantly different between younger arm and elderly arm (17.1% vs. 14.8%, P = 0.443). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (70.0% vs. 69.8%, P = 0.773) and overall survival (79.5% vs. 82.9%, P = 0.270) rates were not significantly different between two arms. Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery was less frequently delivered to elderly arm than younger arm (69.0% vs. 83.9%, P = 0.773). Grade 3 or higher acute hematologic toxicity was observed more frequently in elderly arm than in younger arm (9.0% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.008 ), but late complication was not significantly increased in elderly arm (2.6% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.193). Conclusions: Despite an increased acute toxicity, elderly rectal cancer patients with good performance status would have equivalent tumor response and recurrence-free survival compared to younger patients.

Adjuvant treatment in extreme elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 784-784
Author(s):  
Marta Llopis Cuquerella ◽  
Maria del Carmen Ors Castaño ◽  
María Ballester Espinosa ◽  
Alejandra Magdaleno Cremades ◽  
Vicente Boix Aracil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Complementary Treatment ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

784 Background: Surgical and adjuvant treatment in extreme elderly ( > 80 years) patients with localized colorectal cancer is an unresolved issue. Owing to the lack of available neither clinical practice nor investigational data in this field we present our experience in this scenario. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data regarding surgical and complementary treatment for colorectal cancer patients aged more than 80 consecutively attended by General Surgery Department in Vega Baja Hospital between 2008 and 2013. Results: A total number of 115 colorectal cancer patients were registered. 95 patients diagnosed of localized disease were selected for analysis. Colon vs rectal cancer ratio was 4:1. Median age was 83.6 years (80-94). Male sex was predominant (60 patients, 63.2%). Emergency surgery was performed in 15 patients (15.8%). Complementary treatment to surgery was advised, according to international guidelines, in 53 patients (55.8%). 10 patients (18.9%) with an advise of adjuvant treatment finally received it. More patients with rectal cancer received recommended treatment (41.7% rectal vs 12.2% colon cancer). Patients with stage III disease were more frequently finally treated according to guidelines (22.2 % stage III vs 11.8% stage II). More patients with stage II rectal cancer were advised and received treatment (recommendation: 66.7% rectal vs 36.1% colon cancer; administration: 25% rectal vs 7.7% colon cancer). Treatment was also more frequently administered to stage III rectal cancer (50% rectal vs 14.3% rectal cancer) (Table). Conclusions: Our experience in localized colorectal cancer in extreme elderly patients ( > 80 years) showed that, although advised according to guidelines, most of them did not receive adjuvant treatment to surgery. Complementary treatment administration was more common in rectal cancer patients and with more advanced disease. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document