scholarly journals Pathological Response Has Survival Benefits for Rectal Cancer following Neoadjuvant Therapy

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Chih Chen ◽  
Li-Jen Kuo ◽  
Chia-Che Chen ◽  
Po-Li Wei ◽  
Yu-Min Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
N Stage

Abstract Background Studies reporting the results of associated factors of pathological completed response (PCR) and tumor regression response in patients with rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) are inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to identify the prognostic factors of tumor response and outcome in rectal cancer patients.Methods The study was a retrospective analysis. Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer underwent nCRT followed by surgery from 2010 to 2014 with 5 years of follow-up. The primary outcomes were associated factors of pathological completed response and downstaging. The risk factors of survival outcome and disease recurrence were also observed.Results A total of 169 rectal cancer patients were included. The PCR rate was 17.8%, and the downstaging rate was 60.9%. Patients with a histology type of adenocarcinoma associated with PCR, and patients positive for clinical N stage were associated with downstaging. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the PCR group performed better to a statistically significant level both in overall survival and disease recurrence free survival than the no PCR group (p= 0.033 & 0.025, respectively). Patients with a downstaging response also showed better overall survival benefits and disease recurrence free survival benefits than their counter-parts (both p<0.001). After controlling confounding variables, the risk factors of overall survival were downstaging [Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% CI: 0.21-0.74], male, abnormal post-nCRT CEA level and abnormal Hb level. In addition, the protective factors of recurrence were downstaging and having adjuvant chemotherapy.Conclusions Among rectal cancer patients who received the neoadjuvant therapy, histology type and clinical N stage were associated with PCR and downstaging, respectively. Downstaging was an important protective factor for better overall survival and recurrence free survival.

scholarly journals Pathological Response Has Survival Benefits for Rectal Cancer following Neoadjuvant Therapy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Chih Chen ◽  
Li-Jen Kuo ◽  
Chia-Che Chen ◽  
Po-Li Wei ◽  
Yu-Min Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
N Stage

Abstract Background: Studies reporting the results of associated factors of pathological completed response (PCR) and tumor regression response in patients with rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) are inconsistent. Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify the prognostic factors of tumor response and outcome in rectal cancer patients. Design: The study was a retrospective analysis. Settings: The study was conducted in a single large institution in Taiwan. Patients: Newly diagnosed rectal cancer patients who underwent nCRT followed by surgery from 2010 to 2014 with 5 years of follow-up. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes were associated factors of pathological completed response and downstaging. The risk factors of survival outcome and disease recurrence were also observed. Results: A total of 169 rectal cancer patients were included. The PCR rate was 17.8%, and the downstaging rate was 60.9%. Patients with a histology type of adenocarcinoma associated with PCR, and patients positive for clinical N stage were associated with downstaging. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the PCR group performed better to a statistically significant level both in overall survival and disease recurrence free survival than the no PCR group (p= 0.033 & 0.025, respectively). Patients with a downstaging response also showed better overall survival benefits and disease recurrence free survival benefits than their counterparts (both p<0.001). After controlling confounding variables, the risk factors of overall survival were downstaging [Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% CI: 0.21-0.74], male, abnormal post-nCRT CEA level and abnormal Hb level. In addition, the protective factors of recurrence were downstaging and having received adjuvant chemotherapy. Limitations: Modest sample size and limited genetic bio-markers information. Conclusions: Among rectal cancer patients who received the neoadjuvant therapy, histology type and clinical N stage were associated with PCR and downstaging, respectively. Downstaging was an important protective factor for better overall survival and recurrence free survival.

scholarly journals Influence of incorrect staging of colorectal carcinoma on oncological outcome: are we playing safely?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Reali ◽  
Gabriele Bocca ◽  
Ian Lindsey ◽  
Oliver Jones ◽  
Chris Cunningham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Preoperative Staging ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Preoperative Imaging ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
Colorectal Cancers ◽  
Radiological Staging ◽  
N Stage

AbstractAccurate preoperative staging of colorectal cancers is critical in selecting patients for neoadjuvant therapy prior to resection. Inaccurate staging, particularly understaging, may lead to involved resection margins and poor oncological outcomes. Our aim is to determine preoperative imaging accuracy of colorectal cancers compared to histopathology and define the effect of inaccurate staging on patient selection for neoadjuvant treatment(NT). Staging and treatment were determined for patients undergoing colorectal resections for adenocarcinomas in a single tertiary centre(2016–2020). Data were obtained for 948 patients. The staging was correct for both T and N stage in 19.68% of colon cancer patients. T stage was under-staged in 18.58%. At resection, 23 patients (3.36%) had involved pathological margins; only 7 of which had been predicted by pre-operative staging. However, the staging was correct for both T and N stage in 53.85% of rectal cancer patients. T stage was understaged in 26.89%. Thirteen patients had involved(R1)margins; T4 had been accurately predicted in all of these cases. There was a general trend in understaging both the tumor and lymphonodal involvement (T p < 0.00001 N p < 0.00001) causing a failure in administrating NT in 0.1% of patients with colon tumor, but not with rectal cancer. Preoperative radiological staging tended to understage both colonic and rectal cancers. In colonic tumours this may lead to a misled opportunity to treat with neoadjuvant therapy, resulting in involved margins at resection.

Impact of diabetes on site-specific oncologic outcome in stage I-III colorectal cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14114-e14114
Author(s):  
Justin Y Jeon ◽  
Deok Hyun Jeong ◽  
Min Keun Park ◽  
Jennifer A. Ligibel ◽  
Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
Survival Outcome ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
All Cause Mortality

e14114 Background: Background: Conflicting results have been reported whether pre diagnosis diabetes mellitus (DM) influence survival of colorectal cancer patients or not. Therefore, we determine the influence of DM on long-term outcomes of stage 1-3 patients with resected colon and rectal cancer. Methods: This prospective study include a total of 4,131 participants who were treated for cancer between 1995 and 2005 in South Korea in a single hospital (Non DM: 3,614 patients, DM: 517 patients) with average follow up period of 12 years. We analyzed differences in all cause mortality, disease free survival (DFS), recurrence free survival (RFS) and colorectal cancer-specific mortality between colorectal patients with DM and those without DM. Results: After adjustment for potential confounders, pre-diagnosis DM significantly associated with increased all cause mortality (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.11-1.92), and recurrence free survival reduced DFS (HR: 1.45, 95%CI: 1.15-1.84) and RFS (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.98-1.76) in colon cancer patients but not in rectal cancer patients. In colon cancer patients, DM negatively affects the survival outcome of proximal colon cancer (HR: 2.08, 95%CI: 1.38-3.13), but not of distal cancer (HR:1.34, 95% CI: 0.92-1.96). Conclusions: To our knowledge, the current study first reported the effects of pre-diagnosis DM on survival outcome of colorectal cancer are site specific (proximal colon, distal colon and rectum). The current study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (KRF) (No. 2011-0004892) and the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (1120230). [Table: see text]

Impact of testosterone replacement therapy after radiation therapy on prostate cancer outcomes.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 99-99
Author(s):  
Reith Sarkar ◽  
J Kellogg Parsons ◽  
John Paul Einck ◽  
Arno James Mundt ◽  
A. Karim Kader ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Testosterone Replacement ◽  
Testosterone Replacement Therapy ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Groups

99 Background: Currently there is little data to guide the use of testosterone replacement therapy in prostate cancer patients who have received radiation therapy (RT). We sought to evaluate the impact of post-RT testosterone replacement on prostate cancer outcomes in a large national cohort. Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using the Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure. We identified node-negative and non-metastatic prostate cancer patients diagnosed between 2001-2015 treated with RT. We excluded patients for missing covariate and follow-up data. Receipt of testosterone was coded as a time-dependent covariate. Other covariates included: age, Charlson Comorbidity index, diagnosis year, body mass index, race, PSA, clinical T/N/M stage, Gleason score, and receipt of hormone therapy. We evaluated prostate cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and biochemical recurrence free survival using multivariable Cox regression. Results: Our cohort included 41,544 patients, of whom 544 (1.3%) received testosterone replacement after RT. There were no differences in Charlson comorbidity, clinical T stage, median pre-treatment PSA or Gleason score between treatment groups. Testosterone patients were more likely to be of younger age, non-black, have a lower median post-treatment PSA nadir (0.1 vs. 0.2; p < 0.001), have higher BMI, and have used hormone therapy (46.7% vs 40.3%; p = 0.003). Median duration of ADT usage was equivalent between treatment groups (testosterone: 185 days vs. non-testosterone: 186 days, p = 0.77). The median time from RT to TRT was 3.52 years. After controlling for differences in covariates between treatment groups, we found no difference in prostate cancer specific mortality (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.62-1.67; p = 0.95), overall survival (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.84-1.24; p = 0.86), non-cancer mortality (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.82-1.27; p = 0.86) biochemical recurrence free survival (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.90-1.28; p = 0.45). Conclusions: Our results suggest that testosterone replacement is safe in prostate cancer patients who have received RT. Prospective data are required to confirm the safety of post-RT testosterone replacement.

scholarly journals Association of MMP-2, RB and PAI-1 with decreased recurrence-free survival and overall survival in bladder cancer patients

Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (59) ◽  
pp. 99707-99721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen T.M. Chan ◽  
Hideki Furuya ◽  
Ian Pagano ◽  
Yoshiko Shimizu ◽  
Kanani Hokutan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Pai 1

Oncologic outcome and morbidity for elderly rectal cancer patients compared to younger patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery: A multi-institutional and case-matched control study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 736-736
Author(s):  
Soo Yoon Sung ◽  
Jong Hoon Lee ◽  
Sung Hwan Kim
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Late Complication ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Younger Patients

736 Background: To elucidate the toxicity and survival outcome of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by curative total mesorectal excision (TME) in elderly rectal cancer patients compared to younger patients. Methods: A total of 1232 rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant CRT and curative surgery were collected from 7 tertiary institutions. After propensity-score matching, 310 patients of < 70 years for younger arm and 310 patients of ≥ 70 years for elderly arm were identified, respectively and matched with 1:1 manner. Treatment response and toxicity, surgical outcome, recurrence, and survival were assessed and compared between two arms. Results: The two younger (< 70 years) and elderly (≥ 70 years) arms were well-matched and had similar baseline characteristics. Median ages were 58 years for younger arm and 74 years for elderly arm, respectively. Pathologic complete response rates were not significantly different between younger arm and elderly arm (17.1% vs. 14.8%, P = 0.443). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (70.0% vs. 69.8%, P = 0.773) and overall survival (79.5% vs. 82.9%, P = 0.270) rates were not significantly different between two arms. Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery was less frequently delivered to elderly arm than younger arm (69.0% vs. 83.9%, P = 0.773). Grade 3 or higher acute hematologic toxicity was observed more frequently in elderly arm than in younger arm (9.0% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.008 ), but late complication was not significantly increased in elderly arm (2.6% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.193). Conclusions: Despite an increased acute toxicity, elderly rectal cancer patients with good performance status would have equivalent tumor response and recurrence-free survival compared to younger patients.

Prognosis of BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer patients with HBOC risk factors compared with sporadic breast cancer patients without HBOC risk factors

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-113
Author(s):  
Jai Min Ryu ◽  
Seok Jin Nam ◽  
Seok Won Kim ◽  
Jeong Eon Lee ◽  
Byung Joo Chae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Objective Demands for genetic counseling with BRCA1/2 examination have markedly increased. Accordingly, the incidence of uninformative results on BRCA1/2 mutation status has also increased. Because most patients examined for BRCA1/2 mutation have a high risk of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer, many patients suffer psychological distress even when the BRCA1/2 result is negative. We compared oncological outcomes between BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer with high risk of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer and sporadic breast cancer without risk of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer. Methods The criteria for high risk for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer were defined as family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer in first- or second-degree relative, early onset breast cancer at &lt;35 years old and bilateral breast cancer. Patients were matched maximally 1:3 into those who identified as negative for BRCA1/2 mutation with risk of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (study group) and those who were not examined for BRCA1/2 mutation without risk for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (control group). Matched variables were pathologic stage, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 status. Results All matching variables were successfully matched. Median follow-up duration was 57.8 months. There was no significant difference between the groups in disease-free survival (log-rank P = 0.197); however, the study group showed significantly better overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival (both P &lt; 0.0001). We conducted subgroup analysis in the middle-aged group (36–54) and showed no significant difference for disease-free survival (P = 0.072) but significantly better overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival in the study group (P = 0.002 and P &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer patients who had hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer risk factors showed similar disease-free survival and better overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival compared with those with sporadic breast cancer without hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer risk factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document