The effect of vascular reconstruction on early postoperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: An analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 153-153
Author(s):  
Anthony W. Castleberry ◽  
Rebekah Ruth White ◽  
Sebastian G. De La Fuente ◽  
Douglas S. Tyler ◽  
Theodore N. Pappas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Vascular Reconstruction ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Team ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Acs Nsqip ◽  
American College Of Surgeons

153 Background: Several single-center reports have been published suggesting that vascular reconstruction (VR) during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) allows an acceptable oncologic outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma without affecting early postoperative mortality or morbidity. The objective of our study was to review the outcomes associated with VR during PD using a large multicenter data source. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Participant User Files for 2005-2009. All patients undergoing PD for a postoperative diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the pancreas were included. Forward stepwise multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the association between VR during PD and 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity after adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidities. Results: 3582 patients were included for analysis, 281 (7.8%) of whom underwent VR during PD. VR during PD was associated with significantly greater risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality (5.7% with VR vs. 2.9% without VR, Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 2.1, 95% CI 1.22-3.73, p = 0.008) and overall morbidity (39.9% with VR vs. 33.3% without VR, AOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.05-1.75, p = 0.02). Patients undergoing VR required significantly longer operative times, and were more likely to require intraoperative transfusion or early reoperation, than patients not undergoing VR during PD. There was no significant difference in risk-adjusted postoperative mortality or morbidity between those patients undergoing VR by the primary surgical team versus those patients undergoing VR by a vascular surgical team. Conclusions: Contrary to the findings of several previously published single-center analyses, data from ACS-NSQIP suggests that VR significantly increases the risk of 30-day postoperative death or complications after PD. Patients who may require VR during PD will likely benefit from referral to centers with sufficient experience with this procedure.

Outcomes of Ileal Pouch Excision: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2142-2149
Author(s):  
Sebastien Lachance ◽  
Maria Abou-Khalil ◽  
Carol-Ann Vasilevsky ◽  
Gabriela Ghitulescu ◽  
Nancy Morin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Ileal Pouch ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Acs Nsqip ◽  
American College Of Surgeons ◽  
Pouch Excision

scholarly journals Reporting Methodology of Neurosurgical Studies Utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yagiz Yolcu ◽  
Waseem Wahood ◽  
Mohammed Ali Alvi ◽  
Panagiotis Kerezoudis ◽  
Elizabeth B Habermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Acs Nsqip ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
American College Of Surgeons ◽  
Potential Sources ◽  
Strobe Statement

AbstractBACKGROUNDUse of large databases such as the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) has become increasingly common in neurosurgical research.OBJECTIVETo perform a critical appraisal and evaluation of the methodological reporting for studies in neurosurgical literature that utilize the ACS-NSQIP database.METHODSWe queried Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases for all neurosurgical studies utilizing the ACS-NSQIP. We assessed each study according to number of criteria fulfilled with respect to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement, REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected Health Data (RECORD) Statement, and Journal of American Medical Association–Surgical Section (JAMA-Surgery) Checklist. A separate analysis was conducted among papers published in core and noncore journals in neurosurgery according to Bradford's law.RESULTSA total of 117 studies were included. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) scores for number of fulfilled criteria for STROBE Statement, RECORD Statement, and JAMA-Surgery Checklist were 20 (IQR:19-21), 9 (IQR:8-9), and 6 (IQR:5-6), respectively. For STROBE Statement, RECORD Statement, and JAMA-Surgery Checklist, item 9 (potential sources of bias), item 13 (supplemental information), and item 9 (missing data/sensitivity analysis) had the highest number of studies with no fulfillment among all studies (56, 68, 50%), respectively. When comparing core journals vs noncore journals, no significant difference was found (STROBE, P = .94; RECORD, P = .24; JAMA-Surgery checklist, P = .60).CONCLUSIONWhile we observed an overall satisfactory reporting of methodology, most studies lacked mention of potential sources of bias, data cleaning methods, supplemental information, and external validity. Given the pervasive role of national databases and registries for research and health care policy, the surgical community needs to ensure the credibility and quality of such studies that ultimately aim to improve the value of surgical care delivery to patients.

scholarly journals O impacto do envolvimento do residente nos resultados dos pacientes na revisão da artroplastia total do quadril

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley Alexander ◽  
Mackenzie Sowers ◽  
Roshan Jacob ◽  
Gerald McGwin ◽  
Nicola Maffulli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Acs Nsqip ◽  
American College Of Surgeons

Resumo Objetivo O objetivo do presente estudo foi determinar a influência do envolvimento dos residentes nas taxas de complicações agudas na revisão da artroplastia total do quadril (ATQ). Métodos Utilizando o banco de dados do American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP, na sigla em inglês), foram identificadas 1.743 revisões de ATQs entre 2008 e 2012; 949 delas envolveram um médico residente. Foram analisadas informações demográficas, incluindo gênero e raça, comorbidades, incluindo doenças pulmonares, doenças cardíacas e diabetes, tempo de permanência e complicações agudas pós-operatórias no prazo de 30 dias. Resultados O envolvimento dos residentes não foi associado a um aumento significativo no risco de complicações agudas. O tempo de operação total demonstrou associação estatisticamente significativa com o envolvimento de um residente (161,35 minutos com residente presente, 135,07 minutos sem residente; p < 0,001). Não houve evidência de que o envolvimento do residente tenha sido associado a um maior tempo de internação hospitalar (5,61 dias com residente presente, 5,22 dias sem residente; p = 0,46). Conclusão O envolvimento de um residente ortopédico durante a revisão da ATQ não parece aumentar as taxas de complicações pós-operatórias de curto prazo, apesar de um aumento significativo nos tempos operacionais.

Risk Factors for Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Surgery: Analysis of 2138 Converted Operations in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (9) ◽  
pp. 914-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominic Papandria ◽  
Thomas Lardaro ◽  
Daniel Rhee ◽  
Gezzer Ortega ◽  
Amany Gorgy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Laparoscopic Procedure ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Acs Nsqip ◽  
American College Of Surgeons

Minimal access procedures have influenced surgical practice and patient expectations. Risk of laparoscopic conversion to open surgery is frequently cited but vaguely quantified. The present study examines three common procedures to identify risk factors for laparoscopic conversion to open (LCO) events. Cross-sectional analysis using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP; 2005 to 2009) identified cases with laparoscopic procedure codes for appendectomy, cholecystectomy, and bariatric procedures. The primary outcome was conversion of a laparoscopic procedure to its open equivalent. Summary statistics for laparoscopic and LCO groups were compared and logistic regression analysis was used to estimate patient and operative risk factors for conversion. Of 176,014 selected laparoscopic operations, 2,138 (1.2%) were converted. Most patients were female (68%) and white (71.2%); mean age was 45.1 years. LCO cholecystectomy was significantly more likely (n = 1526 [1.9%]) and LCO bariatric procedures were less likely (n = 121 [0.3%]); appendectomy was intermediate (n = 491 [1.0%], P < 0.001). Patient factors associated with LCO included male sex ( P < 0.001), age 30 years or older ( P < 0.025), American Society of Anesthesiologists Class 2 to 4 ( P < 0.001), obesity ( P < 0.01), history of bleeding disorder ( P = 0.036), or preoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis ( P < 0.001). LCO was associated with greater incidence of postoperative complications, including death, organ space surgical site infection, sepsis, wound dehiscence, and return to the operating room ( P < 0.001). Overall LCO incidence is low in hospitals participating in ACS-NSQIP. Conversion risk factors include patient age, sex, obesity, and preoperative comorbidity as well as the procedure performed. This information should be valuable to clinicians in discussing conversion risk with patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document