The influence of seminal events on the transition from adjuvant to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in the treatment of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (LARC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 631-631
Author(s):  
Jeremy Warner ◽  
Rebecca A. Miksad ◽  
Deborah Nagle ◽  
Robert Najarian ◽  
Michael Goldstein
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Rectal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Pivotal Phase ◽  
The Impact

631 Background: Factors leading to uptake of new oncology treatment innovations are poorly understood. In particular, the degree to which seminal events, such as report of pivotal phase III trials, influence practice is unclear. For example, preoperative (pre-op) 5-fluorouracil + radiation (5-FU + RT) is the current standard of care for definitive treatment of LARC. However, postoperative (post-op) 5-FU + RT was standard before the seminal German Rectal Cancer Study Group (GRCSG) results were published. We investigated the impact of seminal events on the change in practice pattern from pre- to post-op 5-FU + RT at our institution. Methods: Patients with LARC (T2N+; any T3; any T4) treated at our institution between 1994-2010 were identified from the cancer registry. The date of diagnosis was compared to the dates of three seminal events: A) JAMA meta-analysis publication; B) publication of GRCSG results; C) founding of a multidisciplinary clinic at our institution. Pearson Chi square was used for univariate analysis. Results: 334 patients were evaluable. RT +/- 5-FU was delivered pre-op for 207 patients, post-op for 127 patients. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for receiving pre-op treatment after vs. before each seminal event was similar: (A) 4.16; (B) 4.08; (C) 3.91. When patients diagnosed prior to (A) or after (C) were excluded, (B) appeared to have a smaller effect, OR 2.07 (p = .053) (Table). Conclusions: All seminal events had similar associated OR, indicating that the process of uptake of the innovation of pre-op 5-FU + RT was gradual. The seminal GRCSG publication, when temporally isolated, had only modest effect. This suggests that report of seminal results is necessary but not sufficient for uptake of a new therapy innovation in LARC at our institution. Whether this pattern of uptake is generalizable is worthy of further investigation. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Trastuzumab for the treatment of HER2- positive metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 33-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Norman ◽  
S Rice ◽  
E Spackman ◽  
L Stirk ◽  
A Danso-Appiah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation ◽  
Metastatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Testing Strategies ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Impact

This paper presents a summary of the evidence review group (ERG) report into trastuzumab for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach (mGC) or gastro-oesophageal junction. HER2 positivity is defined by immunohistochemistry (IHC)3+ or IHC2+/fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH)+. The decision problem addressed was the testing of the whole mGC population with IHC and, for IHC2+ patients, also with FISH, followed by treatment of HER2-positive patients with trastuzumab combined with cisplatin and either capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) [HCX (trastuzumab, cisplatin, capecitabine)/fluorouracil (F)] compared with current standard NHS therapy. The manufacturer’s submission contained direct evidence from the ToGA trial, a well-conducted, multinational, phase III randomised controlled trial (RCT) that compared HCX/F with cisplatin and a fluoropyrimidine alone [cisplatin, capecitabine (CX)/F]. HCX/F showed statistically significantly better overall survival in the European Medicines Agency-licensed population subgroup (74%) (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.83), corresponding to median survival of 16 months versus 11.8 months. No other evidence exists for the efficacy of any therapy in a known HER2-positive mGC population; other comparisons extrapolate from trials in mixed HER2 status populations. The ERG accepted the manufacturer’s view that a meaningful network meta-analysis to establish a comparison for HCX/F compared with current standard NHS therapy [epirubicin, cisplatin, capecitabine (ECX)/epirubicin, oxaliplatin, capecitabine (EOX)/epirubicin, cisplatin, 5-FU (ECF)] was not possible, but was unconvinced by arguments advanced in the alternative narrative synthesis. These involved disregarding evidence from a meta-analysis and interpreting non-significant results of small RCTs comparing epirubicin-containing triplets with cisplatin, 5-FU (CF)/capecitabine (X) doublets as evidence of no difference between triplet and doublet regimens. The high CX/F dose in the ToGA trial was an additional basis for the contention of equivalence. An appropriate de novo economic evaluation, including an economic model that separately compared HCX or trastuzumab, cisplatin, 5-FU (HCF) with the triplet regimens ECX, EOX and ECF, based on a simple, three-state cohort model (progression-free, disease, progression and death), was submitted. Utility weights were applied to estimate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs were assessed from an NHS perspective, and incorporated the acquisition and monitoring costs of the alternative regimens, HER2 testing, adverse events and other supportive care costs. An 8-year time horizon was used to represent a lifetime analysis. Results from the ToGA trial were combined with a series of assumptions on relative treatment effects and testing strategies. The manufacturer’s results produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £53,010 per QALY for HCX versus ECX. Although the manufacturer undertook a detailed set of sensitivity analyses, several alternative model assumptions were not evaluated. The ERG undertook a series of alternative base-case analyses. As a result of these analyses, EOX replaced ECX as the appropriate comparator, and the ICER for the comparison of HCX vs EOX increased to between £66,982 and £71,636 per QALY. The impact of implementation of alternative testing strategies remained unclear. There is also considerable uncertainty surrounding the true estimate of effectiveness for the comparison between triplet regimens containing epirubicin (ECX/ECF/EOX) and doublet CX/F regimens. Consequently, the view of the ERG was that there is insufficient evidence on the efficacy of HCX/F compared with current NHS standard therapy for an ICER to be determined with any degree of certainty.

Triple therapy in uncontrolled asthma: a network meta-analysis of Phase III studies

2021 ◽  
pp. 2004233
Author(s):  
Paola Rogliani ◽  
Beatrice Ludovica Ritondo ◽  
Luigino Calzetta
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Severe Exacerbation ◽  
Triple Combination ◽  
Combination Therapies ◽  
Uncontrolled Asthma ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
The Impact

Conflicting evidence is currently available concerning the impact on asthma exacerbation of triple inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonist (LABA), and long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist (LAMA) fixed-dose combination (FDC). Since meta-analyses allow settling controversies of apparently inconsistent results, we performed a network meta-analysis of Phase III randomised controlled trials including 9535 patients to assess the effect of ICS/LABA/LAMA combinations in uncontrolled asthma. Triple combination therapies with an ICS administered at high dose (HD) were more effective (p<0.05) than medium dose (MD) ICS/LABA/LAMA FDC and both MD and HD ICS/LABA FDCs against moderate to severe exacerbation (relative risk [RR] from 0.61 to 0.80) and increasing trough forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (mL from +33 to +114). Triple combination therapies including HD ICS were superior (p<0.05) than MD ICS/LABA/LAMA FDC in preventing severe exacerbation (RR from 0.46 to 0.65), but not with respect to moderate exacerbation (p>0.05). Triple combination therapies were equally effective on asthma control, with no safety concerns. This quantitative synthesis suggests that ICS/LABA/LAMA FDCs are effective and safe in uncontrolled asthma, and that the dose of ICS in the combination represents the discriminating factor to treat patients with a history of moderate or severe exacerbation.

Primary Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiation With or Without Oxaliplatin in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Pathologic Results of the STAR-01 Randomized Phase III Trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (20) ◽  
pp. 2773-2780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Aschele ◽  
Luca Cionini ◽  
Sara Lonardi ◽  
Carmine Pinto ◽  
Stefano Cordio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Muscularis Propria ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Preoperative Treatment ◽  
The Impact

Purpose To investigate oxaliplatin combined with fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy as preoperative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients and Methods Seven hundred forty-seven patients with resectable, locally advanced (cT3-4 and/or cN1-2) adenocarcinoma of the mid-low rectum were randomly assigned to receive pelvic radiation (50.4 Gy in 28 daily fractions) and concomitant infused fluorouracil (225 mg/m2/d) either alone (arm A, n = 379) or combined with oxaliplatin (60 mg/m2 weekly × 6; arm B, n = 368). Overall survival is the primary end point. A protocol-planned analysis of response to preoperative treatment is reported here. Results Grade 3 to 4 adverse events during preoperative treatment were more frequent with oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil and radiation than with radiation and fluorouracil alone (24% v 8% of treated patients; P < .001). In arm B, 83% of the patients treated with oxaliplatin had five or more weekly administrations. Ninety-one percent, compared with 97% in the control arm, received ≥ 45 Gy (P < .001). Ninety-six percent versus 95% of patients underwent surgery with similar rates of abdominoperineal resections (20% v 18%, arm A v arm B). The rate of pathologic complete responses was 16% in both arms (odds ratio = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.44; P = .904). Twenty-six percent versus 29% of patients had pathologically positive lymph nodes (arm A v arm B; P = .447), 46% versus 44% had tumor infiltration beyond the muscularis propria (P = .701), and 7% versus 4% had positive circumferential resection margins (P = .239). Intra-abdominal metastases were found at surgery in 2.9% versus 0.5% of patients (arm A v arm B; P = .014). Conclusion Adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy significantly increases toxicity without affecting primary tumor response. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact on efficacy end points.

scholarly journals Impact of histological subtype on treatment outcomes in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 1721-1723
Author(s):  
Rajesh S. Shinde ◽  
Ninad Katdare ◽  
Naveena A. N. Kumar ◽  
Rahul Bhamre ◽  
Ashwin Desouza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Rectal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
Histological Subtype

Efficacy and Safety of Triplet Versus Doublet Salvage Therapies Among Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) Experiencing Early Relapse: Meta-Analysis of Phase III Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5344-5344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay K. Nooka ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
Madhusmita Behera ◽  
Charise Gleason ◽  
Hannah Collins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
P Value ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Early Relapse ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Relapsed Myeloma

Abstract Introduction: Controversy exists regarding the choice of triplet versus doublet salvage therapy among patients with multiple myeloma (MM) experiencing early relapse. Triplet therapies produce deeper responses (CR, ≥VGPR, ORR) and result in prolonged progression free survival (PFS) while doublet therapies demonstrate an improved toxicity profile. We performed a meta-analysis of the RCTs comparing triplet to doublet salvage regimens in early relapsed myeloma patients (1-3 prior lines of therapy). The objective is to test the hypothesis that triplet regimens are tolerable, improve CR, ≥VGPR, ORR rates and would translate to an improved PFS. Methods: We searched Pubmed, Cochrane databases and ASH, ASCO conference proceedings from 01/2000 through 07/2015 for publications and abstracts to identify the phase III RCTs comparing triplet vs. doublet salvage therapies among patients with relapsed myeloma. A meta-analysis of 4 RCTs (PANORAMA1, MMVAR/IFM 2005-04, ASPIRE, ELOQUENT2 consisting of 2475 patients) was performed using the fixed (Mantel-Haenszel) and random (DerSimonain and Laird) models to calculate the impact of triplets versus doublets (table 1) by evaluating the CR, ≥VGPR, ORR, PFS and toxicities. Mature OS data was not available for the RCTs, hence not included in meta-analysis. The consistency of results (effect sizes) among studies was investigated by means of 2 heterogeneity tests: the χ 2-based Cochran's Q test, and the I2 Statistic. We considered that heterogeneity was present when the P-value of the Cochran's Q test was <.1 and the I2 statistic was > 50%. Results: The pooled odds ratios of ORR, ≥VGPR and CR with triplets vs. doublets were 1.935 (P <0.000; 95% CI: 1.614-2.321); 2.185 (P <0.000; 95% CI: 1.832-2.606); 2.461 (P <0.000; 95% CI: 1.888-3.207) respectively, indicating that the odds of achieving higher quality responses are improved with triplet regimens compared to the use of a doublet regimens. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.661 (95% CI 0.596-0.734; P =0.000) in favor of triplet regimens (Figure 1). The Q-statistic for PFS (P =0.725; df =3; I2 = 0.00) suggests homogeneity across studies. Though the relative risk of selected ≥grade 3 serious adverse events (G3 SAE) was higher with triplet regimens (diarrhea, fatigue, thrombocytopenia 2.288 (95% CI 1.637-3.197; P =0.000), 1.654 (95% CI 1.263-2.166; P =0.000), 2.434 (95% CI 1.934-3.063; P =0.000), respectively), the overall G3 SAE were comparable with RR 1.498 (95% CI 1.176-1.908; P =0.001) favoring doublets. Conclusion: Our mixed model meta-analysis demonstrates that triplet regimens in early relapsed myeloma patients result in improved ORR, ≥VGPR, CR and PFS compared to doublets. G3 SAEs are higher with triplet regimens, however this appears to be influenced by the regimen-related toxicity from the PANORAMA1 trial. Appropriate dose modifications or use of selective HDAC inhibitors in future may mitigate the toxicities of the regimen. The pooled estimates ofresponse and survival strongly favor triplets in the early relapsed setting. Table 1. Triplet vs. doublet regimens in RCTs Trial Triplet regimen Doublet regimen PANORAMA1 Panobinostat, bortezomib, dexamethasone Placebo, bortezomib, dexamethasone MMVAR/IFM 2005-04 Bortezomib, thalidomide, Dexamethasone Thalidomide, Dexamethasone ASPIRE Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, Dexamethasone Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone ELOQUENT 2 Elotuzumab, lenalidomide, Dexamethasone Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone Figure 1. VGPR rates and PFS with triplet vs. doublet regimens Figure 1. VGPR rates and PFS with triplet vs. doublet regimens Disclosures Nooka: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Kaufman:Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Gleason:Onyx: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Lonial:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Impact of radiation (RT) regimen on palliative procedures (PP) for patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with exclusive chemoradiation (CRT) or preoperative chemoradiation (CRT+S): results from a phase III trial of the Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive (FFCD 9102)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4531-4531
Author(s):  
G. Crehange ◽  
F. Bonnetain ◽  
S. Seng ◽  
T. N'guyen ◽  
X. Mirabel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Local Relapse ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Dysphagia Score ◽  
Cancérologie Digestive ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

4531 Background: The FFCD 9102 trial demonstrated that CRT is an alternative to CRT+S for responding patients. We investigated the type of PP in the follow-up (FU) period, according to the RT scheme: protracted (P-RT) vs. split course (SC-RT). Methods: Resectable T3 N0–1 M0 thoracic esophageal carcinoma were included. First sequence : 2 cycles of cisplatin and 5-FU (day (d)1 - d22) combined with RT. Two schemes of RT were allowed: P-RT (46 Gy / 4.5 weeks (w), 2 Gy / f) or SC-RT (2 one-week courses of 15 Gy, 3 Gy / f). For CRT, the same chemotherapy was given on d43, d64 and d92 combined with 20 Gy / 2w (P-RT) or 15 Gy / 1w (SC-RT). Responding patients after the first sequence were randomized between CRT and CRT+S. The impact of SC-RT vs. P-RT on PP in the FU period was explored using a Mann-Whitney test. Results: From February 1993 to December 2000, 451 pts were registered and 446 were eligible. P-RT: 161 pts, SC-RT: 285 pts. After a median FU of 47.4 months, 2-year overall survival and local relapse-free survival were for P-RT vs. SC-RT: 37.1% vs. 30.5% (p = 0.25) and 76.7% vs. 56.8% (p = 0.002), respectively. P-RT vs. SC-RT: mean length of hospital stay: 48 d vs. 60.5 d (p= 0.0003). Mean number of dilatation sessions: 0.56 vs. 0.66 (p= 0.43). Mean number of stents: 0.21 vs. 0.34 (p= 0.03). Mean number of any PP: 1.01 vs. 1.50 (p= 0.001). Mean dysphagia grade: 2.99 vs. 3.12 (p= 0.21). In the CRT+S-group, P-RT vs. SC-RT: mean length of hospital stay 55.0d vs. 68.7d (p =0.051). Mean number of dilatation sessions: 0.74 vs. 0.74 (p= 0.77). Mean number of stents: 0.09 vs. 0.18 (p= 0.44). Mean number of PP: 1.00 vs. 1.37 (p= 0.054). In the CRT-group, P-RT vs. SC-RT, mean length of hospital stay: 42.6d vs 54.0d (p= 0.053). Mean number of dilatation sessions : 0.38 vs. 0.67 (p= 0.12). Mean number of stents: 0.31 vs. 0.50 (p= 0.03). Mean number of PP: 0.83 vs. 1.86 (p= 0.0005). Conclusions: Stents, rate of PP and length of hospital stay were significantly increased with SC-RT. Dysphagia score was similar between SC-RT and P-RT at last FU. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Updated analysis of SWOG 0023: A randomized phase III trial of gefitinib versus placebo maintenance after definitive chemoradiation followed by docetaxel in patients with locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7513-7513 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Kelly ◽  
K. Chansky ◽  
L. E. Gaspar ◽  
J. R. Jett ◽  
Y. Ung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Alternative Hypothesis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Logrank Test ◽  
Ideal Agent ◽  
Thoracic Radiation ◽  
Grade 3

7513 Background: Early clinical studies with gefitinib (G) showed promising efficacy and mild toxicity in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. Thus, G was an ideal agent to evaluate in a maintenance setting in stage III disease following definitive treatment. Methods: Untreated pts with stage III NSCLC, a PS of 0–1 and adequate organ function were eligible. Patients received the SWOG 9504 core regimen (cisplatin 50 mg/m2, d1 & 8 plus etoposide 50 mg/m2 day 1–5, every 28 days for 2 cycles with concurrent thoracic radiation, 1.8–2 Gy fractions/day, total dose 61 Gy, followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m2). Non- progressing pts were randomized to G 250 mg per day or placebo (P) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or 5 years. The planned sample size was 672, to confer power of 0.89 to detect a 33% increase over the expected median survival of 21 months (one-sided 0.025 level logrank test). Randomization was stratified by stage and histology. Results: Enrollment began in July 2001. An unplanned interim analysis prompted by outside data was conducted in April 2005 and the alternative hypothesis of improved survival was rejected at the 0.0015 level for 243 randomized patients. The study closed and preliminary results were reported (ASCO 2005). Now with a median follow up of 27 months, median survival for the G arm (n=118) was 23 months and was 35 months for the P arm (n=125) (two sided p=0.013). Overall survival for the 571eligible patients was 19 months. ≥ Grade 3 toxicities in the G arm were rash (7%), diarrhea (7%) and pneumonitis (3%). Conclusion: In this unselected population G did not improve survival. Decreased survival was due to cancer not G toxicity. Three year survival estimates will be presented. Molecular studies of the EGFR pathway are underway and will be correlated with outcomes. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document