Effect of moisturizers on prevention of hand-foot syndrome associated with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 681-681
Author(s):  
Kazuyoshi Kawakami ◽  
Mitsukuni Suenaga ◽  
Takashi Yokokawa ◽  
Kazuo Sugita ◽  
Yutaro Mae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Poor Compliance ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cancer Institute Hospital ◽  
First Line ◽  
Good Compliance ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
The Relationship

681 Background: Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) has been established as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is the most common toxicity associated with capecitabine, and the mechanism of which remains to be clarified. Appropriate management of HFS for continuing treatment is needed to ensure improved survival. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of our candidate moisturizers for HFS, considering its compliance in each patient at a single institute. Methods: Patients who received XELOX for metastatic colorectal cancer at the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Cancer Institute Hospital, between Apr 1 2010 and Apr 30 2011 were included in this study. Pharmacists conducted the skin care for HFS using moisturizers: heparinoid ointment, a mixture of vitamin A oil and white petrolatums (1:1). All HFS events were graded according to NCI–CTC, version 4.0. The relationship between accumulated dose of capecitabine and incidence of HFS events stratified by frequency of daily moisturizers application was analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier method. P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Moisturizers were applied two or more times a day in 45 patients (Good compliance group) and once a daily in 28 patients (Poor compliance group). In terms of incidence of grade ≥1 HFS, no significant differences were observed between good compliance group and poor compliance group (p = 0.764). Incidence of grade ≥2 HFS was observed slightly higher in the poor compliance group than in the good compliance group, though the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.286). Conclusions: The onset of capecitabine-associated HFS is independent of frequency of using moisturizers. However, more frequent application of moisturizers appeared to have a possibility to prevent severe HFS. Assessment for compliance with the moisturizers is important as well as patient-compliance-instruction by pharmacist.

scholarly journals Comparison between the three oxaliplatin-based regimens with bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 687-687
Author(s):  
Yoshihito Ohhara ◽  
Mitsukuni Suenaga ◽  
Satoshi Matsusaka ◽  
Eiji Shinozaki ◽  
Nobuyuki Mizunuma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Treatment ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

687 Background: XELOX (capecitabine/L-OHP) therapy that includes orally administered fluoropyrimidine instead of infusional fluorouracil (5-FU) was approved for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Sep 2009 in Japan. A pivotal trial (NO16966 study) demonstrated the non-inferiority of XELOX to FOLFOX (5-FU/L-OHP/LV) and the superiority of those L-OHP-based regimens plus bevacizumab (BV) to those without in the first-line treatment of mCRC. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of XELO+BV compared with FOLFOX4 or mFOLFOX6 plus BV in the first-line treatment for mCRC patients at a single institute. Methods: Between Jun 2007 and Nov 2008, 85 patients received FOLFOX4+BV (FF4 arm), between Dec 2008 and Sep 2009, 40 patients received mFOLFOX6+BV (FF6 arm), and between Oct 2009 and Sep 2010, 60 patients received XELOX+BV (XELOX arm). The best overall responses were evaluated using RECIST 1.0 during chemotherapeutic treatment, and adverse events were graded according to CTCAE ver.3.0. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Characteristics of patients of FF4 arm, FF6 arm, and XELOX arm were below: median age, 60 yr vs. 62 yr vs. 60.5 yr; gender (male), 48.2 % vs. 62.5 % vs. 58.3%. The overall response rates (CR+PR) were 61.1 %, 72.5 %, and 75 % (95% CI; 50.6-71.8%, 58.0-87.0%, and 63.7-86.3%). Median PFS were 17.0 months, 15.5 months, and 14.4 months, respectively (cut-off: Aug 31, 2011). There were no statistical significances not only between FF4 arm and FF6 arm (log-rank; p=0.641), but also between XELOX arm and FF4+FF6 (FOLFOX) arm (log-rank; p=0.138). FOLFOX arm was associated with higher incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia than XELOX arm. Grade3 diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome (HFS) were more frequent in XELOX arm. Conclusions: This study suggests that XELOX arm was equal to FOLFOX arm, regardless of regimen, in tumor response and PFS. Further follow-up is necessary to confirm the benefit on survival.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Monitoring of Response to Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFOX-4 in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 244-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.L. Tsai ◽  
Y.T. Chang ◽  
K.S. Chu ◽  
C.F. Chen ◽  
Y.S. Yeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Carcinoembryonic Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Targeted Chemotherapy ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Imaging Results ◽  
Serum Cea ◽  
The Relationship

First-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with combinations of cetuximab and irinotecan-based or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has shown promising efficacy. The clinical response to such treatment is generally assessed by tumor measurement through imaging. This study was performed to evaluate the correlation between serial changes in imaging results and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. In 64 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving cetuximab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy we retrospectively analyzed the relationship between changes in serum CEA and changes in imaging results throughout the treatment course. Response in terms of serum CEA change was defined as a ≥50% drop in CEA level for more than 4 weeks. The sensitivity and specificity of serum CEA changes after targeted chemotherapy in relation to imaging results were 80.5% (33/41) and 73.9% (17/23), respectively, with a diagnostic accuracy of 78.1% (50/64). The progression-free survival time of responders assessed by serum CEA change was significantly longer than that of nonresponders (p=0.0091). Our results highlight the importance of serum CEA monitoring in assessing the response to targeted chemotherapy and in predicting the prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Randomized Phase III Study of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Compared With Fluorouracil/Folinic Acid Plus Oxaliplatin As First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 2006-2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Cassidy ◽  
Stephen Clarke ◽  
Eduardo Díaz-Rubio ◽  
Werner Scheithauer ◽  
Arie Figer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Folinic Acid ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeTo evaluate whether capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) is noninferior to fluorouracil. folinic acid, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).Patients and MethodsThe initial design of this trial was a randomized, two-arm, noninferiority, phase III comparison of XELOX versus FOLFOX-4. After patient accrual had begun, the trial design was amended in 2003 after bevacizumab phase III data became available. The resulting 2 × 2 factorial design randomly assigned patients to XELOX versus FOLFOX-4, and then to also receive either bevacizumab or placebo. We report here the results of the analysis of the XELOX versus FOLFOX-4 arms. The analysis of bevacizumab versus placebo with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is reported separately. The prespecified primary end point for the noninferiority analysis was progression-free survival.ResultsThe intent-to-treat population comprised 634 patients from the original two-arm portion of the study, plus an additional 1,400 patients after the start of the amended 2 × 2 design, for a total of 2,034 patients. The median PFS was 8.0 months in the pooled XELOX-containing arms versus 8.5 months in the FOLFOX-4–containing arms (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 97.5% CI, 0.93 to 1.16). The median overall survival was 19.8 months with XELOX versus 19.6 months with FOLFOX-4 (HR, 0.99; 97.5% CI, 0.88 to 1.12). FOLFOX-4 was associated with more grade 3/4 neutropenia/granulocytopenia and febrile neutropenia than XELOX, and XELOX with more grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 hand-foot syndrome than FOLFOX-4.ConclusionXELOX is noninferior to FOLFOX-4 as a first-line treatment for MCRC, and may be considered as a routine treatment option for appropriate patients.

Phase II study of bevacizumab in combination with capecitabine as first line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15074-e15074
Author(s):  
E. Vrdoljak ◽  
T. Omrcen ◽  
A. Hrabar
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Arterial Hypertension ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
First Line Treatment

e15074 Background: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with capecitabine as first line treatment in elderly patients with MCC. Methods: 40 elderly patients (median age 75 years) with MCC have been treated with bevacizumab in combination with capecitabine as their first line therapy. Regimen consisted of bevacizumab 7.5 mg mg/kg on day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 on day 1–14 followed by 7 days rest. Results: The median follow up time at time of ASCO will be 12 months. Median number of 9 cycles was administrated, ranging from 1 to 23. 3 patients (7.5 %) had complete response, 19 patients (47.5 %) had partial response, 11 patients (27.5 %) had stable disease, 1 patient (2.5 %) progressed according to RECIST criteria and 6 patients (15%) were not evaluated yet. Until this report 15 of 40 patients progressed and 9 of 40 patients died. Median time to progression is 6.37 months. Median overall survival will be reported at ASCO 2009 meeting. The most common hematological adverse events were mild (grade I and II): anemia (27.5%) neutropenia (22.5%), and thrombocytopenia (20%). The most common non-hematological toxicity were mild as well (grade I and II): hand-foot syndrome (70%), arterial hypertension (52.5%), proteinuria (45%), hyperbilirubinemia (45%), diarrhea (25%), loss of appetite (23.5%), fever (22.5%), fatigue (17.5%), tearing (17.5%), and nail changes (12.5%). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred rarely: hand-foot syndrome (12.5%), deep vein thrombosis (7.5%), fever (5%), and arterial hypertension (2.5%). Conclusions: This prospective phase II study has demonstrated that bevacizumab in combination with capecitabine as first line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is an effective and well-tolerated regimen. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Prognostic utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated using different modalities

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Nogueira-Costa ◽  
I. Fernandes ◽  
R. Gameiro ◽  
J. Gramaça ◽  
A.T. Xavier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
First Line ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Introduction Inflammation is a critical component in carcinogenesis. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (nlr) has been retrospectively studied as a biomarker of prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc). Compared with a low nlr, a high nlr is associated with worse prognosis. In the present study, we compared real-world survival for patients with mcrc based on their nlr group, and we assessed the utility of the nlr in determining first-line chemo­therapy and metastasectomy benefit. Methods In this retrospective and descriptive analysis of patients with mcrc undergoing first-line chemotherapy in a single centre, the last systemic absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte count before treatment was used for the nlr. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to estimate the nlr cut-off value, dividing the patients into low and high nlr groups. Median overall survival (mos) was compared using Kaplan–Meier curves and the log-rank test. A multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox regression model. Results The 102 analyzed patients had a median follow-up of 15 months. Regardless of systemic therapy, approx­imately 20% of patients underwent metastasectomy. The nlr cut-off was established at 2.35, placing 45 patients in the low-risk group (nlr < 2.35) and 57 in the high-risk group (nlr ≥ 2.35). The Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a mos of 39.1 months in the low-risk group and 14.4 months in the high-risk group (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression on the nlr estimated a hazard ratio of 3.08 (p = 0.01). Survival analysis in each risk subgroup, considering the history of metastasectomy, was also performed. In the low-risk group, mos was longer for patients undergoing metastasectomy than for those not undergoing the procedure (95.2 months vs. 22.6 months, p = 0.05). In the high-risk group, mos was not statistically different for patients undergoing or not undergoing metastasectomy (24.3 months vs. 12.7 months, p = 0.08). Conclusions Our real-world data analysis of nlr in patients with mcrc confirmed that this biomarker is useful in predicting survival. It also suggests that nlr is an effective tool to choose first-line treatment and to predict the benefit of metastasectomy.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Apatinib Combined with FOLFIRI in the First-Line Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuetong Rong ◽  
Haiyi Liu ◽  
Hongmei Yu ◽  
Jian Zhao ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with FOLFIRI in the first-line treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and explore potential factors of efficacy. Methods: Twenty mCRC patients treated at Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from March 2017 to March 2019 were included according to the enrolment criteria. They provided informed consent and were treated with apatinib combined with FOLFIRI according to the scheduled regimen until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was OS. The secondary endpoints included PFS, ORR, DCRand safety. OS and PFS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS. R was used to determine cut-off values for biochemical indicators. Forest maps were drawn for Cox univariate results and the relationships between NLR and ECOG, which were significant in univariate analysis, and OS were represented by Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: The median OS and PFS were 16.135 months (95% CI: 9.211–22.929) and 6 months (95% CI: 5.425–6.525). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that NLR and CEA were independent prognostic factors. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were hypertension, diarrhoea, increased alkaline phosphatase, decreased leukocytes and decreased neutrophils. Conclusion: Apatinib combined with FOLFIRI for the first-line treatment of advanced unresectable mCRC showed good efficacy and safety. The baseline NLR was predictive of efficacy, and a low baseline NLR (HR: 0.2895, P=0.0084) was associated with improved OS.

Analysis of oxaliplatin-induced sensory neurotoxicity (sNT) in patients receiving FIREFOX, alternating regimen of mFOLFOX-6 and FOLFIRI, with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Results from combined analysis of KSCC0501 and KSCC0701.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 492-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Kusumoto ◽  
Y. Emi ◽  
Y. Kakeji ◽  
Y. Akagi ◽  
H. Samura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
First Line ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Combined Analysis ◽  
Kaplan Meier

492 Background: The Kyushu Study Group of Clinical Cancer (KSCC) conducted two phase II trials (KSCC0501 and KSCC0701, Akagi et al. J Clin Oncol. 28:15s, 2010, UMIN ID: 000001342) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for MCRC. This combined analysis was performed to compare the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced sNT between the two trials. Methods: Patients (pts) were accrued from 2005 to 2007 in KSCC0501 and from 2007 to 2008 in KSCC0701. Sixty pts received FOLFOX-4 in KSCC0501 and 47 pts received FIREFOX(4 cycles of mFOLFOX-6 alternating with 4 cycles of FOLFIRI) in KSCC0701. All pts were reviewed for efficacy and toxicity (NCI-CTCAEv3.0). Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess the incidence of sNT. Results: The incidence of sNT was 71.4% with FOLFOX-4 and 36.2% with FIREFOX (Table). The ORR was 34.5% (95% CI F22.5-48.1%) for FOLFOX4 and 58.7% (43.9-73.5%) for FIREFOX. Median PFS was 7.0 M (5.1-9.8 M) with FOLFOX-4 and 10.3 M (7.5-11.9 M) with FIREFOX. MST and 2-year survival were respectively 31.5 M (18.1-40.1 M) and 58.0% for FOLFOX4, versus not determined and 57.1% for FIREFOX. The median no. of treatment cycles was 9 for FOLFOX-4 and 12 for FIREFOX. After 4, 8, and 12 cumulative treatment cycles, the incidence of grade 2+sNT was respectively 24.0%, 30.7%, and 60.5% with FOLFOX-4 versus 6.5%, 6.5%, and 16.0% with FIREFOX. Conclusions: As first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for MCRC, FIREFOX caused less oxaliplatin-induced sNT and prolonged the duration of treatment. We have now finished enrollment for study KSCC 0801 (KSCC 0701+bevacizumab) and are following the pts. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

The efficacy and safety outcomes of bevacizumab and systemic therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal disease in the AGITG MAX clinical trial and in nontrial patients in two cancer centers.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 595-595
Author(s):  
Aflah Roohullah ◽  
Katrin Marie Sjoquist ◽  
Val Gebski ◽  
Weng Ng ◽  
Wei Chua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
P Value ◽  
First Line ◽  
Peritoneal Disease ◽  
Cancer Centers

595 Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer with peritoneal disease (PmCRC) represents a phenotype that may derive a greater clinical benefit from bevacizumab (BEV) due to the effect of VEGF on peritoneal spread and ascites production. However, there is concern of greater adverse events, in particular GI perforations. We investigated the clinical benefit and safety of adding BEV to chemotherapy in PmCRC in clinical trial and nontrial populations. Methods: We compared PFS and OS in PmCRC patients receiving first-line chemotherapy with and without BEV in: (1) the AGITG MAX trial (capecitabine [CAP] vs CAP/BEV +/- mitomycin C) and (2) two cancer centers in New South Wales between Jan 2005 and Dec 2012 (any regimen +/- BEV). Secondary endpoints included chemotherapy duration and GI adverse events. Time to event outcomes were estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and comparisons made using the logrank test. Proportional hazards models were used to obtain hazard ratios for regression analysis. Results: See Table. 84 MAX and 69 nontrial pts had PmCRC and there was a 37% reduction in the risk of progression in those receiving BEV, which is similar when compared to the nonperitoneal disease pts (HR= 0.63 95% CI 0.52-0.79 p value < 0.001). OS in the PmCRC group was significantly worse than the nonperitoneal group (14.3 months vs 18.8 months p value = 0.02). Chemotherapy duration was similar across the groups. The rate of notable GI adverse events, including GI perforation was not increased in the PmCRC group receiving BEV in either cohort. One pt had a GI perforation after receiving CAP+BEV. Conclusions: Pts with mCRC and peritoneal disease receiving first-line therapy in trial and nontrial populations appear to derive a similar proportional benefit when BEV is added to systemic therapy without an increase in GI adverse events. However, this subgroup of patients continues to have a worse prognosis. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document