Phase I trial of trebananib (AMG 386) plus temsirolimus (Tr + T) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors (PJC-008/NCI#9041).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2534-2534
Author(s):  
David Shao Peng Tan ◽  
Christian K. Kollmannsberger ◽  
Sebastien J. Hotte ◽  
David W. Cescon ◽  
Ivan Diaz-Padilla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Treatment Benefit ◽  
Amg 386 ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Limb Edema

2534 Background: Preclinical data suggest that combined Ang1/2 and mTOR blockade has synergistic anti-cancer activity. The combination of Tr (inhibits angiogenesis by preventing interaction of Ang1/2 with Tie2) with the mTOR inhibitor T was evaluated in pts with advanced solid tumors to determine safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacodynamics and preliminary antitumor activity. Methods: Pts were enrolled using 3+3 design. Tr and T were dosed on Day 1 (D1), 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle. Peripheral blood was collected for evaluation of Tie2-expressing monocytes (TEMs) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) (an angiogenic enzyme increased in TEMs upon Tie2 stimulation) by flow cytometry. Tumor response was assessed every 2 cycles. Results: 13 pts have been enrolled, 6 at dose level (DL) 1 (15mg/kg Tr + 25mg T) and 7 (1 died from disease before DLT assessment) at DL -1 (15mg/kg Tr + 20mg T). Median age was 57yrs, ECOG 0-1, median previous chemotherapy lines 3 (range 1-8). In DL 1, 1/6 pts experienced DLT (Grade (Gr) 2 pneumonitis). In view of frequent Gr2 adverse events (AEs) in DL 1, DL -1 was evaluated with DLTs in 2/6 evaluable pts (Gr3 mucositis and intolerable Gr2 limb edema preventing start of cycle 2 within 14 days). The most common related AEs (all Gr across both DL) were: fatigue (77%), edema (69%), anorexia (62%), and nausea (54%). Common Gr≥3 AEs included lymphopenia (23%) and fatigue (23%). Of 10 evaluable pts, best RECIST responses were: 1 breast cancer pt (ER+/ HER2-/ PIK3CA mutant) with PR (now in cycle 9), 7 pts with SD, and 2 pts with PD. Four pts with ovarian cancer (1 PIK3CAmutant) had SD ≥11weeks with 2/3 pts (1 not evaluable) demonstrating GCIG response (>50% decrease in CA125). In preliminary analyses, TP expression in TEMs was decreased (mean -18%) in 4pts with tumor shrinkage, but increased (+6%) in 1pt with tumor growth, suggesting a trend between reduced TP and tumor response. Conclusions: The MTD was exceeded at 15mg/kg Tr and 20mg T weekly. The safety of 10mg/kg Tr and 20mg T weekly is currently being evaluated. The combination of Tr and T shows early signs of antitumor activity. TP expression in TEMs by flow cytometry as an early marker of treatment benefit warrants further evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT01548482.

AMG 386, a selective angiopoietin 1/2-neutralizing peptibody, in combination with chemotherapy in adult patients with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14033-14033 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Mita ◽  
D. Wang ◽  
C. H. Takimoto ◽  
E. Malseed ◽  
L. Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Amg 386 ◽  
Angiopoietin 1

14033 Introduction: AMG 386 is a selective angiopoietin 1 /2-neutralizing peptibody that inhibits angiogenesis by preventing interaction between angiopoietins and Tie2 receptors. This open-label study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity of AMG 386 in combination with FOLFOX-4 (F), carboplatin + paclitaxel (CP), or docetaxel (D) in adult patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Three cohorts of 6–9 pts received 1 full cycle of chemotherapy (2 weeks of F or 3 weeks of D 75 mg/m2 or CP). Administration of AMG 386 10 mg/kg IV weekly was started on day 1 of cycle 2 for patients who did not experience a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) to chemotherapy during cycle 1, and continued until disease progression or intolerance. Safety and tolerability, tumor response (RECIST every 8 weeks), PK profiles of AMG 386 and chemotherapy agents, and formation of antibodies to AMG 386 were assessed. Results: As of October 2, 2006, 16 pts have received AMG 386: 6 pts in the F cohort, 5 in CP, and 5 in D; 7 pts were men, median age 59.5 years (range, 44- 75 years). No AMG 386-related serious AEs or DLTs were reported. AEs related to chemotherapy + AMG 386 in = 2 pts were neutropenia (n = 3), thrombocytopenia (n=2), diarrhea (n=2), and vomiting (n=2). No neutralizing antibodies were observed. F, CP, and D coadministered with AMG 386 did not appear to affect the PK profile of AMG 386, and AMG 386 had no apparent effect on the PK profile of 5 FU, leucovorin, C, P, or D. Tumor response data are available for 6 pts. One pt receiving CP+ AMG 386 for bladder cancer refractory to gemcitabine/cisplatin had a complete response (CR) at week 8, confirmed at week 16. Stable disease in 4 pts and progressive disease in 1 pt were also observed. Conclusions: Weekly administration of AMG 386 in combination with F, CP, or D appears to be safe and well tolerated. A CR in bladder cancer suggests promising antitumor activity of AMG 386 in combination with chemotherapy. Further clinical studies of AMG 386 in combination with chemotherapy and other targeted agents are warranted. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of oral S-1 in combination with oxaliplatin (oxali) and bevacizumab (bev) in patients with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4091-4091
Author(s):  
J. Zhang ◽  
K. Chung ◽  
C. Zergebel ◽  
P. Urrea ◽  
M. Quinones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Cyanuric Acid ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Clinical Pharmacokinetics ◽  
Progression Of Disease ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

4091 Background: S-1 is a novel oral fluoropyrimidine (tegafur, CDHP and potassium oxonate) designed for enhanced DPD inhibition and reduced GI toxicity. Bev and oxali have demonstrated safety and synergistic anti-tumor activity with oral and IV fluoropyrimidines. The primary objective is to investigate the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of S-1 combined with bevacizumab and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary objective is to investigate the clinical pharmacokinetics (PK) of the components of S-1 (FT, CDHP, Oxo), 5-FU, a-fluoro-β-alanine, cyanuric acid, uracil, and oxali and to document any antitumor activity. Methods: ECOG 0/1 patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors received oral S-1 starting at 20 mg/m2/dose BID x 14 days (classic 3+3 cohort dose escalation by 5mg/m2/dose until MTD), plus fixed doses of bev 7.5 mg/kg IV day 1, and Oxali 130 mg/m2 IV day 1 of every 3 week cycle, with discontinuation of oxali after 4 cycles. Reintroduction of oxali was allowed upon progression of disease. Toxicity, antitumor activity and PKs were assessed. The MTD was defined as the highest dose level at which < 33% of the patients experience a dose- limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first 2 cycles. Results: Of 22 evaluable patients, 3 patients were treated at 20mg/m2 S1 and 13 patients were treated at 25mg/m2 S1 without a DLT. At 30mg/m2, two patients experienced a DLT(Grade 3 diarrhea, Grade 4 mucositis). The MTD and recommended phase II dose of S-1 is 25mg/m2 in combination with oxali and bev. A median of 8 cycles of S-1 were initiated at the 25 mg/m2 dose level. Common MTD level toxicities included fatigue (62%), nausea (62%) and diarrhea (46%), with no grade 4 toxicities observed. Best responses (RECIST): stable disease(16 patients), partial response (2 patients), non-measurable disease (3 patients). The Day 8 AUC(0–8) of 5-FU at 20/25/30 mg/m2 dose level were 230±115 hr*ng/ml, 470±172 hr*ng/ml and 502±169 hr*ng/ml, respectively. Conclusions: The MTD combination of 25mg/m2 S-1, oxali and bev can be given safely. The study will be expanded to test S-1 one week on, one week off schedule in combination with oxali/bev every two weeks. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

First-in-human study of AMG 208, an oral MET inhibitor, in adult patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 41-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Hong ◽  
Peter J. Rosen ◽  
A. Craig Lockhart ◽  
Siqing Fu ◽  
Filip Janku ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Human Study ◽  
Human Tumor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Response Data ◽  
Met Inhibitor

41 Background: AMG 208 is a small molecule MET inhibitor that suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis in human tumor xenografts. This first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of AMG 208. We report data from the dose escalation part of the study. Methods: Key eligibility criteria: ≥ 18 yr, advanced solid tumors, ECOG ≤ 2, and evaluable/measurable disease. Using a modified Fibonacci design, 3–9 pts were enrolled into 1 of 7 sequential dose cohorts (25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 300, and 400 mg) of AMG 208. Pts received AMG 208 orally on days 1 and 4–28 once daily. If no dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen on days 1–28, pts received AMG 208 once daily starting at day 36 provided pts showed no evident disease progression. In cohorts 1–3, a standard 3+3 design was followed. In cohorts 4–7, a modified 3+3+3 design was followed. Results: As of July 16 2012, 54 pts (25 mg [n=6], 50 mg [n=4], 100 mg [n=4], 150 mg [n=3], 200 mg [n=16], 300 mg [n=10], and 400 mg [n =11]) had received ≥ 1 dose of AMG 208. 67% were men; 19% had prostate cancer (PC). Median (range) age: 61 (39–80) yr. ECOG 0/1: 52%/48%. 6 DLTs were seen: a grade (G) 3 increased AST (200 mg), a G3 thrombocytopenia (200 mg), a G4 acute myocardial infarction (300 mg), a G3 prolonged QT (300 mg), and two G3 hypertensions (400 mg). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. 83% of pts had tx-related adverse events (AE). Tx-related AE occurring in > 10 pts: fatigue (n=24), nausea (n=18), hypertension (n=12), and diarrhea (n=11). 24% of pts had grade ≥ 3 tx-related AE. AMG 208 was orally bioavailable with a 30–35 hr mean half-life in plasma. Exposure increased linearly with dose; accumulation at day 28 was 2.7-fold across cohorts. Of the 42 pts with available tumor response data for site reads, 1 had complete response on bone scan (PC 300 mg) while 2 had partial responses (PR; PC 400 mg and kidney cancer 200 mg; both had -33% tumor shrinkage), and 29 had stable disease (SD); 1 other PC pt had PR after data cutoff. Of the 35 pts with available tumor response data for central reads, 26 had SD. FLT and biomarker data will be presented. Conclusions: AMG 208 up to 400 mg daily had manageable toxicities and showed evidence of antitumor activity, especially in prostate cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT00813384.

A phase 1/2 study of intermittent, high dose sunitinib in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2591-2591
Author(s):  
Maria Rovithi ◽  
Mariette Labots ◽  
Richard Honeywell ◽  
Albert J. Ten Tije ◽  
Rita Ruijter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Population Expansion ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Blood Levels ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Treatment Benefit ◽  
Flat Dose ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

2591 Background: Despite widespread clinical integration, refinement of treatment with sunitinib is actively pursued. Sub-therapeutic blood levels rather than true resistance and tumor adaptation through drug accumulation have been accounted as reasons for treatment failure. Based on our preclinical data with high dose sunitinib and prospective analyses supporting the concept of intermittent dosing, we designed a phase 1 trial to investigate the feasibility and tolerability of high dose, once weekly (1w) or once every two weeks (2w) sunitinib (NCT02058901). Methods: Eligible were patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, refractory to standard treatment, measurable disease, WHO ≤ 1. Sunitinib was administered orally 1w or 2w. Starting dose was 200 mg, with cohorts escalating in 100 mg steps until maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Response was evaluated by RECIST 1.1. Treatment continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Dedicated PK sampling was performed. Sunitinib plasma concentration was measured by LC-MS. Results: 34 (w) and 24 (2w) pts were included, predominantly with mCRC [56% (1w) and 55% (2w)]. MTD was set at 300 mg (1w) and 700 mg (2w). Most common adverse events were fatigue (79%, one pt with G3), nausea (71%, all G1-2), anorexia (29%, all G1-2). Median PFS of evaluable pts was 2.7 mo (1w) and 2.6 mo (2w), while 39% pts (1w) and 25% pts (2w) had PFS > 5 mo. CT scans in pts with treatment benefit showed extensive tumor necrosis. Mean sunitinib plasma Cmax was 190 [300 mg (1w), range: 185-295] and 476 ng/mL [(700 mg (2w), range: 323-580]. Accumulation was minimal. Conclusions: Once weekly or once every two weeks, high dose sunitinib is feasible and clinically efficacious in heavily pretreated pts with advanced solid tumors, while toxicity remains well manageable. Importantly, no accumulation was recorded and sunitinib exposure was significantly increased, compared to the universal, flat dose. Since increased sunitinib exposure has been correlated to improved outcome, we consider this alternative scheduling as promising strategy to produce enduring clinical benefit in a wider patient population. Expansion cohorts are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02058901.

Lurbinectedin (LUR) in combination with Irinotecan (IRI) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: Updated results from a phase Ib-II trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3514-3514
Author(s):  
Santiago Ponce Aix ◽  
Gregory Michael Cote ◽  
Alejandro Falcon Gonzalez ◽  
Juan Manuel Sepulveda ◽  
Elizabeth Jimenez Aguilar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Dose Levels

3514 Background: LUR is a novel agent that exerts antitumor activity through inhibition of trans-activated transcription and modulation of tumor microenvironment. Preclinical synergism/additivity in combination with IRI has been reported, thus prompting the conduct of this clinical trial. Methods: Phase Ib-II trial to evaluate escalating doses of LUR on Day (D) 1 plus a fixed dose of IRI 75 mg/m2 on D1 and D8 every 3 weeks (q3w) in pts with advanced solid tumors (+/- G-CSF, if dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs] were neutropenia). Starting dose was LUR 1.0 m/m2 + IRI 75 mg/m2. Results: 77 pts have been treated to date at 5 dose levels, 51 of them at the recommended dose (RD). Baseline characteristics of all 77 pts were: 48% females, 68% ECOG PS=1; median age 57 years (range, 19-75 years); median of 2 prior lines (range, 0−4 lines). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was LUR 2.4 mg/m2 + IRI 75 mg/m2 with G-CSF, and the RD was LUR 2.0 mg/m2 + IRI 75 mg/m2 with G-CSF. DLTs in Cycle 1 occurred in 2/3 evaluable pts at the MTD and 3/13 evaluable pts at the RD, and comprised omission of IRI D8 infusion due to grade (G) 3/4 neutropenia (n=3 pts) or G2-4 thrombocytopenia (n=2). At the RD (n=51), common G1/2 non-hematological toxicities were nausea, vomiting, fatigue, diarrhea, anorexia and neuropathy. G3 non-hematological toxicities (diarrhea 10%, fatigue 10%) and G3/4 hematological abnormalities (neutropenia 49%, thrombocytopenia 10%) were transient. Conclusions: The combination of LUR and IRI had acceptable tolerance, with no unexpected toxicities. Transient myelosuppression was dose-limiting. The RD is LUR 2.0 mg/m2 on D1 + IRI 75 mg/m2 on D1 and D8 q3w with G-CSF. Antitumor activity was observed at the RD in SCLC pts, as well as in endometrial carcinoma pts. Hints of activity were also observed in STS pts. Updated results will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02611024 . [Table: see text]

First-in-human study of AMG 386, a selective angiopoietin1/2-neutralizing peptibody, in adult patients with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3522-3522 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. S. Rosen ◽  
D. Hong ◽  
L. Chap ◽  
R. Kurzrock ◽  
A. Garcia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Human Study ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dce Mri ◽  
Amg 386

3522 Introduction: AMG 386 is a selective angiopoietin1/2-neutralizing peptibody that inhibits angiogenesis by preventing interaction of angiopoietins with Tie2 receptors. This first-in-human study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and tumor response of AMG 386 in adults with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Patients (pts) in sequential cohorts received weekly IV AMG 386 at 0.3, 1, 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg. Safety assessments were adverse events (AEs), laboratory data, vital signs, ECGs, and anti-AMG 386 antibodies. Tumor response was assessed via RECIST criteria, DCE-MRI, FDG-PET, and volumetric CT. Results: As of Oct. 2, 2006, enrollment is complete with 32 pts (15 men, mean [SD] age 58 [12] years). One dose-limiting toxicity was seen at 30 mg/kg: respiratory arrest likely related to tumor burden, deemed possibly related to AMG 386. Other treatment-related toxicities were all = Grade 2; those observed in = 2 pts were fatigue (n=8), nausea (n=2), and peripheral edema (n=4). PK was dose-linear (mean terminal half-life, 3.1 to 6.3 days). AMG 386 appeared to reach a steady state after 3 doses, with minimal accumulation. Two pts developed binding antibodies to AMG 386; in 1 pt, they disappeared at wk 6. No neutralizing antibodies were seen. Sixteen pts had stable disease (4–52 wks, median 8 wks); 13 had progressive disease; 3 were not evaluable. One pt with ovarian cancer remains active at 52 weeks with 27% tumor shrinkage and investigator-reported reduction in serum CA-125 from 217 U/ml pretreatment to 73 U/ml (wk 4) and 31 U/ml (wk 48). A significant vascular effect (> 20% reduction) was seen by DCE-MRI in 7 of 12 (58%) evaluable subjects. Reduction in SUVmax (FDG-PET) accompanied reduction in IAUC (DCE-MRI) in 5 of 6 evaluable patients. Conclusions: Weekly administration of AMG 386 appeared to be generally well tolerated, with 1 AE > Grade 2 and no reports of the toxicities associated with VEGF blockade (hypertension, proteinuria, bleeding/clotting). Half of pts experienced stable disease; 1 has a sustained minor clinical response accompanied by a biologic response. Further clinical studies of AMG 386 in combination with chemotherapy and other targeted agents are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Final results of a dose escalation (DE), pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) study of two schedules of OSI-930 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3564-3564
Author(s):  
S. George ◽  
R. Lal ◽  
D. R. Camidge ◽  
H. Arkenau ◽  
J. Chick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dce Mri ◽  
Glycolytic Activity ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Xenograft Models ◽  
Expansion Cohort

3564 Background: OSI-930 is an oral TKI with potent activity against Kit, VEGFR2, and PDGFR. Preclinical studies demonstrate tumor regression with long-term remissions across multiple xenograft models. Methods: Sequential cohorts of pts with advanced solid tumors received continuous daily OSI-930 to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate safety, PK/PD and efficacy of OSI-930 with both QD and BID dosing. An expansion cohort was enrolled for detailed PD analysis including sVEGFR2 plasma levels, PET imaging in GIST pts or DCE-MRI in selected pts. Results: A total of 58 pts were treated (20M/38F; median 60 years (range 19–83)). OSI-930 was dosed up to 1600 mg QD without reaching MTD. 46 pts received BID dosing [mg(# pts treated)]; 400(7), 500 (31) and 600(8). DLT's were seen in 3/8 pts at 600 mg BID; G3 rash (2 pts) and G4 GGT; and 3/31 at 500 mg BID; G3 myalgia, G3 fatigue and G3 lipase. G3 hypertension was noted in 3/46 pts but not dose-limiting. Common G1/2 toxicities were fatigue (37%), diarrhea (27%), nausea (31%), and rash (24%). Objective (CA125) responses were seen in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (2 PR/8) while in heavily pretreated GIST (median 4 prior therapies including imatinib/sunitinib), 8/18 pts achieved SD ≥12 w. Median therapy duration in the BID arm was 9 w and 18/46 pts with SD ≥12 w. PK indicated that Css were achieved after ∼7d with BID dosing. PET scans showed reduction in glycolytic activity in 4/9 pts and DCE-MRI response was seen in 4/6 pts. A trend in decreased sVEGFR levels was seen at higher doses. Conclusions: At the MTD level of 500 mg BID OSI-930 is an active, well-tolerated compound with clinically relevant antitumor activity and exposure levels consistent with antitumor activity in preclinical models. PD data indicate mechanistic proof of concept for OSI-930. OSI-930/erlotinib combination phase I study is currently enrolling. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Epacadostat Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: Phase I Results From a Multicenter, Open-Label Phase I/II Trial (ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037)

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (32) ◽  
pp. 3223-3230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara C. Mitchell ◽  
Omid Hamid ◽  
David C. Smith ◽  
Todd M. Bauer ◽  
Jeffrey S. Wasser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Endometrial Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase

Purpose Tumors may evade immunosurveillance through upregulation of the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) enzyme. Epacadostat is a potent and highly selective IDO1 enzyme inhibitor. The open-label phase I/II ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037 trial evaluated epacadostat plus pembrolizumab, a programmed death protein 1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Phase I results on maximum tolerated dose, safety, tolerability, preliminary antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics are reported. Patients and Methods Patients received escalating doses of oral epacadostat (25, 50, 100, or 300 mg) twice per day plus intravenous pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or 200 mg every 3 weeks. During the safety expansion, patients received epacadostat (50, 100, or 300 mg) twice per day plus pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. Results Sixty-two patients were enrolled and received one or more doses of study treatment. The maximum tolerated dose of epacadostat in combination with pembrolizumab was not reached. Fifty-two patients (84%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with fatigue (36%), rash (36%), arthralgia (24%), pruritus (23%), and nausea (21%) occurring in ≥ 20%. Grade 3/4 TRAEs were reported in 24% of patients. Seven patients (11%) discontinued study treatment because of TRAEs. No TRAEs led to death. Epacadostat 100 mg twice per day plus pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks was recommended for phase II evaluation. Objective responses (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1) occurred in 12 (55%) of 22 patients with melanoma and in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, endometrial adenocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The pharmacokinetics of epacadostat and pembrolizumab and antidrug antibody rate were comparable to historical controls for monotherapies. Conclusion Epacadostat in combination with pembrolizumab generally was well tolerated and had encouraging antitumor activity in multiple advanced solid tumors.

scholarly journals A Phase I study of the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of navitoclax plus docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Puglisi ◽  
L Rhoda Molife ◽  
Maja JA de Jonge ◽  
Khurum H Khan ◽  
Leni van Doorn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Optimal Schedule ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration

Aim: This Phase I study investigated safety of navitoclax and docetaxel in patients (n = 41) with advanced solid tumors. Patients & methods: Two navitoclax plus docetaxel dosing schedules (21 and 28 days) were evaluated. Maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities and preliminary antitumor activity were assessed. Results: Ten (24%) patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities; dose-escalation cohorts: n = 7 (21-day schedule: n = 5; 28-day schedule: n = 2) and 21-day expanded safety cohort: n = 3. Navitoclax 150-mg days 1–5 every 21 days with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 day 1 was the maximum tolerated dose and optimal schedule. Adverse events included thrombocytopenia (63%), fatigue (61%), nausea (59%) and neutropenia (51%). Four confirmed partial responses occurred. Conclusion: Navitoclax 150-mg orally once/day was safely administered with docetaxel. Myelosuppression limited dose escalation; antitumor activity was observed. Clinical trial registration: NCT00888108 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

A phase I study evaluating COM701 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2657-TPS2657
Author(s):  
Drew W. Rasco ◽  
Daniel A. Vaena ◽  
Ryan J. Sullivan ◽  
Jason J. Luke ◽  
Adam ElNaggar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Tumor Growth Inhibition ◽  
Mouse Tumor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label

TPS2657 Background: There is a high unmet medical need for the treatment (tx) of patients (pt) who are refractory to or relapse following tx with checkpoint inhibitors. Newer checkpoint therapies with novel mechanisms of action that can activate T cells and demonstrate antitumor activity in this pre-tx pt population are urgently needed. COM701 is a novel first-in-class humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to PVRIG (poliovirus receptor related immunoglobulin domain containing) blocking its interaction with its ligand, PVRL2. Both PVRIG and PVRL2 are part of the DNAM axis as are TIGIT and PD1. Inhibition of PVRIG leads to enhanced activation of T and NK cells, and PVRIG results in tumor growth inhibition in mouse tumor models. We hypothesize that COM701 will demonstrate antitumor activity in pts who are checkpoint inhibitor pre-tx. Methods: NCT03667716 is an ongoing open-label first-in-human phase 1 study in pts with advanced solid tumors. The initial part of this study (Arm A) will evaluate escalating doses of COM701 monotherapy IV Q3 weekly with single pt cohorts for the initial 4 and then 3+3 design. Key Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥18 yrs, histologically confirmed locally advanced/ metastatic solid malignancy and has exhausted available standard therapy, ECOG 0-1, prior anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4, OX-40, CD137 permissible. Key Exclusion Criteria: Active autoimmune disease requiring systemic therapy in the last 2 years, symptomatic interstitial or inflammatory lung disease, untx or symptomatic central nervous system metastases. Primary objectives are safety and tolerability of COM701 as measured by the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and dose-limiting toxicities (21-day DLT window), pharmacokinetics of COM701, and to identify the maximum tolerated dose and/or the recommended dose for expansion. Secondary objectives are to characterize the immunogenicity and preliminary antitumor activity of COM701. Statistical Considerations: AEs graded as per CTCAE v4.03, responses as per RECIST v1.1. The analyses of all study objectives will be descriptive and hypothesis generating. No DLTs have been observed in the single pt cohorts. Assessment of pts enrolled into cohort 5 is ongoing at the time of this submission. Clinical trial information: NCT03667716.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document