BRAF and KRAS mutations as additional risk factors in the context of clinical parameters of patients with colorectal cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3522-3522
Author(s):  
Vlad Calin Popovici ◽  
Eva Budinska ◽  
Arnaud Roth ◽  
Fred Bosman ◽  
Sabine Tejpar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Tumor Site ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
P Values ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Survival After Relapse

3522 Background: The BRAF and KRAS mutations have been proposed as prognostic markers in colorectal cancer (CRC). Of them, only the BRAF V600E mutation has been validated as prognostic for overall survival and survival after relapse, while the value of KRAS mutation is still unclear. Methods: In a cohort of 1423 stage II-III patients from the PETACC-3 clinical trial, the prognostic value of the BRAF and KRAS mutations was retrospectively assessed in all possible stratifications defined by the 5 factors (T and N stage, tumor site and grade, and microsatellite instability status), by log rank test for overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and survival after relapse (SAR). The presence of interactions was tested by Wald test. The significance level was set to 0.01 for Bonferroni-adjusted p-values (P*), and a second level for a trend towards statistical significance was set at 0.05 for unadjusted p-values (P). Results: BRAF mutation was a marker of poor OS only in microsatellite stable (MSS) and left-sided tumors, with no prognostic value in microsatellite instable (MSI-H) or right-sided tumors. In MSS/left-sided tumors, BRAF mutation represents a marker of higher risk than previously reported: OS HR=6.4 [95% CI: 3.6-11.5], P* < 0.0001. For SAR, BRAF was prognostic in more stratifications, with higher risk in MSS/left-sided tumors (HR=3.9 [95% CI: 2.1-7.2], P* = 0.0002) than in MSS/right-sided (HR=2.3 [95% CI: 1.2-4.4], P=0.01). A novel observation was that BRAF mutation was prognostic also for RFS, but only in MSS/left-sided tumors (HR=3.6 [95% CI:2-6.3], P*=0.0005]). Additionally, heterogeneity in OS and RFS among BRAF mutants was observed. In general, KRAS mutation did not reach the significance level required, but showed a trend to become a prognostic marker for RFS in MSS tumors with early lymph node involvement (N1) (HR=1.6 [95% CI:1.1-2.2], P=0.01). Conclusions: The prognostic utility of the BRAF and KRAS mutations has to be interpreted in the context of other factors. For the BRAF mutation, a clear interaction with MSI status and tumor site was observed, with BRAF mutation indicating a much higher risk in MSS/left-sided tumors than previously considered.

Evaluation of BRAF mutation as a powerful prognostic factor in advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 413-413
Author(s):  
T. Yokota ◽  
T. Ura ◽  
N. Shibata ◽  
D. Takahari ◽  
K. Shitara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Clinicopathological Features ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Braf Mutant

413 Background: Alterations in the RAS/RAF/ERK signaling pathways frequently occur in colorectal cancer (CRC). KRAS mutations preclude responsiveness to EGFR-targeted therapies for CRC patients. However, prognostic significance of KRAS mutation is still controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate clinicopathological features of KRAS mutation in codon 12 and 13 as well as of BRAF mutation, and to validate prognostic impact of KRAS/BRAF mutation in advanced and recurrent CRC. Methods: The population consisted of 230 unselected patients who had undergone first-line chemotherapy for advanced and recurrent CRC between November 2002 and June 2010. Cycleave PCR was performed to detect a point mutation at codon 12, 13 or 61 in KRAS, and the V600E mutation in BRAF. Prognostic factors associated with survival were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic and/or Cox proportional hazards analyses. Results: KRAS mutations were present in 34.8% (n= 80) of patients, including 23.5% (n = 54) in codon 12, 11.3% (n = 26) in codon 13, and 0% in codon 61. 6.5% (n = 15) of patients had BRAF mutation. None of the CRC patients carried both KRAS and BRAF mutations. The primary tumor lesions were located on the right side of the colon in 60% of the BRAF mutant patients (p=0.0371). Furthermore, BRAF mutant was significantly associated with the pathological subtypes of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma/mucinous carcinoma (p<0.0001) and peritoneal metastasis (p=0.0059). The median overall survival for BRAF mutant and KRAS 13 mutant patients was 11.0 and 27.7 months, respectively, which was significantly worse than that for KRAS wild-type (wt)/BRAF wt (40.6 months) (BRAF; HR=3.89, 95% CI 1.83-8.24, p<0.001, KRAS13; HR=2.03, 95% CI 1.10-3.74, p=0.024). After adjustment for significant features by multivariate Cox regression analysis, BRAF mutation was associated with poor overall survival (HR, 3.70, 95% CI, 1.48-9.28; p=0.005), together with performance status 2. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis shows that clinicopathological features of CRC patients with BRAF mutations seem to be distinct from those with wild type BRAF. BRAF mutation is one of the most powerful prognostic factors in advanced and recurrent CRC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals IMPACT OF KRAS MUTATIONS IN CLINICAL FEATURES IN COLORECTAL CANCER

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato Morato ZANATTO ◽  
Gianni SANTOS ◽  
Júnea Caris OLIVEIRA ◽  
Eduardo Marcucci PRACUCHO ◽  
Adauto José Ferreira NUNES ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Direct Sequencing ◽  
Colorectal Carcinogenesis ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
Exon 2 ◽  
Metastatic Site ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

ABSTRACT Background: KRAS mutations are important events in colorectal carcinogenesis, as well as negative predictors of response to EGFR inhibitors treatment. Aim: To investigate the association of clinical-pathological features with KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer patients treated. Methods: Data from 69 patients with colorectal cancer either metastatic at diagnosis or later, were retrospectively analyzed. The direct sequencing and pyrosequencing techniques were related to KRAS exon 2. The mutation diagnosis and its type were determined. Results: KRAS mutation was identified in 43.4% of patients. The most common was c.35G>T (p.G12V), c.35G>A (p.G12D) and c.38G>A (p.G13D). No correlation was found between KRAS mutation and age (p=0.646) or gender (p=0.815). However, mutated group had higher CEA levels at admission (p=0.048) and codon 13 mutation was associated with involvement of more than one metastatic site in disease progression (p=0.029). Although there was no association between primary tumor site and mutation diagnosis (p=0.568), primary colon was associated with worse overall survival (p=0.009). Conclusion: The KRAS mutation was identified in almost half of patients. Mutated KRAS group had higher levels of CEA at admission and the mutation at codon 13 was associated with involvement of more than one metastatic site in the course of the disease. Colon disease was associated with the worst overall survival.

Overall survival based on MSI and BRAF mutation status for stage II/III colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 132-132
Author(s):  
Sophiya Karki ◽  
Rashna Madan ◽  
Sarah Schmitt ◽  
Ziyan Y. Pessetto ◽  
Andrew K. Godwin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Age At Diagnosis ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Braf Mutant

132 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-associated deaths in the United States. Some of the poor prognostic factors for metastatic CRC (mCRC) include BRAF V600E mutation and microsatellite instability (MSI) that result from mutation or loss of mismatch-repair genes. While the prognostic value of MSI-high CRC for early-stage patients treated with resection and adjuvant chemotherapy is favorable, the prognostic value of BRAF mutation is still unclear. Furthermore, the impact of BRAF mutation with concurrent microsatellite instability on overall survival has not been well investigated. Methods: Here, we collected BRAF mutation status and MSI status of stage II/III CRC patients (n=106) treated at the University of Kansas Cancer Center between September 2009 and July 2020 and compared overall survival between 4 subtypes:MSI-H/BRAF mutant (n=16), MSS/BRAF mutant (n=4), MSI-H/BRAF WT (n=17) and MSS/BRAF WT (n=69), further stratifying patients by age at diagnosis and tumor location. Molecular data were obtained from molecular oncology laboratory as PCR or IHC-based or acquired from outside records. Subgroup analyses were done for stage II and stage III cancers. Results: Table shows the patient characteristics. From our preliminary analysis, MSI-H CRC was found to be primarily a right-sided tumor (MSI-H/BRAF mutant: 94% and MSI-H/BRAF WT 76%). On the contrary, MSS CRC had a more heterogenous localization, spanning left colon, right colon and rectum. In our patient cohort, median survival was not reached for stage II patients whereas for stage III patients, BRAF mutation was associated with poor median survival irrespective of MSI status (MSS/BRAF mutant: 27 months and MSI-H/BRAF mutant 29 months). Median overall survival was found to be 87 months, not reached, 27 months and 29 months for MSS/BRAF WT, MSI-H/BRAF WT, MSS/BRAF mutant and MSI-H/BRAF mutant, respectively. Although associated with poor survival, MSI-H/BRAF mutant displayed later age at diagnosis (mean age 73) compared to MSS/BRAF mutant (mean age 60, p-value<0.029). Conclusions: Our finding suggests that BRAF mutation has poor prognosis even at earlier stages of the disease and that MSS/BRAF mutation, in particular, has the worst prognostic features. These findings highlight the need for BRAF-targeted therapy for CRC at any stage. Due to small sample size, however, our results warrant validation in a larger cohort. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Clinical characteristics and prognostic value of the KRAS mutation in Chinese colorectal cancer patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 172460082110171
Author(s):  
Ye Yuan ◽  
Yingting Liu ◽  
Ye Wu ◽  
Junling Zhang ◽  
Chunti Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Exon 2 ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Background: The KRAS mutations are high-frequency somatic mutations found in colorectal cancer patients from Western and Asian countries however, with the exception of exon 2 of KRAS, other prevalence and prognostic values have not been adequately assessed in Asian patients. The aim of this study was to determine the mutation frequencies of whole exon mutations of KRAS in Chinese colorectal cancer patients and to investigate their impact on prognosis. Methods: A total of 7189 tumor tissue samples (iCohort) were subjected to next-generation sequencing for detection of KRAS mutations. All pathologic or likely pathologic mutations of KRAS were considered. In addition, clinical features and prognostic dates were collected from 145 patients at The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, China (sCohort) and used droplet digital™ polymerase chain reaction to detect KRAS mutations. Results: In the iCohort, 2706 patients (37.6%) were confirmed harboring KRAS mutations. The most frequent of these mutations were G12D (32.19%), G12V (17.96%), and G13D (17.59%). In the sCohort, 51 colorectal cancer patients (35.17%) had KRAS mutations, among which KRAS G12D (64.71%), G13D (29.41%), and G14D (3.92%) were high-frequency. The KRAS mutations were associated with shorter median overall survival than wild-type tumors (69 vs. 55 months; HR 1.80; 95% Cl 1.22, 2.64; P=0.0003). In the Cox multivariate analysis, age (HR 1.562; 95% Cl 1.10, 2.22; P=0.013), tumor differentiation (HR 0.417; 95% Cl 0.19, 0.90; P=0.026), and KRAS mutation (HR 1.897; 95% Cl 0.19, 0.90; P=0.001) remained independent predictors of shorter overall survival. Among the common KRAS mutations, G12D was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (HR 2.17; 95% Cl 1.31, 3.58; P < 0.0001) compared with KRAS wild-type patients. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that KRAS genes are frequently mutated, and over 30% harbored the KRAS G12D mutation subtype. We found that the KRAS G12D mutation is associated with inferior survival and is a biomarker of poor prognosis in Chinese patients. Our data emphasize the importance of molecular features in colorectal cancer patients, which could potentially be improved by G12D-specific related inhibitors.

Age-dependent prognostic value of KRAS mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammet Ozer ◽  
Suleyman Yasin Goksu ◽  
Nina Niu Sanford ◽  
Chul Ahn ◽  
Muhammad Shaalan Beg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Kras Gene ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Kras Status ◽  
Age Dependent

Background: The age-dependent prognostic impact of KRAS status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is unknown. Materials & Methods: We used the National Cancer Database to evaluate the survival by KRAS status for age-groups <50, 50–69 and ≥70, adjusting for relevant patient and tumor characteristics. Results: mCRC patients (n = 26,095; 33.5%) had KRAS status reported, and 11,338 of these patients (43.4%) had mutations in the KRAS gene. Patients with KRAS mutations had worse overall survival than wild-type KRAS patients. In age-groups <50 years (23 vs 29 months; p < 0.001) and 50–69 (21 vs 23.4 months; p < 0.001), KRAS mutations were significantly associated with worse survival, whereas in the ≥70-year age-group, there was no significant association (14 vs 14 months; p = 0.34). Conclusion: We conclude that the age of patients influences the prognostic value of KRAS mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Relationship between oncogenic mutations (RAS, BRAF and PIK3CA) and tumor location and prognosis in colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15109-e15109
Author(s):  
Daisuke Inagaki ◽  
Manabu Shiozawa ◽  
Tetta Satoyoshi ◽  
Yosuke Atsumi ◽  
Masaaki Murakawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Pik3ca Mutation ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Oncogenic Mutation

e15109 Background: Several studies have reported that right-sided colon cancers (RCC) and left-sided colorectal cancers (LCRC) differ in several factors including genetic features. We investigated the difference in clinicopathological characteristics and oncogenic mutation status between patients with RCC and LCRC in all stages and assessed outcome. Methods: This study was a prospective, observational study. Patients were recruited from November 2014 to February 2016. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were collected and DNA wes extracted from tissue sections from 227 cases. There was no double cancer. Mutations in KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA were detected by next-generation DNA sequencer. Tumors from cecum to transverse colon were defined as RCC, and tumors from descending colon to rectum were defined as LCRC. The median follow-up period was 521 days. Results: KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations were present in 95 patient (41.9%), 7 patients (3.1%), 10 patients (4.4%) and 23 patients (10.1%) respectively, and there was no HRAS mutation in all patients. RCC was 68 patients and LCRC was 159 patients. Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and mutinous adenocarcinoma were significantly more frequent in RCC compared to LCRC (P = 0.031). KRAS mutations were detected in 37 patients with RCC (54.4%) and in 58 patients with LCRC (36.5%). BRAF mutations were detected in 7 patient with RCC (10.3%) and in 3 patients with LCRC (1.9%). KRAS and BRAF mutation in RCC were significantly more frequent than in LCRC (P = 0.012 and P = 0.005, respectively). The incidence of NRAS and PIK3CA mutation was no difference between two groups. In all patients, overall survival was evaluated. On univariate Cox regression analysis, BRAF mutation was associated with significantly poorer overall survival than BRAF wild type (HR = 4.831, P = 0.013). Other oncogenic mutation status and tumor location weren’t associated with overall survival. Conclusions: KRAS and BRAF mutation were more frequent in the patients with RCC compared to those with LCRC in all stages. This study suggested BRAF mutation correlated with poor outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer.

scholarly journals Colorectal Cancer Prognosis is Not Associated with BRAF and KRAS Mutations-A STROBE Compliant Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joon-Hyop Lee ◽  
Jiyoung Ahn ◽  
Won Seo Park ◽  
Eun Kyung Choe ◽  
Eunyoung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Viral Oncogene ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Mutation Group ◽  
Viral Oncogene Homolog

Background: We investigated the associations between v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAFV600E, henceforth BRAF) and v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations and colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis, using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE39582) datasets. Materials and Methods: The effects of BRAF and KRAS mutations on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of CRC were evaluated. Results: The mutational status of BRAF and KRAS genes was not associated with overall survival (OS) or DFS of the CRC patients drawn from the TCGA database. The 3-year OS and DFS rates of the BRAF mutation (+) vs. mutation (−) groups were 92.6% vs. 90.4% and 79.7% vs. 68.4%, respectively. The 3-year OS and DFS rates of the KRAS mutation (+) vs. mutation (−) groups were 90.4% vs. 90.5% and 65.3% vs. 73.5%, respectively. In stage II patients, however, the 3-year OS rate was lower in the BRAF mutation (+) group than in the mutation (−) group (85.5% vs. 97.7%, p <0.001). The mutational status of BRAF genes of 497 CRC patients drawn from the GSE39582 database was not associated with OS or DFS. The 3-year OS and DFS rates of BRAF mutation (+) vs. mutation (−) groups were 75.7% vs. 78.9% and 73.6% vs. 71.1%, respectively. However, KRAS mutational status had an effect on 3-year OS rate (71.9% mutation (+) vs. 83% mutation (−), p = 0.05) and DFS rate (66.3% mutation (+) vs. 74.6% mutation (−), p = 0.013). Conclusions: We found no consistent association between the mutational status of BRAF nor KRAS and the OS and DFS of CRC patients from the TCGA and GSE39582 databases. Studies with longer-term records and larger patient numbers may be necessary to expound the influence of BRAF and KRAS mutations on the outcomes of CRC.

Prognostic Role of KRAS and BRAF in Stage II and III Resected Colon Cancer: Results of the Translational Study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 Trial

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 466-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud D. Roth ◽  
Sabine Tejpar ◽  
Mauro Delorenzi ◽  
Pu Yan ◽  
Roberto Fiocca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Exon 2 ◽  
Mutation Status

Purpose Mutations within the KRAS proto-oncogene have predictive value but are of uncertain prognostic value in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. We took advantage of PETACC-3, an adjuvant trial with 3,278 patients with stage II to III colon cancer, to evaluate the prognostic value of KRAS and BRAF tumor mutation status in this setting. Patients and Methods Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks (n = 1,564) were prospectively collected and DNA was extracted from tissue sections from 1,404 cases. Planned analysis of KRAS exon 2 and BRAF exon 15 mutations was performed by allele-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction. Survival analyses were based on univariate and multivariate proportional hazard regression models. Results KRAS and BRAF tumor mutation rates were 37.0% and 7.9%, respectively, and were not significantly different according to tumor stage. In a multivariate analysis containing stage, tumor site, nodal status, sex, age, grade, and microsatellite instability (MSI) status, KRAS mutation was associated with grade (P = .0016), while BRAF mutation was significantly associated with female sex (P = .017), and highly significantly associated with right-sided tumors, older age, high grade, and MSI-high tumors (all P < 10−4). In univariate and multivariate analysis, KRAS mutations did not have a major prognostic value regarding relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS). BRAF mutation was not prognostic for RFS, but was for OS, particularly in patients with MSI-low (MSI-L) and stable (MSI-S) tumors (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.4; P = .0003). Conclusion In stage II-III colon cancer, the KRAS mutation status does not have major prognostic value. BRAF is prognostic for OS in MS-L/S tumors.

KRASMutations As an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated With Cetuximab

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 374-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid Lièvre ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Bachet ◽  
Valérie Boige ◽  
Anne Cayre ◽  
Delphine Le Corre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Independent Prognostic Factor ◽  
Allelic Discrimination ◽  
Kras Mutations

PurposeCetuximab is efficient in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). We previously showed that KRAS mutations were associated with resistance to cetuximab in 30 CRC patients. The aim of this study was to validate, in an independent larger series of 89 patients, the prognostic value of KRAS mutations on response to cetuximab and survival.Patients and MethodsEighty-nine metastatic CRC patients treated with cetuximab after treatment failure with irinotecan-based chemotherapy were analyzed for KRAS mutation by allelic discrimination on tumor DNA. The association between KRAS mutations and tumor response, skin toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed.ResultsA KRAS mutation was present in 27% of the patients and was associated with resistance to cetuximab (0% v 40% of responders among the 24 mutated and 65 nonmutated patients, respectively; P < .001) and a poorer survival (median PFS: 10.1 v 31.4 weeks in patients without mutation; P = .0001; median OS: 10.1 v 14.3 months in patients without mutation; P = .026). When we pooled these 89 patients with patients from our previous study, the multivariate analysis showed that KRAS status was an independent prognostic factor associated with OS and PFS, whereas skin toxicity was only associated with OS. In a combined analysis, median OS times of patients with two, one, or no favorable prognostic factors (severe skin toxicity and no KRAS mutation) was of 15.6, 10.7, and 5.6 months, respectively.ConclusionThese results confirm the high prognostic value of KRAS mutations on response to cetuximab and survival in metastatic CRC patients treated with cetuximab.

Prognostic value of BRAF and KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14104-e14104
Author(s):  
Paola Murata ◽  
Agostina Stradella ◽  
David Páez ◽  
Maria Tobeña ◽  
Ana Sebio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Time To Relapse

e14104 Background: KRAS mutation has been established as a predictive marker of resistance to antiEGFR therapy in patients (pts) with colorectal cancer (CRC) but the role of BRAF is not yet clear. Both gene mutations have also been studied as prognostic factors but results are contradictory. AntiEGFR therapies impair evaluation of KRAS and BRAF as prognostic factors when overall survival is an endpoint. We hypothesized that if KRAS or BRAF were prognostic factors, they would influence time to relapse (TTR) after complete tumor resection. Methods: Patients who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2011 for stage II and III CRC were retrieved from our database. Codon 12 and 13 KRAS mutations and V600E BRAF mutation were analyzed. Clinical characteristics and mutation status were correlated with TTR. Results: We analyzed 170 pts with a median age of 66 (26 – 86) years. Tumors were located in the right colon in 27% of pts, in the transverse colon in 3%, in the left colon in 41%, and in the rectum in 29%. Most (55.3%) were stage III; 59% received adjuvant chemotherapy. KRAS and BRAF mutations were present in 66 (38.8%) and 5 (2.9%) pts respectively, and both were mutually exclusive. The most frequent KRAS mutations were: G12D (39.3%), G12V (27.2%), G13D (15.1%). Median TTR was 71 weeks (w) (95% CI 63-79). V600E BRAF mutation was the only factor associated with TTR. TTR was 42 w in tumors with the BRAF mutation and 74 w in wild-type tumors (p=0.041). Among KRAS mutations, KRAS G12V conferred a significantly longer TTR (100w) than the other subtype mutations (69 w; p=0.05). Conclusions: Our results suggest that V600E BRAF mutation is a negative prognostic factor in CRC, conferring a shorter time to relapse. Additionally, the KRAS G12V determines a different behavior among KRAS mutation tumors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document