Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC G3): Prognostic factors and potential novel targets.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15071-e15071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian Heetfeld ◽  
Atsuko Kasajima ◽  
Arend Koch ◽  
Francesco Milone ◽  
Ingo Steffen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
First Line ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma ◽  
Poorly Differentiated

e15071 Background: Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC G3) represent a subgroup of neuroendocrine neoplasms with aggressive clinical behavior and poor prognosis, but showing quite variable clinical courses. In metastatic disease objective response to first-line therapy with cisplatin/ etoposide ranges between 40-67%, however median duration of response is short (4 to 9 months). There is no established second-line therapy. Methods: Clinical data of 42 patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic NEC G3 were analyzed in retrospect. In 26 cases tissue was analyzed for cell size, expression of p-mTOR and downstream effectors (p-eIF4E and p-4EBP1), somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-subtypes and growth factor receptors (EGFR and IGF-1R). Histopathological findings were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curve, log rank test and Cox regression. Results: Patients with large cell NEC showed a more favorable survival than patients with small cell NEC. Median overall survival (mOS) was 31 versus 11 months (P=0.034). Expression of p-mTOR and p-eIF4E was seen in 64% and 24% of cases. High expression levels of p-mTOR (mOS 9 vs 25 months, P=0.026) and expression of p-eIF4E (mOS 9 vs 25 months, P=0.015) was significantly associated with shorter survival. In multivariate Cox regression p-mTOR and p-eIF4E proved to be independent prognostic factors for survival taking cell size and TNM staging into account. EGFR (cytoplasmatic and nuclear) and IGF-1R expression was found in 73.1%, 65.4% and 69.2% of the cases respectively, without significant association to survival. Expression of SSTR subtypes, Ki67 value and response to first line chemotherapy was not of prognostic value analyzed by log rank test. Conclusions: The clinical impact of cell size discrimination requires further evaluation in NEC G3. The mTOR pathway seems to play a role in tumor growth in some NEC and may represent a novel therapeutic target.

Germinal Center B Cell and Non-Germinal Center B Cell-Like DLBCL Have Similar Clinical Features at the Time of Progression and Comparable Outcome Following Autologous HSC Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1901-1901
Author(s):  
Luciano J. Costa ◽  
Andrew L. Feldman ◽  
Ivana N. Micallef ◽  
David J. Inward ◽  
Patrick B. Johnston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Germinal Center ◽  
Immunohistochemical Analysis ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Germinal Center B Cell ◽  
Hsc Transplantation

Abstract Background: Germinal center B cell-like (GCB) DLBCL, as determined by gene expression profiling or immunohistochemistry, is more likely to be cured by initial conventional chemoimmunotherapy than non-germinal center B cell-like (non-GCB) DLBCL. For patients with relapsed or refractory chemosensitive DLBCL, high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplant is considered standard-of-care treatment, but it is unknown whether the outcome of these patients is similarly influenced by the subtype of DLBCL. We therefore explored the differences between patients with GCB and non-GCB DLBCL as regards their clinical features at relapse after first line therapy and their outcome following salvage autologous HSC transplant. Methods: Patients undergoing BEAM conditioning and autologous HSC transplantation for relapsed or refractory chemosensitive DLBCL at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN between 2001 and 2006 were included. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed for CD10, BCL-6 and MUM1 allowing classification in GCB and non-GCB-like DLBCL, as well as for BCL-2. GCB and non-GCB groups were compared in terms of known prognostic factors at time of progression and outcome after HSC transplant Results: Fifty-nine patients were included and had retrievable tumor samples to allow immunohistochemical analysis. Median follow-up of survivors was 25 months; median age at the time of transplant was 60 years (range 17–77); All patients had failed at least one previous anthracycline-based regimen (15 had refractory disease). Overall, 25/59 cases (42%) were positive for CD10, 32/58 (55%) for BCL-6, and 19/58 (32%) for MUM1. Thirty-two patients (54%) were classified as having GCB and 27 (46%) non-GCB-like DLBCL. Patients in the GCB and non-GCB group had similar time to progression (TTP) (median 12.5 months vs. 11 months, Wilcoxon P=0.81) after first line therapy and similar IPI-R scores (Chi-square, P=0.38). In univariate analysis, GCB and non-GCB did not differ in time to relapse after HSC transplant (log rank test P=0.77) or survival (log rank test P=0.48; figure). The lack of demonstrable difference in survival persisted even after correction for IPI-R and TTP, factors know to affect transplant outcome (Cox regression, RR=0.80 for GCB; P=0.28). BCL-2 was highly expressed in both GCB (81%) and non-GCB (96%) and did not correlate with outcome in the entire population nor in any of the two groups. Conclusion: Patients with chemosensitive relapsed or refractory GCB and non-GCB-like DLBCL derive similar benefit from autologous HSC transplant. Figure Figure

Differences in Cell of Origin (COO) Affect Outcomes in Caucasian(C) but Not in African American(AA) Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma(DLBCL)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1460-1460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uma Borate ◽  
Deniz Peker ◽  
James M. Foran ◽  
Luciano J Costa
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Cell Of Origin ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction: DLBCL is an aggressive mature B-cell neoplasm with a low incidence in African Americans and other minority groups. The differences in outcomes based on DLBCL Cell of Origin(COO) immunophenotypic subtypes as defined by the Hans algorithm using CD10, Bcl-6, and MUM1 namely germinal center B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB have been based on predominantly Caucasian patients (pts) and their impact on outcomes in AA patients have not been well studied. Material and Methods: A retrospective review of clinicopathologic data from patients diagnosed and treated for DLBCL at UAB between 2002-2011 was conducted following IRB approval .The data collected included patient demographics (age, sex, self identified race), DLBCL subtype (GCB vs. non-GCB based on the Hans algorithm), disease stage, first line therapy regimens and patient outcomes. We analyzed group differences in both C and AA pts with GCB and non-GCB subtypes of DLBCL in all the parameters mentioned above using the chi square test for categorical variables,. In addition, OS was examined using Kaplan Meier curves and the log rank test. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to examine the effects of variables of interest on OS. All results were considered statistically significant at α=0.05 level. Results: We included a total of 259 pts in our analysis after excluding patients with missing demographics, disease related data, primary mediastianal DLBCL, missing first line therapy data and outcomes data as well as race identified as other than C or AA. 45 patients (17.4%) of patients self identified as AA and 214 (82.6%) self identified as Caucasian. The mean age of presentation for AA pts was 52 yrs compared to 58 years for C patients (p=0.045) and 28 (62.2%) AA patients presented with advanced Stage III and IV disease compared to 89 (44.6%) of C patients (P=0.04) both being statistically significant. Based on COO characterization using immunophenotype by Hans algorithm, 27 AA pts (60%) and 145(67%) of C pts were GCB by immunophenotype(p=0.317). 95% of all patients received R-CHOP as first line therapy , 3.5% received R-CVP and the remaining received a combination of Rituximab alone, FCR or radiation therapy .On analyzing OS based on COO, AA patients did not demonstrate a significant difference in OS based on COO with both GCB and non-GCB groups having a median OS of 84 months ( p=0.74)( 95% CI 72-121 months). However, the median OS for C pts with GCB phenotype was 104 months compared to 25 months for the non-GCB phenotype and the median OS was 55 months +/-12.6 months for the C pt group as a whole( p<0.001 by log rank test )which was highly statistically significant.Multivariate analyses of different factors affecting OS showed only COO (p<0.001), age(p=0.07) and stage of DLBCL at presentation(p=0.027) to affect OS significantly.Race,Gender and IPI score did not appear to impact OS significantly. Conclusion: Our study aimed to study the impact of COO and Race on OS in DLBCL especially in AA pts where this has not been well characterized. Our results show that as expected the incidence of DLBCL is lower in AA patients compared to C pts. However, DLBCL presents at younger age and with more advanced stage in AA than in C patients. Although distribution of COO is similar in AA and C patients, our findings suggest that COO may not have the same effect on prognosis among AA pts as it does among the C pt population where we see non-GCB patients do significantly worse than their GCB counterparts. This may reflect a different disease biology in AA patients that has yet to be understood. Our study limitations include not taking into account disease relapse, second line therapy and effect of autologous bone marrow transplantation on overall survival. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 3. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors of Small Intestine Angiosarcoma: a Retrospective Clinical Analysis of 66 Cases

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 817-827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong Li ◽  
Ze-ying Ouyang ◽  
Jun-bo Xiao ◽  
Jian He ◽  
Yan-wu Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Small Intestine ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Gi Bleeding ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Clinical Records ◽  
Year 2000

Background/Aims: Primary angiosarcoma of the small intestine is a rare neoplasia, and there are limited data from systematic analyses. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical and pathological characteristics in addition to the prognostic factors for this rare neoplasia. Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical records and prognostic information of 66 patients with small intestine angiosarcoma reported between 1970 and 2017. We used the Chi-square test, the log-rank test, and Cox regression analyses to evaluate the data. Results: There were 66 patients diagnosed with small intestine angiosarcoma. The onset age ranged from 24–92 years old. There were 24 patients diagnosed before the year 2000, and 42 patients were diagnosed after 2000. The data indicated that 49 cases were diagnosed as primary disease, and the remaining 15 cases were secondary disease. The main clinical symptoms were nonspecific and included gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and abdominal pain. Additionally, we found multi-center foci were one of the characteristics of this disease. Radiation-induced small intestine angiosarcoma (RSIA) is a special type of disease with a similar prognosis. This type was more frequent in females and decreased after the year 2000. We also found that GI bleeding was less common in RSIA cases. The log-rank test results revealed that old-age, poor differentiation, and GI bleeding were associated with worse prognosis. Surgical treatment showed a trend toward a prolonged survival time. However, the result was not statistically significant. Our results show treatment with adjuvant therapy improved prognosis. The multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated adjuvant therapy was an independent indicator of a favorable outcome in small intestine angiosarcoma patients. Conclusion: Pay attention to the unexplained gastrointestinal bleeding could lead to a faster diagnosis and control of small intestine angiosarcoma. Furthermore, treatments including adjuvant therapy can effectively improve the prognosis.

Sunitinib therapy for patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Updated results of two phase II trials and prognostic factor analysis for survival

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5095-5095 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Rosenberg ◽  
R. J. Motzer ◽  
M. D. Michaelson ◽  
B. G. Redman ◽  
G. R. Hudes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Line Therapy

5095 Background: Two single-arm phase 2 trials reported a 42% objective response rate (ORR) with sunitinib as second-line therapy in mRCC pts (JAMA 2006;295:2516–24). Efficacy results were updated and an analysis of prognostic factors for survival was performed on pooled data. Methods: Eligibility criteria and treatment plan were nearly identical for both trials. Pts with mRCC who failed =1 prior cytokine-based therapy received sunitinib in repeated 6-week cycles of 50 mg/day orally for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off treatment. Response was assessed by investigators according to RECIST. Pretreatment clinical and biochemical features were examined for prognostic factors by univariate and multivariate analysis (p<0.05 significance level was used in the backward stepwise selection procedure). Results: Updated efficacy data for 168 evaluable pts showed an ORR of 45% (95% CI: 39%, 54%), median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.4 months (95% CI: 7.9, 10.7), and median overall survival (OS) of 22.3 months (95% CI: 14.8, 36.0). Twenty pts remain on treatment with sunitinib with the longest pt on the drug for >3.5 years with partial response for >3 years. The median duration of response was 11.6 months (95% CI: 9.9, 15.2), and included 1 pt with a complete response for >2 years. The proportion of pts alive at 2 years is 48%. Final prognostic factors for survival in the multivariate model were ECOG PS 0 vs. =1 (p=0.0034); time interval from diagnosis to sunitinib treatment =1 yr vs. <1 yr (p=0.0002); hemoglobin =13 vs. <13 g/dL for males and =11.5 vs. <11.5 g/dL for females (p=0.0002). Conclusions: Median survival is nearly 2 years, which compares favorably to the historical experience (12.7 months) in second-line therapy with other agents (JCO 2004;22:454–63). The influence of sunitinib therapy on patient survival is being investigated in a randomized phase 3 trial compared to interferon-a in first-line therapy for mRCC. Further study of prognostic factors to sunitinib therapy is warranted in the first-line setting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Prognostic Factors in CBFB-MYH11 Positive AML: Trisomy 21, AGE, and t(16;16) Are Associated with Inferior Outcome.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 486-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Weisser ◽  
Susanne Schnittger ◽  
Wolfgang Kern ◽  
Wolfgang Hiddemann ◽  
Torsten Haferllach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Trisomy 21 ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Fusion Transcript ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Worse Prognosis

Abstract The fusion transcript CBFB-MYH11 is the molecular correlate of inv(16)/t(16;16) and strictly associated with FAB subtype M4eo. This subgroup is associated with a favorable prognosis in AML. However, approximately 30% of the patients relapse. Our intention was to examine prognostic factors for the outcome within this subgroup. Therefore 153 CBFB-MYH11 positive AML patients were analyzed. The median age was 52 years (range 18–83), 80 patients were female, 73 were male. In 22 cases AML was therapy-related, in 131 cases a de novo AML was diagnosed. Inv(16) was detected in 138 and t(16;16) in 12 cases. In 3 cases neither inv(16) nor t(16;16) were detectable despite PCR and FISH positivity for CBFB-MYH11 suggesting cryptic rearrangements. The most frequent additional cytogenetic abnormalities were +8 (n=19), +9 (n=3), +21 (n=7), +22 (n=23). Cox regression analysis revealed that advanced age (OS: p=0.026; EFS: p=0.029) and increased CBFB-MYH11/ABL ratio at diagnosis (OS: 0.016, EFS: p=0.064) were associated with a worse prognosis. Using log rank test additional factors influencing survival were detected. These included: t(16;16) vs inv(16) (OS: n=8, censored 4, median 362 days vs n=118, censored 92, median not reached, p=0.018; EFS: n=8, censored 4, median 232 days vs n=118, censored 70, median 918 days, p=0.048) and trisomy 21 vs no additional aberrations (OS: n=6, censored 3, median 435 days vs n=74, censored 59, median not reached, p=0.024; EFS: n=6, censored 2, median 293 d vs n=74, censored 44, median 764 days, p=0.0047). Therapy related AML was associated with worse EFS than de novo AML (n=16, censored 6, median 371 days vs n=112, censored 70, median 1179 days, p=0.0167) and there was a trend towards worse OS (p=0.157 n=16, censored 10, median 764 days vs n=112, censored 88, median not reached). A multivariate analysis including t(16;16), age, CBFB-MYH11/ABL ratio, therapy related AML and +21 as covariates revealed t(16;16) and age as independent factor for OS (p=0.014 and p=0.015, respectively) and age, t(16;16), and +21 as independent factors for EFS (p=0.047, p=0.013, and p=0.016, respectively). There was no evidence that the additional aberrations +22 or +8 had an influence on survival. Taken together our data suggest that t(16;16) as compared to inv(16), trisomy 21 and age are associated with worse prognosis in patients with CBFB-MYH11 positive AML.

scholarly journals Estimation of treatment and prognostic factors of pneumocystis pneumonia in patients with connective tissue diseases

RMD Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e001508
Author(s):  
Yuichi Ishikawa ◽  
Kazuhisa Nakano ◽  
Kei Tokutsu ◽  
Hiroko Miyata ◽  
Yoshihisa Fujino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Connective Tissue Diseases ◽  
Pneumocystis Pneumonia ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Line Therapy

ObjectivesTo investigate short-term prognosis and prognostic factors for connective tissue disease-associated pneumocystis pneumonia (CTD-PCP) using the Japanese nationwide diagnosis procedure combination (DPC) inpatient database.MethodsThe present retrospective cohort study from April 2014 to March 2016 included data of patients with CTD-PCP extracted from the DPC database using the 10th revision of International Classification of Diseases and Injuries codes.ResultsIn 15 901 766 cases registered from 1329 hospitals, 333 of 67 890 patients who were admitted with PCP were diagnosed with CTD-PCP and included in the study. The median age was 71.0 years, and 214 (64.3%), 80 (24.0%), and 29 (8.7%) patients received sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (ST) monotherapy and pentamidine-containing and atovaquone-containing therapy, respectively. There were 114 (34.2%) in-hospital deaths, and the 30-day and 60-day in-hospital survival rates after PCP treatment initiation were 66.0% and 53.7%, respectively. Older age (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.08) and concomitant interstitial lung disease (ILD) (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.42) were poor prognostic factors. Patients who completed PCP treatment with ST monotherapy had a significantly higher survival rate than those treated with those not treated with ST monotherapy (p=0.015; log-rank test). Pentamidine versus atovaquone as second-line therapy was significantly higher with atovaquone (p=0.012; log-rank test).ConclusionOlder age and concomitant ILD were poor prognostic factors for CTD-PCP. ST was a reasonable first-line therapy in patients with CTD-PCP, and patients with inadequate response to ST treated with atovaquone tended to have a better prognosis than those treated with pentamidine.

Phase 3 trial of lenvatinib (LEN) plus pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) or everolimus (EVE) versus sunitinib (SUN) monotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (CLEAR study).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 269-269
Author(s):  
Robert J. Motzer ◽  
Camillo Porta ◽  
Masatoshi Eto ◽  
Thomas Powles ◽  
Viktor Grünwald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Study Results

269 Background: In pts with advanced RCC, second-line treatment with LEN + EVE prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with EVE alone. LEN + PEMBRO, also showed preliminary efficacious evidence in a phase 1/2 RCC study. Here, we describe the investigational study results of first-line LEN + PEMBRO or LEN + EVE versus SUN in pts with advanced RCC. Methods: Pts were randomized (1:1:1) to receive LEN 20 mg orally once daily + PEMBRO 200 mg IV every 3 weeks (wks); or LEN 18 mg + EVE 5 mg orally once daily; or SUN 50 mg orally once daily (4 wks on/2 wks off). Eligible pts had advanced RCC with no prior systemic therapy. Randomization was stratified by geographic region and MSKCC prognostic group. The primary endpoint was PFS by Independent Review Committee per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. A sequential approach was used to test PFS first, then OS and ORR. PFS and OS were compared across arms by a stratified log-rank test; hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated by a stratified Cox regression model. Results: 1069 pts were randomized (Table). After a median follow-up of 27 months (data cutoff August 28, 2020), PFS was significantly improved with LEN + PEMBRO (median 24 months [mos]) vs SUN (median 9 mos; HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.32–0.49) and LEN + EVE (median 15 mos) vs SUN (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53–0.80). OS was significantly longer with LEN + PEMBRO vs SUN (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49–0.88), whereas OS with LEN + EVE vs SUN was not statistically different (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.88–1.50). ORR was significantly greater with LEN + PEMBRO (ORR 71%; complete response [CR] 16%) vs SUN (ORR 36%; CR 4%; odds ratio 4.35, 95% CI 3.16–5.97) and LEN + EVE (ORR 54%; CR 10%) vs SUN (odds ratio 2.15, 95% CI 1.57–2.93). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 72% of pts in the LEN + PEMBRO arm and 73% of pts in the LEN + EVE arm compared with 59% of pts in the SUN arm. Conclusions: LEN + PEMBRO demonstrated significant improvements in PFS, OS and ORR vs SUN. LEN + EVE demonstrated significant improvements in PFS and ORR vs SUN. Safety was manageable and consistent with the known single-agent profiles. Clinical trial information: NCT02811861 . [Table: see text]

A large multicenter study evaluating prognosis and chemosensitivity of metastatic colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3536-3536 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Tougeron ◽  
Benjamin Sueur ◽  
David Sefrioui ◽  
Lucie Gentilhomme ◽  
Thierry Lecomte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Colorectal Cancers ◽  
First Line ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinosis

3536 Background: Deficient Mismatch Repair (dMMR) in colorectal cancers (CRC) represent 12% of all tumors. In non-metastatic CRC setting, dMMR are associated with good prognosis but also with resistance to adjuvant 5-FU chemotherapy. In metastatic CRC (mCRC) setting, dMMR is found in less than 5% and its influence on prognosis and treatment response is little known. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included all consecutive patients with dMMR mCRC treated between 2005 and 2015 in 17 centers. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Prognostic variables were evaluated in univariate analysis using the Log rank test and in multivariate analysis using the Cox regression model. Results: A total of 198 patients with dMMR mCRC were included (median age 64.6 years). dMMR mCRC were mostly diagnosed with synchronous metastases (59%) and frequent peritoneal carcinosis (43%). Lynch syndrome was found in 34% of cases and 36% of tumors had a BRAFV600E mutation. Median OS was 20.6 months. A low risk Kohne's prognostic index (HR = 0.40 [0.22-0.72], p = 0.02) and absence of peritoneal carcinosis (HR = 0.51 [0.29-0.90], p = 0.02) were associated with better OS in multivariate analysis. Main first-line regimens were 5FU-based (n = 20), oxaliplatin-based (n = 75) or irinotecan-based (n = 46) chemotherapy. Median PFS on first-line treatment was 5.9 months. The objective response rate (ORR) was 0%, 19% and 36% for 5FU-based, oxaliplatin-based and irinotecan-based chemotherapies, respectively (p = 0.02). A trend for a longer PFS (3.3, 5.5 and 10.2 months, respectively, p = 0.06) and OS (17.7, 21.1 and 34.2 months, respectively, p = 0.05) was also observed for irinotecan-based chemotherapy. The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy was associated with a significant increase of ORR (p = 0.01) and PFS (p = 0.04) as compared to the addition of an anti-EGFR therapy. Conclusions: This study suggests that dMMR mCRC are associated with poor prognosis and chemoresistance, especially to 5FU-based chemotherapy. Efficacy of irinotecan and bevacizumab should be evaluated in a prospective trial in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

scholarly journals A practical nomogram from the SEER database to predict the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with lymph node metastasis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Zhang ◽  
Changcheng Tao ◽  
Jianxiong Wu ◽  
Weiqi Rong
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Seer Database ◽  
Survival Curves ◽  
Node Metastasis ◽  
Log Rank Test

Abstract Background: The presence of lymph node metastases is related to poor survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients and because of the reported low probability of lymph node metastasis, research into the prognoses of such patients is difficult to conduct. In this study, we aimed to develop a nomogram model to predict the prognosis of HCC patients with lymph node metastasis and provided a reasonable basis for the choice of follow-up treatment.Methods: HCC patients diagnosed with LN metastasis from 2010 to 2015 were enrolled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate Cox regression and lasso regression were used to screen prognostic factors. Cox multiple-factor analysis was employed to investigate the independent prognostic factors for survival. The concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve were used to evaluate the predictive performance of our model. The clinical benefit was assessed via decision curve analysis (DCA). The survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and the differences among survival curves were compared by the log-rank test.Results: Patients were randomized into the training group (944 patients) and the validation group (402 patients) in a 70:30 ratio. Grade, T stage, surgery to the liver, chemotherapy, radiation recode, AFP, fibrosis score, tumor size group, M stage were selected as independent prognostic factors, and we developed nomograms using these variables. The c-indices of the training and validation groups were 0.70 and 0.73, respectively. The calibration curves for probability of survival showed good agreement. The DCA indicated that the nomogram had positive net benefits. Patients were divided into two risk groups according to our model, survival curves were drawn, and the log-rank test was performed, the p-value of which was <0.001.Conclusions: The nomogram can accurately predict the prognosis of HCC patients with lymph nodes metastasis and provide a reasonable basis for treatment.

Prognostic factors for survival in patients with metastatic malign melanoma treated with ipilimumab: Turkish Oncology Group study

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 1658-1664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuksel Urun ◽  
H Arzu Yasar ◽  
Hande Turna ◽  
Ece Esin ◽  
A Murat Sedef ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Lactic Dehydrogenase ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Metastatic Sites ◽  
Ecog Ps

Purpose Studies in the last decade show survival improvement with checkpoint blocker therapy in patients with metastatic malign melanoma. Our purpose was to define the efficacy of ipilimumab according to the patient's baseline characteristics including absolute lymphocytes count. Methods We collected the data of 97 patients with advanced malign melanoma treated with ipilimumab (3 mg/kg, q3w) retrospectively. Log-rank test was used to analyze the univariate effects of patient's characteristics (age, gender, metastatic sites, ECOG PS, type of melanoma, lactic dehydrogenase levels, anemia, lymphocytes (L), neutrophils (N), N/L ratio), c-kit and BRAF status. Survival analyses were estimated with Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the possible factors identified with log-rank test. Results The median age was 58, and 58% were male and 90% of patients had at least one prior systemic therapy. The median survival was 9.7 months for all patients; and the 12- and 24-month survival rates were 43% and 19%, respectively. Absolute lymphocytes count, lactic dehydrogenase level, bone metastasis, the number of metastatic sites, and RECIST response were significantly related to survival. After Cox regression analysis, RECIST response (complete or partial response), absolute lymphocytes count (more than 1500/mm3) and the number of metastatic sites (less than three sites) remained as significant independent prognostic factors for longer survival. Conclusion Ipilimumab improved survival of patients with metastatic malign melanoma. However, patients with fewer metastatic sites and higher absolute lymphocytes count have a significantly better benefit. To determine if these markers could be used to direct patient therapy, further validation analysis is needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document