Induction chemotherapy (ICh) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (ChR) in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN): Experience in a Mexican institute.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17031-e17031
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel Alvarez Avitia ◽  
Jose Luis Aguilar Ponce ◽  
Gisell Anaid Lara ◽  
Violeta Moreno Molina ◽  
Jaime G. De La Garza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Progression Rate ◽  
Alternative Scheme ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Objective Rate

e17031 Background: ICh has taken an important role in the treatment of locally advanced disease, but it has not been recognized in which patients (pts) may be the best option ICh followed by ChR or just ChR. We present our experience with ICh followed by ChR regimen in the National Cancer Institute of Mexico (INCan). Methods: We identified 69 patients (pts) diagnosed with locally and/or regionally advanced non-metastatic squamous cell cancer of head and neck, who were attended at the INCan from 2008-2012, in whom, the original treatment was ICh with two cycles of Paclitaxel (P), cisplatin (C) and 5Fluorouracil (5FU) scheme, followed by concurrent ChR with C. But only 35 pts of the original group accomplished the treatment. Results: 13 pts were women (37%) and 22 were men (63%).The median age at diagnosis was 59 years old. In stages III (28%), IVa (46%), and IVb (26%); AJCC, 2002. The subsites per pts. studied were: oral cavity 9 (25.7%), larynx 9 (25.7%), hypopharynx 7 (20%), paranasal sinuses 7 (20%) and oropharynx 3 (8.6%). The rate response was observed in 83%: complete objective rate response (CR) in13 pts (37%), partial response rate in 16 pts (46%) and progression rate in 6 pts. (17%). The mean survival was of 18.3 months (mth) (CI-95: 0.32-0.68).Median survival was not achieved in pts with CR with a median follow up of 2 yrs, pts with PR had a median survival of 15 mth (CI-95: 0.27-0.75) and the median progression was 11 mth (CI-95: 0.11-0.80). We have not got any CR with ICh only, but 13 patients obtained CR at the end of the ChR. Neither age, sex nor subsites were crucial to the clinical response. Conclusions: Our results cannot distinguish patients who might benefit from ICH. In the intention-to-treat population, more than a half of pts did not complete the proposed scheme. Recently, we reported a study using an alternative scheme: Cisplatin and gemcitabine concurrent with radiotherapy to treat pts with advanced SCCHN, and we found that this scheme of treatment is effective and well tolerated, with a 5 yr progression-free survival rate of 27.8 (CI-95: 0–61.5). Yet further studies are needed to compare ICh followed by RCh vs RCh to assess what the best treatment may be.

Hyperfractionated Radiation Therapy With or Without Concurrent Low-Dose Daily Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Prospective Randomized Trial

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 1458-1464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branislav Jeremic ◽  
Yuta Shibamoto ◽  
Biljana Milicic ◽  
Nebojsa Nikolic ◽  
Aleksandar Dagovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Free Survival

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the addition of cisplatin (CDDP) to hyperfractionation (Hfx) radiation therapy (RT) offers an advantage over the same Hfx RT given alone in locally advanced (stages III and IV) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty patients were randomized to receive either Hfx RT alone to a tumor dose of 77 Gy in 70 fractions in 35 treatment days over 7 weeks (group I, n = 65) or the same Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose (6 mg/m2) daily CDDP (group II, n = 65). RESULTS: Hfx RT/chemotherapy offered significantly higher survival rates than Hfx RT alone (68% v 49% at 2 years and 46% v 25% at 5 years; P = .0075). It also offered higher progression-free survival (46% v 25% at 5 years; P = .0068), higher locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) (50% v 36% at 5 years; P = .041), and higher distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (86% v 57% at 5 years; P = .0013). However, there was no difference between the two treatment groups in the incidence of either acute or late high-grade RT-induced toxicity. Hematologic high-grade toxicity was more frequent in group II patients. CONCLUSION: As compared with Hfx RT alone, Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose daily CDDP offered a survival advantage, as well as improved LRPFS and DMFS.

scholarly journals Cisplatin, Cetuximab, and Radiation in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer: A Retrospective Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. CMO.S18682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prakash Peddi ◽  
Runhua Shi ◽  
Binu Nair ◽  
Fred Ampil ◽  
Glenn M. Mills ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Efficacy of cisplatin versus cetuximab with radiation in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) was evaluated. A total of 96 patients with newly diagnosed LAHNC treated at our institution between 2006 and 2011 with concurrent radiation and cisplatin (group A, n = 45), cetuximab (group B, n = 24), or started with cisplatin but switched to cetuximab because of toxicity (group C, n = 27) were reviewed. Chi-square test, analysis of variance, and log-rank test were used for analysis. The three groups had similar baseline characteristics, except for median age, T stage, albumin levels, hemoglobin levels, performance status, and comorbidities. A complete response (CR) was seen in 77%, 17%, and 67% of patients ( P < 0.001), respectively. There was no significant difference in median overall survival (OS) between groups A and C. The median OS for groups A and C was not reached (>65 months), even though it was significantly longer than median OS for group B (11.6 months; P ≤ 0.001). The 2-year OS in groups A and C is significantly higher than that in group B (70% for groups A and C, 22% for group B). There is no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between groups A and C. The median PFS for these groups was not reached (>62 months), and is significantly longer than that for group B (4.3 months; P ≤ 0.001). The 2-year PFS of group A (67%) and group C (76%) was significantly longer than that of group B (20%). Cisplatin with radiation appears to be more efficacious even in suboptimal dosing than cetuximab with radiation in LAHNC but the two groups were not well matched.

Cetuximab, paclitaxel, carboplatin and radiation for esophageal and gastric cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4029-4029 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Suntharalingam ◽  
T. Dipetrillo ◽  
P. Akerman ◽  
H. Wanebo ◽  
B. Daly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Squamous Cell Cancer ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Grade 3

4029 Background: Cetuximab is an IgG1, chimerized, monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the epidermal growth factor receptor. Cetuximab improves survival when combined with radiation for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the addition of cetuximab to concurrent chemoradiation for patients with esophageal and gastric cancer. Methods: Patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell cancer of the esophagus or stomach without distant organ metastases were eligible. Patients with locally advanced disease from mediastinal, celiac, portal and gastric lymphadenopathy were eligible. Surgical resection was not required. Clinical complete response was defined as no tumor on postreatment endoscopic biopsy. Patients received cetuximab, 400mg/m2 week #1 then 250 mg/m2/week for 5 weeks, paclitaxel, 50 mg/m2/week, and carboplatin, AUC =2 weekly for 6 weeks, with concurrent 50.4 Gy radiation. Results: Thirty-seven patients have been entered. The median age was 61 (range of 30–87). Thirty-four have esophageal cancer and 3 have gastric cancer. Of the patients with esophageal cancer, twenty-five have adenocarcinoma and nine have squamous cell cancer. Thus far, 30 patients have completed treatment and are evaluable for toxicity. There have been no grade 4 non-hematologic toxicities and 1 pt had grade 4 neutropenia (3%). Six patients (20%) had grade 3 esophagitis. Other grade 3 toxicities included dehydration (n=5), rash (n=9), and paclitaxel/cetuximab hypersensitivity reactions (n=2). Eighteen of 27 patients (67%) have had clinical complete response. Seven pts out of 16 (43%) who have gone to surgery have had a pathologic CR. Conclusions: Cetuximab can be safely administered with chemoradiation for patients with esophageal cancer. Consistent with the data in head and neck cancer, cetuximab increases cutaneous toxicity but does not increase mucositis/esophagitis when combined with chemoradiation. Further evaluation is ongoing. [Table: see text]

A phase II study examining the feasibility of long-term and low-dose oral capecitabine in newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after surgery, radiation, and/or chemotherapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6053-6053
Author(s):  
A. Sukari ◽  
H. Mulrenan ◽  
K. Almhanna ◽  
Z. Kafri ◽  
H. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Oral Capecitabine ◽  
One Year

6053 Background: In advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), the five-year survival rate is less than 40%. Although the efficacy and tolerability of continuous IV 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) therapy has been established in HNSCC, the feasibility and tolerability of long-term therapy of oral capecitabine has not been established in HNSCC. Our primary objective is to assess the feasibility of treating patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) with adjuvant Capecitabine after undergone definitive treatment. The secondary objectives are to estimate time to recurrence, local-regional control and survival rates along with incidence of second primary tumors. Methods: Eligible patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced HNSCC received capecitabine 1,000 mg orally once daily for one year, after undergone definitive treatment. Patients’ compliance with oral capecitabine as will as the side effects profile was evaluated on monthly basis over the first 12 months. Feasibility, survival, progression and progression free survival were measured over 36 months. Results: Thirty five patients were enrolled in the study. 17 patients had stage IV b, 7 had stage III, and 5 had unknown primary HNSCC. All but one took at least 60% of dispensed tablets. Twenty six patients completed at least 7 months of capecitabine. Sixteen patients completed at least 10 month of capecitabine. Two years overall survival rate was 97%. Three years progression free survival was 86%. Conclusions: Adjuvant capecitabine in locally advanced HNSCC is a feasible approach with minimum side effects. A favorable 3-year progression-free survival was found as compare to historical results. We recommend a randomized phase III trail to examine the effect of one year of adjuvant capecitabine versus placebo in locally advanced HNSCC after definitive treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document