Different prevalence of BRAF and NRAS somatic mutations in melanomas according to the patients’ origin.
e20013 Background: Genetic factors predisposing to melanoma at germline level have been demonstrated to be geographically heterogeneous. We here evaluated the spectrum of NRAS and BRAF mutations at somatic level, in a large subset of melanoma tissues from patients originating from different Italian geographical areas: Sardinia, whose population is genetically homogeneous, and Middle-South Italy, with a genetically heterogeneous population. Methods: Patients were enrolled consecutively between June 2008 and December 2012. Genomic DNA was isolated from tumor tissues [primary melanomas (N=439) and melanoma metastases (N=269)] or melanoma cell lines (N=32). Paired samples of primary melanomas (n=140) and synchronous or asynchronous metastases from the same patients (n=203) were included. The full coding sequences and splice junctions of NRAS (exons 2-3) and BRAF (exon 15) genes were screened for mutations through automated sequencing. Results: BRAF/NRAS mutations were identified in 63% of primary melanomas (48% BRAF; 15% NRAS), 67% melanoma metastases (51% BRAF; 16% NRAS), and 68% melanoma cell lines (56% BRAF; 12% NRAS). A non-significant increase in mutation frequency after progression from primary melanoma was observed. However, distribution of BRAF/NRAS mutations varied between in vivo tumors and melanoma cell lines, suggesting a preponderant role for BRAF activation in highly proliferating cultured melanoma cells. Among paired samples, consistency of BRAF/NRAS mutation patterns between metastatic and primary melanomas ranged from 71% (skin metastases) to about 90% (lymph node and visceral metastases). A significant inverse distribution of BRAF/NRAS mutation rates was observed in our series on the basis of the geographical origin of patients: for BRAF, 58% Sardinian vs. 42% non-Sardinian cases (p=0.045); for NRAS, 2% Sardinian vs. 21% non-Sardinian cases (p<0.001). Conclusions: Our findings provide additional insights into the spectrum and distribution of BRAF/NRAS mutations in melanoma; moreover, they support the hypothesis that differences in patients’ origins and related genetic backgrounds may contribute to even determine the incidence rate of somatic mutations in such cancer genes.