Peptide vaccines with low-dose dexamethasone versus dexamethasone alone for chemotherapy-naive castration resistant prostate cancer: A randomized phase II study.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Author(s):  
Hirotsugu Uemura ◽  
Takahiro Kimura ◽  
Takafumi Minami ◽  
Kazuhiro Yoshimura ◽  
Masahiro Nozawa ◽  
...  

3 Background: We previously developed MHC class I restricted peptide vaccines for prostate cancer and carried out a phase 1 trial for castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients to assess safety and immunological evaluation. In the present study, we conducted a randomized phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy of peptide vaccination therapy for chemotherapy-naive CRPC patients. Methods: Early-stage CRPC (PSA<10ng/ml) patients positive for HLA-A02 or A24 or A3 super family were randomized into two treatment groups; peptide vaccine with low dose (1mg/day) dexamethasone (Dx) versus low dose Dx alone. Patients were vaccinated subcutaneously with 3 mg of selected peptides (max. 4 kinds) 6 times at two weeks interval. Dx 1mg/day p.o. was started on the first day of peptide vaccination. Toxicity was assessed monthly, and immunological responses such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity and clinical responses were evaluated every 3 months. The primary endpoint of this study is progression-free survival including serum PSA. Secondary endpoints are overall survival and safety. Results: A total of 83 chemotherapy-naive CRPC patients were selected for this trial. Of these 10 patients were excluded due to HLA type mismatch and exclusion criteria. 73 patients were enrolled and randomized; 37 in the vaccine treatment group and 36 in the Dx group. One patient in the Dx group self-withdrew from the study immediate after the randomization. Median time to PSA failure in the vaccine group was significant longer than the Dx group; 602 days vs 210 days, p<0.001 (Table). Conclusions: These findings suggest that combination therapy of peptide vaccines and low dose dexamethasone may be a promising tool for chemotherapy-naive CRPC patients. Clinical trial information: UMIN000000959.[Table: see text]

Chemotherapy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriyoshi Miura ◽  
Nozomu Tanji ◽  
Yutaka Yanagihara ◽  
Terutaka Noda ◽  
Seiji Asai ◽  
...  

Aim: Docetaxel-based chemotherapy against castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) has recently been shown to be effective and tolerable. The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of low-dose docetaxel in combination with dexamethasone. Methods: Thirty-seven CRPC patients were administered a treatment regimen consisting of 50 mg/m2 docetaxel once every 3-4 weeks and 1 mg dexamethasone daily at our institution, between November 2004 and April 2014. Results: Twenty-four patients (65%) had a decrease in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >50%. The median overall survival (OS) and PSA progression-free survival were 26.2 and 10.0 months, respectively. Ten of 12 patients (83%) taking analgesic agents reduced their intake because of decreased pain levels. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia occurred in 2 patients (5%). Nonhematological toxicities were less frequent but sometimes severe. Treatment-related death occurred in 2 octogenarian patients, 1 due to gastric bleeding and the other due to infective endocarditis. Conclusion: Low-dose docetaxel in combination with dexamethasone is feasible in Japanese CRPC patients. Hematological toxicity is less than that seen with standard docetaxel therapy, but it is necessary to monitor patients for severe nonhematological toxicities, particularly very elderly patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5033-5033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masanori Noguchi ◽  
Kiyohide Fujimoto ◽  
Gaku Arai ◽  
Hiroji Uemura ◽  
Katsuyoshi Hashine ◽  
...  

5033 Background: To develop a new treatment modality, we conducted a phase III randomized trial of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) -A24 positive patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who failed docetaxel chemotherapy. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive PPV or placebo. Four of 12 warehouse peptides selected based on preexisting peptide-specific immunoglobulin G levels or the corresponding placebo were subcutaneously injected 6 doses weekly followed the maximum of 30 doses bi-weekly until disease progression. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and immune responses. Results: From August 2013 to April 2016, 310 patients were randomly assigned (207 to PPV and 103 to placebo), and 306 patients were analyzed by the full analysis set (204 to PPV and 102 to placebo). Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Estimated median OS was 16.1 months (95% CI, 13 to 18.2) with PPV and 16.9 months (95% CI, 13.1 to 20.4) with placebo (HR, 1.04; 95%CI, 0.79 to 1.37; P = 0.77). Median PFS was also not significantly different among them. Median Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in 41% in both groups. The analysis of treatment arm effects among various subgroups revealed a lower HR for OS in favor of the PPV arm in patients with a < 64% neutrophil proportion (HR, 0.55; 95%CI, 0.33 to 0.93), with a significant interaction test ( P = 0.003). Conclusions: PPV did not prolong either OS or PFS in HLA-A24 positive patients with CRPC progressing after docetaxel chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: 0000113088.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 183-183
Author(s):  
Yumiko Yokomizo ◽  
Narihiko Hayashi ◽  
Akitoshi Takizawa ◽  
Kazuki Kobayashi ◽  
Jun-ichi Ohta ◽  
...  

183 Background: It was reported that GnRH antagonist could extend progression free survival for prostate cancer patients significantly longer than GnRH agonist in a first line hormonal therapy. However, the usefulness of switching from GnRH agonist to GnRH antagonist as a second hormonal therapy remains obscure. We performed a multicentral prospective study to investigate whether the switching from GnRH agonist to GnRH antagonist (degalerix) for patients with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) as the 2nd line hormonal therapy was effective. Methods: 37 patients who were pathologically diagnosed as prostatic adenocarcinoma and developed CRPC after 1st line hormonal therapy with GnRH agonist plus anti-androgens were enrolled. After confirming anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome, they were treated with switching from GnRH agonists to degalerix. The primary endpoint was PSA response (PSA decline or up to 10% over baseline PSA). Secondary endpoints were the time to 25% PSA increase from the baseline (PSA response time), PSA progression free survival (PPFS), the time to treatment failure, cancer specific survival, radiographic PFS (rPFS), and safety. Results: Mean age was 76 years old, super high risk; 20 cases (54.1%), high risk; 11 cases (29.7%), intermediate risk; 5 cases (13.5%), low risk; one case (2.7%). PSA responder rate was 24.3% (9 cases). In responders, the median PSA response time was 5.75 months, the median PPFS was 1.77 months, and rPFS rate at 3 months was 96%. Regarding safety, only 2 cases (5.4%) showed G3 of AE. The PSA response had no relationship with the change of serum testosterone, LH nor FSH. Conclusions: The effectiveness of switching from GnRH agonist to GnRH antagonist showed to be limited. Although no predictive factor of the switching was recognized, some long-term responders were seen. We expect the possibility of switching to GnRH antagonist for patients in the early stage of CRPC, especially non-metastatic status. Clinical trial information: UNKNOWN.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document