scholarly journals Survival Among Patients With Pancreatic Cancer and Long-Standing or Recent-Onset Diabetes Mellitus

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Yuan ◽  
Douglas A. Rubinson ◽  
Zhi Rong Qian ◽  
Chen Wu ◽  
Peter Kraft ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Health Study ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Recent Onset ◽  
Onset Diabetes ◽  
Diabetes Status ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Long-standing diabetes is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer, and recent-onset diabetes in the several years before diagnosis is a consequence of subclinical pancreatic malignancy. However, the impact of diabetes on survival is largely unknown. Patients and Methods We analyzed survival by diabetes status among 1,006 patients diagnosed from 1986 to 2010 from two prospective cohort studies: the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS). We validated our results among 386 patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2013 from a clinic-based case series at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI). We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for death using Cox proportional hazards models, with adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking, diagnosis year, and cancer stage. Results In NHS and HPFS, HR for death was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.15 to 1.69) for patients with long-term diabetes (> 4 years) compared with those without diabetes (P < .001), with median survival times of 3 months for long-term diabetics and 5 months for nondiabetics. Adjustment for a propensity score to reduce confounding by comorbidities did not change the results. Among DFCI patient cases, HR for death was 1.53 (95% CI, 1.07 to 2.20) for those with long-term diabetes compared with those without diabetes (P = .02), with median survival times of 9 months for long-term diabetics and 13 months for nondiabetics. Compared with nondiabetics, survival times were shorter for long-term diabetics who used oral hypoglycemics or insulin. We observed no statistically significant association of recent-onset diabetes (< 4 years) with survival. Conclusion Long-standing diabetes was associated with statistically significantly decreased survival among patients with pancreatic cancer enrolled onto three longitudinal studies.

Effect of Cytokine Therapy on Survival for Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1928-1935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Motzer ◽  
Madhu Mazumdar ◽  
Jennifer Bacik ◽  
Paul Russo ◽  
William J. Berg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Interferon Alfa ◽  
Cytokine Therapy ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Long Term Survivors

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between treatment with cytokine therapy and survival, investigate the effect of nephrectomy on survival, and identify long-term survivors among a cohort of 670 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 670 patients with advanced RCC treated on 24 clinical trials of systemic chemotherapy or cytokine therapy were the subjects of this retrospective analysis. Treatment was categorized as cytokine (containing interferon alfa and/or interleukin-2) in 396 patients (59%) and as chemotherapy (cytotoxic or hormonal therapy) in 274 (41%). Among the 670 patients, those with survival times of greater than 5 years were identified as long-term survivors. RESULTS: Patients treated with cytokine therapy had a longer survival time than did those treated with chemotherapy, regardless of the year of treatment or risk category based on pretreatment features. The median survival times for favorable-, intermediate-, and poor-risk patients were 27, 12, and 6 months for those treated with cytokines and 15, 7, and 3 months for those treated with chemotherapy, respectively. The magnitude of difference in median survival was greater in the favorable- and intermediate-risk groups. The median survival time was less than 6 months in the poor-risk group for both treatment programs. Median survival time was 14 months among patients with prior nephrectomy plus time from diagnosis to treatment greater than 1 year versus 8 months among those with time from diagnosis to treatment less than 1 year, regardless of pretreatment nephrectomy status. Thirty patients (4.5%) among the 670 patients were identified as long-term survivors; 12 were free of disease after nephrectomy and treatment with interferon alfa, interleukin-2, or surgical resection of metastasis. CONCLUSION: The low proportion of patients with advanced RCC who achieve long-term survival emphasizes the need for clinical investigation to identify more effective therapy.

scholarly journals How to evaluate the effect of seven years of the Norwegian School Fruit Scheme (2007–2014) on fruit, vegetable and snack consumption and weight status: A natural experiment

2019 ◽  
pp. 140349481987592
Author(s):  
Ingrid Marie Hovdenak ◽  
Tonje Holte Stea ◽  
Per Magnus ◽  
Steinar Krokstad ◽  
Oddrun Samdal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Schools ◽  
Weight Status ◽  
Natural Experiment ◽  
Dietary Habits ◽  
Child Growth ◽  
Health Study ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Norwegian School ◽  
The Impact

Aim: From August 2007 to June 2014, the Norwegian School Fruit Scheme (NSFS) legally established that all pupils in junior high and combined schools (275,000 pupils every year), but not those in primary schools (343,000 pupils every year), were entitled to a free piece of fruit or vegetable every school day. The NSFS is a natural experiment, unique in terms of scope and lengthiness. Such governmental efforts to improve the diet of the public are rarely evaluated. Thus, an evaluation of the comprehensive, well-designed NSFS is warranted. The aim was to describe how the NSFS can be evaluated using existing data sets. Methods: Four data sets have been identified for the evaluation of the NSFS: (a) the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, (b) the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study, (c) the Norwegian Child Growth Study/Growth in Teenagers and (d) Health Behaviour in School Aged Children. These comprehensive studies have collected cross-sectional or longitudinal data providing information about children’s dietary consumption and/or weight status, which can be utilised in the evaluation of the NSFS. Both short- and long-term effects of the NSFS related to dietary habits and weight status and the potential effect of moderators such as socio-economic status, sex, ethnicity and the age of children and adolescents can be studied. Conclusions: Worldwide, there is a lack of well-designed, long-term studies evaluating the impact of governmental efforts to improve public diet. The present study describes how the NSFS can be evaluated using data from four large data sets on eating habits and weight status.

Long-term outocomes of preoperative chemoradiation therapy with gemcitabine and accelerated hyperfractionated radiation for respectable pancreatic cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14004-14004
Author(s):  
S. Nakamori ◽  
S. Nakahira ◽  
A. Miyamoto ◽  
S. Marubashi ◽  
H. Nagano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Preoperative Chemoradiation ◽  
Chemoradiation Therapy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy

14004 Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) is recognized as an effective chemotherapeutic agent for non-curative pancreatic cancer and has an activity for radiosensitizer. Although preoperative chemoradiation therapy (preCRT) with GEM is one of the promising adjuvant therapies for potentially curative pancreatic cancer, the clinical significance of the treatment remains to obscure. Methods: Potentially resectable pancreatic cancer patients were recruited in this study from September 2001 through August 2004. Patients were randomly divided into preCRT group and a control group. Patients in preCRT group received GEM (400 mg/m2 or 800 mg/m2 on day 1 and 7) and concomitant accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation (1.5 Gy ×2/day, 5 days/weeks, total dose 30Gy or 36 Gy). After 3–4 weeks’ rest of the preCRT, patients were re-evaluated for resectability. Patients who underwent R0 resection did not received any postoperative adjuvant treatment until recurrence. Results: There were 23 patients in preCRT group and were 19 patients in control group. After re-evaluation, 4 patients (17%) were considered as unresectable due to the progressed disease. 19 patients (83%) in preCRT group and 19 patients (100%) in control group underwent laparotomy. Sixteen patients (70%) in preCRT group and 17 patients (89%) in control group underwent R0 resection. Median survival times were 17.6 months in preCRT group and 16.7 months in control group, respectively (p=0.65). Among patients underwent R0 resection, one and three-years survival rate were 81.2% and 27.1% in preCRT group, while these were 70.6% and 15.4% in the control group (p=0.26). Local recurrence was observed in 4 (25%) of 16 patients who underwent R0 resection in preCRT group and in 7 (41%) of 17 patients who underwent R0 resection in control group, while recurrence at distant organs (liver, lung, peritoneum, bone) were observed in 8 patients (50%) of preCRT group and 8 patients (47%) in control group. Conclusions: Although the preoperative chemoradiation therapy with GEM and accelerated hyperfractionated radiation for potentially curative pancreatic cancer is likely to be promising against local recurrence after R0 resection, survival benefit of the therapy was unsatisfactory. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

An assessment of the impact of geographic variation on resection rates and survival for early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15052-e15052
Author(s):  
Bradley D. McDowell ◽  
Brian J. Smith ◽  
Anna M Button ◽  
James R. Howe ◽  
Elizabeth A. Chrischilles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Selection Factors ◽  
The Impact

e15052 Background: Pancreatic resection is the only known curative option for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Resection has been previously reported to be underutilized in patients with early stage disease. To develop a better understanding of this issue and control for treatment selection factors, we examined the relationship between geographic area resection rates and survival in patients with stage I/II pancreatic cancer. Methods: We queried Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data for patients with stage I/II cancer of the pancreatic head diagnosed from 2004-2009. We excluded patients with less than 3mo survival. Resection rates were calculated within Health Service Areas (HSAs) across all 18 SEER regions. Resection rate was defined as the number of patients who had an operation divided by the total number diagnosed with early stage pancreatic cancer. Multivariate Cox regression was used to estimate the overall survival effect of HSA rates while controlling for age, gender, marital status, poverty level, education, and AJCC stage. Results: 8,323 patients with stage I (n=1,454) and stage II (n=6,869) disease were analyzed. Pancreatectomy was performed in 476 patients (32.7%) with stage I disease and 3,846 (56.0%) with stage II disease. HSA resection rates were arranged into five groups (quintiles) which ranged from 42.7 to 65.7% (Table). Across the quintiles, median overall survival increased from 11 to 14 months, suggesting a positive association with resection rate. Multivariate analysis revealed that for every 10.00% increase in resection rate, the risk of overall death decreased by 5.26% (p<0.001). Conclusions: Patients with early stage pancreatic cancer who live in areas with higher resection rates have longer average survival times. Because geography should not influence treatment response, we conclude that efforts to raise resection rates should increase survival times in patients for whom there is uncertainty about the risk/benefits of resection. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Measuring Bias in Uncontrolled Brain Tumor Trials – to Randomize or Not to Randomize?

1997 ◽  
Vol 24 (04) ◽  
pp. 307-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
William D. Irish ◽  
David R. Macdonald ◽  
J. Gregory Cairncross
Keyword(s):  
Malignant Glioma ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Selection Bias ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Patient Selection ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Entire Group ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT:Purpose:To help investigators decide if new therapies for glioma warrant definitive evaluation in randomized studies we have been developing a method for assessing the degree to which patient selection may have enhanced the results of uncontrolled treatment trials. In this study, we analyzed the impact of case selection on the survival of patients with malignant glioma receiving adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery, a promising therapy reserved for those with small tumors and good performance status.Methods:Following published eligibility criteria we simulated the patient selection process for stereotactic radiosurgery given as a boost at the conclusion of conventional radiotherapy. Eligible patients were culled from a pre-existing clinical/imaging database of 101 consecutive conventionally-treated patients with biopsy-proven malignant glioma and known survival times. Median durations of survival and 2- and 3-year survival rates were determined for those judged eligible or ineligible for stereotactic radiosurgery.Results:Twenty-seven percent of patients were deemed eligible for stereotactic radiosurgery, eligible patients had more favorable prognostic factors and significantly longer median survival than ineligible patients (23.4 vs. 8.6 months; 2-year rate, 48% vs. 15%; 3-year rate, 30% vs. 7%); eligible patients also had a longer median survival than the entire group of unselected patients (23.4 vs. 11.4 months). Radiosurgery-eligible, conventionally-treated patients with glioblastoma multiforme and a group of radiosurgery-treated patients at a special referral center had similar median survival times (16.4 vs. 19.7 months).Conclusion:We provide additional evidence for selection bias in uncontrolled trials of stereotactic radiosurgery and by simulating the selection process accurately have detected a larger bias effect than noted previously. Judging from experience with interstitial radiation and intraarterial chemotherapy where substantial selection bias also occurred and randomized controlled trials proved disappointing, we conclude that a phase III study of stereotactic radiosurgery for malignant glioma is unlikely to yield a positive result and may not be necessary.

Survival impact of neoadjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 367-367
Author(s):  
Katelin Anne Mirkin ◽  
Christopher S Hollenbeak ◽  
Joyce Wong
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Median Income ◽  
Stage Disease ◽  
Surgery First ◽  
The Impact

367 Background: Pancreatic cancer carries a dismal prognosis, with surgical resection and adjuvant therapy offering the only hope for long-term survival. In recent years, neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has been employed to optimize outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of NAT on survival in patients with resected stage I-III pancreatic cancer. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base (2003-2011) was analyzed for patients with clinical stage I-III resected carcinoma of the pancreas who underwent NAT or surgery first +/- adjuvant therapy. Univariate statistics were used to compare characteristics between groups. Analysis of variance and Kaplan Meier analyses were used to compare median survival for each clinical stage of disease. Multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: 16,122 patients who underwent NAT and 16,869 patients who underwent surgery-first were included. Patients who underwent NAT tended to be younger, covered by private insurance, have a higher median income, greater comorbidities, higher clinical stage disease, and undergo a whipple. Additionally, NAT patients had a greater number of positive regional lymph nodes (9 vs. 6, respectively), although a similar number of nodes retrieved, and higher pathological stage disease. In patients with clinical stage I disease, adjuvant therapy was associated with improved median survival than NAT and surgery-alone (24.8, 18.5, 17.9 months, p < 0.0001, respectively). However, in stage II, adjuvant and NAT offered similar median survival, which was improved over surgery-alone (20.5, 20.1, and 12.4 months, p < 0.0001, respectively). In stage III, NAT had improved median survival than the other groups (19.6, 14.2, 8.6 months, p < 0.0001, respectively). In the multivariate survival analysis, patients who received NAT had a 22% lower hazard of mortality up to 5 years as compared to adjuvant therapy (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy in advanced stage pancreatic cancer confers a survival benefit and may allow more patients to undergo surgery; NAT appears to offer similar survival as adjuvant therapy in early stage pancreatic cancer.

Perioperative and long-term impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using full-dose gemcitabine and concurrent radiation for resectable pancreatic cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 367-367
Author(s):  
Minako Nagai ◽  
Takahiro Akahori ◽  
Satoshi Nishiwada ◽  
Kenji Nakagawa ◽  
Kota Nakamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Full Dose ◽  
Venous Involvement ◽  
The Impact

367 Background: Although much attention has been paid to neoadjuvat treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC), its efficacy remains to be established. In this study, we have retrospectively evaluated the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) on perioperative and long-term clinical outcome in PC. Methods: One hundred sixty patients who preoperatively received full-dose gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) with concurrent radiation of 54 Gy between 2006 and 2016 were analyzed. One hundred thirty patients who underwent upfront surgery were served as control. Results: Among the 160 patients treated with NACRT, 153 patients (96%) completed the protocol treatment. The reasons of failure to complete NACRT were drug-induced pneumonia, acute mucosal injury, severe cholangitis and poor performance status (PS). Furthermore 21 (13%) couldn’t undergo pancreatic resection after NACRT because of distant metastasis in 9 patients, tumor progression in 7 and poor PS in 5. The rate of pancreatic fistula was lower and hospital stay was shorter in the NACRT group compared to the control group (P = 0.033, P = 0.002). Furthermore, the rate of lymph node metastasis, R0 resection and pathological stage were favorable in the NACRT group (P < 0.0001, P = 0.006, P < 0.0001). The completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy was also higher in the NACRT group (P = 0.015). Importantly, patients treated with NACRT had a better prognosis than those without (median survival time: 60.2 vs. 28.5M, P = 0.008). In addition, according to tumor resectability status, patients were classified as R (resectable), BR-P (borderline resectable with venous involvement) and BR-A (borderline resectable with arterial involvement) groups. As a result, patients treated with NACRT had a better prognosis than those without in the R and BR-P groups (58.6 vs. 34.2M, P = 0.013, 62.4 vs. 18.8M, P = 0.015), while NACRT had no significant impact on prognosis in the BR-A group. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy may have a variety of favorable impact in pancreatic cancer treatment. Furthermore, NACRT may improve the prognosis especially in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with venous involvement.

scholarly journals The impact of bilateral endoscopic inferior turbinoplasty with or without adenoidectomy on the quality of life of children: a retrospective case series study

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mourad ◽  
Hussein Jaffal ◽  
Ismaeel El-Hakim ◽  
Hamdy El-Hakim
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Retrospective Case Series ◽  
Case Series Study ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Series Study

Abstract Background Inferior turbinoplasty (IT) and adenoidectomy (Ad) are frequently resorted to in children with chronic rhinitis (CR) refractory to medical therapy. The aim of this study is to document the long-term improvement in quality of life (QOL) in children with CR following endoscopic IT with or without Ad. Methods A retrospective case series study was conducted. We searched a prospectively kept surgical database for children ≤18 years old who had CR who underwent endoscopic IT with or without Ad between 2009 and 2016 at a tertiary care children’s center. Patients with sinonasal pathologies other than CR, had craniofacial syndromes or dysmorphism and had other sinonasal procedures or trauma were excluded. Collected data included demographics, secondary diagnoses, duration of follow-up, and complications of procedures. The Glasgow Children’s Benefit Inventory (GCBI) was administered by phone to assess QOL improvement. Results One hundred sixty-five eligible subjects were identified. Eighty-nine subjects met the inclusion criteria. Data was collected for the 60 subjects that were reached. Forty-two patients had IT only while 18 had IT and Ad. The mean age was 10.7 ± 2.7 years, with 31 males and 29 females. The median duration of follow-up (25th, 75th percentile) was 38.1 months (24.6, 55.8). The median GCBI score (25th, 75th percentile) was 22.9 (6.3, 39.6) revealing an overall positive benefit in all domains. There was only one complication. Conclusions This study validates prior findings regarding improvement of QOL and safety of IT with or without Ad for children with CR and indicates it is maintained in the long term.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document