scholarly journals Phase I Imaging and Pharmacodynamic Trial of CS-1008 in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (24) ◽  
pp. 2609-2616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marika Ciprotti ◽  
Niall C. Tebbutt ◽  
Fook-Thean Lee ◽  
Sze-Ting Lee ◽  
Hui K. Gan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Death Receptor ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Death Receptor 5 ◽  
Antibody Uptake

Purpose CS-1008 (tigatuzumab) is a humanized, monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) agonistic antibody to human death receptor 5. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of CS-1008 dose on the biodistribution, quantitative tumor uptake, and antitumor response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and Methods Patients with mCRC who had received at least one course of chemotherapy were assigned to one of five dosage cohorts and infused with a weekly dose of CS-1008. Day 1 and day 36 doses were trace-labeled with indium-111 (111In), followed by whole-body planar and regional single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging at several time points over the course of 10 days. Results Nineteen patients were enrolled. 111In-CS-1008 uptake in tumor was observed in only 12 patients (63%). 111In-CS-1008 uptake and pharmacokinetics were not affected by dose or repeated drug administration. 111In-CS-1008 biodistribution showed gradual blood-pool clearance and no abnormal uptake in normal tissue. No anti–CS-1008 antibody development was detected. One patient achieved partial response (3.7 months duration), eight patients had stable disease, and 10 patients had progressive disease. Clinical benefit rate (stable disease + partial response) in patients with 111In-CS-1008 uptake in tumor was 58% versus 28% in patients with no uptake. An analysis of individual lesions showed that lesions with antibody uptake were one third as likely to progress as those without antibody uptake (P = .07). Death-receptor–5 expression in archived tumor samples did not correlate with 111In-CS-1008 uptake (P = .5) or tumor response (P = .6). Conclusion Death-receptor–5 imaging with 111In-CS-1008 reveals interpatient and intrapatient heterogeneity of uptake in tumor, is not dose dependent, and is predictive of clinical benefit in the treatment of patients who have mCRC.

A phase I imaging and pharmacodynamic trial of CS-1008 in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2583-2583
Author(s):  
Marika Ciprotti ◽  
Niall C. Tebbutt ◽  
Fook Thean Lee ◽  
Sze Ting Lee ◽  
Dave C. McKee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Response ◽  
Death Receptor ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Imaging Biomarker ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Death Receptor 5 ◽  
Tumor Uptake ◽  
Apoptotic Pathway ◽  
Liver Uptake ◽  
The Impact

2583 Background: Death receptor 5 (DR5) is a member of the TNFR superfamily that initiates the extrinsic apoptotic pathway. CS-1008 is a humanised, monoclonal IgG1 agonistic antibody (Ab) to human DR5 created by CDR grafting of the murine Ab TRA-8. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of CS-1008 dose on biodistribution, quantitative tumor uptake and anti-tumor response in pts with mCRC. Methods: Pts with mCRC were treated with weekly IV CS-1008 in 5 non-sequential cohorts (Co). Different loading doses were used on days 1 and 8 (0.2 to 6 mg/kg), followed by a weekly dose of 2 mg/kg. D1 and D36 doses were trace-labeled with 111In, followed by whole-body planar and regional SPECT imaging over 10 days. Primary endpoints: initial biodistribution, pharmacokinetic (PK) and tumor uptake following single infusion; changes in biodistribution, PK and tumor uptake following sequential doses. Secondary endpoints: tumor response; changes in tumor metabolism by FDG-PET; serum apoptosis biomarkers and tumor response markers. Results: 19 pts (median age 64 yrs; M:F 11:8; 2-6 prior chemotherapy regimens) were enrolled as follows: Co 1, n=2; Co 2, n=4; Co 3, n=5; Co 4, n=3; and Co 5, n=5. Tumor uptake was variable: 7 pts had no uptake, 11 pts had uptake in all sites of disease but liver, 1 pt showed liver uptake. Tumor uptake and PK were not affected by dose or repeated drug administration. No anti-CS-1008 Ab responses were detected. DR5 expression in archived samples did not correlate with uptake or response. 111In‐CS‐1008 biodistribution showed gradual blood pool clearance and no abnormal uptake in normal tissue. Mean % change in SUVmax from baseline in lesions with uptake was higher than in those with no uptake. There were 8 SD, 1 PR and 10 PD. Duration of PR was 3.7 months (mo). Mean duration of SD was 4 mo. Disease control rate (SD + PR) in pts with uptake was 58% vs 28% of pts with no uptake. Lesions with no uptake were more likely to progress, with a PD risk of 3.4 times higher than those lesions with uptake. Conclusions: Tumor DR5 expression, assessed by 111In-CS-1008 imaging, revealed real-time heterogeneous DR5 expression and appeared to be a promising predictive imaging biomarker of clinical benefit in pts with mCRC receiving CS-1008. Clinical trial information: NCT01220999.

scholarly journals Atypical, Non-V600 BRAF Mutations as a Potential Mechanism of Resistance to EGFR Inhibition in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benny Johnson ◽  
Jonathan M. Loree ◽  
Alexandre A. Jacome ◽  
Shehara Mendis ◽  
Muddassir Syed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Egfr Inhibition ◽  
Mechanism Of Resistance

PURPOSE Atypical, non-V600 BRAF ( aBRAF) mutations represent a rare molecular subtype of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Preclinical data are used to categorize aBRAF mutations into class II (intermediate to high levels of kinase activity, RAS independent) and III (low kinase activity level, RAS dependent). The clinical impact of these mutations on anti-EGFR treatment efficacy is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from 2,084 patients with mCRC at a single institution and from an external cohort of 5,257 circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) samples were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS BRAF mutations were harbored by 257 patients, including 36 with aBRAF mutations: 22 class III, 10 class II, four unclassified. For patients with aBRAF mCRC, median OS was 36.1 months, without a difference between classes, and median OS was 21.0 months for patients with BRAFV600E mCRC. In contrast to right-sided predominance of tumors with BRAFV600E mutation, 53% of patients with aBRAF mCRC had left-sided primary tumors. Concurrent RAS mutations were noted in 33% of patients with aBRAF mCRC, and 67% of patients had microsatellite stable disease. Among patients with aBRAF RAS wild-type mCRC who received anti-EGFR antibodies (monotherapy, n = 1; combination therapy, n = 10), no responses to anti-EGFR therapy were reported, and six patients (four with class III aBRAF mutations, one with class II, and one unclassified) achieved stable disease as best response. Median time receiving therapy was 4 months (range, 1 to 16). In the ctDNA cohort, there was an increased prevalence of aBRAF mutations and subclonal aBRAF mutations ( P < .001 for both) among predicted anti-EGFR exposed compared with nonexposed patients. CONCLUSION Efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy is limited in class II and III aBRAF mCRC. Detection of aBRAF mutations in ctDNA after EGFR inhibition may represent a novel mechanism of resistance.

scholarly journals Parthenolide enhances sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to TRAIL by inducing death receptor 5 and promotes TRAIL-induced apoptosis

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 1121-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
SE-LIM KIM ◽  
YU-CHUAN LIU ◽  
YOUNG RAN PARK ◽  
SEUNG YOUNG SEO ◽  
SEONG HUN KIM ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Death Receptor ◽  
Death Receptor 5 ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Cells ◽  
Induced Apoptosis

Folfox 2 Regimen in Heavily Pretreated Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 270-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Luppi ◽  
Francesca Zanelli ◽  
Antonio Di Stasi ◽  
Federica Bertolini ◽  
Micol Pifferi
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Aims and Background To determine the efficacy and safety of the FOLFOX 2 regimen in patients with pretreated advanced colorectal cancer. Methods In this single-arm phase II study, 28 patients with heavily pretreated advanced colorectal cancer received the following drug combination: oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2 for 2 hrs on day 1), folinic acid (250 mg/m2 for 2 hrs on day 1) and 5-filuorouracil (1500 mg/m2 for 22 hrs continuous infusion on days 1 and 2) every 2 weeks (one cycle). The treatment was continued until unacceptable toxicity occurred or at most for 10 cycles. Results Nine patients (32%) had a partial response and 5 (18%) stable disease, with a median duration of tumor control of 24 weeks (range, 8-44). The median survival of patients with a partial response or stable disease was 32 weeks (range, 12-52), whereas the median overall survival was 32 weeks (range, 8-72). A clinical benefit was achieved in 32% (9/21) of the patients. Severe (grade 3-4) non-hematological toxicity included diarrhea (1 patient), nausea/vomiting (7%) and peripheral neuropathy (1 patient). Severe hematological toxicities were rare (4%). Conclusions Our phase II study confirmed the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of the FOLFOX 2 regimen in pretreated advanced colorectal cancer patients.

Randomized phase II trial of capecitabine versus capecitabine, low molecular weight heparin, and prednisone in refractory colorectal carcinoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15126-e15126 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Mak ◽  
C. Townsley ◽  
R. Buckman ◽  
E. Chen ◽  
L. Lopez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Grade 3

e15126 Background: Capecitabine is widely used in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Continuous low dose chemotherapy has been postulated to have anti-angiogenic effects discrete from its anti-proliferative effects on tumors (metronomic therapy). Dalteparin and prednisone have also been implicated in inhibiting tumour angiogenesis and hypothesized to have additive benefit to chemotherapy. This randomized phase II study examined the additive effect of dalteparin and prednisone with capecitabine in metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were randomized to either capecitabine (C) 2,500 mg/m2 in divided doses from days 1–14 in a 3-week cycle or capecitabine with dalteparin and prednisone (CDP). There was no restriction on previous treatment, other than no prior capecitabine. Dalteparin was given at 5,000 units once daily subcutaneously, and prednisone orally 10 mg daily, both on a continuous basis. Thirty patients were planned for accrual in each arm with interim analysis when accrual reached fifteen in each arm. The primary end-point was disease control defined as treatment response or stable disease >4 months. Radiological evaluation was performed every 6 weeks. Treatment was discontinued if patients had progressive disease or intolerable toxicity. Results: Thirty patients were recruited. Fourteen patients had received ≥3 previous regimens (median 3 (C), 2 (CDP)). Median performance statuses were ECOG 1 (C) and 0 (CDP). Nine patients achieved stable disease greater than 6 months (5 (C)/4 (CDP)). There was no statistical difference in the median survival time and time-to- progression for the two groups (11.1 mth (C)/15.8 mth (CDP); 3.2 mth (C)/2.8 mth (CDP)). The commonest toxicities overall were myelosuppression and hand-foot syndrome (HFS). The most common Grade 3+ adverse events were HFS (6 patients) and diarrhea (4 patients). Conclusions: The combination of dalteparin, prednisone and capecitabine did not improve disease control over that seen with capecitabine in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Clinical benefit rate (CBR) of panitumumab monotherapy among patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14176-e14176
Author(s):  
Hagen F. Kennecke ◽  
Howard John Lim ◽  
Balvindar Singh Johal ◽  
Muhammad Zulfiqar ◽  
Caroline Speers
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Clinical Benefit Rate ◽  
Previous Therapy ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Third Line

e14176 Background: Panitumumab (Pmab) improves progression free survival as first-, second- and third-line therapy for KRAS wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Only in the third-line setting is there evidence of benefit of Pmab monotherapy. In this analysis of an exploratory biomarker study of Pmab monotherapy, the clinical benefit rate of Pmab according to previous lines of therapy is described. Methods: Patients (pts) with KRAS non-mutated, measurable MCRC previously treated with or ineligible for oxaliplatin/5-FU and irinotecan were treated with Pmab 6mg/kg IV q2w until progression or toxicity. The primary endpoint is clinical benefit rate (complete (CR) or partial response (PR) + prolonged stable disease (PSD) > = 24 weeks) by RECIST criteria. Results: The study completed accrual and (40) evaluable patients were treated between September 2009 and December 2011 of which 32 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Median follow-up was 8.8 months, median age was 64.5 years and 90% were ECOG 0/1. Previous therapy was: 5-FU/Capecitabine(C) only in 12 pts, Irinotecan/5-FU/C only in 2 patients, Oxaliplatin/5-FU/C only in 3 pts, Oxaliplatin/Irinotecan/5-FU/C in 23 pts. 22 patients received prior Bevacizumab. Median number of cycles was 8 and 6 pts required a dose modification. There were 7 (22%) PRs and 7 (22%) pts experienced PSD >=24 weeks. Clinical benefit rate (PR+PSD) according to previous therapy was 33% (3/9) for 5FU/C only, 100% (2/2) Oxaliplatin/FU/C only, 0% (0/2) Irinotecan/FU/C only, and 47% (9/19) for Oxaliplatin/Irinotecan/5FU/C. Conclusions: Pmab monotherapy is well tolerated and response rates vary according to previous lines of therapy. Patients ineligible for irinotecan and/or oxaliplatin experience a high clinical benefit rate with single agent Panitumumab and should be considered for such therapy. Updated study results will be presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document