Propensity score analysis: Frontline therapy with high-dose (HD) imatinib vs. 2nd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7022-7022
Author(s):  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Koichi Takahashi ◽  
...  
Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3336-3343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Takahashi ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Yulong Yang ◽  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
Preetesh Jain ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3228-3228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Batty ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Variant Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) translocations frequently involving 1-2 additional chromosomes besides 9 and 22 and represent 5–10% of patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The European LeukemiaNet recommendations provide a warning for patients with variant translocations, although there is limited information about their outcome after therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Our prior analysis mostly among pts who had failed prior interferon suggested that these pts had similar outcome to those with classic Ph translocations when treated with imatinib (El-Zimaity et al; Br. J Haematol 2004). Aims: To explore the characteristics and outcome of patients with variant translocations treated with frontline imatinib or 2nd generation TKI (dasatinib or nilotinib) after imatinib failure. Methods: We reviewed the outcome of all pts with CML treated at our institution in 3 groups: early chronic phase (CP) receiving imatinib as initial therapy, and CP treated with 2nd generation TKI after Imatinib failure, accelerated phase (AP) treated with 2nd TKI after imatinib failure. Results of pts with variant Ph were compared to those with classic Ph. Results: Among 554 pts (278 CP frontline imatinib, 190 CP post imatinib failure, 86 AP post Imatinib failure) 33 (6%) had variant Ph (21[8%], 6[3%], 6[7%], in each of the 3 groups, respectively). Median follow up is 55 months (mo) (2 – 90), 24 (1 – 53) mo and 29 (5 – 46) mo, respectively, for the 3 groups. Results are summarized in the following tables: Frontline Imatinib Therapy Percentage Variant Ph Classic Ph P value N=21 N=255 MCyR 95 95 1 CCyR 86 89 0.49 2-yr EFS 83 93 0.93 2-yr TFS 94 96 0.7 2-yr OS 100 99 0.48 Second generation TKI Variant Ph Chromosome Variant Ph Classic Ph P value Chronic Phase N = 6 N = 78 MCyR 100 75 0.34 CCyR 100 72 0.34 2-yr EFS 100 80 0.27 2-yr OS 100 98 0.71 Accelerated Phase N=6 N=80 MCyR 33 38 1 CCyR 33 32 1 2-yr EFS 25 41 0.41 2-yr OS 100 89 0.44 Conclusion: Pts with variant Ph have a similar prognosis to those with classic Ph translocations when treated with imatinib as initial therapy or with 2nd generation TKI after imatinib failure. The warning category for these patients may no longer be needed in the era of TKI.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2125-2125
Author(s):  
Dushyant Verma ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Mary Beth Rios ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
Pat Ault ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Success of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has given patients (pts) hope for a long disease free survival, and with increased survival, may be some late effects of TKI treatment in the form of development of another malignancy. One prior report suggested an unexpected increased incidence of cancers among pts treated with imatinib after failure to interferon (Roy et al, Leukemia 2005). Aims: To investigate the frequency and characteristics of 2nd malignancies (other than AML, ALL or MDS) among pts with CML or other hematologic malignancies treated with TKI. Methods: We analyzed the records of 1647 pts treated with TKIs at our institution: 384 in chronic phase treated with imatinib after interferon failure, 338 treated with imatinib in advanced phases, 312 treated with imatinib as initial therapy, 422 treated with 2nd generation TKI after imatinib failure, and 109 treated with 2nd generation TKI as frontline therapy. Results: A total of 67 (4.07%) pts (47 male, 20 female) developed a 2nd cancer. Their median age was 67 (range 31–85) years; the median follow-up after CML diagnosis was 94 (range 13–480) months (mo), and median time from start of TKI to development of another cancer was 38 (range 2–95) mo. These included 31/67(46%) pts who received imatinib as 1st line therapy for median 39.5 (range 16–88) mo, 5 pts who received 2nd generation TKI after imatinib failure (4 dasatinib, 1 bosutinib) for a median 10 (range 3–22) mo, and 1 pt received nilotinib as frontline therapy for 3 mo before diagnosis of 2nd cancer. The accompanying table summarizes the findings. The most common cancer was non-melanoma skin cancer representing 31% of all cancers. Excluding these, the 2nd cancers were seen in 2.8% of all pts treated. The skin cancers and melanomas were scattered and not localized to any particular anatomical site. Prostate cancer patients had median age 69 (range 43–83) years and imatinib treatment of median 38 (range 18–74) mo, for a cumulative incidence of 1.18% among male pts. Two patients with CLL were diagnosed on flow cytometry after loosing their hematologic response while still maintaining complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) on imatinib. After median follow up of 22 (range 1–95) mo from diagnosis of 2nd cancer, 12 (18%) pts have died (none from 2nd cancer). 49 pts continue on therapy with TKI after the diagnosis of 2nd cancer with 15 in complete molecular response (CMR), 25 with complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), 4 with partial cytogenetic response (PCyR), 5 having only complete hematologic response (CHR). All the frontline imatinib patients who are alive with a second cancer are in CCyR except one who is having CHR only Type of second cancer No. of patients (n=67) Skin Cancer (BCC+SCC) 21 (11+10) Melanoma 7 Prostate cancer 11 GU cancer (Ovarian+Uterine) 2 (1+1) GU cancer (Urinary bladder+Kidney) 4 (1+3) GI cancer (Colon+Gastric+Esophageal) 6 (3+2+1) GI cancer (Hepatobiliary) 1 Lung cancer 1 Thyroid cancer (Papillary+Follicular) 2 (1+1) Thymoma 1 Lymphoma (large B-cell) 1 CLL 2 MPD 1 Breast cancer (relapse+new) 4 (2+2) Head & neck cancer 2 Cancer of Unknown Primary 1 BCC: basal cell carcinoma, SCC: squamous cell carcinoma, GU: genito-urinary, GI: gastro-intestinal, CLL: chronic lymphocytic leukemia, MPD: myeloproliferative disorder Conclusion: Second cancers occur in a small percentage of pts receiving therapy with TKI for hematologic malignancies, mostly CML. These results need to be analyzed in the context of the underlying lifetime risk of developing cancer in the general population and in cancer survivors. There is no evidence at the moment to suggest that exposure to TKI is carcinogenic.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1643
Author(s):  
Prahathishree Mohanavelu ◽  
Mira Mutnick ◽  
Nidhi Mehra ◽  
Brandon White ◽  
Sparsh Kudrimoti ◽  
...  

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the frontline therapy for BCR-ABL (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). A systematic meta-analysis of 43 peer-reviewed studies with 10,769 CML patients compared the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events (GI AEs) in a large heterogeneous CML population as a function of TKI type. Incidence and severity of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were assessed for imatinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, and nilotinib. Examination of combined TKI average GI AE incidence found diarrhea most prevalent (22.5%), followed by nausea (20.6%), and vomiting (12.9%). Other TKI GI AEs included constipation (9.2%), abdominal pain (7.6%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (3.5%), and pancreatitis (2.2%). Mean GI AE incidence was significantly different between TKIs (p < 0.001): bosutinib (52.9%), imatinib (24.2%), dasatinib (20.4%), and nilotinib (9.1%). Diarrhea was the most prevalent GI AE with bosutinib (79.2%) and dasatinib (28.1%), whereas nausea was most prevalent with imatinib (33.0%) and nilotinib (13.2%). Incidence of grade 3 or 4 severe GI AEs was ≤3% except severe diarrhea with bosutinib (9.5%). Unsupervised clustering revealed treatment efficacy measured by the complete cytogenetic response, major molecular response, and overall survival is driven most by disease severity, not TKI type. For patients with chronic phase CML without resistance, optimal TKI selection should consider TKI AE profile, comorbidities, and lifestyle.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 1208-1215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Soverini ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Franck E. Nicolini ◽  
Franz Gruber ◽  
Thoralf Lange ◽  
...  

AbstractMutations in the Bcr-Abl kinase domain may cause, or contribute to, resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Recommendations aimed to rationalize the use of BCR-ABL mutation testing in chronic myeloid leukemia have been compiled by a panel of experts appointed by the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) and European Treatment and Outcome Study and are here reported. Based on a critical review of the literature and, whenever necessary, on panelists' experience, key issues were identified and discussed concerning: (1) when to perform mutation analysis, (2) how to perform it, and (3) how to translate results into clinical practice. In chronic phase patients receiving imatinib first-line, mutation analysis is recommended only in case of failure or suboptimal response according to the ELN criteria. In imatinib-resistant patients receiving an alternative TKI, mutation analysis is recommended in case of hematologic or cytogenetic failure as provisionally defined by the ELN. The recommended methodology is direct sequencing, although it may be preceded by screening with other techniques, such as denaturing-high performance liquid chromatography. In all the cases outlined within this abstract, a positive result is an indication for therapeutic change. Some specific mutations weigh on TKI selection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document