Long-term outcomes of preoperative chemotherapy with modified DCS therapy for highly advanced gastric cancer with distant metastasis.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 193-193
Author(s):  
Atsushi Matsuki ◽  
Atsushi Nashimoto ◽  
Hiroshi Yabusaki ◽  
Masaki Aizawa
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Preoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Eligibility Criteria

193 Background: Among patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer (AGC), the poor prognosis was exhibited and many pts died even after R0 resection. The aim of this study is to evaluate the preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 (modified DCS therapy) for treatment in highly AGC with distant metastasis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 58 pts (man/woman; 49/9, median age; 64.5-years) treated with preoperative modified DCS therapy in our hospital between 2009 and 2012. Eligibility criteria included StageIV AGC with distant metastasis (H1;14, P1;18,CY1;31, LYM;25, PUL;2, OTH;2), a Performance status of 0-2 and no prior chemotherapy. The regimen consisted of docetaxel and cisplatin infusion (35mg/m2, days 1 and 15) and oral administration of S-1 (80mg/m2, days 1-14) every 4 weeks. Surgery was planned 3 to 4 weeks after the chemotherapy. Pathological response was graded according to the JGCA criteria. Almost all pts were treated with S-1 as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: The median cycles was 2 (1-13). The incidence of grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia 53.4%, anemia 8.6%, anorexia 15.5%, nausea 5.2%, and diarrhea 3.4%. All of these toxicities were well tolerable and there was no TRD. According to RECIST, The overall response rate was 79.3%. Forty-tree pts underwent gastrectomy (R0/R1/R2; 27/8/8), respectively. Postoperative morbidity rate was 20.9% and there was no mortality. Over all 5 years survival rate (5YSR) was 21.4 % and that of R0 was 44.8%, on the other hand 5YSR and MST of chemotherapy alone was 0% and 14.5 month. Pathological response rate (>=1b) was 60.5% and complete response was achieved 1 pts. 5YSR of pathological responders who underwent R0 resection was 81.4% and that of non-responders who underwent even R0 resection was 22.5% (P<0.05). Conclusions: Preoperative modified DCS therapy for AGC was tolerable, and survival benefit of pathological responders with R0 surgery was promising and warrants further investigation.

Phase II study of docetaxel (DTX) and S-1 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for potentially R0 advanced gastric cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 74-74
Author(s):  
Yasunori Emi ◽  
Eiji Oki ◽  
Hiroshi Saeki ◽  
Masaru Morita ◽  
Tetsuya Kusumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Preoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Curative Resection ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Preoperative Staging ◽  
Peritoneal Cytology ◽  
Eligibility Criteria

74 Background: This trial sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative chemotherapy with DTX plus S-1 for advanced gastric cancer with poor prognosis even after R0 curative resection. We show the 2 years follow-up data. Methods: Preoperative staging was confirmed by laparoscopy. Eligibility criteria included 1) negative peritoneal cytology, H0, P0 and M0, 2) possible curative resection, and 3) ECOG PS 0-1. Patients received DTX (35 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15, and daily oral administration of S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for days 1–14 every 4 weeks of 2 courses, followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint was pathological response rate (pRR). A sample size of 45 was planned for the expected pRR of 40% and threshold value of 20%, with one-sided alpha of 0.05 and beta of approximately 0.1. Results: A total of 47 patients were centrally registered between November 2007 and November 2009 from 14 centers. All patients were eligible for analysis. The median age was 63 (range 37–79); male/female: 36/11; PS0/1:41/6; and clinical stage IIIA/IIIB: 31/16. The target pRR was 47% (90%CI, 34–60%; p<0.0001). Forty six patients (98%) underwent surgery, in whom curative resection was performed in 44 patients, and 37 patients completed the protocol treatment. The response to preoperative chemotherapy was PR/SD/PD/NE in 16/24/2/5 with a response rate of 34%. The rate of 2 years and 3 years DFS were 53.9%, and 49.3%, respectively. The rate of 2 years and 3 years Overall survival were 69.6%, and 55.1%, respectively. The most common toxicities of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were grade 3/4 neutropenia (42%), febrile neutropenia (4%), grade 2 anorexia (21%), and fatigue (15%). Major operative morbidity included pancreatic fistula (9%), abdominal abscess (11%), pneumonia (2%), and anastomotic leakage (0%). No patients died due to surgical complications. Conclusions: The combination of DTX and S-1 was well tolerated and promising as a preoperative chemotherapy regimen for patients with potentially resectable advanced gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: UMIN000000875.

Phase II study of combination therapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) for advanced gastric cancer: (KDOG 0601)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4555-4555
Author(s):  
N. Nakayama ◽  
W. Koizumi ◽  
T. Sasaki ◽  
S. Tanabe ◽  
K. Nishimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria

4555 Background: Our previous phase I study (Oncology 2008, 75:1–7) provided evidence that combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) is effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancer. The present multicenter phase II study was conducted to confirm the efficacy and toxicity of DCS in advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Eligibility criteria included a histologically proved diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma with at least one measurable metastatic lesion, no previous treatment for gastric cancer except for surgery, an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2, and adequate organ function. Docetaxel (40 mg/m2) and cisplatin (70–60 mg/m2) were given intravenously on day 1, and S-1 was given orally at a dose of 40 mg/m2 twice daily from days 1 to day 14 of a 28-day cycle. Patients received a maximum of 6 cycles. Subsequently, patients were given repeated cycles of S-1 plus docetaxel (DS). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Results: 59 patients (47 men, 12 women) were enrolled. The median age was 62 (range: 35–75) years. PS 0/1/2 was 40/18/1. The median number of treatment cycles was 7 (DCS 6+DS 1: range, 1–20). Because myeloid suppression and renal dysfunction developed during the study, we lowered the recommended dose of cisplatin from 70 mg/m2 to 60 mg/m2. The dose of cisplatin was 70 mg/m2 in 19 patients and 60 mg/m2 in 40. The overall response rate was 81.3% (48/59; 95% CI, 80.7–91.2). The response rates with cisplatin 70 mg/m2 and 60 mg/m2 were 78.9% (95% CI, 60.5–97.2) and 82.5% (95% CI, 70.7–94.2), respectively. Tumor down-staging was achieved in 9 (18.7%) of the 48 patients who responded to treatment. The median survival time and median progression-free survival were not reached. Grade 3 or 4 major toxicity comprised leukopenia (44.0%), neutropenia (72.8%), anemia (15.2%), febrile neutropenia (13.5%), anorexia (6.7%), nausea (5.1%), vomiting (5.1%), fatigue (1.6%), and diarrhea (5.1%). There was one treatment-related death caused by the perforation of the primary tumor. This patient refused surgery. Conclusions: DCS was a well-tolerated regimen with a high response rate in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Cisplatin at a dose of 60 mg/m2 was considered adequately effective. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II study of perioperative capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for clinical SS/SE N1-3 M0 gastric cancer (OGSG1601).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 203-203
Author(s):  
Atsushi Yasuda ◽  
Jin Matsuyama ◽  
Tetsuji Terazawa ◽  
Masahiro Goto ◽  
Ryohei Kawabata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
English Edition ◽  
D2 Gastrectomy ◽  
Japanese Classification

203 Background: D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 is one of the standard therapy for the patients (pts) with stage III gastric cancer (GC) in Japan; however, the outcome is not satisfactory. We examined the efficacy of perioperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) in pts with clinical SS/SE N1-3 M0 GC. Methods: The eligibility criteria included histopathologically confirmed clinical T3(SS)/T4a(SE) N1-3 M0 GC according to the Japanese Classification of GC (JCGC; 3rd English Edition). Three cycles of neoadjuvant CapeOx (NAC; capecitabine, 2,000 mg/m2 for 14 days; oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks) were administered, followed by five cycles of adjuvant CapeOx after D2 gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was the pathological response rate (pRR) according to JCGC ( ≥Grade 1b). Results: Thirty-seven pts were enrolled from April 2016 to May 2017, and fully evaluated for efficacy and toxicity. Thirty-three pts (89.2%) completed the planned three cycles of NAC and underwent gastrectomy, with an R0 resection rate of 78.4% (n = 29) and a pRR of 54.1% (n = 20, p = .058; 90% confidence interval [CI], 39.4–68.2) were demonstrated. The relative dose intensity (RDI) of capecitabine and oxaliplatin were 90.5% and 91.9%, respectively. Among 27 pts who initiated AC, 21 (63.6%) completed the treatment, and the RDI of capecitabine and oxaliplatin were 80.9% and 65.1%, respectively. Grade 3–4 toxicities during NAC included neutropenia (8%), thrombocytopenia (8%), and anorexia (8%) and during AC included neutropenia (37%), diarrhea (4%), and anorexia (4%), but no treatment-related death was reported. The overall survival (OS) rate and relapse free survival (RFS) rate at 3 years was 83.8% (95% CI, 72.7-96.5%) and 73.0% (95% CI, 60.0-88.8%), respectively. Subgroup analyses according to residual tumor after surgery (R status) showed a 3-year OS and RFS rate of 86.2% (95% CI, 74.5-99.7%) and 75.7% (95% CI, 63.0-90.8%) for R0. Conclusions: Perioperative CapeOx showed good feasibility and favorable prognosis with sufficient pathological response, although statistical significance at .058 did not reach the commonly accepted cutoff of .05. The data obtained using this novel approach warrant further investigations. Clinical trial information: 000021641.

A combination chemotherapy of weekly paclitaxel and doxifluridine (5’-DFUR: an intermediate metabolite of capecitabine) in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer in an outpatient setting. Final results of a multicenter phase II trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15050-15050
Author(s):  
S. Yoshino ◽  
T. Nishimura ◽  
S. Hazama ◽  
M. Oka ◽  
H. Ozasa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Recurrent Gastric Cancer

15050 Background: Paclitaxel (PTX) and 5’-DFUR have single-agent activity in gastric cancer and have distinct mechanisms of action and no overlap of key toxicities. Synergistic interaction between PTX and 5’-DFUR is mediated by taxane-induced up-regulation of thymidine phosphorylase, which converts 5’-DFUR to 5-FU. We conducted a combination phase II study of PTX and 5’-DFUR in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer to evaluate the efficacy and safety in an outpatient. Methods: Eligibility criteria included patients with histologically proven unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer who had measurable lesions fitting RECIST, up to one prior chemotherapy, a performance status of 0–2 and adequate organ function. According to our results of phase I study (Proc ASCO 2004, Abstr. 4228), the treatment included PTX 70 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks and 5’-DFUR 600 mg/body p.o. everyday until there was disease progression or the appearance of unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was: RR; and secondary endpoints were OS, PFS, TTF and onset rate of adverse events. Results: Between June 2004 and July 2006, 42 patients were enrolled in this study: including 34 men; 8 women; median age of 70 years (range, 44–85 years); and PS levels were, zero with 27, one with 13 and two with 2 patients. In 42 eligible patients, clinical usefulness was evaluated resulting in response rate of 40.5% (CR, 1; PR, 16; SD, 17; PD, 6; and NE, 2 patients). The first-line therapy involved 28 patients in whom the response rate was 50.0%. The second-line therapy involved 13 patients (all TS-1 failure) in whom the response rate was 23.1%. OS was 371 days, PFS was 170 days and TTF was 147 days. All patients were treated in outpatient. Severe adverse events were found in 2 patients to discontinue the present treatment, though other adverse events were relatively mild without death due to the present therapy. Commonly observed grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (26.2%), appetite loss (4.8%), neuropathy (4.8%), and fatigue (4.8%). Conclusions: The outpatient combination of a weekly PTX and 5’-DFUR chemotherapy is active and well tolerated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Randomized phase III trial of standard D2 versus D2 + para-aortic lymph node (PAN) dissection (D) for clinically M0 advanced gastric cancer: JCOG9501

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4015-LBA4015 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sasako ◽  
T. Sano ◽  
S. Yamamoto ◽  
A. Nashimoto ◽  
A. Kurita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Curative Intent

LBA4015 Background: The INT-0116 study proved the efficacy of radiochemotherapy after R0 resection for gastric cancer and thus the importance of the local control and the insufficiency of D0/1 surgery. Recently D2 surgery was for the first time proven to improve the survival compared with D1 in a Taiwanese RCT (Lancet Oncol 2006). In our study, D2+PAND was compared with D2 in a RCT. Low operative mortality has been reported (Sano et al. J Clin Oncol 2004) and we now present the survival results. Methods: Eligibility criteria included; histologically proven adenocarcinoma, cT2b-T4, cM0, no macroscopic metastasis to the PAN, negative lavage cytology, adequate organ function, and age <76. Linitis plastica was excluded. Eligible pts were randomly assigned to D2 with or without PAND during surgery. All patients were followed without adjuvant therapy until recurrence. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) to be compared by stratified log-rank test. Assuming 256 eligible pts in each arm, the study had 75% power to detect 0.73 hazard ratio for D2+PAND to D2 in OS at 0.05 one-sided alpha. Results: Between 07/1995 and 04/2001, 523 pts were randomized (263 to D2 and 260 to D2+PAND). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the arms. At the time of the final analysis on 23/03/06, 191 (96 and 95, in D2 and D2+PAND, respectively) had died. The 3- and 5-year OS were 76% and 69% in D2 and 76% and 70% in D2+PAND, respectively (p = 0.57, Hazard ratio was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.77–1.37)). Disease free survival did not show any difference between the groups as well. Median operation time was 63 minutes longer and median blood loss was 230 ml larger in D2+PAND than in D2. There was no difference in the incidence of major surgical complications and hospital mortality (0.8% in both arms). Conclusions: D2 or D2+PAND could be carried out safely and showed excellent survival for advanced gastric cancer treated with curative intent. PAND could not improve the survival achieved by D2. General use of PAND should be avoided. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II trial of S-1 combined with oxaliplatin (SOX) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 122-122
Author(s):  
L. Chen
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

122 Background: Previous phase II trial with combination therapy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) demonstrated high response rate and well tolerability in patients with untreated advanced gastric cancer. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOX as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Methods: Eligibility criteria included a histologically proven AGC with stage IIIb, IIIc (AJCC 7th edition), at least 1 measurable lesion, no prior chemotherapy, ECOG 0∼2, adequate hepatic, renal, and bone marrow function. Enrolled patients were staged by EUS and CT. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of 3-4 cycles of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) on day 1 and S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for 14 days with 7 days rest. After chemotherapy, the patients underwent surgery. Results: From Dec 2009 to Sep 2010, 35 patients (IIIb; 19pts, IIIc; 16pts) were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 54.6 years (range; 20-72 y). All patients were available for evaluating the clinical responese and adverse events. The overall response rate was 68.5% (1CR, 23 PR, 9 SD, 2 PD). 32 patients underwent surgical resection. Of them, 27 patients underwent standard D2 surgery and 5 patients had palliative surgery. 25 patients had R0 resection. Postoperative pathological examination showed that most of the surgical patients were in T4a stage. According to Lauren classification, 71.9% patiens (23/32pts) were diffuse type, SOX showed higher respons rate (1CR, 20 PR, 2 SD, RR: 91.3%) among these patients. Major grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were anemia (5.7%), neutropenia (5.7%) and liver dysfunction (8.6%) and non-hematological toxicities were anorexia (5.7%) and vomiting (11.4%). But most of the adverse events were managable. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) showed high response rate and and R0 resection rate for locally advanced GC, especially for diffuse type patients. All the patients did not have severe toxicity during the process of chemotherapy. This is the preliminary results, and the survival benefit in locally advanced GC patients that respond to SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy needs to be addressed by a randomized-controlled trial. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II study of perioperative S-1 combined with weekly docetaxel in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: Clinical and pharmacogenetic results.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4114-4114
Author(s):  
Sook Ryun Park ◽  
Young Woo Kim ◽  
Keun Won Ryu ◽  
Hyeong-Seok Lim ◽  
Jun Ho Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Clinical Response Rate ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

4114 Background: We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative S-1 + docetaxel (DS) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), and to investigate the association between CYP2A6 genotypes and treatment outcomes. Methods: Eligibility criteria included 18-70 yrs, PS 0-1, measurable lesion(s), and LAGC (clinical stage III-IV (M0) by Japanese staging system). Pts were given each 3 cycles of pre- and post-operative chemotherapy (S-1 40 mg/m2 bid on D1-14, docetaxel 35 mg/m2iv on D1, 8 q 3 wks), and underwent surgery (≥D2). Results: From Oct 2006 to June 2008, 44 pts entered into the study, and 43 pts were eligible. Median age=53 yrs (range, 33-69); PS 0/1=2/41; M/F=29/14; and stage IIIA/IIIB/IV (M0)=20/18/5. All 43 eligible pts completed preoperative DS and 40 pts (93%) completed postoperative DS. The most common G3/4 toxicities during pre- and post-operative DS were neutropenia (28% vs. 65%), stomatitis (19% vs. 5%), and abdominal pain (5% vs. 18%). The clinical response rate was 74.4% (95% CI, 61.4-87.4%) with 1 CR (2.3%) and 31 (72.1%) PRs. R0 resection rate was 97.7%, major pathologic response rate was 48.8% with 1 CR, and pathologic stage was 0/1/2/3/4 (%) = 2.3/44.2/20.9/20.9/11.6. With a median follow-up of 66.6 months, 3-yr PFS and 5-yr OS was 62.8% and 69.6%, respectively. Survival differed according to clinical response, clinical downstaging, and CYP2A6 genotypes (Table). Pts with two CYP2A6 variant alleles (V/V) had higher Cmax (27.7±4.6 vs. 20.3±1.2; p=0.045) and AUCinf (220.4±43.1 vs. 172.5±12.5; p=0.187) of tegafur, and lower Cmax (1.4±0.2 vs. 1.8±0.1; p=0.178) and AUCinf (8.4±1.2 vs. 9.7±0.5; p=0.308) of 5-FU than those with no or one variant allele (W/W or W/V). Conclusions: DS is active with a manageable toxicity profile in the perioperative setting in pts with LAGC. CYP2A6 genotype may be predictive of efficacy (S-1 and docetaxel was provided by JEIL Pharm. Co., Ltd. and sanofi-aventis Korea Co., Ltd., respectively). Clinical trial information: NCT00587145. [Table: see text]

Real-world efficacy and biomarker of nivolumab for advanced gastric cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 388-388
Author(s):  
Ryohei Kawabata ◽  
Yukinori Kurokawa ◽  
Takaomi Hagi ◽  
Takeshi Omori ◽  
Jin Matsuyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Tumor Growth Rate ◽  
Positive Score ◽  
Previously Treated

388 Background: Although nivolumab demonstrated survival benefit and a manageable safety profile in previously-treated advanced gastric cancer in a phase III trial (ATTRACTION-2), the efficacy of nivolumab in real-world and predictive factors of responses to nivolumab for advanced gastric cancer remain unclear. We evaluated the efficacy of nivolumab and compared clinicopathological characteristics with responses to nivolumab and long-term survivals in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: 205 patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer who were treated with nivolumab as 3rd or more line treatment were enrolled from 23 institutions. Tissue specimens were collected in 199 patients. PD-L1 expression of tumor specimens defined as tumor positive score (TPS) and combined positive score (CPS) and mismatch repair (MMR) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Tumor responses were assessed according to RECIST version 1.1. Hyper progressive disease (HPD) was defined as ≥two folds increase in tumor growth rate. Results: 138 out of 205 enrolled patients had measurable lesions. Response rate and HPD rate were 16.7% (23/138) and 22.0% (29/132), respectively. Response rate was significantly higher in patients with performance status (PS) 0-1, non-peritoneal diseases, CPS ≥10, and MMR deficient patients. On the other hand, PS 2-3 and liver metastases were predictive factors of HPD. Patients with CPS≥10 and MMR deficiency showed significantly better progression-free (P = 0.005, P = 0.001) and overall survivals (P = 0.005, P = 0.002). TPS showed no significant association with any outcomes. Conclusions: Real-world efficacy of nivolumab was shown in previously-treated advanced gastric cancer. CPS and MMR could be the useful biomarkers for the efficacy of nivolumab treatment as well as PS and metastasis site. Clinical trial information: UMIN000032164.

Feasibility and pathological response of TAS-118 + oxaliplatin as perioperative chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (APOLLO-11).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 351-351
Author(s):  
Daisuke Takahari ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
Takako Eguchi Nakajima ◽  
Naoki Ishizuka ◽  
Manabu Ohashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Preoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Complete Regression ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

351 Background: TAS-118 is a novel oral agent, containing S-1 and leucovorin. In the SOLAR study (NCT02322593), TAS-118 + oxaliplatin (OHP) significantly improved overall survival compared to S-1 + cisplatin for patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer (GC). We conducted this open-label study to assess feasibility of perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy with TAS-118 + OHP in pts with locally advanced resectable GC with lymph node metastasis. (Clinical trial information: UMIN000024688). Methods: Eligible pts who had histopathologically confirmed GC with clinical T3-4N1-3M0 on image findings (14th Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma), age 20 to 79 years, were enrolled in this study. The protocol treatment consisted of preoperative 4 courses of TAS-118 (80-120 mg/body, days 1-7) + OHP (85 mg/m2, day 1) every 2 weeks, and gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, followed by postoperative 12 courses of TAS-118 alone (step1) or 8 cycles of TAS-118 + OHP (step2). The primary endpoints were tolerability of preoperative chemotherapy, gastrectomy and postoperative chemotherapy with TAS-118 plus OHP. Here, we report the feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy and gastrectomy, and pathological response. Results: Between December 2016 and April 2018, 45 pts with a median age of 61 years were enrolled. The numbers of pts with T stage (cT3/4a) and those with N stage (cN1/2/3) were 13/32 and 25/17/3, respectively. The completion rate of preoperative chemotherapy and gastrectomy was 88.9% ( 95% CI 78.0-95.5) and 95.6% (95% CI 86.7-99.2). The relative dose intensity of TAS-118 and OHP was 86.0% and 90.6%. During the 4 cycles of preoperative TAS-118 + OHP, 2 pts discontinued the treatment due to adverse event (AE). Major grade 3-4 AEs were diarrhea (17.8%) and neutropenia (8.9%). R0 resection rate was as high as 95.6%. One pts experienced grade 4 postoperative bleeding, but no treatment-related death was reported. pCR was achieved in 6/45 pts (13.3%) and other 7 pts (28.9%) showed near complete regression (<10 % residual tumor cells). Conclusions: Preoperative TAS-118 + OHP followed by D2 gastorectomy was well tolerated and showed promising efficacy. Clinical trial information: 000024688.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document