Adjuvant Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin in Stage II to III Colon Cancer: Updated 10-Year Survival and Outcomes According to BRAF Mutation and Mismatch Repair Status of the MOSAIC Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (35) ◽  
pp. 4176-4187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry André ◽  
Armand de Gramont ◽  
Dewi Vernerey ◽  
Benoist Chibaudel ◽  
Franck Bonnetain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
International Study ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded ◽  
Resected Stage

Purpose The MOSAIC (Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer) study has demonstrated 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 6-year overall survival (OS) benefit of adjuvant oxaliplatin in stage II to III resected colon cancer. This update presents 10-year OS and OS and DFS by mismatch repair (MMR) status and BRAF mutation. Methods Survival actualization after 10-year follow-up was performed in 2,246 patients with resected stage II to III colon cancer. We assessed MMR status and BRAF mutation in 1,008 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens. Results After a median follow-up of 9.5 years, 10-year OS rates in the bolus/infusional fluorouracil plus leucovorin (LV5FU2) and LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) arms were 67.1% versus 71.7% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; P = .043) in the whole population, 79.5% versus 78.4% for stage II (HR, 1.00; P = .980), and 59.0% versus 67.1% for stage III (HR, 0.80; P = .016) disease. Ninety-five patients (9.4%) had MMR-deficient (dMMR) tumors, and 94 (10.4%) had BRAF mutation. BRAF mutation was not prognostic for OS (P = .965), but dMMR was an independent prognostic factor (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.15 to 3.55; P = .014). HRs for DFS and OS benefit in the FOLFOX4 arm were 0.48 (95% CI, 0.20 to 1.12) and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.16 to 1.07), respectively, in patients with stage II to III dMMR and 0.50 (95% CI, 0.25 to 1.00) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.31 to 1.42), respectively, in those with BRAF mutation. Conclusion The OS benefit of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy, increasing over time and with the disease severity, was confirmed at 10 years in patients with stage II to III colon cancer. These updated results support the use of FOLFOX in patients with stage III disease, including those with dMMR or BRAF mutation.

Oxaliplatin/5FU/LV in adjuvant colon cancer: Updated efficacy results of the MOSAIC trial, including survival, with a median follow-up of six years

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4007-4007 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. de Gramont ◽  
C. Boni ◽  
M. Navarro ◽  
J. Tabernero ◽  
T. Hickish ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Significant Benefit ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Resected Stage ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Disease Free

4007 Background: The MOSAIC study was designed to evaluate the effects of the FOLFOX4 regimen (5-FU/LV + oxaliplatin) on 3- year disease free survival (DFS) probability in patients with stage II and III colon cancer. Methods: Patients (n=2246) with completely resected stage II (40%) or III (60%) colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive 5-FU/LV (LV5FU2) or FOLFOX4 every 2 weeks for 12 cycles. Results: Results for the primary endpoint of the study (for the overall population, with a median follow-up [FU] of 3 years), showed a significant benefit in DFS for the FOLFOX4-treated patients (78.2% vs 72.9%; HR: 0.77, p=0.002) (André et al, NEJM, 2004). Patients were followed beyond the 3-year cut-off for DFS and overall survival (OS) updates. Final DFS, at 5 years FU, are consistent with earlier results (HR: 0.80, p = 0.003). In addition, at a median FU of 6 years, the study demonstrates a significant benefit in OS for the stage III patients. Summary of OS results (median FU 6 years) Long-term safety update shows no increase in the rate of secondary cancer (5.0% in both treatment arms). Conclusions: These results confirm the benefit of the FOLFOX4 regimen in adjuvant colon cancer patients. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer: Survival follow-up of study NO16968 (XELOXA).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 388-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Joachim Schmoll ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Jean Alfred Maroun ◽  
Filippo G. De Braud ◽  
Timothy Jay Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
Resected Stage

388 Background: The MOSAIC trial demonstrated that adding oxaliplatin to 5-FU/LV (FOLFOX4) improved 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) compared to infusional and bolus 5-FU/LV as adjuvant therapy in patients (pts) with stage II/III colon cancer [André et al. NEJM 2004]. A significant survival advantage for FOLFOX4 versus 5-FU/LV was not evident until after median duration of follow-up had exceeded 6 years [André et al. JCO 2009]. Study NO16968 demonstrated that XELOX was superior to bolus 5-FU/LV as adjuvant therapy in pts with stage III colon cancer in terms of DFS at 57 months median follow-up (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.69–0.93; p=0.0045) [Haller et al. JCO 2011]. The difference between treatment groups in overall survival (OS) was not significant at 59 months median follow-up (HR=0.87; p=0.1486). Data from the planned final analysis of NO16968 are presented. Methods: Pts with resected stage III colon cancer were randomized to receive XELOX (8 cycles, 24w) or bolus 5-FU/LV (Mayo Clinic, 6 cycles; 24w or Roswell Park, 4 cycles; 32w). The primary study endpoint was DFS. Secondary endpoints included OS. Results: The ITT population included 1886 pts (XELOX, n=944; 5-FU/LV, n=942). After a median follow-up of 74 months, the HR (XELOX vs 5-FU/LV) for DFS was 0.80 (95% CI 0.69–0.93; p=0.0038). Seven-year DFS rates were 63% for XELOX and 56% for 5-FU/LV. After a median follow-up of 83 months, the HR for OS was 0.83 (95% CI 0.70–0.99; p=0.0367). Absolute 7-year OS rates were 73% with XELOX and 67% with 5-FU/LV. After adjusting for stratification and prognostic variables, HRs remained essentially unchanged for both DFS (0.79; 95% CI 0.68–0.91; p=0.0016) and OS (0.84; 95% CI 0.71–1.00; p=0.0477). Locoregional / systemic treatments after recurrence were given in 230 (24%) XELOX pts and 308 (33%) 5-FU/LV pts. Conclusions: The combination of oxaliplatin and capecitabine improves OS significantly compared with 5-FU/LV in the adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer after a median follow-up of 83 months; these data are comparable to those achieved with FOLFOX4 in the MOSAIC trial. XELOX is an effective adjuvant therapy option for pts with resected stage III colon cancer.

Three versus six months adjuvant FOLFOX or CAPOX for high risk stage II and stage III colon cancer patients: The efficacy results of Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG) participation to the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant chemotherapy (IDEA) project.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3500-3500
Author(s):  
Ioannis Sougklakos ◽  
Ioannis Boukovinas ◽  
Spyros Xynogalos ◽  
Stylianos Kakolyris ◽  
Nikolaos Ziras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Oncology Research

3500 Background: The IDEA aimed to investigate whether a 3-month (3M) of oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidines-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is non-inferior to the 6-month (6M) in 3-year disease free survival (DFS) in stage high risk stage II and in stage III colon cancer (CC). Methods: HORG-IDEA randomized patients between 3M and 6M of CT with FOLFOX4 or CAPOX with primary end point the 3 years DFS (3yDFS). Results: In total 1121 patients, 413 with high risk stage and 708 with stage IIICC, were randomized between May 2009 and October 2015. The median follow-up was 67 (38-126) months. There were 79 DFS events (43 in 3M and 38 in 6M arm) in high risk stage II patients leading to 3yDFS rate of 82.7 and 83.4% for 3M and 6M, respectively (HR: 1.05; 95%CI: 0.68-1.63, p = 0.829). Similarly, 214 DFS events (161 in 3M and 153 in 6M arm) has been recorded in stage III patients, leading to a 3yDFS rate of 72.9% in the 3M vs. 74.1% in the 6M (HR = 1.06; 95%CI: 0.81–1.42, p = 0.622). For high risk stage II patients receiving FOLFOX4, 3yDFS rate was 76.7% in the 3M vs.79.3% in the 6M (HR = 1.21; 95%CI: 0.54–2.70 p = 0.641). For high risk stage II patients receiving CAPOX 3-year DFS rate was 85.4% in the 3M vs. 83.8% in the 6M (HR = 0.99; 95%CI: 0.59–1.67 p = 0.968). For stage III CC patients receiving mFOLFOX6, 3-year DFS rate was 71.5% in the 3M vs.77.3% in the 6M (HR = 1.18; 95%CI: 0.74–1.86 p = 0.479). For stage III CC patients receiving CAPOX 3-year DFS rate was 74.5% in the 3M vs. 74.7% in the 6M (HR = 0.99; 95%CI: 0.70–1.44 p = 0.991). Conclusions: The results of the HORG-IDEA study are in line with those of the global IDEA project, indicating that 3yDFS is depended on the administered adjuvant regimen, and the choice of regimen and duration should be personalized. Clinical trial information: NCT01308086.

Duration of Oxaliplatin-Containing Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colon Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (16) ◽  
pp. 1436-1447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Lieu ◽  
Erin B. Kennedy ◽  
Emily Bergsland ◽  
Jordan Berlin ◽  
Thomas J. George ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Resected Stage

PURPOSE To develop recommendations for duration of adjuvant chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin for patients with completely resected stage III colon cancer based on the results of trials of 3 months compared with 6 months of treatment. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of relevant studies. The guideline recommendations were based on the review of evidence by the Expert Panel. RESULTS Pooled data from the six International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) Collaboration randomized controlled trials comprise the evidence base for these guideline recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations for therapy duration apply to patients with completely resected stage III colon cancer who are being offered adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and a fluoropyrimidine. Recommendations are informed by the findings of a recent pooled analysis of clinical trials that compared 6 months versus 3 months of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. For patients at a high risk of recurrence (T4 and/or N2), adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered for a duration of 6 months. For patients at a low risk of recurrence (T1, T2, or T3 and N1), either 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy or a shorter duration of 3 months may be offered on the basis of a potential reduction in adverse events and no significant difference in disease-free survival with the 3-month regimen. In determining duration of therapy, the Expert Panel recommends a shared decision-making approach, taking into account patient characteristics, values and preferences, and other factors and including a discussion of the potential for benefit and risks of harm associated with treatment duration. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines .

Adjuvant therapy with alpha-interferon in radically resected stage Il and III renal cell carcinoma

1992 ◽  
Vol 59 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 160-162
Author(s):  
◽  
Urologico Lombardo
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Alpha Interferon ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Resected Stage

In February 1990, a multicentric randomized study was started to verify the therapeutic efficacy of adjuvant alpha-interferon in Robson's stage II and III renal cell carcinoma. Up to April 1992, 749 radical nephrectomies have been recorded by the 25 participating centers. Stage II and III patients fullfilling selection criteria were 124: 64 were assigned to Interferon therapy and 60 to control. The short follow-up does not allow any evaluation of the relapse rate. Therapy related toxicity was represented by mild fever and flu-like syndrome in 50% of cases and slight leucopenia in 5%. The recruitment of the first 200 randomized patients will end approximately within 1 year. While evaluating the hypothesis of a 20% difference in the 5 year disease-free survival between the two groups recruitment will continue up to a total of 350 cases, in order to verify the 15% hypothesis, too.

Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin as Adjuvant Treatment for Colon Cancer

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly McLeon
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Study Intervention ◽  
Disease Free

The landmark MOSAIC trial examined whether the addition of oxaliplatin to a postoperative adjuvant treatment regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin affected disease-free survival from colon cancer. The MOSAIC trial established the efficacy of FOLFOX over 5-FU/LV as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer and established FOLFOX4 as the reference standard for adjuvant treatment for stage III disease. This chapter describes the basics of the study, including funding, year study began, year study was published, study location, who was studied, who was excluded, how many patients, study design, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, gives a summary and discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil-tegafur (UFT) for stage III colorectal cancer: Final results of randomized trials by the National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Colorectal Cancer (NSAS-CC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4049-4049 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Hamaguchi ◽  
K. Shirao ◽  
Y. Moriya ◽  
S. Yoshida ◽  
S. Kodaira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Resected Stage

4049 Background: In the latter 1990s, no consensus was reached as to whether adjuvant chemotherapy was standard treatment for completely resected stage III colorectal cancer in Japan. At that time, we started two randomized controlled trials to clarify the role of adjuvant chemotherapy of stage III colon and rectal cancer in the same time. Methods: Patients with completely resected stage III cancer of the colon or rectum (PS, 0 to 2; age, 20 to 75 years; no other adjuvant therapy) were eligible for these trials. Patients were registered within 6 weeks after surgery and were randomly assigned to receive surgery alone (control group) or surgery followed by treatment with UFT (400 mg/m2/day), given for 5 consecutive days per week for 1 year (UFT group). The target number of patients was 500 for colon cancer and 400 for rectal cancer (hazard ratio = 0.67, one-sided a= 0.05, β= 0.2). The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS), and the secondary end point was overall survival (OS). Results: Between October 1996 and April 2001, a total of 334 patients with colon cancer and 276 with rectal cancer were enrolled. Four ineligible patients were excluded; data from the remaining 332 patients with colon cancer and 274 with rectal cancer were analyzed. The patients’ characteristics were similar in the groups. Analysis of the results of follow-up until March 2006, at least 5 years after surgery in all patients (median follow-up period, 6.2 years), showed no significant difference in RFS or OS in colon cancer. In rectal cancer, however, RFS and OS were significantly better in the UFT group than in the control group. The only grade 4 toxicity was diarrhea, occurring in 1 patient with colon cancer and 1 patient with rectal cancer. Conclusions: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT is well tolerated and improved RFS and OS in patients with stage III rectal cancer. In colon cancer, the expected benefits were not obtained (hazard ratio = 0.67). [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Adjuvant FOLFIRI with or without cetuximab in patients with resected stage III colon cancer: NCCTG Intergroup phase III trial N0147.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 363-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Huang ◽  
D. J. Sargent ◽  
M. R. Mahoney ◽  
S. N. Thibodeau ◽  
T. C. Smyrk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Clin Oncol ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Kras Status ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Resected Stage

363 Background: Irinotecan (CPT-11) has demonstrated antitumor activity against metastatic colorectal cancer used alone or with 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin (LV). Two arms with CPT-11, 5FU, and LV (FOLFIRI) +/- cetuximab (Cmab) were originally included in N0147. However, after CALGB 89803 (J Clin Oncol. 25:3456, 2007), PETACC-3 (J Clin Oncol. 27:3117, 2009), and Accord02 (Ann Oncol. 20:674, 2009) showed no benefit to the three-drug combination in adjuvant therapy, the CPT-11 arms of N0147 were discontinued. We report the outcomes for patients given FOLFIRI +/- Cmab. Methods: Following a signed informed consent patients with resected stage III colon cancer were randomized to one of 6 arms including 12 biweekly cycles of CPT-11 180 mg/m2 d1 with LV 400 mg/m2, 5FU 400 mg/m2 bolus IV, then 46-hr IV 5FU 2,400 mg/m2 on d1-2 without (Arm B, FOLFIRI) or with Cmab (Arm E) 400 mg/m2 d1 cycle 1 then Cmab at 250 mg/m2 d1 and 8. Primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Results: 156 patients (Arm B-111, Arm E-45) were enrolled; median follow-up on 81 patients in Arm B was 60.3 months and 58.2 months in Arm E for 41 patients. wtKRAS (vs mt) status was associated with improved DFS (HR=0.6 [95% CI 0.4-1.1], p = 0.09) and OS (HR 0.7 [95% CI 0.4-1.5], p = 0.38). The addition of Cmab improved DFS and OS in the overall group and within wtKRAS pts. Grade greater than III non-hematologic adverse effects were significantly increased in the Cmab arm (46% vs. 64%, p = 0.05). Conclusions: In this randomized phase III trial adjuvant FOLFIRI resulted in a 3-year DFS lower than that expected for FOLFOX. Trends for improved DFS and OS with the addition of Cmab were observed in patients with resected stage III colon cancer patients, regardless of KRAS status. Supported by NIH Grant CA25224, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ImClone, Sanofi-Aventis, and Pfizer. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Outcome comparison between bridge to surgery stenting and emergency surgery in stage II, III obstructive left colon cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 747-747
Author(s):  
Han-mo Yoo ◽  
Won-Kyung Kang
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Left Colon ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Sems Group ◽  
Left Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free

747 Background: A SEMS (Self Expandable Metallic Stents) has been widely used for obstructive colorectal cancer as a bridge to surgery to avoid emergency surgery. However, it may increase the tumor spillage so that the long-term survival would be compromised. The aim of our study was to compare the short- and long-term outcome of surgery after stent insertion with those of emergency surgery alone for the left colon malignant obstruction patients. Methods: The medical records of patients who received curative resection due to obstructive primary left colon cancer and diagnosed to stage II or III from January 2004 to December 2010 in six hospitals affiliated to the Catholic Medical Center. Overall survival and disease free survival were compared between the SEMS (n = 158) and emergency surgery (n = 56) group. Short-term outcome was also compared. Factors affecting disease-free survival in the SEMS group were analyzed using the cox proportional hazards model. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between two groups by pathologic stage. Intra-operative complication (0.0% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.004), re-operation (1.3% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.042), post-operative hospital stay (11.2 ± 6.5 days vs. 14.6 ± 8.9 days, p = 0.010) and conversion rate (3.5% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.028) showed short-term advantages of the SEMS. 5-year DFS in stage II patients was 87.2% for the SMES group, 73.5% for the ES group (p = 0.117). Among stage III patients, 5-year DFS was 55.8% for the SEMS group and 72.0% for the ES group (p = 0.129). 5-year OS of the SEMS group was 90.2%, and of the ES group was 92.4% in stage II patients (p = 0.694). 5-year OS in the SEMS group was 82.8%, and the ES group 73.0% in stage III patients (p = 0.577). For the stage III SEMS patients, hospital of procedure (p = 0.041) and operation date (HR 0.400, 95% C.I 0.176-0.905, p = 0.028) were independent factors on disease free survival. Conclusions: If there’s an intervention team with sufficient experience for the SEMS and a sufficient preparation for emergency surgery, the SEMS is a good therapeutic option for malignant obstruction in left colon cancer.

Early postoperative PET-CT in patients with pathological stage III colon cancer may change their outcome: Results from a large single-institution study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15163-e15163
Author(s):  
Assaf Moore ◽  
Irit Ben-Aharon ◽  
Ofer Purim ◽  
Gali Perl ◽  
Olga Ulitsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Preoperative Staging ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Pathological Stage ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Changes ◽  
Pet Ct

e15163 Background: Staging of patients (pts) with pathological stage III colon cancer (CC) is currently suboptimal; many pts still recur despite an unremarkable preoperative staging. We previously reported that early postoperative PET-CT can alter the stage and management of up to 15% of pts with high risk stage III CC and later reported also encouraging preliminary results in a larger cohort of consecutive pts with stage III CC, in which staging and management were altered in 14.5%. The aim of the current study was to expand the previous one to a larger cohort and to evaluate the actual impact of early postoperative PET-CT on pts outcome. Methods: A Retrospective study of all consecutive pts with stage III CC who were treated at our institution and underwent early postoperative PET-CT between 2007-2016. Demographic and clinicopathological data were retrieved. Statistical analyses were done using standard methods. Results: 348 pts, 166 (47.7%) males, with a median age of 66 years (range, 29-92), were included. Pathological stage was IIIA, IIIB and IIIC in 21(6%), 254 (73%) and 73 (21%) pts, respectively. The median number of lymph nodes examined and of positive ones were 14 (range, 3-54) and 2 (range, 0-32), respectively. High FDG-uptake was noted in 95 (27.3%) pts, including 23 (6.6%) with clear postoperative changes and 18 (5.2%) with a false positive uptake, of whom 6 underwent invasive diagnostic procedures. PET-CT results modified the management of 52 pts (14.9%) who were found to have true positive findings: 44 (12.6%) with overt metastatic disease and 8 (2.3%) with a second primary tumor. At a median follow-up of 45.6 months, the estimated 5y disease-free survival for true stage III pts was 81.9% and the 6y overall survival of the entire cohort was 76.4%. Interestingly, of the 44 pts found to be metastatic, 12 (27.3%) underwent curative treatments and 8 (66.7%) of those remain free of disease, with a median follow-up of 64.7 months. Conclusions: In this large cohort, early postoperative PET-CT changed the staging and management of 14.9% of pts with resected stage III CC, with encouraging outcome results. We are conducting a prospective trial to further evaluate this strategy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document