Perioperative chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer in Chile: From evidence to daily practice.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 92-92
Author(s):  
Bettina G. Müller ◽  
Carlos Garcia ◽  
Jose Antonio Sola ◽  
Carlos Benavides ◽  
Patrick Werner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Informed Consent Form ◽  
Preoperative Ct

92 Background: Gastric cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in Chile, with mortality rate of 26.7/100.000 in men, placing the country among the highest mortality rates worldwide. For locally advanced gastric cancer, a multimodality treatment is recommended, but in Chile, the treatment covered by the public health insurance, which assists more than 70% of the patients, is surgery alone. We conducted an observational study to assess efficacy and toxicity of perioperative chemotherapy (CT) in public hospitals in Chile (NCT01633203). Methods: Patients with locally advanced, operable gastric carcinoma, defined as presence of invasion of serosa or beyond (cT > 3 AJCC 2002) and/or lymph node metastasis (cN+) without distant metastasis (M0), were offered to receive preoperative CT with Epirubicin+Cisplatin+Capecitabine (ECX) regimen for 3 cycles followed by curative surgery with D2 lymphadenectomy. Staging abdominal CT scan was mandatory, laparoscopy was recommended. Patients with gastric retention, severe dysphagia or contraindications for CT were excluded. All patients signed the IRB approved informed consent form prior to enrolment. Data were collected using the OpenClinica platform. Results: Between August 2010 and March 2013, 110 patients were screened and 61 enrolled. Median age was 62 years (23-76 years) and most patients had good performance status at baseline (ECOG 0: 42, ECOG 1: 19). Tumor site was proximal in 24 (39%), medial in 16 (26%) and distal in 10 patients (16%). All but 4 patients (n = 57, 93%) completed three cycles of preoperative CT as planned. Fifty-five patients were operated and 54 (89%) had curative R0 resection. Of these, 36 (67%) had pT0-2, and 15 (28%) had pN0 tumors. A complete pathological response was found in 2 patients. Two patients were not operated for other reasons (one patient refused surgery and one patient presented a cerebrovascular accident during preoperative CT and died), and 5 patients (8%) progressed. As of September 1, 2015, 32 patients died. Three-year survival rate was 49%. Conclusions: Perioperative CT is feasible in public hospitals in Chile and should be offered as an alternative to primary surgery for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

scholarly journals Duration of Perioperative Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A “Less Is More” Question When ypN0 Is Achieved

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zining Liu ◽  
Yinkui Wang ◽  
Fei Shan ◽  
Xiangji Ying ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Tree Model ◽  
Less Is More ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference

BackgroundsPerioperative chemotherapy (PEC) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have become a vital part of locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) treatment, but the optimal duration of PEC has not been studied. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the possibility of duration reduction in PEC in the adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) phase for ypN0 patients.MethodsWe included LAGC patients who achieved ypN0 after NAC in our institution from 2005 to 2018. The risk/benefit of AC and other covariates were majorly measured by overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). We developed a survival-tree-based model to determine the optimal PEC duration for ypN0 patients in different classes.ResultsA total of 267 R0 resection patients were included. There were 55 patients who did not receive AC. The 5-year OS was 74.34% in the non-AC group and 83.64% in the AC group with a significant difference (p = 0.012). Multivariate Cox regression revealed that both AC (AC vs. non-AC: HR, 0.49; 95%CI, 0.27–0.88; p = 0.018) and ypT stages (ypT3-4 vs. ypT0-2: HR, 2.00; 95%CI, 1.11–3.59; p = 0.021) were significant protective/risk factors on patients OS and PFS. A decision tree model for OS indicated an optimal four to six cycles of PEC, which was recommended for ypT0-2N0 patients, while a minimum of five PEC cycles was recommended for ypT3-4N0 patients.ConclusionAC treatment is still necessary for ypN0. The duration reduction could be applied for the ypT0-2N0 stage patients but may not be suitable for higher ypT stages and beyond. A multicenter-based study is required.

scholarly journals A radiomics-based model for predicting prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer in the preoperative setting

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaeseung Shin ◽  
Joon Seok Lim ◽  
Yong-Min Huh ◽  
Jie-Hyun Kim ◽  
Woo Jin Hyung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Clinical Model ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ct ◽  
Preoperative Ct

AbstractThis study aims to evaluate the performance of a radiomic signature-based model for predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) of locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) using preoperative contrast-enhanced CT. This retrospective study included a training cohort (349 patients) and an external validation cohort (61 patients) who underwent curative resection for LAGC in 2010 without neoadjuvant therapies. Available preoperative clinical factors, including conventional CT staging and endoscopic data, and 438 radiomic features from the preoperative CT were obtained. To predict RFS, a radiomic model was developed using penalized Cox regression with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator with ten-fold cross-validation. Internal and external validations were performed using a bootstrapping method. With the final 410 patients (58.2 ± 13.0 years-old; 268 female), the radiomic model consisted of seven selected features. In both of the internal and the external validation, the integrated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of both the radiomic model (0.714, P < 0.001 [internal validation]; 0.652, P = 0.010 [external validation]) and the merged model (0.719, P < 0.001; 0.651, P = 0.014) were significantly higher than those of the clinical model (0.616; 0.594). The radiomics-based model on preoperative CT images may improve RFS prediction and high-risk stratification in the preoperative setting of LAGC.

scholarly journals Correction to: Perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer in Japan: current and future perspectives

Surgery Today ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 424-424
Author(s):  
Masanori Tokunaga ◽  
Yuya Sato ◽  
Masatoshi Nakagawa ◽  
Tomoki Aburatani ◽  
Takatoshi Matsuyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Future Perspectives ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

The article Perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer in Japan: current and future perspectives, written by Masanori Tokunaga, Yuya Sato, Masatoshi Nakagawa, Tomoki Aburatani, Takatoshi Matsuyama, Yasuaki Nakajima and Yusuke Kinugasa was originally published Online First without Open Access.

A single-arm, phase II feasibility study of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy in potentially resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 96-96
Author(s):  
M. Ryu ◽  
Y. Choi ◽  
B. Kim ◽  
Y. Park ◽  
H. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

96 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction. Methods: Forty-one patients with clinical stage T3-4N0M0 or T2-4N+M0 determined by CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and laparoscopy were enrolled between DEC 2008 and MAR 2010. Gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was conducted after 3 cycles of DOS chemotherapy. DOS chemotherapy consists of docetaxel 50 mg/m2 iv (day1), oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 iv (day1), and S-1 40 mg/m2 po bid (days1-14) at 3 weeks interval. After curative gastrectomy, the patients were given 1 year of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (40 mg/m2 D1-28, every 6 weeks). Results: All patients finished the planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-three (56%) patients achieved a partial response, and the remaining 18 patients had stable disease by CT scan after 3 cycles of DOS chemotherapy. No disease progression was observed during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A median 4.7 weeks (range, 4.0-7.6) after the start of the 3rd cycle of DOS chemotherapy, 39 (95%) patients underwent R0 resection with no pathologic residual disease in 4 (10%) patients. Hematologic toxicities were common including grade 4 neutropenia (32%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (17%), and febrile neutropenia (10%). However, hematologic toxicities were generally transient and manageable. There were no grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities with frequency > 5% of patients. With all toxicities taken together, 21 (51%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities (except grade 3 neutropenia). There was no treatment-related death, and surgical complications included only mild wound problem in 4 (10%) patients. Conclusions: In this study, neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy could induce a sufficient down-staging and R0 resection of locally advanced gastric cancer with mild and manageable toxicities. A phase III randomized trial is planned for evaluating the benefit of neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. [Table: see text]

Apatinib combined with SOX neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A multicenter, single-armed, prospective study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 367-367
Author(s):  
Jian-Xian Lin ◽  
Changming Huang
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Gastric Surgery ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Tumor Response Evaluation

367 Background: Molecular targeted therapy has made great progress in the treatment of gastric cancer. In some previous studies, apatinib, an oral small molecular of VEGFR-2 TKI, had been confirmed can improve OS and PFS with an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to two or more lines of prior chemotherapy. However, there is limited evidence about the safety and feasibility of apatinib combined with SOX regimen as neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Methods: This is a multicenter, single-armed, prospective study. Patients with AGC (cT2-4N+M0) without prior anti-cancer strategies were included. Patients were received 2 to 5 cycles (21 days a cycle) of neoadjuvant therapy using S-1 (po, 40-60 mg bid, day1-day14), oxaliplatin (iv, 130 mg/m2, day1), and apatinib (po, 500 mg qd). Apatinib was prohibited in the last cycle. The operation should be performed 2 to 4 weeks later of the neoadjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was R0 resection rate. The secondary endpoint included safety, ORR, and DCR. Results: A total of 56 patients from 10 centers in China were recruited. There were 43 males and 13 females. The median age was 63.04 years (range 41-75 years). There were 43 patients with tumor response evaluation, 29 patients (67.4%) had partial response (PR), 12 patients (27.9%) had stable disease (SD), and 2 patient (4.6%) had progressive disease (PD). The ORR and DCR were 67.4% (29/43) and 95.3% (41/43), respectively. 36 patients received gastric surgery, the R0 resection rate was 97.2%, 3 patients had postoperative complication: one had intestinal obstruction and 2 had pneumonia (all Clavien-Dindo classification less than grade II). 46 patients were included for safety analysis. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and grade 3/4 AEs were 84.8% (39/46) and 17.4% (8/46), respectively. The most common AEs were neutropenia (40%), low platelet count (40%), leucopenia (32.6%), vomit (13%). Conclusions: This prospective study shows that neoadjuvant therapy using apatinib plus SOX brings clinical benefit to AGC with a high disease control rate and tolerable adverse reactions. Clinical trial information: NCT 03192735.

Prognostic value of response assessed by RECIST and WHO criteria to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15647-e15647
Author(s):  
S. R. Park ◽  
J. S. Lee ◽  
Y. W. Kim ◽  
I. J. Choi ◽  
K. W. Ryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Who Criteria ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Response To Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

e15647 Background: In metastatic gastric cancer, the response to chemotherapy is assessed by RECIST or WHO criteria according to the change of tumor size. There are no data, however, on the usefulness of those criteria in evaluating tumor response in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy-as assessed by RECIST and WHO criteria-and clinical outcome in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients. Methods: This study recruited LAGC patients who, from January 2003 through November 2005, entered the neoadjuvant arm of prospective randomized phase II trials comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy. LAGC was defined as stage III or IV (M0) disease based on computed tomography (CT) according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. Patients with measurable lesions received 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel (36 mg/m2) and cisplatin (40 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, followed by surgery. Results: After chemotherapy, 40 (95%) patients underwent surgery and the remaining 2 patients showed new distant metastasis on CT scan. Thirty-five (83%) patients had curative R0 resection. Twenty-eight (67%) patients had a clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to RECIST/WHO criteria. Although R0 resection rate (93% vs 64%, P = 0.03), median relapse-free survival (RFS) (43.2 vs 7.5 months, P = 0.14), and overall survival (OS) (not reached vs 27.0 months, P = 0.10) were better in responders than non-responders, they did not differ significantly in the subgroup that subsequently underwent surgery. When we redefined the decrease in tumor size judged as a response by RECIST (≥60% rather than ≥30%) and WHO (≥75% rather than ≥50%) criteria, response correlated significantly with both RFS (P = 0.03) and OS (P = 0.02). Conclusions: In the neoadjuvant setting, which frequently involves smaller measurable lesions than the metastatic setting, larger changes in tumor size than those specified by RECIST and WHO criteria are needed to predict postoperative outcome. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II trial of S-1 combined with oxaliplatin (SOX) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 122-122
Author(s):  
L. Chen
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

122 Background: Previous phase II trial with combination therapy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) demonstrated high response rate and well tolerability in patients with untreated advanced gastric cancer. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOX as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Methods: Eligibility criteria included a histologically proven AGC with stage IIIb, IIIc (AJCC 7th edition), at least 1 measurable lesion, no prior chemotherapy, ECOG 0∼2, adequate hepatic, renal, and bone marrow function. Enrolled patients were staged by EUS and CT. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of 3-4 cycles of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) on day 1 and S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for 14 days with 7 days rest. After chemotherapy, the patients underwent surgery. Results: From Dec 2009 to Sep 2010, 35 patients (IIIb; 19pts, IIIc; 16pts) were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 54.6 years (range; 20-72 y). All patients were available for evaluating the clinical responese and adverse events. The overall response rate was 68.5% (1CR, 23 PR, 9 SD, 2 PD). 32 patients underwent surgical resection. Of them, 27 patients underwent standard D2 surgery and 5 patients had palliative surgery. 25 patients had R0 resection. Postoperative pathological examination showed that most of the surgical patients were in T4a stage. According to Lauren classification, 71.9% patiens (23/32pts) were diffuse type, SOX showed higher respons rate (1CR, 20 PR, 2 SD, RR: 91.3%) among these patients. Major grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were anemia (5.7%), neutropenia (5.7%) and liver dysfunction (8.6%) and non-hematological toxicities were anorexia (5.7%) and vomiting (11.4%). But most of the adverse events were managable. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) showed high response rate and and R0 resection rate for locally advanced GC, especially for diffuse type patients. All the patients did not have severe toxicity during the process of chemotherapy. This is the preliminary results, and the survival benefit in locally advanced GC patients that respond to SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy needs to be addressed by a randomized-controlled trial. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document