Anti-dementia and anti-hyperlipidemic medication use at end of life in elderly lung cancer patients: Analysis of SEER-Medicare data.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10027-10027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Ji Kim ◽  
Zhigang Duan ◽  
Hui Zhao ◽  
Holly Michelle Holmes ◽  
Joanna-Grace Mayo Manzano ◽  
...  

10027 Background: Despite risk for polypharmacy, elderly cancer patients may receive drugs whose time to benefit likely exceeds life expectancy. This study aims to describe use of drugs considered potentially unnecessary, namely anti-hyperlipidemics and anti-dementia drugs, and to identify factors associated with their use in Stage 3 or 4 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients approaching end of life. Methods: We identified all patients older than 65 diagnosed with primary Stage 3 or 4 NSCLC between 2006 and 2011 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Information on drug prescriptions was extracted from Medicare Part D files. First-time hospice enrollment or death date was used as the final endpoint in analysis. The primary outcome was use of drugs of interest at 4 months before NSCLC diagnosis, 6 months and 3 months before death or hospice. Associations with demographic or other factors were tested using the Pearson χ2 test. Results: Of all 7983 patients, 45.1% were taking statins before diagnosis, while 40.7% and 30.9% were still taking statins at 6 and 3 months before death or hospice. Use of bile acid sequestrants, fibric acid derivatives, and cholesterol absorption inhibitors were found to decrease toward death or hospice. In contrast, anti-dementia drug use did not decrease, with 3.4% before diagnosis and 4.2% and 3.5% at 6 and 3 months before death or hospice. Approximately 30% of anti-dementia medications were newly prescribed at 6 and 3 months before study endpoint. Having a higher number of prescriptions at 3 months before death or hospice was associated with higher rates of drug use both before and after cancer diagnosis. Having a higher Charlson comorbidity index correlated with greater anti-dementia drug use before diagnosis. Demographic, socioeconomic, and treatment factors were not found to be correlated with drug use. Conclusions: A high prevalence of statin use persists while a notable proportion of anti-dementia drugs are newly prescribed toward death or hospice. Our findings suggest an opportunity for clinicians to re-evaluate risks and benefits of potentially unnecessary medications in elderly patients nearing end of life.

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (S1) ◽  
pp. 17-17
Author(s):  
Amanda Lovato ◽  
Nisha Almeida

IntroductionAn important reason for receiving non-beneficial treatment at end-of life is the lack of timely discussions on goals of care and end-of-life preferences. A recent randomized clinical trial demonstrated that patients primed with a questionnaire on their end-of-life preferences were more likely to initiate such conversations with their doctors. Our objective is to integrate the questionnaire into a smartphone application to facilitate early goals of care discussions. To achieve this goal, we first plan to undertake a feasibility study to understand stakeholder preferences.MethodsAs part of a quality improvement initiative at our Canadian quaternary-care hospital, we conducted focus groups with oncology and palliative care physicians and patients to understand barriers to early conversations on end-of-life preferences, and to assess feasibility of using smartphone technology in facilitating these conversations. The app would integrate a questionnaire to patients and send prompts to physicians on patient readiness and timing of conversations.ResultsWe conducted separate focus groups with lung cancer patients (n = 6) and clinicians in oncology (n = 6) and palliative care (n = 6). Clinical teams expressed enthusiasm about early conversations but raised several barriers including system (lack of electronic documentation and access to data; multiple physicians), clinician (lack of time) and patient (stigma associated with end-of-life) barriers. Clinicians agreed that an app could overcome some of these barriers such as access to patient and electronic data by making patients the repository of all their data and empowering them to initiate discussions. However, they raised concerns about universal accessibility of such technology, especially among the elderly. Patient focus groups will take place in March 2021 and inform us on feasibility in this population.ConclusionsThere is a consensus among physicians at our hospital that early end-of-life conversations have the potential to mitigate adverse events and that use of a smart phone app could facilitate such conversations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siddharth Karanth ◽  
Suja S. Rajan ◽  
Frances L. Revere ◽  
Gulshan Sharma

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. S590-S591
Author(s):  
J.L. Cruz ◽  
M. Provencio ◽  
E. Menasalvas ◽  
C. Parejo ◽  
F. Martínez-Ruíz ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1083-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siddharth Karanth ◽  
Suja S. Rajan ◽  
Gulshan Sharma ◽  
Jose-Miguel Yamal ◽  
Robert O. Morgan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document