spanish hospital
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

217
(FIVE YEARS 50)

H-INDEX

26
(FIVE YEARS 3)

Author(s):  
Marta Valera-Rubio ◽  
María Isabel Sierra-Torres ◽  
Raquel Castillejo García ◽  
Jaime Cordero-Ramos ◽  
María Reyes López-Márquez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F. J. Carrera-Hueso ◽  
L. Álvarez-Arroyo ◽  
J. E. Poquet-Jornet ◽  
P. Vázquez-Ferreiro ◽  
R. Martínez-Gonzalbez ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives The aim was to determine the direct impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Spain’s health budget. Methods Budget impact analyses based on retrospective data from patients with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) admitted to a Spanish hospital between February 26 and May 21, 2020. Direct medical costs from the perspective of the hospital were calculated. We analyzed diagnostic tests, drugs, medical and nursing care, and isolation ward and ICU stays for three cohorts: patients seen in the emergency room only, hospitalized patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, and patients who tested negative. Results The impact on the hospital’s budget for the 3 months was calculated at €15,633,180, 97.4% of which was related to health care and hospitalization. ICU stays accounted for 5.3% of the total costs. The mean cost per patient was €10,744. The main costs were staffing costs (10,131 to 11,357 €/patient for physicians and 10,274 to 11,215 €/patient for nurses). Scenario analysis showed that the range of hospital expenditure was between €14,693,256 and €16,524,924. The median impact of the pandemic on the Spanish health budget in the sensitivity analysis using bootstrapped individual data was €9357 million (interquartile range [IQR], 9071 to 9689) for the conservative scenario (113,588 hospital admissions and 11,664 ICU admissions) and €10,385 million (IQR, 110,030 to 10,758) for the worst-case scenario (including suspected cases). Conclusion The impact of COVID-19 on the Spanish public health budget (12.3% of total public health expenditure) is greater than multiple sclerosis, cancer and diabetes cost.


Author(s):  
A. Conde‐Taboada ◽  
Á. Iglesias‐Puzas ◽  
A. Sirgado ◽  
L. Campos ◽  
I. Serrano ◽  
...  

Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (37) ◽  
pp. e27228
Author(s):  
Carmen Hidalgo-Tenorio ◽  
Coral García-Vallecillos ◽  
Sergio Sequera-Arquelladas
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Silvia Carbonell-Sahuquillo ◽  
Andrés Piolatti-Luna ◽  
José Rafael Bretón-Martínez ◽  
Silvia Castillo-Corullón

Author(s):  
José Manuel Viñuela-Prieto ◽  
Maria Carmen Escarpa Falcón ◽  
Francisco Javier Candel ◽  
Alonso Mateos Rodríguez ◽  
Juan Ignacio Torres González ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001126
Author(s):  
Rocío López Ruiz ◽  
Félix Sánchez Fernández ◽  
María Ruiz de Arcos ◽  
Julio Dotor García-Soto ◽  
Alejandro Fuerte Hortigón ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground and Objective:The most common adverse events following Alemtuzumab include adverse infusion reactions, infections and autoimmune disorders. Skin adverse events are common during infusion but there are few reported cases of long-term skin autoimmune disease.Methods:A retrospective case series of patients developing long-term autoimmune skin disorders following alemtuzumab administration in a tertiary care hospital.Results:Of 133 patients treated with alemtuzumab, eight patients (6.02%) developed nine autoimmune cutaneous adverse events, including four events of alopecia areata, two of vitiligo, two of chronic urticaria and one of inflammatory atrichia. Three of them occurred between the first and the second infusion.Discussion:The lesions described are secondary to autoimmune disorders, probably related to immune dysregulation due to a differential lymphocyte repopulation following alemtuzumab. Autoimmune cutaneous adverse events may be frequent, and it would be recommended to monitor its appearance in order to treat them.


2021 ◽  
pp. 100154
Author(s):  
Manuel Bustamante Montalvo ◽  
Miguel Cainzos ◽  
Luis Prieto Carreiras ◽  
Andrea Castiñeira Piñeiro ◽  
Adrián García Iglesias ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. S88
Author(s):  
M. Valerio ◽  
C. Veintimilla ◽  
C. Rodríguez ◽  
S. De la Villa ◽  
M. Sánchez Somolinos ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24098-e24098
Author(s):  
Veronica Velasco Durantez ◽  
Adán Rodríguez González ◽  
Maria Pilar Solis-Hernandez ◽  
Clara Iglesias Gomez ◽  
Alfonso Revuelta ◽  
...  

e24098 Background: Patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) represent a tool to objectively assess the health of cancer patients. PROMs may complement oncological evaluations by adding patients’ perspectives on their care priorities. Aim: to address more accurately the management of tumor related symptoms or drug related toxicities to bring he therapies more accurately to bring patients the best quality of life possible. Methods: Data was collected from our electronic registry after proper authorization and corresponding anonymization. Patients were systematically asked for symptoms as fever, diarrhea, dyspnea, vomiting and nausea. These symptoms were graded according to their severity using the Common Toxicity Criteria v5.0. Results: 49 patients admitted to Medical Oncology Hospitalization were included from July of 2020 to January 2021, 80% in advanced disease. Median age 63yo, 32% above 70 yo. Baseline data showed that 27% patients (19% stage IV) had fever at admission, decreasing at 48h to 4%. Patients who had vomiting at admission were 33% (28% stage IV) median grade 2 becoming 20% and grade 1 at 48h. Nausea was present in 49% patients (35% stage IV) at the time of admission with a median grade 1.5, and it decreased to 16% at 48h with a median grade 2. Diarrhea was reported in 12% patients (6% stage IV) median grade 2 at baseline and it was reduced to 10% median grade 1 at 48h. The median severity of diarrhea at admission was 2 and only 1 at 48h. At admission, 33% (all stage IV) of patients presented dyspnea with a median grade 3, while at 48h it was present in 26% of patients and reduced to median grade 2. Conclusions: By systematically measuring symptoms, patients achieved better control of diarrhea, dyspnea, vomiting and nausea after admission. It should be noted that nausea was the variable that decreased the most at 48h, followed by fever, vomiting, dyspnea and diarrhea. All patients with stage IV disease had dyspnea and most of them had nausea and vomiting. These results reflect that these symptoms are more usual in patients with advanced disease compared to those with localized disease. PROMS also help us educate patients by teaching them how to manage treatments, thus improving therapeutic adherence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document