The INFORM personalized medicine study for high-risk pediatric cancer patients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10509-10509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Christine Worst ◽  
Elke Pfaff ◽  
Cornelis M. Van Tilburg ◽  
Gnana Prakash Balasubramanian ◽  
Petra Fiesel ◽  
...  

10509 Background: Relapses from high-risk tumors pose a major clinical challenge in pediatric oncology. The German INFORM registry (INdividualized therapy FOr Relapsed Malignancies in children) addresses this problem using integrated next-generation sequencing to rapidly identify patient-specific therapeutic targets. Methods: Whole-exome, low-coverage whole-genome and RNA sequencing is complemented with microarray-based DNA methylation profiling. Identified alterations are discussed and prioritized according to biological significance and potential druggability in a weekly molecular tumor board. Results: To date, 214 tumor samples of high-risk pediatric cancer patients have been profiled from 47 German centers, with 39% being sarcomas, 30% brain tumors, 13% neuroblastoma and 18% hematological or other malignancies. Turnaround time from tissue arrival to molecular results was 21 calendar days on average. In 14/214 patients (7%) we identified an underlying germline predisposition syndrome. In several cases there were discrepancies between the original histological diagnosis and our molecular findings, especially in brain tumors. We detected one or more potentially druggable alterations in 147/214 (69%) cases. Tyrosine kinases, the PI3K/mTOR pathway, MAPK pathway, and cell-cycle as well as transcriptional regulators were commonly affected. Based on these findings, targeted therapeutics were incorporated into the therapy regime in one-third of patients, with anecdotal reports of marked responses, including a patient with a pleomorphic sarcoma, where we detected a previously undescribed RAF-fusion, showing a partial remission upon RAF-inhibition. Conclusions: In summary, real-time comprehensive profiling of pediatric tumors provides valuable diagnostic information and identifies potential therapeutic targets. In parallel, the implementation of a systematic program for reverse-translational evaluation is ongoing. Recently, this nationwide effort has expanded to include patients from other countries. We will also recruit patients to the complementary eSMART and INFORM2 biomarker-driven, phase I/II combination trial series, to provide unprecedented access to targeted therapies in Europe.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS10578-TPS10578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olena Morozova ◽  
Sofie R. Salama ◽  
Isabel Bjork ◽  
Theodore C. Goldstein ◽  
Sabine Mueller ◽  
...  

TPS10578 Background: California Kids Cancer Comparison (CKCC), a demonstration project for the California Initiative to Advance Precision Medicine, evaluates the utility of incorporating gene expression information into the genomic analysis of difficult-to-treat pediatric cancers. CKCC is a partnership between UC Santa Cruz and clinical genomic trials conducted by Children’s Hospital of Orange County, UC San Francisco (Pacific Pediatric Neuro Oncology Consortium), and Stanford University. Methods: CKCC compares each prospective tumor’s RNA sequencing profile to over 11,000 uniformly analyzed tumor profiles from pediatric and adult cancer patients. These comparisons are used to identify genes and pathways that are significantly over expressed in each patient’s tumor. The pathways are reviewed by data analysis for the potential for clinical impact and presented to the treating oncologist in a molecular tumor board setting.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2074-2074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Borretta ◽  
Tamara MacDonald ◽  
Victoria E. Price ◽  
Conrad Fernandez ◽  
Mark Bernstein ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVE: Pediatric oncology patients may require a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) for their therapy. Data from adult oncology studies indicate a high risk of complications associated with PICC lines. However, little data exists on the management experience of PICCs in pediatric oncology population. The aim of the present study was to document and analyze the management experience and complications with use of PICC lines in pediatric cancer patients at our center. METHODS: All pediatric cancer patients in the three Maritime Provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island are managed at the IWK health center in Halifax, Nova Scotia in a shared care model with regional hospitals. After ethics approval, all pediatric cancer patients managed at the IWK health center from January 1st 2000 through Dec 31st 2014 who received a PICC line were identified for inclusion in the study. The following databases were used to integrate data on the study patients: (i) pediatric oncology hospital database, (ii) Provincial Cancer in Young People database, (iii) Electronic medical records, (iv) Pharmacy database (v) IWK central line database and (v) Hospital Health records. Patients who received PICC line for an indication not related to their oncologic diagnosis or management were excluded from analysis. SPSS version 22 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 125 PICCs were placed in 102 (11.8%) of the 864 oncology patients. Of these 86 patients received 103 PICCs for oncology related indications. Fifteen (17%) patients required >1 PICC line. For the study cohort, gender ratio was 1:1. The median age at cancer diagnosis was 9.8 years (range: 0-19.3 years). Among the 86 patients who received PICC line, 37% had leukemia, 19% had lymphoma, 13% had brain tumor, 4% had sarcoma, and 28% had other diagnoses. For the first PICC, catheter duration ranged from 0 to 175 days (median 18 days) for a total of 2370 catheter days. The site of insertion was through the antecubital (16%), basilic (31%), brachial (2%), cephalic (41%), jugular (8%), saphenous (2%) veins, and was unknown in 2 patients. In 44% of patients the insertion was through the right side, 56% the left side and was unknown in 2 patients. The indication of the first PICC line included: (i) administration of chemotherapy or bone marrow transplant: 34 (39.5%), (ii) failure of a previous central venous catheter: 15 (17.4%) and (iii) supportive care such as antibiotics, parenteral nutrition or intravenous access: 37 (43.0%). The reasons for removal were as follows: (i) Complications: 24 (28.2%), (ii) elective removal: 55 (64.7%) and (iii) other reasons: 6 (7.1%). Among the 55 PICCs removed electively, 12 (14.0%) were removed at the completion of cancer treatment, 23 (26.7%) at the completion of supportive care, and 20 (23.3%) were replaced with another type of central venous catheter. Among the 24 PICCs removed due to complications, 6 were removed due to infection, 15 due to mechanical complications and 3 due to thrombosis. CONCLUSION: We found that PICC lines are frequently used in pediatric cancer patients for a variety of indications. Seventeen percent of the patients needed >1 PICC line. Further, close to 1/3rd of the patients experienced a complication related to their PICC line. Our experience highlights the need to conduct further studies addressing (i) indications of PICC line insertion in pediatric oncology (ii) determination of causes of PICC line related complications to help guide PICC line indications. Identifying patients at high risk of PICC line related complications will aid judicious choice of PICC line in pediatric cancer patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara C. Worst ◽  
Cornelis M. van Tilburg ◽  
Gnana P. Balasubramanian ◽  
Petra Fiesel ◽  
David Capper ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuko Noda ◽  
Yuhki Koga ◽  
Tamaki Ueda ◽  
Yuko Hamada ◽  
Shouichi Ohga

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S605-S606
Author(s):  
Muayad Alali ◽  
Jennifer Pisano

Abstract Background Prolonged and profound neutropenia are risk factors for invasive fungal disease (IFD) during febrile neutropenia (FN) episodes. The D-index combines both depth and duration of neutropenia in a single assessment and has been proposed as a useful tool to exclude or predict IFD in high-risk adult patients. We assessed the D-index as a predictor of IFD in pediatric cancer patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of pediatric oncology patients with FN at UCM Comer Children’s Hospitals. IFD was stratified as possible, probable, and proven according EORTC/MSG criteria. Patients considered high risk of IFD were receiving intensive chemotherapy with expected prolonged neutropenia >7 days, including, but not limited to, AML, high-risk acute ALL, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The D1-index was equal to 2t1 + 3t2, where t1, and t2 are the number of days from the first day of neutropenia < 500mm3 and < 100/ mm3 respectively, until the development of IFD. The D2-index approximates the area over the neutrophil curve during neutropenia. A cumulative D-index (c-D-index) was also calculated using the first day of neutropenia until the date of the first clinical manifestation of IFD. We compared duration of neutropenia vs D-index vs c-D-index as a predictor of IFD using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)/AUC analysis. Figure 1 Figure 2 Results We identified 455 FN episodes in 203 high-risk patients. 53/455 (11.6%) had IFD, 12 (2.6%) proven, 23 (5%) probable, and 18 (4%) possible. The median of D1, D2 indexes and c-D-index were significantly higher in patients developing IFD (38, 5225, 7352) compared to the non-IFD group (26, 3857, 5169) (P=.001, P=.001, and P=.01) respectively. The ROC curve of D-index and c-D-index (figure 1,2,3) showed better performance (AUC of 0.85,0.89, 0.81) respectively compared to the duration of neutropenia alone. The ROC was highest when D-index was combined with prolonged fever >5 days (AUC 0.94) Figure 3 Figure 4 Conclusion The D-index may be a useful tool to stratify high-risk pediatric patients according to risk of IFD. The c-D-index, particularly, may be a useful tool to guide for empiric antifungal therapy and diagnostic testing. Prospective multi-center studies using these tools are required to refine the clinical approach to IFD. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fransisca M. Sidabutar ◽  
Anggie Regia Anandari ◽  
Ingrid Karli ◽  
Yusnita Katagori ◽  
Henny E. Wirawan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document