Open label, non randomized, interventional study to evaluate response rate after induction therapy with docetaxel and cisplatin in unresectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (NCT02061631).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17513-e17513
Author(s):  
S. H. Manzoor Zaidi ◽  
Ahmed I. Masood ◽  
Syed Ijaz Hussain Shah ◽  
Irfan Hashemy
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Induction Regimen

e17513 Background: This single arm, multicenter, phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate overall response (OR) rate and safety of subjects treated with induction regimen docetaxel + cisplatin, followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT), in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity (stage III or IV) without distant metastasis. Methods: Induction regimen consisted of docetaxel 75mg/m2 and cisplatin 75mg/m2 on day 1; cycles were repeated every 21 days for 3 cycles with supportive G-CSF treatment beginning at first cycle. CRT consisted of weekly cisplatin 30mg/m2 for 4 weeks starting concomitantly with 60 Gy/30 fractions of conventional radiotherapy for 6 weeks. Primary and secondary efficacy criteria were OR rate at 3 weeks after cycle 3 and 8 weeks after last cycle of CRT respectively. Results: Three centers enrolled 35 patients. Primary efficacy endpoint: OR rate of evaluable patients (n = 27) was 88.9% (95% CI:71.9-96.2). Complete response (CR) was not achieved by any patients; partial response (PR) was achieved by 88.9% (24 of 27). From intent to treat (ITT) analysis OR rate was 68.6% (24 of 35). Secondary efficacy endpoint: OR rate of evaluable patients (n = 19) was 78.9% (95% CI:56.7-91.5) with CR and PR achieved by 2 (10.5%) and 13 (68.4%) patients respectively. Progressive disease (PD) was present in 4 patients. From ITT analysis CR rate was 5.7% (2 of 35) and OR rate was 42.9% (15 of 35). During induction most common hematological toxicity was leukopenia in 8 patients, with ≥Grade 3 leukopenia in 3 patients. Common non hematologic toxicities (all grades) were nausea, stomatitis and alopecia in 21, 18 and 18 patients respectively. During CRT most common adverse events were alopecia, stomatitis and nausea in 14, 13 and 13 patients respectively. Overall, leukopenia met seriousness criteria in 4 patients, and there was 1 case of febrile neutropenia. Overall, 7 patients died. Fatal events were not associated to investigational drugs. Conclusions: We observed an ITT response rate of 68.6% with docetaxel + cisplatin, suggestive of an active induction regimen with manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT02061631.

Response to docetaxel and cisplatin induction chemotherapy of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter, non-comparative, open-label interventional pilot study

2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (9) ◽  
pp. 833-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Noronha ◽  
C Goswami ◽  
S Patil ◽  
A Joshi ◽  
V M Patil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Induction Regimen

AbstractBackground:Docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil is an efficacious induction regimen but is more toxic than cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil. This study aimed to determine whether docetaxel and cisplatin without 5-fluorouracil maintains efficacy while decreasing toxicity.Methods:A multicenter non-comparative pilot study of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was performed. Patients received primary therapy comprising three cycles of 75 mg/m2 docetaxel and 75 mg/m2 cisplatin followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the response rate to the docetaxel and cisplatin induction regimen.Results:A total of 26 patients were enrolled: of these, 23 (88.5 per cent) received all three docetaxel and cisplatin cycles. Common grade 3–4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (19.2 per cent of patients), diarrhoea (19.2 per cent) and non-neutropenic infection (15.4 per cent). The overall response rate to docetaxel and cisplatin induction chemotherapy was 65.4 per cent. A total of 23 patients (88.5 per cent) subsequently received chemoradiotherapy with a median radiotherapy dose of 70 Gy. The response rate to chemoradiotherapy was 73 per cent. At a median follow up of 44 months, the 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 62 per cent and 69 per cent, respectively.Conclusion:Docetaxel and cisplatin induction chemotherapy is a feasible induction regimen with comparable efficacy to docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Pooled analysis of 115 patients from updated data of Epitopes-HPV01 and Epitopes-HPV02 studies in first-line advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592097535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Kim ◽  
Aurélia Meurisse ◽  
Laurie Spehner ◽  
Morgane Stouvenot ◽  
Eric François ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Aims: The addition of docetaxel to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) has shown promising efficacy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). Preliminary results of Epitopes-HPV01 study showed a high rate of long-lasting complete response to DCF. The prospective, multicenter, Epitopes-HPV02 trial then confirmed the high efficacy of the modified DCF (mDCF) regimen in terms of complete response rate and long-term survival in metastatic or non-resectable locally advanced recurrent SCCA. Here, we present updated results of the Epitopes-HPV01 and Epitopes-HPV02 studies. Patients & methods: Epitopes-HPV01 is a prospective study performed by the regional cancer network of Franche-Comté, France. Epitopes-HPV02 is a phase II study supported by two French collaborative oncological groups, performed in 25 centers. Both studies included patients with metastatic, or with unresectable local recurrent SCCA, treated with DCF regimen. Results: In Epitopes-HPV01, 51 patients were enrolled between September 2012 and January 2019, and 49 patients were included for analysis; while 69 patients were included between September 2014 and December 2016 in Epitopes-HPV02, and 66 patients for analysis. Pooled analysis of 115 patients showed a median progression-free survival of 12.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.6–16.1] [11.0 months (9.3–16.0) in -HPV02, and 15.6 months (11.2–34.5) in -HPV01, ( p = 0.06)]. The median overall survival was 39.2 months (26.0–109.1) [36.3 in -HPV02 (25.2–NR), and 61.1 months (21.4–120.0) in -HPV01 ( p = 0.62)]. Objective response rate was 87.7% (90.9% in -HPV02 and 83.3% in -HPV01) with 40.3% of complete response (45.5% in -HPV02 and 33.3% in -HPV01). No differences were observed between standard DCF ( n = 54) and mDCF ( n = 58) in terms of OS ( p = 0.57) and PFS ( p = 0.99). 5-years PFS and OS rates were 24.5% and 44.4%, respectively, in the whole population. No treatment-related death was observed. Conclusion: Updated results of Epitopes-HPV01 and 02 studies, as well as the pooled analysis, confirm mDCF as a standard treatment in patients with advanced SCCA.

scholarly journals Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with S-1 Compared with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Docetaxel and Cisplatin for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-Lei Zhou ◽  
Chang-Hua Yu ◽  
Wan-Wei Wang ◽  
Fu-Zhi Ji ◽  
Yao-Zu Xiong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: This retrospective study was to assess and compare the toxicity and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with S-1 or docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: Patients who had locally advanced ESCC and received CCRT with S-1 (70mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14, every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, S-1 group) or docetaxel (25mg/m2) and cisplatin (25mg/m2) on day 1 weekly (DP group) between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment-related toxicities, response rate, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Results: A total of 175 patients were included in this study (72 in the S-1 group and 103 in the DP group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events were significantly lower in the S-1 group than in the DP group (22.2% versus 45.6%, p = 0.002). The objective overall response rate (complete response + partial response) was 68.1% in the S-1 group, and 73.8% the DP group (p = 0.497). The 3-year overall survival was 34.7% in the S-1 group, and 38.8% in the DP group (p = 0.422). The 3-year progression free survival in the DP group was higher than that in the S-1 group but without significant difference (33.0% versus 25.0%, p = 0.275). Conclusion: CCRT with S-1 is not inferior to CCRT with docetaxel and cisplatin and is better tolerated in in elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Cisplatin and Radiotherapy With or Without Erlotinib in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Randomized Phase II Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1415-1421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato G. Martins ◽  
Upendra Parvathaneni ◽  
Julie E. Bauman ◽  
Anand K. Sharma ◽  
Luis E. Raez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Egfr Inhibition ◽  
End Point

Purpose The combination of cisplatin and radiotherapy is a standard treatment for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Cetuximab-radiotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in this population, validating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a target. Erlotinib is a small-molecule inhibitor of EGFR. Adding EGFR inhibition to standard cisplatin-radiotherapy may improve efficacy. Patients and Methods Patients with locally advanced SCCHN were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, and 43 combined with 70 Gy of radiotherapy (arm A) or the same chemoradiotherapy with erlotinib 150 mg per day, starting 1 week before radiotherapy and continued to its completion (arm B). The primary end point was complete response rate (CRR), evaluated by central review. The secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Available tumors were tested for p16 and EGFR by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Results Between December 2006 and October 2011, 204 patients were randomly assigned. Arms were well balanced for all patient characteristics including p16, with the exception of more women on arm A. Patients on arm B had more rash, but treatment arms did not differ regarding rates of other grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Arm A had a CRR of 40% and arm B had a CRR of 52% (P = .08) when evaluated by central review. With a median follow-up time of 26 months and 54 progression events, there was no difference in PFS (hazard ratio, 0.9; P = .71). Conclusion Erlotinib did not increase the toxicity of cisplatin and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced HNSCC but failed to significantly increase CRR or PFS.

Neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil before concurrent chemoradiotherapy or concurrent cetuximab-radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17045-e17045
Author(s):  
S. Billan ◽  
R. Abdah-Bortnyak ◽  
F. Mezid ◽  
Z. Bernstein ◽  
E. Gez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma

e17045 Background: Encouraging results have recently been reported in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The present study assessed the feasibility of neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CHT-RT) or concurrent cetuximab-radiotherapy. Methods: Induction chemotherapy consisted of TPF (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), cisplatin 75 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2)/d continuous infusion for 96 h) every three weeks, followed by CHT-RT regimen (radiotherapy 70 Gy total dose fractionated at 2Gy per day, 5 days a week concurrently with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) or cetuximab with loading dose of 400 one week before starting radiotherapy and 250 weekly during the radiotherapy) 4–7 weeks later. Percutaneus endoscopic gastrectomy inserted before the combined treatment. The National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (version 2) were used for classification of adverse events. Results: Between march 2007 and november 2008, 29 previously untreated patients (19 male and 4 female) with stage III-IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx, or hypopharynx were included to the study. The median age was 60 years (range, 56–75 years). The stage distribution was as follows: stage II, 1 patient; stage III, 14 patients; and stage IV, 14 patients. 16 patients had a performance status of 0 and 11 had a performance status of 1. The response rate (RR) after IC was: complete response (CR) for 10 pts (34%), partial response (PR) for 13 pts (57%) and no response (NR) for 3 pts (13%). Toxicity from IC included neutropenia Gr III,IV 25%,neutropenic fever 9%, mucositis and diarrhrea Gr III, IV 22% . 60% of patients completed 3 cycles, 20% received 2 cycles and 20% received only one cycle of TPF. The toxicity from the concurrent phase included mucositis Gr III-IV in 70% of patients,dermatitis Gr III-IV in 43% and no case of neutropenia Gr III-IV. The combined treatment was interrupted only in 4 patients for one week. Conclusions: TPF was well tolerated with high response rate and low rate of acute toxicity. Three cycles of TPF followed by combined treatment are feasible. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Cetuximab, paclitaxel, cisplatin and concurrent radiation in Chinese patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: An open-label, multicenter, phase II study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4073-4073
Author(s):  
Jinming Yu ◽  
Xue Meng ◽  
Jian hua Wang ◽  
Xindong Sun ◽  
Lv hua Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

4073 Background: In China more than 90% of esophageal malignancies are of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We conducted this Chinese multicenter trial to determine the efficacy and safety of the addition of cetuximab with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and concurrent radiation for patients with esophageal SCC and to determine whether KRAS status predicts response. Methods: Patients with unresectable locally advanced cervical, upper or mid-esophageal SCC without distant metastasis were eligible for this open-label phase II trial. All patients received cetuximab (400 mg/m2 day 1 before chemoradiotherapy and 250 mg/m2 q1w × 7 weeks), paclitaxel (45 mg/m2 q1w × 7 weeks) and cisplatin (20 mg/m2 q1w × 7 weeks) with 59.4 Gy of radiation. The primary end point was response rate. Second end points included toxicity, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and KRAS mutation status. Results: Fifty-five patients were enrolled and evaluable to safety. Non-hematological adverse events were generally grade 1 or 2, and were most often rash (94.5%), mucositis (58.2%), fatigue (45.5%), nausea (41.8%) and hepatic dyfunction (40%). Hematologic adverse events included grade 3 neutropenia (32.7%) and grade 3 anemia (1.82%). Ten patients did not complete the protocol therapy (6 for chemotherapy dose delays, 1 for paciltaxel hypersensitivity, 1 by the treating physicians for unstated reasons, 1 for concurrent unrelated infection, and 1 for tracheo-esophageal fistula). The response rate was 97.7%. The 1-year OS and median OS was 87.3% and 16.8 months, the 1-year PFS and median PFS was 30.4% and 13.9 months, respectively. No mutations were detected at KRAS codons 12 or 13 in the 52 available specimens. Conclusions: Cetuximab can be safely administered with chemoradiation for Chinese patients with esophageal cancer and may improve the clinical response rate. KRAS mutations were too rare to be analyzed as a predictor of response.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document