Cannabis use in palliative care: The prevalence and clinical characteristics.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 245-245
Author(s):  
Young Doo Chang ◽  
Joshua S. Smith ◽  
Ritika Oberoi-Jassal ◽  
Vijay Desai ◽  
Stephanie L Winn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
P Value ◽  
Spiritual Wellbeing ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Palliative Care Setting ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Drug Sample

245 Background: Cannabis has growing attention in palliative care, been used for some cancer related symptom burden, but limited data in terms of prevalence in palliative care setting and clinical characteristics with using it. Purpose: To identify the prevalence of positive rate of cannabis metabolite on urine drug sample (UDS) and compare clinical characteristics focused on symptoms burden on Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) on the same day of UDS. Methods: We conducted retrospective medical records review of 919 consecutive supportive care clinic patients who were seen at a National Cancer Institute center during a 12-month period between 7/01/2015 to 6/30/2016. Results: 531 out of 919 patients were excluded because UDS was not ordered: either patients were established or had low risk of substance abuse by clinicians’ judgement. 2 patients did not complete ESAS on same day of UDS. 137 patients were excluded because of missing UDS results as well. Finally, 249 out of 919 patients were included for data analysis with their UDS and ESAS at same day of visit. 54 patients were positive for cannabis metabolite (THC: tetrahydrocannabinol) on UDS (22%). We found that positive cannabis group was younger (Mean age 56.1 vs 48.8, p-Value .001), reported higher score of total ESAS (Mean 45.5 vs 38.9, p-value 0.023), pain (Mean 6.13 vs 4.99, p-Value 0.007), and insomnia (6.04 vs 4.44, p-Value 0.001). In addition, positive cannabis group reported poorer overall wellbeing (5.43 vs 4.56, p-Value 0.015) and spiritual wellbeing (6.04 vs 4.44, p Value 0.040) compared to negative cannabis group. Conclusions: The positive results of cannabis on UDS may be a marker of greater symptom burden, in particular, pain, insomnia and poorer overall and spiritual wellbeing as assessed by ESAS patient’s self-reporting.

Clinical needs of patients referred early to supportive and palliative care.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9065-9065
Author(s):  
Jung Hye Kwon ◽  
David Hui ◽  
Caroline Ann Ha ◽  
Gary B. Chisholm ◽  
Sriram Yennurajalingam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Service Utilization ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

9065 Background: Palliative care is evolving from delivering care to patients at the end-of-life to those earlier in the disease trajectory. We evaluated the differences in clinical characteristics, symptoms burdens, and service utilization between traditional palliative care patients (late referrals, LR) and the new patients group who are in earlier in their course of disease (early referrals, ER). Methods: We reviewed consecutive cancer patients referred to the Supportive Care Clinic with follow up visit within 30 days between August 2008 and October 2010. Patients were divided into two groups: ER (defined as patients with expected survival ≥ 2 years or receiving treatment for curative intent) and LR (all others). We compared clinical characteristics, symptoms and service utilization between both groups using chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: 58% (695/1208) patients had a 2nd visit within 30 days. Among them, 100 patients were classified as ER (14.4%) and 100/595 LR were randomly selected as the comparison group. ER patients were younger (median age 54 years vs 60 years, p=0.009), more likely to have head and neck cancer (67% vs 6%, p<0.001) and to have a shorter interval between cancer diagnosis and palliative care consultation (3.8 m vs 16.2 m, <0.001). ER patients were also more likely to be CAGE positive (15% vs 4%, p=.014), referred from radiation oncology (49% vs 3%, p<0.001), referred for treatment related side effects (70% vs 9%, p<0.001), and receiving active anti-cancer treatment at the time of consultation (74% vs 48%, p=0.0002). Baseline symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale) were similar between ER and LR except for insomnia (1.8 vs 2, p=0.004). LR patients experienced greater improvement in the symptom distress score (-5.5 vs -3, p=0.007). Overall median number of medical visits was 24 for ER vs 10.5 for LR (p<0.001); however, median visit per month was 4.3 for LR and 2.1 for ER (p<0.001). Conclusions: ER was associated with different patient characteristics; patients have similar distress but different needs and outcomes as compared to traditional LR patients.

scholarly journals Integrating Palliative Care Services in Ambulatory Oncology: An Application of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. e401-e407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherri L. Rauenzahn ◽  
Susanne Schmidt ◽  
Ifeoma O. Aduba ◽  
Jessica T. Jones ◽  
Nazneen Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Referral System ◽  
Referral Rates ◽  
Ambulatory Oncology ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

Purpose: Research in palliative care demonstrates improvements in overall survival, quality of life, symptom management, and reductions in the cost of care. Despite the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendation for early concurrent palliative care in patients with advanced cancer and high symptom burden, integrating palliative services is challenging. Our aims were to quantitatively describe the palliative referral rates and symptom burden in a South Texas cancer center and establish a palliative referral system by implementing the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). Methods: As part of our Plan-Do-Study-Act process, all staff received an educational overview of the ESAS tool and consultation ordering process. The ESAS form was then implemented across five ambulatory oncology clinics to assess symptom burden and changes therein longitudinally. Referral rates and symptom assessment scores were tracked as metrics for quality improvement. Results: On average, one patient per month was referred before implementation of the intervention compared with 10 patients per month after implementation across all clinics. In five sample clinics, 607 patients completed the initial assessment, and 430 follow-up forms were collected over 5 months, resulting in a total of 1,037 scores collected in REDCap. The mean ESAS score for initial patient visits was 20.0 (standard deviation, 18.1), and referred patients had an initial mean score of 39.0 (standard deviation, 19.0). Conclusion: This project highlights the low palliative care consultation rate, high symptom burden of oncology patients, and underuse of services by oncologists despite improvements with the introduction of a symptom assessment form and referral system.

The influence of a cachexia clinic on palliative care integration in oncology.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 124-124
Author(s):  
Diane Portman ◽  
Sarah Thirlwell ◽  
Kristine A. Donovan
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
The Impact

124 Background: Appetite and weight loss are common in patients with advanced cancer and specialized cachexia clinics have been established to address these symptoms. Given the association between anorexia/cachexia and other adverse symptoms, these patients may also benefit from specialty level palliative care (PC). However, referral to outpatient specialty level PC is often delayed or does not occur. We sought to examine the prevalence of other factors associated with appetite and weight loss in patients with advanced cancer and the impact of a specialized cachexia clinic on identification and treatment of other PC needs. Methods: The records of patients referred by their Oncologist to the cachexia clinic of a cancer center from August 2016 to June 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Subjects who had been referred to PC by their Oncologist were excluded. Patients had been assessed for symptom burden using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-r). Patients identified with PC needs had been referred to the PC clinic for follow-up within 30 days after cachexia clinic consultation. Results: Thirty subjects were evaluated in the cachexia clinic (average age 68 years; 63% female). The predominant diagnosis was lung cancer (70%). An average of 6 symptoms per patient were in the moderate to severe range on ESAS, excluding appetite. Depression, fatigue and pain were most common. The average cachexia clinic total ESAS score was 51.61. Only 17% of patients had completed advance directives. Ninety-three % of patients were referred to PC and 68% were seen. The average number of PC visits was 2.79. Within the PC clinic, advance directive completion increased to 37%, goals of care discussion occurred with 50% and 17% received hospice referrals. At the most recent follow-up in the PC clinic, the average total ESAS score had decreased by 11.44 (22%) and all ESAS item scores were improved on average. Conclusions: The cachexia clinic proved a useful means to identify other PC needs and achieve effective PC referrals. We suggest this is proof of concept that specialty clinics can be a meaningful way to achieve an earlier entry point to comprehensive PC in patients who were not previously referred by their Oncologists.

Symptom reduction in palliative care from single session mindful breathing: a randomised controlled trial

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei Ling Look ◽  
Seng Beng Tan ◽  
Li Li Hong ◽  
Chong Guan Ng ◽  
Hway Ann Yee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Single Session ◽  
Median Reduction ◽  
Palliative Care Setting ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Multiple Symptoms

ContextThere has been increasing evidence of the role of mindfulness-based interventions in improving various health conditions. However, the evidence for the use of mindfulness in the palliative care setting is still lacking.ObjectivesThe objective of our study was to determine the efficacy of a single session of 20 min mindful breathing in alleviating multiple symptoms in palliative care.MethodsAdult palliative care in patients with at least one symptom scoring ≥5/10 based on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) were recruited from September 2018 to December 2018. Recruited patients were randomly assigned to either 20 min mindful breathing and standard care or standard care alone.ResultsForty patients were randomly assigned to standard care plus a 20 min mindful breathing session (n=20) or standard care alone (n=20). There was statistically significant reduction of total ESAS score in the mindful breathing group compared with the control group at minute 20 (U=98, n 1 = n 2 = 20, mean rank 1 = 15.4, mean rank 2 = 25.6, median reduction 1 = 6.5, median reduction 2 = 1.5, z=−2.763, r=0.3, p=0.005).ConclusionOur results provided evidence that a single session of 20 min mindful breathing was effective in reducing multiple symptoms rapidly for palliative care patients.

Comfort Level in Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients and Affecting Factors: What Should We Know?

2021 ◽  
pp. 003022282110147
Author(s):  
Kadriye Sayin Kasar ◽  
Yasemin Yildirim ◽  
Ulku Bulut
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Nursing Care ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Comfort Level ◽  
Affecting Factors ◽  
Holistic Nursing ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale

Caregivers are an important source of support for patients in palliative care. Comfort is an important concept in nursing care for both patients and their families, and nurses aim to increase comfort. The aim of the study was to determine the comfort level and influencing factors in caregivers of palliative care patients. The research sample consisted of 102 caregivers related to palliative care patients. The data were obtained with an Individual Information Form, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and the End of Life Comfort Scale (Caregiver/Family). The study was conducted in the palliative care clinic of Aksaray University Training and Research Hospital between October 2018 and April 2019. There was a significant relationship between the total comfort score of the caregivers and the patient's performance status, the caregivers' age, their economic situation, the length of the caregiving period and receiving help in care (social support) ( p < 0.05). Providing comfort is an important function and challenge for holistic nursing care, as comfort is a lifelong need in health and disease. Caregivers in the risk group should be aware of this issue and necessary precautions should be taken.

Utilization of an electronic medical record trigger to promote palliative care consultation in ambulatory oncology.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18201-e18201
Author(s):  
Sherri L. Rauenzahn ◽  
Susanne Schmidt ◽  
Nazneen Ali ◽  
Laura LaNiel Tenner
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Medical Record ◽  
Electronic Medical Record ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Ambulatory Oncology ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
The Impact

e18201 Background: Research insupportive care demonstrates improvements in overall survival, quality of life, symptom management, and reductions in the cost of care. Despite the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendation for early concurrent supportive care in patients with advanced cancer and high symptom burden, integrating supportive services is challenging. Our aims were to 1) implement an electronic medical record (EMR) provider alert of high symptom burden based on Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) criteria and 2) determine the impact an alert has on supportive service referrals. Methods: ESAS scores were implemented in medical ambulatory oncology clinics to quantitatively assess symptom burden. An EMR alert was programmed for a total ESAS score > 30 and any single response of ≥9 to capture approximately 15% of our high symptom burden patient population. The provider could elect to accept the alert placing an order for palliative consultation or decline the prompt. Referral rates and symptom assessment scores were followed as metrics for EMR alert efficiency. Results: Over 10 months, 9,710 patient visits used the ESAS system resulting in 7,707 fully completed ESAS scores (79.4% completion rate). There were 78 total consults to palliative care, a referral rate of less than 1% of the population, which was unchanged from prior to trigger implementation. Of the total completed ESAS forms, the trigger alerted 686 times (8.9% of patient visits) with only 55 of those triggers leading to a supportive care referral (8.0%). Conclusions: This project highlights the challenges of an EMR based alert system and the need for continued efforts to improve supportive care referrals through provider education and tool implementation. [Table: see text]

Symptom burden and distress in patients with cancer in Africa.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 255-255
Author(s):  
John K. Weru
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

255 Background: Cancer has become a significant public health problem in Africa but still most diagnoses are made late, Sitas et al (2006). The need for palliative care is significant due to the late contact with health care providers and the many symptoms they present with. No study has been undertaken to assess symptomatology for these patients in Africa. Objective: To study the prevalence of symptoms in patients with cancer in an African setting. Methods: Symptom studies from records of patients with cancer referred to the Palliative Care Services at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi in 6 months. Symptoms charted on Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Results: 42 patients were referred to the service in this period. All the patients reported > 3 symptoms which cut across the physical, social, psychological and spiritual concerns. The most common symptoms were pain in the physical dimension (90%) as reported by the patient. Fatigue was reported by (93%).Family wellbeing was the main worry in psychological dimension (95%). 94 % reported social disconnect due to the diagnosis, job losses and huge cost of health care. 96% suffered from the existential question of why me and worry about the future. Conclusions: Cancer has become a major burden to patients, families, societies and nations in Africa. Patients suffering from this illness experience a myriad of symptoms which require holistic approach to care. Social wellbeing remains a major concern for patients with cancer in Africa.

Hope, Symptoms, and Palliative Care

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mellar P. Davis ◽  
Ruth Lagman ◽  
Armida Parala ◽  
Chirag Patel ◽  
Tanya Sanford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Marital Status ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Cancer Site ◽  
Cancer Symptoms ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

Background: Hope is important to patients with cancer. Identifying factors that influence hope is important. Anxiety, depression, fatigue, and pain are reported to impair hope. The objective of this study was to determine whether age, gender, marital status, duration of cancer, symptoms, or symptom burden measured by the sum of severity scores on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) correlated with hope measured by the Herth Hope Index (HHI). Methods: Patients with advanced cancer in a palliative care unit participated. Demographics including age, gender, marital status, cancer site, and duration of cancer were collected. Individuals completed the ESAS and HHI. Spearman correlation and linear regression were used to assess associations adjusting for gender (male vs female), age (< 65 vs ≥ 65 years), marital status (married or living with a partner vs other), and duration of cancer (≤ 12 vs > 12 months). Results: One hundred and ninety-seven were participated in the study, of which 55% were female with a mean age of 61 years (standard deviation 11). Hope was not associated with gender, age, marital status, or duration of cancer. In univariable analysis, hope inversely correlated with ESAS score (−0.28), lack of appetite (−0.22), shortness of breath (−0.17), depression (−0.39), anxiety (−0.32), and lack of well-being (−0.33); only depression was clinically relevant. In multivariable analysis, total symptom burden weakly correlated with hope; only depression remained clinically significant. Discussion: This study found correlation between symptom burden and hope was not clinically relevant but was so for depression. Conclusion: Among 9 ESAS symptoms, only depression had a clinically relevant correlation with hope.

Phase II Study of an Outpatient Palliative Care Intervention in Patients With Metastatic Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Follwell ◽  
Debika Burman ◽  
Lisa W. Le ◽  
Kristina Wakimoto ◽  
Dori Seccareccia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Family Satisfaction ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
The Mean

Purpose Although there is increasing advocacy for timely symptom control in patients with cancer, few studies have assessed outpatient palliative care clinics. This study assessed prospectively the efficacy of an Oncology Palliative Care Clinic (OPCC) in improving patient symptom distress and satisfaction. Patients and Methods Eligible patients were new referrals to an OPCC, had metastatic cancer, were at least 18 years old, and were well enough and able to speak and read English sufficiently to provide informed consent and complete questionnaires. Patients received a consultation by a palliative care team. The primary end points of symptom control and patient satisfaction were assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and patient-adapted Family Satisfaction with Advanced Cancer Care (FAMCARE) scale at baseline, 1 week, and 1 month. Initial and follow-up scores were compared using paired t tests. Results Of 150 patients enrolled, 123 completed 1-week assessments, and 88 completed 4-week assessments. At baseline, the mean ESAS Distress Score (EDS) was 39.5. The mean improvement in EDS was 8.8 points (P < .0001) at 1 week and 7.0 points (P < .0001) at 1 month. Statistically significant improvements were observed for pain, fatigue, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, dyspnea, insomnia, and constipation at 1 week (all P ≤ .005) and 1 month (all P ≤ .05). The mean improvement in FAMCARE score was 6.1 points (P < .0001) at 1 week and 5.0 points (P < .0001) at 1 month. Conclusion This phase II study demonstrates efficacy of an OPCC for improvement of symptom control and patient satisfaction with care. Randomized controlled trials are indicated to further evaluate the effectiveness of specialized outpatient palliative care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document