NESC multicenter phase II trial in the preoperative treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma with chemotherapy (docetaxel-cisplatin-5FU + lenograstim) followed by chemoradiation (RTCT) based 5FU and oxaliplatin and surgery.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 95-95
Author(s):  
Laurent Mineur ◽  
Gael Deplanque ◽  
Francoise Desseigne ◽  
Laurence Moureau-Zabotto ◽  
Olivier Boulat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Gastric Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Subtotal Gastrectomy ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Preoperative Treatment

95 Background: Perioperative chemotherapy is a standard treatment. The combination of Docetaxel- cddp-5FU(DCF) is a treatment in metastatic gastric cancer with high response rate. Preoperative RTCT is expected to increase the rate of curative resections and complete histological response. We investigate the efficacy of an optimal chemotherapy with DCF + lenograstim then preoperative RTCT with oxaliplatin - 5FU in gastric adk. Methods: Between 2009 and 2014, 33 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma(adk) were included. Inclusion criteria adk of stomach, cardia, Siewert II, III, according to staging classification T2bT3T4anyNM0 optional laparoscopy. Treatment consisted of 2 cycles docetaxel 75 mg/m2 I.V. day 1, cddp 75 mg/ m2 I.V. day 1, 5-FU 750 mg/m2 continuous infusion for 120 h, every 3 weeks and lenograstim followed by RTCT delivered in 25 daily fractions of 1.8 Gy in 5 weeks with 5Fu 250mg/m2 continuous infusion per day on days 1 to 35 and oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 day 1-14-28. Surgery was performed 4-6 weeks after RTCT. The primary endpoints were pathological response rate and secondary PFS, overall survival, morbidity and post operative mortality, toxicity. Results: 33 patients were included, 1patient progressive disease(PD) after 2 cycles of DCF, 32 patients received RTCT and 2 patients PD after RTCT, 1 patient refused surgery. 29 patients were operated and 3 non resected (peritoneal metastasis). 26 patients underwent surgery after RTCT (total gastrectomy n = 12, total gastrectomy and diaphragm surgery n = 1 lewis santy n = 11, subtotal gastrectomy n = 1, Enlarged gastrectomy transverse colectomy and partial pancreatic n = 1 D1 (n = 5) and D2 (n = 21) R0 resection rate was n = 26/26. Postoperative morbidity (n = 12) and mortality (n = 2), histology mean nods examined and involved respectively 16 and 2,5. pT0pN0 23% pT1pN0 19% pTpN2N3 20% others 38%. < 10% residual tumor 27% histologic complete response 23%. Conclusions: Promising results from trials involving preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery in gastric cancer need to be further evaluated in a Phase III and compared with perioperative CT. Clinical trial information: NCT01565109.

Phase II Trial of 4′-Epi-Doxorubicin in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer

1988 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Cazap ◽  
Roberto Estevez ◽  
Mario Bruno ◽  
Daniel Levy ◽  
Carlos Algamiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Gastric Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Phase Iii Trials

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma received an i.v. bolus of 4′-epi-doxorubicin, 75/mg/m2/cycle, every 21 days. Partial responses were observed in 5 of 23 evaluable patients (21.7%). Treatment was generally well tolerated and toxicity was mild. The response rate to epirubicin appears to be very similar to that reported for doxorubicin. Larger doses of epirubicin could be safely used in future studies, and further evaluation of epirubicin in phase III trials is indicated.

Phase II trial of S-1 combined with oxaliplatin (SOX) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 122-122
Author(s):  
L. Chen
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

122 Background: Previous phase II trial with combination therapy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) demonstrated high response rate and well tolerability in patients with untreated advanced gastric cancer. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOX as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Methods: Eligibility criteria included a histologically proven AGC with stage IIIb, IIIc (AJCC 7th edition), at least 1 measurable lesion, no prior chemotherapy, ECOG 0∼2, adequate hepatic, renal, and bone marrow function. Enrolled patients were staged by EUS and CT. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of 3-4 cycles of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) on day 1 and S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for 14 days with 7 days rest. After chemotherapy, the patients underwent surgery. Results: From Dec 2009 to Sep 2010, 35 patients (IIIb; 19pts, IIIc; 16pts) were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 54.6 years (range; 20-72 y). All patients were available for evaluating the clinical responese and adverse events. The overall response rate was 68.5% (1CR, 23 PR, 9 SD, 2 PD). 32 patients underwent surgical resection. Of them, 27 patients underwent standard D2 surgery and 5 patients had palliative surgery. 25 patients had R0 resection. Postoperative pathological examination showed that most of the surgical patients were in T4a stage. According to Lauren classification, 71.9% patiens (23/32pts) were diffuse type, SOX showed higher respons rate (1CR, 20 PR, 2 SD, RR: 91.3%) among these patients. Major grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were anemia (5.7%), neutropenia (5.7%) and liver dysfunction (8.6%) and non-hematological toxicities were anorexia (5.7%) and vomiting (11.4%). But most of the adverse events were managable. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) showed high response rate and and R0 resection rate for locally advanced GC, especially for diffuse type patients. All the patients did not have severe toxicity during the process of chemotherapy. This is the preliminary results, and the survival benefit in locally advanced GC patients that respond to SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy needs to be addressed by a randomized-controlled trial. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Compared With Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Cancer of the Stomach and Cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Randomized Trial 40954

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (35) ◽  
pp. 5210-5218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Schuhmacher ◽  
Stephan Gretschel ◽  
Florian Lordick ◽  
Peter Reichardt ◽  
Werner Hohenberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Preoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Postoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate

PurposePatients with locally advanced gastric cancer benefit from combined pre- and postoperative chemotherapy, although fewer than 50% could receive postoperative chemotherapy. We examined the value of purely preoperative chemotherapy in a phase III trial with strict preoperative staging and surgical resection guidelines.Patients and MethodsPatients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction (AEG II and III) were randomly assigned to preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery or to surgery alone. To detect with 80% power an improvement in median survival from 17 months with surgery alone to 24 months with neoadjuvant, 282 events were required.ResultsThis trial was stopped for poor accrual after 144 patients were randomly assigned (72:72); 52.8% patients had tumors located in the proximal third of the stomach, including AEG type II and III. The International Union Against Cancer R0 resection rate was 81.9% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as compared with 66.7% with surgery alone (P = .036). The surgery-only group had more lymph node metastases than the neoadjuvant group (76.5% v 61.4%; P = .018). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the neoadjuvant arm (27.1% v 16.2%; P = .09). After a median follow-up of 4.4 years and 67 deaths, a survival benefit could not be shown (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.35; P = .466).ConclusionThis trial showed a significantly increased R0 resection rate but failed to demonstrate a survival benefit. Possible explanations are low statistical power, a high rate of proximal gastric cancer including AEG and/or a better outcome than expected after radical surgery alone due to the high quality of surgery with resections of regional lymph nodes outside the perigastic area (celiac trunc, hepatic ligament, lymph node at a. lienalis; D2).

scholarly journals Updated Analysis of SWOG-Directed Intergroup Study 0116: A Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Radiochemotherapy Versus Observation After Curative Gastric Cancer Resection

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (19) ◽  
pp. 2327-2333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen R. Smalley ◽  
Jacqueline K. Benedetti ◽  
Daniel G. Haller ◽  
Scott A. Hundahl ◽  
Norman C. Estes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Substantial Reduction ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Second Malignancies ◽  
Adjuvant Radiochemotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Failure Patterns ◽  
Postoperative Radiochemotherapy

Purpose Surgical resection of gastric cancer has produced suboptimal survival despite multiple randomized trials that used postoperative chemotherapy or more aggressive surgical procedures. We performed a randomized phase III trial of postoperative radiochemotherapy in those at moderate risk of locoregional failure (LRF) following surgery. We originally reported results with 4-year median follow-up. This update, with a more than 10-year median follow-up, presents data on failure patterns and second malignancies and explores selected subset analyses. Patients and Methods In all, 559 patients with primaries ≥ T3 and/or node-positive gastric cancer were randomly assigned to observation versus radiochemotherapy after R0 resection. Fluorouracil and leucovorin were administered before, during, and after radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was given to all LRF sites to a dose of 45 Gy. Results Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) data demonstrate continued strong benefit from postoperative radiochemotherapy. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS is 1.32 (95% CI, 1.10 to 1.60; P = .0046). The HR for RFS is 1.51 (95% CI, 1.25 to 1.83; P < .001). Adjuvant radiochemotherapy produced substantial reduction in both overall relapse and locoregional relapse. Second malignancies were observed in 21 patients with radiotherapy versus eight with observation (P = .21). Subset analyses show robust treatment benefit in most subsets, with the exception of patients with diffuse histology who exhibited minimal nonsignificant treatment effect. Conclusion Intergroup 0116 (INT-0116) demonstrates strong persistent benefit from adjuvant radiochemotherapy. Toxicities, including second malignancies, appear acceptable, given the magnitude of RFS and OS improvement. LRF reduction may account for the majority of overall relapse reduction. Adjuvant radiochemotherapy remains a rational standard therapy for curatively resected gastric cancer with primaries T3 or greater and/or positive nodes.

Late term renal complications related to chemoradiotherapy in patients with gastric cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15033-15033
Author(s):  
A. Mayadagli ◽  
O. O. Seseogullari ◽  
C. Gemici ◽  
A. Ozkan ◽  
C. Parlak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Renal Damage ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Subtotal Gastrectomy ◽  
Renal Scintigraphy ◽  
Normal Range ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Renal Complications

15033 Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate late term renal complications of the combined treatment with chemoradiotherapy, according to the scheme of McDonald et al, in patients diagnosed with gastric cancer, after radical curative surgery. Methods: Totally 44 patients who administered to our clinic between years 2003 and 2004, with the diagnosis of gastric cancer, and with the age-adjusted creatinine clearance test (CCT) results within normal range, were enrolled into the study. Surgical procedure was subtotal gastrectomy in 34 patients (63,6%), and total gastrectomy in 16 patients (36,4%). Total 4600 cGy radiotherapy was administered to all patients through parallel-opposed AP-PA fields in 23 fractions concomitant with chemotherapy according to the scheme of McDonald et al. One year after the completion of the treatment, a technetium 99-m renal scintigraphy (DMSA) and CCT were performed to all patients whose renal functions were within normal limits. Results: Median age in the study was 52 (22–78). 34 patients (77,3%) were male and 10 (22,7%) were female. TNM stages were stage II in 15 (34,1%), IIIA in 21 (47,7%), IIIB in 4 (9,1%), and IV in 4 cases (9,1%). CCT measured 1 year after the treatment was low in 13 patients (29,6%), and within normal range in 31 patients (70,4%). Renal scintigraphy revealed damage at one pole in 32 patients (72,7%), damage at bilateral renal poles in 8 patients (18,3%), and it was normal in 4 patients (9%). Renal damage was higher in left kidneys than right kidneys (89,9% vs. 15,4%). There was a correlation between CCT values and scintigraphical findings. Damage in bilateral renal poles was higher in cases with low CCT than in cases with normal values (85,7% vs. 15,4). In general, there were no statistically significant relationship between late term renal complications and sex, and grade III treatment-related gastrointestinal toxicity. However, the relationships with age, extent of surgery reached statistical significance (p=0.009, and =0.006). Renal damage was notably higher in older patients, and in patients who underwent total gastrectomy. Conclusions: Since postoperative chemoradiotherapy is a novel modality for the treatment of gastric cancer, more studies are required in order to evaluate chronic toxicities. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A single-arm, phase II feasibility study of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy in potentially resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 96-96
Author(s):  
M. Ryu ◽  
Y. Choi ◽  
B. Kim ◽  
Y. Park ◽  
H. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

96 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction. Methods: Forty-one patients with clinical stage T3-4N0M0 or T2-4N+M0 determined by CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and laparoscopy were enrolled between DEC 2008 and MAR 2010. Gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was conducted after 3 cycles of DOS chemotherapy. DOS chemotherapy consists of docetaxel 50 mg/m2 iv (day1), oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 iv (day1), and S-1 40 mg/m2 po bid (days1-14) at 3 weeks interval. After curative gastrectomy, the patients were given 1 year of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (40 mg/m2 D1-28, every 6 weeks). Results: All patients finished the planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-three (56%) patients achieved a partial response, and the remaining 18 patients had stable disease by CT scan after 3 cycles of DOS chemotherapy. No disease progression was observed during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A median 4.7 weeks (range, 4.0-7.6) after the start of the 3rd cycle of DOS chemotherapy, 39 (95%) patients underwent R0 resection with no pathologic residual disease in 4 (10%) patients. Hematologic toxicities were common including grade 4 neutropenia (32%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (17%), and febrile neutropenia (10%). However, hematologic toxicities were generally transient and manageable. There were no grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities with frequency > 5% of patients. With all toxicities taken together, 21 (51%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities (except grade 3 neutropenia). There was no treatment-related death, and surgical complications included only mild wound problem in 4 (10%) patients. Conclusions: In this study, neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy could induce a sufficient down-staging and R0 resection of locally advanced gastric cancer with mild and manageable toxicities. A phase III randomized trial is planned for evaluating the benefit of neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. [Table: see text]

Value of peritoneal drain placement after total gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: A multi-institutional analysis from the U.S. Gastric Cancer Collaborative.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 131-131
Author(s):  
Gregory C. Dann ◽  
Malcolm Hart Squires ◽  
Lauren McLendon Postlewait ◽  
David A. Kooby ◽  
George A. Poultsides ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Anastomotic Leak ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Gastric Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Drain Placement ◽  
The U.S

131 Background: A recent randomized trial of peritoneal drain (PD) placement after pancreaticoduodenectomy concluded that placement of PDs decreased the frequency and severity of complications. The role of PD placement after total gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is not well-established. Methods: Patients who underwent total gastrectomy for GAC at 7 institutions from the U.S. Gastric Cancer Collaborative from 2000-2012 were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the association of PD placement with postoperative outcomes. Results: 344 patients were identified and anastomotic leak rate was 9%.253 (74%) patients received a PD. Those with PD placed had similar ASA class, tumor size, TNM stage, and need for additional organ resection when compared to their counterparts with no PD. No difference was observed in the rate of any complication (54% vs. 48%;p=0.45), major complication (25% vs. 24%;p=0.90), or 30-day mortality (7% vs. 4%;p=0.51) between the two groups. In addition, no difference in anastomotic leak (9% vs. 10%;p=0.90), need for secondary drainage (10% vs. 9%;p=0.92), or reoperation (13% vs. 8%;p=0.28) was identified. On multivariate analysis, PD placement was not associated with a decrease in frequency or severity of postoperative complications. Subset analysis of patients stratified by whether they underwent concomitant pancreatectomy similarly demonstrated no association of PD placement with reduced complications or mortality. In patients who experienced an anastomotic leak (n=31), placement of PD was similarly not associated with a decrease in complications, need for secondary drainage, or mortality. Conclusions: Peritoneal drain placement after total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma, regardless of concomitant pancreatectomy, is not associated with a decrease in the frequency and severity of adverse postoperative outcomes, including anastomotic leak and mortality, or decrease in the need for secondary drainage procedures or reoperation. Routine use of peritoneal drains is not warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document