A phase II study of enzalutamide (Enz) with dutasteride (Dut) or finasteride (Fin) in men ≥ 65 years with hormone-naive systemic prostate cancer (HNSPCa).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 179-179
Author(s):  
Deepak Kilari ◽  
Elizabeth A. Guancial ◽  
Deepak M. Sahasrabudhe ◽  
Kathryn A. Bylow ◽  
John D. Burfeind ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

179 Background: Older men are at a high risk for adverse events (AEs) from androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In prior studies, peripheral androgen blockade with bicalutamide and Fin was better tolerated but less efficacious than ADT in HNSPCa. The potential syngerism of Enz (a potent antiandrogen) and Dut/Fin (5-a reductase inhibitors for conversion of testosterone [T] to dihydrotestosterone [DHT]) provided the rationale for this Phase II study that examined the clinical efficacy and safety of Enz with Dut/Fin in men > 65 years with HNSPCa. Methods: Eligible patients were > 65 years (y) ; at a high risk of AE from ADT by comprehensive geriatric assessment or treating physicians; had metastatic (M1) or biochemical recurrent (M0) HNSPCa with a PSA doubling time < 9 months; and had T > 50ng/dl. They received Enz (160mg daily) and Dut (0.5mg daily) or Fin (5mg daily) until disease progression according to the Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 guidelines. The primary study endpoint is time to PSA progression. The secondary endpoints are time to PSA nadir and treatment-related AEs. Results: As of July 31, 2016, 24 patients were screened (3 ineligible) and 21 were enrolled with a median follow-up of 31 weeks (7-79). Median age at enrollment was 79.5 y (66-94) and 14 %, 72% and 14% had ECOG performance status of 0, 1, and 2, respectively. 57% (n = 12) had M0 and 43% (n = 9) had M1 HNSPCa, with 18%, 62%, 5%, and 10% having Gleason 6, 7, 8, and 9 disease, respectively (5% with unkown Gleason sum). The median PSA at enrollment was 12 ng/ml (2-102). The median time to 90% PSA decline after treatment initiation was 7 weeks (7-20) and 92% achieved 80% DHT decline in 9 months. At the time of analysis, all patients had ongoing PSA decline of > 90% without radiographic evidence of disease progression. Common Grade 1 AEs included gynecomastia (28%), fatigue (28%), hot flashes (19%) and paresthesias (15%). One patient withdrew from the study due to Grade 2 paresthesia. None had Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs. One patient died due to colitis unrelated to study treatments. Conclusions: Enz with Dut/Fin appears to have clinical activity for older patients with M0 and M1 HNSPCa with acceptable side effects. Clinical trial information: NCT02213107.

A pilot phase II study of consolidation chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5549-5549
Author(s):  
Y. Lee ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
K. Lee ◽  
S. Park ◽  
E. Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Pilot Phase ◽  
Consolidation Chemotherapy ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Consolidation Phase

5549 Background: With the improvement seen with CCRT in the management of locoregionally advanced HNSCC, distant failures have become a more relevant problem in terms of survival. As a consequence, more effective strategies including consolidation chemotherapy are warranted. The primary objective of this pilot phase II study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of docetaxel and cisplatin consolidation following primary CCRT for HNSCC. Methods: Thirty-three patients with previously untreated, stage III/IV HNSCC participated in this study. CCRT consisted of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1, 22 and 43. Concurrent radiotherapy (70 Gy) to the primary tumor and neck was performed over a period of 7 weeks. After completion of CCRT, patients with no evidence of disease progression received an additional 4 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. To minimize the expected accrual into unacceptable treatment, either in terms of clinical response or toxicity, a total of 35 patients would be required in a two-stage design. Results: Baseline characteristics were: male (22), median age (60 years), ECOG performance status 0/1 (15/18), stage III/IV (10/23). Of these, 27 (81%) patients completed CCRT. After CCRT, 3 complete and 19 partial responses were recorded, giving an overall response rate of 67% (95% CI, 51–83%). Of the 19 patients who went to consolidation phase, only 4 (21%) completed all 4 cycles of docetaxel and cisplatin. Failure to consolidation chemotherapy was attributed to the following causes: toxicity (11 including 3 treatment-related deaths), disease progression (4). During consolidation chemotherapy, 13 patients (68%) had grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 6 (32%). With consolidation chemotherapy, one patient with initial stable disease achieved a partial response. Median survival in all patients was 11.0 months, and 8.3 months for those treated with consolidation chemotherapy. Conclusions: The poor compliance and the high incidence of severe toxicities, including 3 treatment-related deaths, prompted no further evaluation of this consolidation chemotherapy following CCRT. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A single-arm, phase II study assessing the efficacy of pembrolizumab (pembro) plus radiotherapy (RT) in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather L. McArthur ◽  
Christopher Andrew Barker ◽  
Ayca Gucalp ◽  
Lizza Lebron-Zapata ◽  
Yong Hannah Wen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Study Entry ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Overall Response

14 Background: Overall response rates of 13-19% have been reported with checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in chemotherapy-resistant, PD-L1-positive mTNBC. RT is frequently used to enhance local control in mTNBC and has been reported to induce distant (abscopal) tumor responses when combined with immunotherapy. In this study, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of RT combined with a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, pembro, in a single-arm, two-stage, phase II study in mTNBC. Methods: Eligible women had biopsy-proven mTNBC, ECOG performance status 0-2, and ≥2 measurable sites of metastatic disease with at least one site requiring RT. A total RT dose of 3000 cGy was delivered in 5 daily fractions. Pembro 200 mg was given intravenously within 3 days of first RT fraction, then every 3 weeks +/-3 days until disease progression. The primary endpoint was overall response rate at week 13 in the non-irradiated lesions by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included safety and overall survival. Tumor biopsies were obtained at baseline and at week 7. PD-L1 expression was not required for study entry. Results: Of the 17 women enrolled, the median age was 52 y (range 37-73y). and the median number of prior chemotherapies received for metastatic disease was 3 (range 0 to 8). Of the 8 women not evaluable at 13 weeks: 5 died secondary to disease-related complications (at weeks 2, 6, 7, 8, and 9) and 3 came off study due to disease progression prior to week 13. Of the 9 women evaluable at week 13, 3 (33%) had a partial response, 1 (11%) had stable disease and 5 (56%) had disease progression. The 3 partial responses represented 60%, 54%, and 34% decreases in tumor burden by RECIST v1.1 and were durable for 31, 21, and ongoing at 22 weeks, respectively. The stable disease response was durable for 22 weeks. Common toxicities were mild and included fatigue, myalgia and nausea. Conclusions: The combination of pembro and RT is well-tolerated. This is a poor prognosis population with 5/17 (29%) of patients dying within 12 weeks of study entry. However, durable responses were observed outside of the RT field in 3/9 (33%) patients who were unselected for PD-L1 expression and evaluable at 13 weeks. Clinical trial information: NCT02730130.

Randomized phase II study with window-design to evaluate anti-tumor activity of the survivin antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) ly2181308 in combination with docetaxel for first-line treatment of castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5019-5019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pawel J. Wiechno ◽  
Piotr Chlosta ◽  
Joanna Pikiel ◽  
Bradley G. Somer ◽  
Begoña Mellado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Survivin Expression ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Combination Methods ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

5019 Background: In prostate cancer, expression of survivin, a protein that inhibits apoptosis, is associated with resistance to taxanes and poor outcome. LY2181308 reduces survivin expression and consequently is expected to improve activity of taxanes, such as docetaxel. A randomized phase II study was conducted to assess the activity of the combination. Methods: Adult patients (pts) with CRPC, ECOG performance status <2, and no bone or CNSmetastases were randomized 1:2 to standard docetaxel/prednisone every 21 days (Arm A) or standard therapy combined with LY2181308 given as a 3-hr IV infusion (Arm B). Analysis was planned and performed after 130 pts progressed or died. This assessment provided a 70% chance of detecting a difference in progression-free survival (PFS) at the 10% significance level. Initially, LY2181308 was given as a loading dose (3 consecutive days) and then as a weekly 3-hr IV maintenance dose. Arm B also included a window treatment with LY2181308 monotherapy equivalent to a 21-day cycle of docetaxel before starting combined treatment. The primary endpoint was PFS. Results: This study enrolled 154 pts. The median PFS for Arm B was 8.64 (90% CI, 7.39–10.45) months vs. 9.00 (90% CI, 7.00–10.09) months in Arm A, showing no statistical difference (log rank p=0.755). The median overall survival (OS) for Arm B was 27.04 (90% CI, 19.94–33.41) months vs. 29.04 (90% CI, 20.11–39.26) months for Arm A (log-rank p= 0.838). The PSA responses (>50% reduction in PSA) were similar: 56.9% for Arm A and 56.1% in Arm B (p=0.856). Most pts had no pain or mild pain at baseline and during the active period. Pts treated in Arm B had a higher frequency of serious and nonserious adverse events (AEs) than those in Arm A. The observed AE and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles were consistent with the known safety and PK profiles of LY2181308 and docetaxel. Conclusions: The addition of LY2181308 to a standard docetaxel/prednisone regimen showed no improvement in PFS, PSA response, and OS in first line CRPC pts. The safety profile of docetaxel and LY2181308 is predictable and consistent with the known safety profiles. Clinical trial information: NCT00642018.

ARN-509 in men with high-risk nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Raymond Smith ◽  
Emmanuel S. Antonarakis ◽  
Charles J. Ryan ◽  
William R. Berry ◽  
Neal Shore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Nuclear Translocation ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Psa Progression

7 Background: ARN-509 is a novel second-generation anti-androgen that binds directly to the ligand-binding domain of the androgen receptor, impairing nuclear translocation and DNA binding. The Phase II portion of a multicenter Phase I/II study is evaluating the activity of ARN-509 in 3 distinct patient populations of men with CRPC (high risk non-metastatic CRPC, metastatic treatment-naïve CRPC, and progressive disease after abiraterone acetate). Preliminary results for the cohort of patients with high-risk non-metastatic CRPC are presented here. Methods: All patients had CRPC, no radiographic evidence of metastases (pelvic lymph nodes <3 cm below the iliac bifurcation were allowed), and high risk for disease progression based on PSA value ≥ 8 ng/mL within 3 months of enrollment and/or PSA doubling time ≤ 10 months. Patients received ARN-509 at the recommended Phase II dose of 240 mg/day, previously established in Phase I (Rathkopf et al, GU ASCO 2012). The primary endpoint was PSA response rate at 12 weeks according to the Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 Criteria. Secondary endpoints included safety, time to PSA progression and 1-year metastasis-free survival. PSA assessments were collected every 4 weeks and tumor scans were performed every 16 weeks. Results: Forty-seven patients were enrolled between November 2011 and May 2012. The median age was 71 years (range 51 to 88) and at baseline, patients presented with ECOG performance status 0 (77%), Gleason Score 8-10 (32%), and median PSA of 10.7 ng/mL. All patients received prior treatment with a LHRH analog with or without a first-generation anti-androgen. At a median treatment duration of 20 weeks, three patients discontinued the study. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AE) were fatigue (30%), diarrhea (28%), nausea (17%), rash (13%), and abdominal pain (11%). The incidence of Grade 3 AEs was 6.4%, and no seizures have been observed to date. The 12-week PSA response was 91% and the time to PSA progression has not been reached. Conclusions: In men with high-risk non-metastatic CRPC, ARN-509 is safe and well tolerated with promising preliminary activity based on high PSA response rates. Clinical trial information: NCT01171898.

Preliminary results from a single-arm, phase II study assessing the efficacy of pembrolizumab plus radiotherapy in metastatic triple negative breast cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 95-95
Author(s):  
Alice Ho ◽  
Christopher Andrew Barker ◽  
Ayca Gucalp ◽  
Lizza Lebron-Zapata ◽  
Yong Hannah Wen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Overall Response

95 Background: Two trials have demonstrated overall response rates of 19% with immune checkpoint inhibitors alone in chemotherapy-resistant triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Radiation therapy (RT) is frequently used to enhance local control in TNBC and has been reported to induce distant (abscopal) tumor responses when combined with immunotherapy. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of RT and pembrolizumab, a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, in a single-arm, two-stage, phase II study in metastatic TNBC. Results from the first stage are reported. Methods: Eligibility criteria includes women with biopsy-proven TNBC, ECOG performance status 0-2, ≥ 2 measurable sites of metastatic disease with at least one site requiring RT. A total RT dose of 3000 cGy is delivered in one week in 5 fractions. Pembrolizumab is given intravenously at 200 mg/kg D1+/- 3 days and then every 3 weeks until disease progression as defined by RECIST v 1.1. The primary endpoint is overall response rate at week 13 in the non-targeted, non-irradiated lesions. Secondary endpoints include safety and overall survival. Tumor biopsies are obtained at baseline and at week 7. PD-L1 expression was not required for study entry. Results: Nine patients were enrolled in the first phase and assessed for antitumor activity and safety. Median age was 52 years (range 37-73). Three patients died secondary to disease-related complications (at weeks 2, 6 and 8) and 1 came off study due to disease progression prior to week 13. Of the 5 patients evaluable at week 13, 2 had a partial response, 1 had stable disease and 2 had disease progression. Common toxicities were mild and included fatigue, myalgia and nausea. One grade 3 event was reported - hyperbilirubinemia not attributable to study therapy after one dose of pembrolizumab. Conclusions: The combination of pembrolizumab and RT was well-tolerated in the first stage of a phase II study. Responses were observed outside of the RT fields in 2 of 5 patients who were evaluable at 13 weeks. The contribution of RT to pembrolizumab is unknown and will be investigated in the second stage of the study, which is ongoing. Correlative studies are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02730130.

University of Chicago Consortium phase II study of ispinesib (SB-715992) in patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15573-15573
Author(s):  
K. W. Beekman ◽  
R. Dunn ◽  
D. Colevas ◽  
N. Davis ◽  
J. Clark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Elevated Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

15573 Background: Ispinesib is a novel kinesin spindle protein inhibitor that has significant antitumor activity in multiple tumor models and has demonstrated preliminary clinical activity in early phase I and II trials. A phase II study of Ispenisib in patients with metastatic RCC who had received at least one prior therapy was thus conducted. Methods: The primary objective was to assess the RECIST based overall response rate (RR) with optimal Simon two-stage design utilizing 10% and 30% RR as the null and alternative hypotheses, respectively. Eighteen pts were to be accrued during the first stage; if 3 or more responses (PR or CR) were seen, an additional 17 pts would be accrued. Further study would be recommended if 7 or more of the 35 total pts had a response. Secondary objectives included toxicity, time to progression, and overall survival. Pts were treated with 7 mg/m2 over one hour on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days with radiologic disease re- evaluation every 8 weeks. Results: 19 pts were accrued in 6 months. Baseline characteristics included clear cell histology in 74%, papillary in 11%, and unclassified in 11%; 1 or =2 prior therapies in 37% and 63%; prior immunotherapy in 53%, and prior sunitinib, sorafenib or bevacizumab in 79%; ECOG performance status 0 in 58% and 1 in 42%. 4 patients are too early for radiologic assessment. None of the 15 patients evaluable responded to treatment (95% CI: 0 - 21.8%). Seven patients (47%) experienced stable disease after 8 weeks. One patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia. No other grade 3 or 4 toxicities were attributable to drug. Grade 1 and 2 toxicities included: fatigue (28%), anemia (28%), leukopenia (33%), elevated alkaline phosphatase (18%), anorexia (11%), hyponatremia (11%), dyspnea (11%), headache (11%), and hypoalbuminemia (11%). Conclusions: Treatment with weekly Ispenesib in metastatic RCC is well tolerated but does not lead to objective responses. Under the hypothesis that Ispenesib is a cytotoxic rather than cytostatic agent, further evaluation in patients with metastatic RCC at this dose and schedule is not indicated. Supported by: NCI #N01-CM-62201 No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study of cetuximab in combination with carboplatin and docetaxel for patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7643-7643 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. P. Belani ◽  
S. Ramalingam ◽  
M. Schreeder ◽  
R. Steis ◽  
R. Guidice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

7643 Background: Cetuximab, a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody against the external domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has demonstrated single-agent activity against NSCLC. When administered in combination with carboplatin and docetaxel, a commonly used regimen for advanced NSCLC, cetuximab exhibits synergistic interaction in preclinical studies. Therefore, we conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of cetuximab, carboplatin, and docetaxel for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients = 18 years with histologically/cytologically confirmed stage IIIB (w/ effusion) or stage IV NSCLC received cetuximab (400 mg/m2 on day 1 and 250 mg/m2 on days 8 and 15) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2 on day 1) and carboplatin (AUC=6 on day 1) every 21 days for up to 6 cycles. Thereafter, patients without evidence of disease progression (CR/PR/SD) were continued on single-agent cetuximab (250 mg/m2/week) for a maximum of 1 year or until disease progression. The primary endpoint was response rate. Results: 81 patients were enrolled and 76 are evaluable for response. Patient characteristics included: gender male/female, 43/38; median age 63 years (range 42–83); ECOG performance status 0/1/, 31/50; and stage IIIB/IV- 5/76. The median number of cycles administered was 4 (range 1–6). The response rate (CR/PR) was 14.5% (95% CI, 7.5 to 24.4), with a median progression-free survival of 4.7 months and a median overall survival of 11 months. With combination therapy, the salient grade 3/4 events were neutropenia (28%), febrile neutropenia (3.8%), hypotension (4%), hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia (5%), hypersensitivity (1%), acne-like rash (3%), peripheral neuropathy (1%), and myalgia (1%). Twenty-five patients received maintenance therapy with single-agent cetuximab (median duration of treatment was 12 weeks) and this was well tolerated. Conclusions: This large multicenter phase II study of the novel combination of cetuximab with docetaxel and carboplatin shows promising efficacy for patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC and has an acceptable toxicity profile. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Preliminary results of a phase II study of alrizomadlin (APG-115), a novel, small-molecule MDM2 inhibitor, in combination with pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic melanoma or advanced solid tumors that have failed immuno-oncologic (I-O) drugs.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2506-2506
Author(s):  
Anthony W. Tolcher ◽  
James Andrew Reeves ◽  
Meredith McKean ◽  
Bartosz Chmielowski ◽  
Joseph Thaddeus Beck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Nerve Sheath Tumor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Multiple Tumor

2506 Background: Alrizomadlin (APG-115) restores TP53 function, activating p53-mediated apoptosis in tumor cells with wild-type TP53 and/or MDM2 amplification. Alrizomadlin also functions as a host immunomodulator and hence may restore antitumor activity in pts with cancers failing PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Methods: This US multicenter trial assessed alrizomadlin combined with pembrolizumab in pts with unresectable/metastatic melanoma or advanced solid tumors that had failed I-O drugs; or pts with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), liposarcoma, or ATM mutant solid tumors that had failed any standard therapy. Eligible pts had ECOG performance status of 0-2 and no CNS metastases. The phase II study cohorts included pts with melanoma, NSCLC, solid tumor with ATM mutation, well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma, urothelial carcinoma, and MPNST. Alrizomadlin was administered orally at 150 mg once every other day for 2 consecutive weeks with 1 week off and pembrolizumab at 200 mg via IV infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Results: As of December 25, 2020, 84 pts had been treated in 6 cohorts: melanoma (n = 26), NSCLC (n = 23), ATM mutation (n = 9), liposarcoma (n = 14), urothelial (n = 9), and MPNST (n = 3). In the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-failed melanoma cohort, there was 1 confirmed partial response (PR) out of 5 pts with uveal melanoma, 2 PR (1 confirmed and 1 unconfirmed) of 5 pts with mucosal melanoma, and 1 confirmed PR of 11 pts with cutaneous melanoma. ORR in the melanoma cohort was 17.4% (4/23 evaluable pts), and the disease control rate was 60.9% (14/23). In the MPNST cohort, 1 of 3 pts had an unconfirmed ongoing PR. In I-O drug-failed NSCLC (n = 14 evaluable) and urothelial (n = 5 evaluable) cohorts, each reported 1 confirmed PR. Common treatment (alrizomadlin or pembrolizumab)-related adverse events (TRAEs) (≥ 10%) were nausea (63.1%), thrombocytopenia (36.9%), vomiting (33.3%), fatigue (31.0%), decreased appetite (27.4%), diarrhea (21.4%), neutropenia (15.4%), and anemia (11.9%). Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (≥ 5%) included thrombocytopenia (20.2%), neutropenia (14.2%), and anemia (8.3%). Eleven pts discontinued treatment due to AEs: 5 were treatment related, including 2 grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and 1 each of grade 2 vomiting, grade 2 fatigue, and grade 2 posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). Three treatment-related SAEs were PRES, pyrexia, and asthenia. Conclusions: Alrizomadlin combined with pembrolizumab is well tolerated and may restore antitumor effects in pts with cancer resistant to or intolerant of I-O drugs, as suggested by preliminary antitumor activities in multiple tumor types. Internal study identifiers: APG-115-US-002; Keynote MK-3475-B66. Clinical trial information: NCT03611868.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document