Faster and better: Improving the diagnostic phase of lung cancer at a system level.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 115-115
Author(s):  
Melissa Kaan ◽  
Claire Holloway ◽  
Julie Gilbert ◽  
Vicky Simanovski ◽  
Garth Matheson
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Diagnostic Process ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
The Past ◽  
Rule Out

115 Background: For many patients going through diagnostic testing for cancer, the time from suspicion to diagnosis or rule-out, can be a confusing and anxious time. In 2007, Cancer Care Ontario began investing in the implementation of diagnostic assessment programs (DAPs) across Ontario, Canada to improve the quality of care during the diagnostic phase of lung cancer. DAPs consist of multidisciplinary healthcare teams that manage and coordinate a patient’s diagnostic care from testing to a definitive diagnosis. The objectives of the DAPs are to: 1) decrease time from suspicion to diagnosis or resolution; 2) optimize the patient’s experience during the diagnostic process; 3) optimize satisfaction and experience among primary care providers and specialists; and 4) provide a sustainable solution by offering good value for money. Today over 35,000 patients have been diagnosed in one of the 18 lung DAPs that exist across the province. Methods: The implementation of DAPs featured the introduction of a patient navigator to act as the primary point of contact for patients, improve the patient experience and ensure their patients were progressing through any required diagnostic imaging and consultations in a timely manner. Cancer Care Ontario also engaged with primary care providers to refer patients with findings suspicious for lung cancer to DAPs as early as possible to ensure they benefited from organized assessment. Cancer Care Ontario has collected patient level data to measure wait times and implemented a patient survey to assess patient experience. Results: In the past five years, the median wait time from referral to a lung DAP to diagnosis or rule out has decreased by 19% to 24 days and the 90th %tile has decreased by 28% to 51 days. The large majority of patients have had a positive experience with their DAPs, with 95% of patients scoring their experience in the diagnostic process as “good” or “excellent”. Conclusions: The implementation of DAPs across the province is seen as a valuable component of quality of care by improving the diagnostic phase of cancer. The sustainability of the DAP model is demonstrated by the continued improvements in access and maintained patient experience in spite of growing volumes (91% increase in the past five years).

Using a disease pathway management (DPM) approach to improve the quality of lung cancer care in Ontario.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 93-93
Author(s):  
William K. Evans ◽  
Yee Ung ◽  
Carol Anne Sawka ◽  
Nathalie Assouad
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Consensus Conference ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Journey ◽  
Treatment Pathways ◽  
The Impact

93 Background: Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) is mandated to oversee quality of cancer care in Ontario and began its Lung Cancer (LC) DPM initiative in 2009. DPM has 4 objectives: align provincial quality improvement (QI) initiatives by disease site; map the patient journey and identify gaps in evidence/quality in clinical practice that impact care or the patient experience; set and manage regional quality indicators across the pathway; and leverage tools to model the impact of policy decisions. Methods: The LC DPM drafted a disease pathway map and established 5 multidisciplinary working groups (WGs) each focussed on a phase of the LC patient journey: prevention, screening, and early diagnosis; diagnosis; treatment; palliative care; the patient experience. WGs held 25 two-hour meetings and developed ideas for 17 QI projects. 8 were selected for discussion at a provincial consensus conference and yielded a Priorities for Action Report. Regional “roadshows” were held in all 14 regions of the province at which region-specific data on incidence, stage at diagnosis, compliance of treatment with guidelines and wait times, amongst other metrics relevant to LC, were shared with the regional care providers. Funding was provided by CCO for regional QI based on the data and identified priorities. Results: Completed diagnostic and treatment pathways are posted on CCO’s website as are educational materials on dyspnea management, including a patient video and a document prepared by patients for patients “Understanding Lung Cancer.” Lung diagnostic assessment units/programs have been initiated in 14 regions. An audit is underway to better understand the barriers to the uniform uptake of evidence-based practices across the province. The percent of LC patients whose symptoms are assessed at least once a month using a standardized symptom assessment instrument (ESAS) has improved. Conclusions: Regional cancer programs are now aware of their performance on a range of LC specific quality metrics. Standardized diagnostic and treatment pathways have been developed and assessment units have been implemented across the province.

scholarly journals Private ownership of primary care providers associated with patient perceived quality of care

Medicine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. e5755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolin Wei ◽  
Jia Yin ◽  
Samuel Y.S. Wong ◽  
Sian M. Griffiths ◽  
Guanyang Zou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Perceived Quality ◽  
Private Ownership ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Perceived Quality Of Care

Improving diagnosis and treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

2021 ◽  
pp. 42-46
Author(s):  
Larry D. McIntire ◽  
Kindall Martin ◽  
Kunal Shah ◽  
Lauren Malinowski ◽  
John Paulson
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Population Health ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Positional Vertigo ◽  
Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Background: Vertigo is defined as an illusion of motion caused by a mismatch of information between the visual, vestibular and somatosensory systems. The most common diagnosis associated with whirling vertigo is benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), which affects approximately 3.4% of patients older than 60 years of age. Objective: This paper aims to educate primary care providers on how to diagnose BPPV by performing canalith repositioning maneuvers at the initial point of care. Timely treatment of BPPV in the primary care office is believed to reduce healthcare costs by way of limiting unnecessary diagnostic testing and lowering referrals for specialty care. Immediate treatment is also believed to improve the quality of healthcare delivery for the vertigo patient by reducing morbidity and resolving the condition without the need for referrals or imaging. Population Health: A review of the literature finds that delayed diagnosis and treatment of BPPV is associated with a host of deleterious effects on patients. Population health impacts include increased rates of anxiety and depression; loss of work and/or change of career paths; inappropriate use of medications or emergency care resources; decreased access to healthcare services; increased healthcare costs; and reduced quality of care. Diagnosis: A history of positional vertigo and evidence of nystagmus with Dix-Hallpike positioning confirms the diagnosis. A detailed description of the performance of this test is elucidated. Treatment: The observed nystagmus is analyzed and classified based on directionality. Treatment can be initiated immediately with canalith repositioning maneuvers.

Compliance, capacity, and quality in colonoscopy screening for CRC: A novel solution.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 357-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. Lloyd
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Training Program ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
African American Men ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Adenoma Detection ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Outstanding Quality

357 Background: CRC is predominately preventable with high quality colonoscopy screenings. Unfortunately, less than half of Americans are “up-to-date.” When referred by primary care providers, less than half complete the process. We proposed to include the primary care provider (PCP) in a novel training program to extend skills from sigmoidoscopy to full colonoscopy in a “mentored and monitored” model. We know that quality in colonoscopy can vary widely (ten fold within a single 12-man group). The protective benefits of colonoscopy reflect the thoroughness of the removal of polyps. Unfortunately, the ACS projections for 2010 predict an increase of 4,400 deaths from CRC over 2009, an 8% rise! Furthermore the death rate for African American men has RISEN 28% since 1960. We are loosing a battle for which we posses the tools to win. To achieve victory we must successfully address all three factors: compliance, capacity and quality. Methods: Thirty primary care physicians in two states (SC, FL) were recruited. We measured compliance rates within the practice before and after enrollment. We further evaluated quality of the colonoscopies as reflected in completion, yield and complications. Results: Compliance more than doubled (38% to 84%). As a compliance enhancement tool, the results were outstanding. The evaluation of quality then became of paramount importance. The gross completion rate was 98.3%, the adenoma detection rate (reflecting polyp yield) was 38%. In over 20,000 cases there were only 5 perforations, substantially below published rates. The quality was consistently at the level of experienced conscientious gastroenterologists. The details of the training program and the use of the “two-man” colonoscopy technique have been reviewed elsewhere (MEDICAL CARE, Aug 2010). Conclusions: If replicated nationally, this model has the potential for saving 25,000 lives annually. The participation of the patient's PCP is a powerful influence for improved compliance. The availability of an “expert” for mentoring and monitoring results in outstanding and consistent quality. The model has the potential to dramatically enhance compliance simultaneously increasing capacity while maintaining outstanding quality. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Driving action through data: Delivering online cancer screening reports to primary care providers.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 174-174
Author(s):  
Nicki Cunningham ◽  
Shama Umar ◽  
Dafna Carr ◽  
Richard Smith ◽  
Patrick Flynn
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Clinical Guidelines ◽  
Management System ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Access Management ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Screening Activity

174 Background: The Screening Activity Report (SAR), a supplementary tool for primary care providers (PCPs), was released in April, 2014. Providers are able to access this comprehensive report securely via an online solution and view the screening activity of their patients across Cancer Care Ontario (CCO)’s three organized cancer screening programs; breast, cervical and colorectal. The objectives of the SAR are to improve the quality of cancer screening by increasing provincial screening rates, improving the rate of appropriate follow-up of abnormal results and promote the alignment of cancer screening practices with CCO’s evidence-based clinical guidelines. Methods: CCO partnered with eHealth Ontario in 2012 to leverage their identity and access management system to provide safe and secure online access to the report. Since this time, CCO has implemented a multi-faceted campaign to support registrations to the system, encourage report access, and gather feedback on how to improve the report for future iterations. Using a detailed methodology developed by a wide range of subject matter experts at CCO, the SAR employs numerous provincial data sources to provide an overview of the patient rosters. Actionable categories are assigned at the patient level using a unique algorithm based on the latest clinical guidelines. Results: Previous to April 2014, the SAR was referred to as the ColonCancerCheck SAR (CCC SAR) as it included colorectal cancer screening data only. The last release of the CCC SAR was in October, 2013. At this time 4,824 providers were registered to the identity and access management system and adoption of this report had reached 31% after being available for five months to providers. To date, 4,992 providers are now registered and adoption of the April SAR has already reached 27% after being available for almost two months. Conclusions: The SAR is the first tool of its kind to make widespread use of eHealth’s identity and access management system service and target a broad user base of PCPs. The successful launch of the SAR has provided key insights into how technology can be leveraged to share provincial data in a meaningful way with providers and support them in improving the quality of cancer screening.

Integrating primary care and cancer care in survivorship: A collaborative approach.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 103-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Sussman ◽  
Mary L McBride ◽  
Jeffrey Sisler ◽  
Grace Kim ◽  
Laura Game ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Vertical Integration ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Functional Integration ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Collaborative Approach ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Clinical Integration ◽  
The Impact

103 Background: Primary care providers (PCPs) have an important role in the provision of survivorship care. While there is evidence to support the feasibility and safety of PCP-led survivorship care, there are gaps in knowledge about how to best integrate providers to support transitions, enhance quality of care, increase system efficiencies, and improve patient and provider satisfaction. Methods: A pan-Canadian study comprised of three projects has been initiated to address three key aspects of care integration, based on a previously described system performance framework. Functional integration will be studied through the evaluation of electronic survivorship care plans using a prospective cohort of breast and colorectal cancer patients with pre and post measures of knowledge, care coordination, and satisfaction. Vertical integration will be evaluated through a series of descriptive case studies to document structures and processes that are currently in place to support PCP re-referral to regional cancer centres. Clinical integration will be studied through the development and evaluation of an interspecialty survivorship training curriculum for oncology and family medicine trainees. Results: Functional integration: Development of an electronic platform for care plan outputs is complete. Two sites in Ontario (ON) and one in British Columbia (BC) have been selected to study the impact on 200 patients and their providers. Vertical integration: Using a study-specific interview guide, 48 semi-structured key informant interviews have been successfully conducted in ON; 15 interviews are planned for Manitoba (MB) and 15 for BC. Clinical Integration: a National Advisory Committee was established and needs assessments were performed with postgraduate program directors, cancer survivors, and trainees using online surveys and focus groups. A blended learning curriculum is being piloted in MB, ON, and BC in 2015. Conclusions: Integrating primary care and cancer care in survivorship requires a collaborative approach that begins in residency, supports PCPs with clear mechanisms for re-entry, and optimizes communication. This study will inform approaches to enhancing provider integration and survivorship care.

The role of annual personal health visits (APHV) on patients' with cancer knowledge and perceptions of the harms of continued smoking.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 152-152
Author(s):  
Delaram Farzanfar ◽  
Lin Lu ◽  
Jie Su ◽  
Devon Alton ◽  
Rahul Mohan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increase Risk

152 Background: With improvements in cancer detection and therapies, important secondary prevention measures in survivorship include smoking cessation. Primary care providers have an opportunity to discuss these measures with cancer survivors at APHV. We evaluated whether having a recent APHV is associated with cancer patients’ awareness and perceptions of the harms of continued smoking. Methods: Cancer survivors were surveyed from April 2014 to May 2016 with respect to their smoking history, knowledge and perceptions of the harms of continued smoking along with the date of their most recent APHV (term changed from annual health physical examination in 2013). Multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed the association of having an APHV with knowledge and perceptions of the harms of continued smoking. Results: Of 985 cancer patients, 23% smoked at diagnosis; 34% quit > 1 year prior to diagnosis; 55% had tobacco-related cancers; 77% received curative therapy. From a knowledge viewpoint, over 52% reported being unaware that smoking negatively impacts cancer outcomes; despite this, most perceived smoking to negatively influence quality of life (75%), survival (76%), and fatigue (73%). Within the last year, 48% had an APHV, while 84% had an APHV at any time in the past; 18 (2%) reported not having a family doctor. Patients who had an APHV in the last year were more likely to be aware that continued smoking can increase risk of death (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.49, 95% CI [1.13-1.96], P=0.004), and more likely to perceive smoking to negatively impact quality of life (aOR=1.37 [0.94-1.99], P=0.10), survival (aOR=1.60 [0.95-2.71], P=0.08), and fatigue (aOR=1.63 [1.11-2.39], P=0.01). Those ever having an APHV were more likely aware that smoking can increase risk of death (aOR=1.61 [1.07-2.43], P=0.02) and second primaries (aOR=1.53 [1.02-2.33], P=0.04). Conclusions: Having a recent APHV was associated with improved awareness and perceptions of the harms of continued smoking, but it is unclear whether this is related to provider counseling or a healthy bias effect. APHV may be an appropriate time for primary care providers to treat tobacco addiction in their cancer survivors.

Evaluation of coordination of cancer care between designated cancer hospitals and primary care providers: Results from a nationwide survey in Japan.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 84-84
Author(s):  
Taro Tomizuka ◽  
Tomone Watanabe ◽  
Satoru Kamitani ◽  
Takahiro Higashi
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Coordination ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Critical Path ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Follow Up Care ◽  
Cancer Specialist

84 Background: To improve coordination of cancer care between cancer specialist hospitals and primary care providers (PCPs), the Japanese government accredited cancer specialist hospitals, so called “designated cancer care hospitals (DCCHs)” and introduced “Cancer care coordination instruction fee” which PCPs can receive if they share a cancer critical path (Japanese version of Survivorship Care Plans) of each cancer patient with DCCHs. We sought to assess the current status of coordination of cancer care in Japan and communication between DCCHs and PCPs from PCPs’ point of view. Methods: A cross-sectional mail survey was administered to randomly selected clinic-based PCPs (4,000 clinics) from a nation-wide database of medical institutions authorized by Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Japan to treat patients with health insurance (87,869 clinics). The survey evaluated how much PCPs provided cancer follow-up care and how well DCCHs coordinated care and communicated with PCPs in cancer survivorship. Results: 1,873 PCPs returned the questionnaire (response rate: 46.8%). 1,223 (65.3%) answered to provide cancer follow-up care in outpatient setting. Most of the PCPs which provided cancer follow-up care evaluated the care coordination and support by DCCHs were satisfactory (946, 77.4%) but the degree of good evaluation varied by region (highest: 91.3%, lowest: 45.8%). In regression analysis, provision of palliative care by PCPs (OR 1.52 95%CI 1.05-2.17) and use of cancer critical path (OR 2.10 95%CI 1.63-2.71) were significantly correlated with better evaluation of communication and care coordination. Conclusions: DCCHs communicated well with PCPs and PCPs were satisfied with the communication and care coordination by DCCHs. Provision of palliative care by PCPs and use of cancer critical path are likely to lead good care coordination in cancer care.

Educating primary care physicians in the management of Alzheimer's disease: using practice guidelines to set quality benchmarks

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S44-S52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra L. Cherry ◽  
Carol Hahn ◽  
Barbara G. Vickrey
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Care Management ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Care Providers

ABSTRACTThis paper presents a strategy for training primary care physicians in the identification, diagnosis and management of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders. The strategy uses evidence-based practice guidelines to establish quality benchmarks and then provides training and other interventions to improve the quality of care received by these patients. The three projects described in this paper assumed that training of primary care physicians alone would not be sufficient to achieve the quality benchmarks derived from guidelines. The projects used creative training strategies supplemented by provider “tool kits”, provider checklists, educational detailing, and endorsement from organizational leadership to reinforce what the primary care providers learned in educational sessions. Each project also implemented a system of dementia care management to “wrap around” traditional primary care to ensure that quality benchmarks would be achieved. Outcomes of two completed studies support the premise that it is possible to improve quality of dementia care through physician education that occurs in association with a coordinated system of dementia care management and in collaboration with community agencies to access guideline-recommended social services.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document