Are BRAF mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) tumors more responsive to VEGFR-2 blockage? Analysis of patient outcomes by RAS/RAF mutation status in the RAISE study—A global, randomized, double-blind, phase III study.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 622-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayuki Yoshino ◽  
Radka Obermannova ◽  
Gyorgy Bodoky ◽  
Jana Prausová ◽  
Rocio Garcia-Carbonero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Mutation Status

622 Background: The RAISE trial (NCT01183780) demonstrated that ramucirumab (RAM) plus leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo (PBO) plus FOLFIRI as second-line mCRC treatment. RAS/RAF mutations are associated with resistance to anti-EGFR therapies and poor prognosis, particularly BRAF mutations. The extensive RAISE biomarker program assessed the association of multiple candidate markers with efficacy outcomes. Here we present the results for RAS/ RAF mutations. Methods: Plasma and tumor tissue collection were mandatory. KRAS mutation status was determined locally before randomization. Further RAS and RAF mutations were assessed centrally by multiplex qPCR using the Modaplex system (Qiagen) only in samples that were initially reported as KRAS wild type. Thus, patients were classified into one of the 3 categories in the table. OS and PFS by RAS and RAF subgroups were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses. Results: As with previously reported KRAS analyses, the favorable RAM treatment effect was similar between patients with expanded RAS mutations compared with patients with RAS/ RAF wild-type tumors. However, in the 41 patients with BRAF mutated tumors, the RAM benefit was even more notable for both OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54; 95% CI 0.25–1.13) and PFS (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.28–1.08). Conclusions: RAISE demonstrated that the addition of RAM to FOLFIRI improved patient outcomes regardless of RAS mutation status. The noteworthy signal for patients with BRAF mutant tumors is encouraging due to their poor prognosis but requires further validation in other clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT01183780. [Table: see text]

Pharmacogenetic analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treated with second-line irinotecan (IR)+/− cetuximab (CB): The EPIC experience

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4022-4022
Author(s):  
D. Yang ◽  
A. Pohl ◽  
W. Zhang ◽  
G. Lurje ◽  
Y. Ning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Ca Repeat ◽  
Ras Mutation ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Log Rank Test

4022 Background: EPIC, a multinational phase III clinical trial with IR + CB vs IR alone in mCRC pts in the second-line setting after failure of FOLFOX demonstrated a benefit for IR+CB in progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR). We evaluated functional germline polymorphisms involved in the EGFR- (EGF, EGFR), angiogenesis- (VEGF, IL-8, CXCR-2) - and drug- metabolism related genes (UGT1A1, MTHFR) for their potential role as molecular predictors for clinical outcome in pts treated with CB/IR vs. IR alone. Methods: DNA was extracted from all available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples from the phase III EPIC trial (US sites only). Genotyping was performed using PCR-RFLP assays and 5’ -end [g-33P] ATP’ labeled PCR-protocols. Results: 186 pts were treated either with IR/CB (arm A, 84 pts) or IR (arm B, 102 pts) only. In arm A, 11/84 pts (13%) showed CR or PR, whereas 73/84 (87%) pts had SD or PD. For arm B, 6/102 pts (6%) showed CR or PR, whereas 96/102 pts (94%) had SD or PD. Median PFS in arm A was 3.0 months (95%CI: 2.4- 4.1 months) vs 2.7 months (95%CI: 2.2–2.9 months) in arm B; median overall survival (OS) was 9.3 months (95%CI: 7.1–12.1 months) in arm A vs. 12.3 months (95%CI: 10.4- 17.9 months) in arm B. K-ras mutation status was not significantly associated with PFS or response to CB/IR in the subgroup of 186 patients. We found an EGFR-CA- repeat in intron 1 in arm A to be associated with PFS (p=0.031, log-rank test). In arm B, we found a significant association with RR (p=0.0103, Fisher's exact test) for MTHFR1298. Furthermore, MTHFR 677 (p =0.0048, log-rank test) and MTHFR 1298 (p=0.038, log-rank test) were also found to be associated with OS in arm B. In multivariate analysis, EGFR-CA-repeat was significantly associated with PFS (adjusted p= 0.023). Furthermore, MTHFR 677 and MTHFR 1298 was associated with OS (adjusted p=0.028 and 0.026, respectively, Cox-proportional hazards models), independent from K-ras mutation status, race and number of disease sites. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the potential predictive value of polymorphisms in the EGFR- and MTHFR- gene in mCRC pts treated with IR+ CB. Further validation in additional clinical trials is necessary. [Table: see text]

BRAF, PIK3CA, and PTEN status and benefit from cetuximab (CET) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC): Results from NCIC CTG/AGITG CO.17.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3515-3515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek J. Jonker ◽  
Christos Stelios Karapetis ◽  
Christopher J. O'Callaghan ◽  
Celia Marginean ◽  
John Raymond Zalcberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Model ◽  
Pik3ca Mutation ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pten Expression ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Colorectal Tumour ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Pik3ca Mutations

3515 Background: CET, a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor, improves overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with KRAS wild-type (WT) chemotherapy refractory CRC. BRAF and PIK3CA mutation status, and PTEN expression levels may further predict benefit from CET therapy. Methods: Available colorectal tumour samples were analyzed from a phase III trial of CET plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC alone (NEJM 2007; 357(20)). BRAF and PIK3CA mutations (MUT) identified in tumour-derived DNA using a high resolution melting analysis to identify amplicons with mutations were confirmed by sequencing. PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on tissue microarrays constructed from available tumour blocks. For each biomarker, prognostic (treatment independent) effects were assessed in patients on the BSC alone arm. Predictive effects (benefit from CET) on OS and PFS among all patients and those in the KRAS wild-type subset were examined using a Cox model with tests for treatment-biomarker interaction, adjusting for covariates. Results: Of 401 pts assessed for BRAF status (70% of CO17 population), 13(3%) had mutations. Of 407 pts assessed for PIK3CA status (71% of CO17 population), 61(15%) had mutations. Of 205 pts assessed for PTEN (36% of CO17 population), 148(72%) were negative for IHC expression. No biomarker was prognostic for OS or PFS, and none were predictive of benefit from CET, either in the whole study population or the KRAS WT subset. Conclusions: In chemotherapy-refractory CRC, neither PIK3CA mutation status nor PTEN expression were predictive of benefit from CET therapy. BRAF mutations are uncommon in this setting. Larger sample sizes would be required to determine if BRAF status is predictive for CET benefit. [Table: see text]

A prognostic model for predicting overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with abiraterone acetate (AA) after docetaxel.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5013-5013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim N. Chi ◽  
Thian San Kheoh ◽  
Charles J. Ryan ◽  
Arturo Molina ◽  
Joaquim Bellmunt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Available N ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Regression ◽  
Proportional Hazards Regression

5013 Background: COU-AA-301 was a multinational, randomized, controlled, phase III trial comparing AA + prednisone (P) (n = 797) versus placebo + P (n = 398) in mCRPC pts post-docetaxel. Using data from that trial, we developed a prognostic model for predicting OS in pts treated with AA post-chemotherapy, with a focus on readily assessable clinical parameters. Methods: The analyses used data from pts treated with AA in the COU-AA-301 trial for whom relevant baseline data were available (n = 729). Baseline variables were assessed for association with OS through a univariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. High/low values for accepted normal ranges were used for laboratory parameters. The Cox proportional hazards regression was used with a stepwise procedure to identify independent prognostic factors for OS. The model was subject to sensitivity analyses and the C-index was utilized as a measure of model accuracy. Results: The following risk factors were associated with a poor prognosis: ECOG performance status (only pts with scores of ≤ 2 were eligible for this trial) of 2 (HR = 2.19, p < 0.0001), presence of liver metastases (HR = 2.00, p < 0.0001), time from start of initial LHRH agonist therapy to start of AA treatment ≤ 36 months (HR = 1.30, p = 0.0078), low albumin (HR = 1.54, p < 0.0001), high ALP (HR = 1.38, p = 0.0016), and high LDH (HR = 2.31, p < 0.0001). Patients were categorized into 3 risk groups (good prognosis, n = 369; intermediate prognosis, n = 321; poor prognosis, n = 107) based on total number of risk factors and median OS calculated for each group (table). The C-index was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.80). Conclusions: This prognostic model uses readily available clinical parameters to conveniently assess risk for mCRPC pts previously treated with docetaxel and initiating treatment with AA + P. If validated, the model will be useful in clinical practice and clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT00638690. [Table: see text]

Alectinib exposure-response (ER) in ALK-inhibitor naïve ALK-positive NSCLC patients: Pooled analysis across phase III studies.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20575-e20575
Author(s):  
Kevin Smart ◽  
Joy C Hsu ◽  
Felix Jaminion ◽  
Elena Guerini ◽  
Alice Tsang Shaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Alk Inhibitor ◽  
Exposure Response ◽  
Alk Positive ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Phase Iii Studies

e20575 Background: Alectinib superiority to crizotinib has been demonstrated in ALK-inhibitor naïve ALK-positive NSCLC patients (pts) in Phase III studies conducted in Japanese (J-ALEX; JapicCTI-132316) pts receiving alectinib 300 mg BID and global (ALEX; NCT02075840) and Asian (ALESIA; NCT02838420) pts receiving alectinib 600mg BID. ER analyses are undertaken to confirm the appropriate alectinib dosing regimen for the global population. Methods: A previous population PK analysis (Hsu et al, ASCO 2016) assessed PK of alectinib and major metabolite, M4, to identify factors influencing PK variability. ER analyses across the 3 Phase III studies investigated the relationship between alectinib and progression-free survival (PFS) by a Cox proportional hazards (CPH) analysis. PK simulations for alectinib 300 mg and 600 mg BID doses were conducted to determine the proportion of pts falling above and below an identified optimal PK threshold for PFS. ER for key safety events were investigated for alectinib 600 mg BID using logistic regression. Results: Alectinib PK is influenced only by body weight and not by race/ethnicity. CPH analysis demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between alectinib exposure and PFS across the 3 Phase III studies, with an improved PFS above an identified optimal PK threshold (Table). PK simulations indicate 49% and 7% of global alectinib treated patients would fall below the optimal PK threshold for 300 and 600mg BID, respectively. Alectinib 600mg BID ensures a distribution of exposures that maximize the PFS benefit while lower alectinib doses/exposures could result in reduced efficacy. Baseline tumor size (BSIZ) was shown to negatively impact PFS with larger BSIZ seen in global pts. No significant exposure-safety relationships were identified for alectinib 600mg BID. Conclusions: Alectinib 600mg BID is the most appropriate dose in the global ALK-inhibitor naïve population. Clinical trial information: NCT02075840; JapicCTI-132316; NCT02838420. [Table: see text]

ColotypeR gene signature predicts response to cetuximab in colorectal cancer metastases.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 599-599
Author(s):  
Steven Allen Buechler ◽  
Yesim Gokmen-Polar ◽  
Sunil S. Badve
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Molecular Characteristics ◽  
Wild Type

599 Background: The consensus molecular subtypes (CMS1-4) partition primary colorectal cancer (CRC) into subgroups with distinct molecular characteristics. We previously reported a 20-genes ColotypeR-CMS signature that accurately defines CMS subtypes for primary CRC tumor samples. The utility of CMS subtyping in defining response to treatment of CRC metastases remains to be established. Here, we report the ability of ColotypeR scores to predict differential response to cetuximab among CMS subtypes in CRC metastases. Methods: The role of ColotypeR-CMS signature scores was assessed in CRC metastasis samples (GSE5851, N = 68, Affymetrix microarray) in predicting response to cetuximab. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. The predictive significance of ColotypeR-CMS scores relative to KRAS mutation status was also studied using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Results: ColotypeR-CMS scores were computed in GSE5851 using the algorithm developed in primary tumor samples. Higher values of ColotypeR-CMS CMS2 score were significantly predictive of longer PFS (p = 5 x 10-5for the score test in Cox proportional hazards model; hazard ratio 0.20 (95%CI 0.09-0.44) in CRC metastases samples (GSE5851, N = 68) treated with cetuximab. PFS was independent of CMS1,3, 4 scores. KRAS wild type tumors had significantly longer PFS (p = 0.01; hazard ratio 0.49 (95%CI 0.28-0.86). In multivariate survival analysis, ColotypeR-CMS CMS2 score added to the significance of KRAS status (p = 0.012) and ColotypeR-CMS CMS2 score was predictive of longer PFS in KRAS wild type tumors (p = 0.009; hazard ratio 0.20 (95%CI 0.06-0.69)). Conclusions: We showed that in CRC metastasis samples, the ColotypeR CMS2 score was highly predictive of sensitivity to cetuximab treatment, while no increase in PFS was observed for higher values of CMS1, 3, 4 scores.

Effect of baseline carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level on overall survival (OS) in NAPOLI-1 trial: A phase III study of MM-398 (nal-IRI), with or without 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV), versus 5-FU/LV in metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPAC) previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 425-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Tzong Chen ◽  
Jens T Siveke ◽  
Andrea Wang-Gillam ◽  
Richard Hubner ◽  
Shubham Pant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Effect ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Previously Treated

425 Background: CA19-9 has been shown to correlate with response to therapy and OS in patients with mPAC. NAPOLI-1, a randomized phase 3 study evaluated nal-IRI, a nanoliposomal formulation of irinotecan, with or without 5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV in patients with mPAC previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. Nal-IRI+5-FU/LV significantly improved OS (primary endpoint) vs 5-FU/LV (6.1 mo vs 4.2 mo; unstratified hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67; P = 0.012). CA19-9 response (≥50% decline from baseline) was superior with nal-IRI+5FU/LV compared with 5-FU/LV (29% vs 9%; P=0.0006). Nal-IRI alone did not show a statistical improvement in survival. Methods: Patients with a recorded baseline CA19-9 measurement were divided into quartiles to evaluate the treatment effect pattern of CA19-9 from nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and 5-FU/LV arms. Quartile ranges were based on 404 available CA19-9 values from randomized patients (N=417). Unstratified Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate HRs and corresponding 95% CIs. Effect of baseline CA19-9 on time to response, progression-free survival, and response will be presented. Results: Of patients randomized to receive nal-IRI+5-FU/LV (n = 117) or 5-FU/LV enrolled contemporaneously (n = 119), 218 received study drug and had a baseline CA19-9 measurement. Results show a greater treatment effect on OS with higher CA19-9 level relative to 5-FU/LV. Conclusions: In patients with mPAC previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy, nal-IRI+5-FU/LV significantly improved OS supported by progression free survival and objective response rate. The CA19-9 serum level can provide important information with regards to overall survival. Clinical trial information: NCT01494506. [Table: see text]

Alpelisib (ALP) with fulvestrant (FUL) in patients (pts) with PIK3CA-mutated hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC): Primary or secondary resistance to prior endocrine therapy (ET) in the SOLAR-1 trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1038-1038
Author(s):  
Dejan Juric ◽  
Sibylle Loibl ◽  
Fabrice Andre ◽  
J. Ignacio Delgado Mingorance ◽  
Frederic Forget ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Pik3ca Mutation ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pi3k Pathway ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Secondary Resistance

1038 Background: A contributor to ETR, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway hyperactivation can result from mutations to PIK3CA; ~40% of pts with HR+, HER2– ABC exhibit tumors with this mutation. Use of the oral α-specific PI3K inhibitor ALP + FUL significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with a PIK3CA mutation (HR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50-0.85; P<0.001) in SOLAR-1, which included both ET sensitive (ETS) and ETR pts (Table). ETS pts were later excluded by a protocol amendment. ETR was further defined as primary (1R) or secondary (2R) per ESMO criteria in both 1L and 2L pts. This subgroup analysis evaluated pts with a PIK3CA mutation based on tx line and endocrine status. Methods: SOLAR-1 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of ALP 300 mg QD or PBO Q28d + FUL 500 mg Q28d + C1d15 in men and postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2– ABC whose disease progressed on/after an aromatase inhibitor. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and median PFS (mPFS) presented by tx arm. A stratified Cox proportional hazards model estimated HR and 2-sided 95% CI. Results: Of 341 pts in the PIK3CA mutant cohort, 39 (11%) were ETS; 302 (89%) were ETR. mPFS in the ALP vs PBO arms was 22.1 vs 19.1 mo (HR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.35-2.17) for ETS pts and 9.4 vs 4.2 mo (HR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.84) for ETR pts. For ETR pts, mPFS for 1L (n=138) was 9.0 vs 4.7 mo (HR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.46-1.05) and for 2L (n=161) was 10.9 vs 3.7 mo (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.89). Conclusions: In SOLAR-1, mPFS was improved with ALP + FUL vs PBO + FUL across ETR pts in 1L and 2L. Representation of ETS pts was low in SOLAR-1, which included more ETR pts. Analysis of the PI3K pathway in ETS pts is warranted in future studies. Clinical trial information: NCT02437318. [Table: see text]

Early carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) dynamics to predict fruquintinib efficacy in FRESCO, a 3+ line metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) phase III trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16001-e16001
Author(s):  
Yuxian Bai ◽  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
Yanhong Deng ◽  
Lei Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Radiological Evaluation

e16001 Background: The FRESCO phase 3 trial demonstrated a significant survival benefit with fruquintinib vs. placebo in the third-line or later therapy of mCRC patients. CEA levels are widely used in conjunction with imaging to monitor response to systemic therapy in patients with mCRC. Herein, we undertook post-hoc analyses of FRESCO patient data to investigate the early changes in CEA during treatment, as well as potential relationships with efficacy parameters. Methods: Patients were included if baseline CEA was abnormal according to local lab reference range. Serum CEA levels were measured at baseline and Day 1 of each cycle (except for Cycle 1). Early CEA change was analyzed at first radiological evaluation (C3D1, Week 8), CEA response was defined as ≥ 50% decrease from baseline, and CEA progression was defined as ≥ 100% increase from baseline. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method; hazard ratio (HR) was estimated through Cox proportional hazards model; p-value was generated from log rank test. Results: 88.4% (245/277) and 94.9% (130/137) of patients had an abnormal baseline CEA in the fruquintinib group and placebo group, respectively. Median baseline CEA values were similar between treatment groups. After 2 cycles of treatment, the proportion of patients had CEA response was significantly higher in the fruquintinib group than placebo group (30.0% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001). In the fruquintinib group, patients with early CEA response (n = 63) had longer median OS (12.8 vs. 7.8 months, HR = 0.45, p < 0.001) and median PFS (5.6 vs. 3.7 months, HR = 0.49, p < 0.001) than patients without (n = 147). 66.7% (140/210) of patients in fruquintinib group had stable disease (SD), and fruquintinib in those patients with concomitant CEA response exhibited a significantly greater OS benefit than with CEA progression (14.4 vs. 8.7 months, HR = 0.38, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Fruquintinib increased early CEA response. CEA response at first radiological evaluation after cycle 2 could be considered as a predictor for better OS and PFS. Among patients with SD at first evaluation, those with CEA response seems benefit more from fruquintinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02314819 .

Quality of life (QOL) predicts for progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with sunitinib compared to interferon-alpha (IFN-α)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6594-6594 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Cella ◽  
J. Z. Li ◽  
J. C. Cappelleri ◽  
A. Bushmakin ◽  
C. Charbonneau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Health State ◽  
Eq Vas

6594 Background: In a recent international, randomized phase III trial, sunitinib malate, an oral multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, RET and FLT3 with both antitumor and antiangiogenic effects, was associated with statistically superior clinical efficacy and superior health-related QOL vs. IFN-a as first-line therapy in patients with mRCC (Motzer et al, Proc ASCO 2006;24:2s [Abstract LBA3]). Here we report a substudy of baseline QOL variables predicting PFS. Methods: 750 mRCC patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either sunitinib 50 mg orally once daily in repeated 6-week cycles (4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off) or IFN-a (9 MU via subcutaneous injection 3 times weekly). QOL was measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index's Disease-Related Symptoms subscale (FKSI-DRS), and the patient self-rated overall health state (EQ-VAS) from the EuroQol Group's EQ-5D self-report questionnaire. For all QOL endpoints, higher scores indicated better outcomes (better QOL or fewer symptoms). Cox proportional-hazards model was used to test which baseline QOL variables predict PFS while controlling for other baseline demographic and clinical factors as well as treatment. Because the three QOL scores are correlated (r=0.61–0.69), three separate univariate models were fitted. Results and Conclusions: All three baseline QOL variables were predictive of PFS: better baseline FACT-G, FKSI-DRS and EQ-VAS scores were associated with longer PFS. When QOL and other baseline variables were controlled in the models, the superior treatment effect of sunitinib on PFS remained robust and large (See the table below). [Table: see text]

Activity of cetuximab (C) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients (pts) with PTEN loss or PIK3CA mutation treated on E5397, a phase III trial of cisplatin (CDDP) with placebo (P) or C.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6028-6028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Burtness ◽  
Ju-Whei Lee ◽  
Donghua Yang ◽  
Fang Zhu ◽  
Joaquin J. Garcia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Pik3ca Mutation ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Pten Expression ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Pik3ca Mutations ◽  
Pten Loss

6028 Background: Abnormalities in EGFR signaling targets are associated with C resistance but no biomarker of C resistance has been identified in HNSCC. We hypothesized that cases with loss of PTEN protein expression (PTEN null) or PIK3CA mutation would display C resistance in HNSCC. Methods: E5397 was a phase III trial of CDDP plus P or CDDP plus C and enrolled 117 eligible and evaluable pts. PIK3CA and PTEN were analyzed for 52 and 67 consented pts, respectively. PTEN expression (PTEN Cell Signaling Technology, Cat. 9559) was determined by automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) on the PM-2000 (HistoRx, New Haven) using a cutpoint generated in 5 HNSCC tissue microarrays, each consisting of HNSCC as well as positive (small intestine, median AQUA score 2833.2) and negative controls (breast and colon carcinoma, median AQUA score 205.5). A cutpoint of 570 provides 100% specificity, 100% sensitivity, and identified 30% of the HNSCCs as PTEN null, consonant with the literature. The 3 most common PIK3CA mutations (E542K and E545K in exon 9 and H1047R in exon 20) were determined by BEAMing (Inostics, Heidelberg, Germany). Response, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between PTEN null or PIK3CA mutated pts and all others. Log rank and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to calculate p values. Results: 23/67 (34%) tumors were PTEN null and 2/52 (4%) had PIK3CA mutations (E542K and E545K). Both tumors with PIK3CA mutation had PTEN expression. No statistically significant differences in response, OS or PFS were noted in this small sample. However, among PTEN expressing/PIK3CA WT pts, median PFS increased to 4.2 months (m) for C (N=22) from 2.9 m for P (N=26) (Wald p=0.07), compared with 4.6 m for C (N=12) and 3.5 m for P (n=13) among the PTEN null/PIK3CA mutated (Wald p=0.60). Conclusions: The PTEN loss or PIK3CA mutation signature warrants further investigation as a predictor of C resistance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document