Early clearance of plasma EGFR mutations as a predictor of response to osimertinib and comparator EGFR-TKIs in the FLAURA trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9020-9020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caicun Zhou ◽  
Fumio Imamura ◽  
Ying Cheng ◽  
Isamu Okamoto ◽  
Byoung Chul Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Digital Pcr ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Egfr Tkis

9020 Background: In the Phase III FLAURA trial (NCT02296125), osimertinib, a third generation EGFR-TKI, showed superior efficacy to comparator EGFR-TKIs as first line treatment for EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm) advanced NSCLC. In an exploratory analysis, we investigated clinical outcomes associated with detection of plasma EGFRm at 3 or 6 weeks (wks) after start of treatment. Methods: Treatment-naïve patients (pts) with EGFRm (ex19del or L858R) locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive osimertinib 80 mg once daily (QD) or comparator EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib 250 mg QD or erlotinib 150 mg QD). Plasma EGFR mutation analysis was conducted at baseline (BL), wks 3 and 6 by droplet digital PCR. Clearance was defined as undetectable levels of EGFRm in ctDNA at wks 3/6, where they were detectable at BL. Progression-free survival (PFS) was investigated based on early clearance of EGFRm. Results: In total 489/556 (88%) pts (osimertinib: 244/279; comparator: 245/277) had evaluable ctDNA at BL and wks 3/6. Of these, 342/489 (70%; osimertinib: 168/244; comparator: 174/245) had detectable BL EGFRm and were included in this analysis. See table. Conclusions: Clearance of plasma EGFRm after 3/6 wks of EGFR-TKI therapy was associated with a numerical improvement in PFS. The efficacy of osimertinib was superior to comparator EGFR-TKIs regardless of clearance status. Clinical trial information: NCT02296125. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Switching from first or second generation EGFR-TKI to osimertinib in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. LMT29
Author(s):  
Fumio Imamura ◽  
Takako Inoue ◽  
Kei Kunimasa ◽  
Aki Kubota ◽  
Hanako Kuhara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Combination Strategies ◽  
Sequential Combination ◽  
Clinical Records ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Egfr Tkis

Aim: We evaluated the efficacy of a novel switch protocol for EGFR-TKIs for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Materials & methods: Clinical records were collected from the patients who had received one of two sequential combination strategies of EGFR-TKIs: Salvage use of osimertinib for T790M-mediated acquired resistance to an prior EGFR-TKI or switch use of osimertinib where an EGFR-TKI was switched to osimertinib before disease progression. Results: Progression-free survival of osimertinib and time from the start of treatment until progression to osimertinib was comparable between the salvage use and switch use of osimertinib. Conclusion: Switch use of osimertinib seemed to produce improved efficacy for patients with activating EGFR mutations, because of the lack of patient selection via T790M.

scholarly journals CALLA: Efficacy and safety of concurrent and adjuvant durvalumab with chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in women with locally advanced cervical cancer: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 1065-1070
Author(s):  
Jyoti Mayadev ◽  
Ana T Nunes ◽  
Mary Li ◽  
Michelle Marcovitz ◽  
Mark C Lanasa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
To Receive

BackgroundConcurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with programmed blockade of the cell death-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 pathway may promote a more immunogenic environment through increased phagocytosis, cell death, and antigen presentation, leading to enhanced immune-mediated tumor surveillance.Primary ObjectiveThe CALLA trial is designed to determine the efficacy and safety of the programmed cell death-ligand 1 blocking antibody, durvalumab, with and following concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in women with locally advanced cervical cancer.Study HypothesisDurvalumab concurrent with and following concurrent chemoradiotherapy will improve progression-free survival in patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IB2 to IVA cervical cancer compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone.Trial DesignCALLA is a phase III, randomized, multicenter, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either durvalumab (1500 mg intravenously (IV)) or placebo every 4 weeks for 24 cycles. All patients will receive external beam radiotherapy with cisplatin (40 mg/m2) IV or carboplatin (area under the curve 2) IV once a week for 5 weeks, followed by image-guided brachytherapy.Major Inclusion/Exclusion CriteriaThe study will enroll immunotherapy-naïve adult patients with histologically confirmed cervical adenocarcinoma, cervical squamous, or adenosquamous carcinoma FIGO 2009 stages IB2–IIB node positive and stage IIIA–IVA with any node stage. Patients will have had no prior definitive surgical, radiation, or systemic therapy for cervical cancer.Primary EndpointThe primary endpoint is progression-free survival (assessed by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1, histopathological confirmation of local tumor progression or death).Sample SizeApproximately 714 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either durvalumab + concurrent chemoradiotherapy or placebo + concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting ResultsPatient enrollment is continuing globally with an estimated completion date of April 2024.Trial RegistrationNCT03830866.

Quantitative test of mutant EGFR and its effect on efficacy of EGFR TKI in advanced NSCLC.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22186-e22186
Author(s):  
Caicun Zhou ◽  
Xuefei Li ◽  
Shengxiang Ren ◽  
Guohua Yang ◽  
Wei He
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Conserved Sequence ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Mutant Egfr

e22186 Background: It is reported that abundance of EGFR mutation is related with efficacy of EGFR TKI in advanced NSCLC patients with positive EGFR mutations. This study was designed to investigate influence of EGFR mutations and their abundance on efficacy of EGFR TKI. Methods: 141 advanced NSCLC treated with EGFR TKI and available tissue for EGFR mutations were enrolled into the study. EGFR mutation was detected with the kit of AmoyDx ARMS and concentration of mutant EGFR was detected with the method of a quantitative competitive allele specific Taqman PCR technology (qCAST). In this assay, copies from EGFR mutants were calibrated by standard curve respectively, and the mutation rates were estimated through normalizing by copies of a conserved sequence in EGFR exon2. The relationship between abundance of EGFR mutations and efficacy of EGFR TKI was analyzed. Results: The median age of patients was 59 years old, and in which 54.3% were male, 71.7% ex-somkers. Among all of the patients, adenocarcinoma accounted for 57.7%, squamous cell carcinoma 27.2%, adeno-squamous cell carcinoma 7.6%, and others 7.6%. 46.7% of patients harbored EGFR mutations, and in which 48.7% existed more than 20% abundance of EGFR mutations. Overall response rate was 31.4% and progression free survival was 5.0 months. The final analysis data will be reported at the conference. Conclusions: The abundance of EGFR mutations might affect the efficacy of EGFR-TKI, and quantitation of mutant EGFR may better predict for efficacy of EGFR TKI in advanced NSCLC.

Phase Ib study of sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy for 1L advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20546-e20546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nong Xu ◽  
Kejing Ying ◽  
Ziping Wang ◽  
Yunpeng Liu ◽  
Haiping Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Treatment Naïve

e20546 Background: Anti-programmed death-1 antibodies (PD-1 Abs) have shown benefits in advanced NSCLC. The efficacy and safety of sintilimab, a PD-1 Ab, in combination with chemotherapy for 1L NSCLC is evaluated in this phase Ib study (NCT02937116). Methods: The study enrolled treatment-naïve unresectable locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous (nsq-) and squamous (sq-) NSCLC patients with neither EGFR mutations nor ALK rearrangements in cohort D and E respectively. Patients received sintilimab 200mg IV q3w in combination with pemetrexed 500mg/m2 and cisplatin 75mg/m2 IV q3w (4 cycles) in cohort D, or gemcitabine 1250mg/m2 D1,8 and cisplatin 75mg/m2 D1 IV q3W (6 cycles) in cohort E until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination. Results: As data cutoff (15 Jan 2019), 21 and 20 patients were enrolled in cohort D and E respectively. ORR in nsq- and sq-NSCLC were 68.4% (95%CI, 43.4 to 87.4) and 64.7% (95%CI, 38.3 to 85.8) respectively based on data of 19 and 17 patients with at least one radiological assessment. Median PFS was 11.4 months (95%CI, 3.1 to NA) and 6.5 months (95%CI, 5.3 to 8.0) respectively (Table). Totally 38 (92.7%) patients experienced at least one treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE). Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 28 (68.3%) patients. TRAE ≥grade 3 occurred in 4 (9.8%) patients. Immune related AEs occurred in 10 patients (24.4%), the most common of which were skin rash (N = 5), pneumonitis (N = 3) and hypothyroidism (N = 2). There was no AEs leading to death. The biomarker analysis was ongoing. Conclusions: The combination of sintilimab and chemotherapy showed efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in 1L nsq- and sq-NSCLC. Two phase III trials are ongoing to evaluate the combination in 1L nsq- (NCT03607539) and sq-NSCLC (NCT03629925) respectively. Clinical trial information: NCT02937116. [Table: see text]

RELAY study of erlotinib (ERL) + ramucirumab (RAM) or placebo (PL) in EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Biomarker analysis using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in Japanese patients (pts).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9527-9527
Author(s):  
Kazuto Nishio ◽  
Kazuko Sakai ◽  
Takashi Seto ◽  
Makoto Nishio ◽  
Edward B. Garon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Digital Pcr ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Activating Mutations ◽  
Biomarker Analysis

9527 Background: The phase III RELAY study (NCT02411448) showed significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) for RAM+ERL vs PL+ERL in 449 pts with previously untreated EGFR mutation-positive metastatic NSCLC (median PFS 19.4 vs 12.4 mo, HR 0.591 [95% CI 0.461–0.760], p<.0001). To understand baseline genetic mutations and treatment-emergent (TE) resistance mechanisms, this exploratory liquid biopsy substudy examined biomarkers in ctDNA from participating Japanese pts by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Methods: Plasma samples were collected at baseline, during treatment (Cycle 4, 13, and every 6 cycles to Cycle 53) and post-study treatment discontinuation (30-day follow-up [30d FU]). Mutations were assessed at baseline and 30d FU by NGS (Ion AmpliSeq Colon and Lung Cancer panel). EGFR mutations and MET and ERBB2 copy number (CN) were assessed at all time points by ddPCR. Baseline markers were analyzed in pts with any detectable baseline mutation (to confirm ctDNA presence; NGS N=84, ddPCR N=74). TE mutations were analyzed in pts with any detectable mutation at baseline and 30d FU (NGS N=26, ddPCR N=28). Among these pts, 81% and 57% for NGS and ddPCR, respectively, had progressed by 30d FU. Results: By plasma NGS, baseline EGFR activating mutations (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 [L858R] mutation) were detected in 83.3% of pts. Common co-occurring baseline mutations were TP53 (42.9%), PTEN (7.1%) and KRAS (6.0%). Baseline TP53 mutation rate was higher in men vs women (p=.02). No difference in PFS was detected by baseline TP53 status (interaction predictive p=.45, prognostic p=.33). TE mutations were detected in EGFR (including T790M), FGFR3, KRAS and TP53. Slightly higher rates of TE KRAS (p=.03) and TP53 (p=.07) mutations were detected in RAM+ERL than in PL+ERL. TE total EGFR mutations (p=.65) or TE T790M (p=.69) did not differ by arm. By ddPCR, baseline EGFR activating mutations were detected in all pts. T790M was detected at baseline in 2/37 pts/arm (5.4%) and was TE in 6/11 (55%) RAM+ERL pts and 7/17 (41%) PL+ERL pts. There was a trend (p=.054) for greater ERBB2 CN in RAM+ERL vs PL+ERL at Cycle 4. MET CN decreased slightly at Cycle 4 in both arms (significant in PL+ERL, p=.003). Biomarker levels by ddPCR across all time points will be presented. Conclusions: Though limited by sample size and likely inconsistent tumor shedding, this exploratory study identified potential differences in TP53, KRAS, ERBB2 and MET by demographics, treatment and/or time. Clinical trial information: NCT02411448 .

Lungful: An observational prospective study to assess the molecular epidemiology of EGFR mutations upon progression on or after first line EGFR-TKI therapy, in real-life clinical settings in Greece.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21641-e21641
Author(s):  
Giannis Socrates Mountzios ◽  
Dimitrios Mavroudis ◽  
Epaminondas Samantas ◽  
Anna Koumarianou ◽  
Evangelos Georgios Konstantinos Fergadis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Epidemiology ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Liquid Biopsies ◽  
T790m Mutation ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Egfr Tki

e21641 Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the gold standard 1st line strategy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with activating EGFR mutations (EGFRm), associated with improved survival outcomes and quality of life compared to chemotherapy. Despite the high response rate with first- and second- generation TKIs, most patients develop resistance to treatment and progress. The acquisition of T790M mutation in exon 20 is considered the most common resistance mechanism. This study aims to investigate the molecular epidemiology of EGFR resistance mutations, focusing on T790M in EGFRm NSCLC patients treated with TKIs. Methods: The study included patients with locally advanced/metastatic EGFRm NSCLC who have progressed on or after 1st line treatment with first- or second- generation TKI. Samples either from plasma-based liquid biopsy and/or tissue re-biopsy were analysed using the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2. All patients signed informed consent and were enrolled between July 2017 and September 2019. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software, Version 9.4. Results: Ninety-six eligible patients were enrolled. At the time of progression, T790M mutation was detected in 16.7%of the patients using plasma-based liquid biopsies. Among patients with negative T790M result, in plasma, tissue re-biopsy was performed in 22,7% with evaluable/valid results in 72.2% of them. T790M mutation was identified in 38.5% of re-biopsy samples. According to Cobas EGFR Mutation test results (combined plasma and tissue), T790M mutation was identified in 21.9% of the patients. Of T790M-positive patients 42.9% had previously received first and 57.1% second generation EGFR-TKI. Conclusions: Results from this study in real world clinical setting in Greece, show that EGFR-T790M acquired resistance positivity rate in plasma is lower compared to previous reports. Moreover, these data underline the challenges of implementing precision medicine using tissue re-biopsy in advanced/metastatic NSCLC. Clinical trial information: D133FR00126. [Table: see text]

Rebiopsy of patients (pts) with acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8025-8025 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Arcila ◽  
G. J. Riely ◽  
M. F. Zakowski ◽  
M. G. Kris ◽  
M. Ladanyi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Met Amplification ◽  
Metastatic Sites ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Egfr Tkis

8025 Background: The EGFR-TKIs erlotinib and gefitinib produce dramatic regressions of tumor in ∼ 70% of NSCLC patients with activating mutations in the EGFR-TK domain. After a median time to progression of ∼1 year, most pts have progressive disease. We undertook this study to search for mechanisms of “acquired resistance” to EGFR-TKIs, to determine the spectrum and frequency of secondary EGFR mutations which arose, and to determine the feasibility of rebiopsy in this setting. Methods: All pts had metastatic or recurrent NSCLC and prior treatment with EGFR-TKI and progressive disease while on EGFR-TKI. Pts must also have had an activating EGFR mutation OR radiographic response (RECIST or WHO) to EGFR-TKI OR significant and durable improvement in cancer-related symptoms as judged by patient's physician. Core biopsies were performed and studied for EGFR mutation (exons 18–21 including PCR-based test for T790M) and MET amplification. Results: From 8/04–12/08 98 pts were consented for rebiopsy and 85 underwent the procedure. Demographics Female/Male=59/39; median age 62 (range 28–88); smoking: never=59, former/current=39. Primary EGFR mutation was exon 19 del-39; exon 21 L858R-11, other/WT-28, pending-7. Median time on EGFR-TKI before biopsy was 12 months (7–28 months). Secondary EGFR mutations: T790M-33, other-2, none detected-31, indeterminate-10, pending-9. MET amplification in 2/16 studied to date. Conclusions: 1) Rebiopsy of patients with NSCLC and acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs is feasible and well-received by pts. 2) Knowledge of EGFR genotype including EGFR T790M and MET status can inform clinical trials of targeted therapies in this population 3) More complete annotation of MET status and exploratory analyses of profiles of specimens by metastatic sites and prior EGFR-TKI versus chemo and EGFR-TKI is ongoing. Supported by the Doris Duke Foundation, the LaBrecque Foundation, Steps for Breath, NIH, and an anonymous donor. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Nazartinib (EGF816) in patients with treatment-naïve EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Updated phase II results.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9574-9574
Author(s):  
Daniel Shao-Weng Tan ◽  
Natasha B. Leighl ◽  
James Chih-Hsin Yang ◽  
Gregory J. Riely ◽  
Lecia V. Sequist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maculopapular Rash ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Egfr Mutant

9574 Background: Prior data from a phase I/II study showed durable responses, including efficacy in brain lesions, and a tolerable safety profile with nazartinib in treatment (tx)-naïve patients (pts) with EGFR-mutant (mut), locally advanced (adv)/metastatic NSCLC. Here we report updated phase II results, including overall survival (OS). Methods: Tx-naïve adult pts with activating EGFR-mut (L858R or ex19del), stage IIIB/IV adv NSCLC with neurologically stable and controlled brain metastasis (BM) received oral nazartinib 150 mg once daily (continuous schedule). Primary endpoint: overall response rate (ORR) by BIRC per RECIST v1.1; secondary endpoints: disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), time to response, progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and safety. Results: At data cut-off (Nov 1, 2019), 45 pts were enrolled (median [range] age: 64 [28–83] years; 26 pts [58%] ECOG PS 1; 18 pts [40%] had baseline BM). EGFR mutations: 56% ex19del, 40% L858R, 4% other. 26/45 pts (58%) discontinued tx, with the primary reason being progressive disease in 19 pts (42%); 2 pts (4%) discontinued tx due to AEs. Median (range) follow-up for OS: 25 (0–33) months (mo); and for PFS: 17 (0–33) mo. ORR by BIRC: 69%; median PFS by BIRC: 18 mo; median OS was NE and at 33 mo, 56% of pts were alive (Table). BIRC results by baseline BM are shown in the Table. Median (range) duration of exposure: 24 (0–34) mo. Most frequent AEs (≥20% all grade, all causality): diarrhea (47%), maculopapular rash (38%), pyrexia (29%), cough and stomatitis (27% each), decreased appetite and pruritus (24% each), and dermatitis acneiform (22%). Most frequent grade 3/4 AEs (≥10%, all causality): maculopapular rash (5 pts [11%]; all grade 3) and increased lipase (5 pts [11%]; 1 pt with grade 4; no clinical pancreatitis AE was observed). Conclusions: After additional follow-up, median OS was still not reached and the safety profile was manageable. Nazartinib is a promising 3rd generation EGFR TKI for tx-naïve pts with adv EGFR-mut NSCLC, including pts with baseline BM. Clinical trial information: NCT02108964 . [Table: see text]

American Society of Clinical Oncology Provisional Clinical Opinion: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Testing for Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Considering First-Line EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15) ◽  
pp. 2121-2127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicki Leigh Keedy ◽  
Sarah Temin ◽  
Mark R. Somerfield ◽  
Mary Beth Beasley ◽  
David H. Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Mutation Testing ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Egfr Mutation Testing

Purpose An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) provisional clinical opinion (PCO) offers timely clinical direction to ASCO's membership following publication or presentation of potentially practice-changing data from major studies. This PCO addresses the clinical utility of using epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to predict the benefit of taking a first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Clinical Context Patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC have a significantly higher rate of partial responses to the EGFR TKIs gefitinib and erlotinib. In the United States, approximately 15% of patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung harbor activating EGFR mutations. EGFR mutation testing is widespread at academic medical centers and in some locales in community practice. As of yet, there is no evidence of an overall survival (OS) benefit from selecting treatment based on performing this testing. Recent Data One large phase III trial (the Iressa Pan-Asia Study [IPASS] trial), three smaller phase III randomized controlled trials using progression-free survival as the primary end point, and one small phase III trial with OS as the primary end point, all involving first-line EGFR TKIs and chemotherapy doublets, form the basis of this PCO. Provisional Clinical Opinion On the basis of the results of five phase III randomized controlled trials, patients with NSCLC who are being considered for first-line therapy with an EGFR TKI (patients who have not previously received chemotherapy or an EGFR TKI) should have their tumor tested for EGFR mutations to determine whether an EGFR TKI or chemotherapy is the appropriate first-line therapy. NOTE. ASCO's provisional clinical opinions (PCOs) reflect expert consensus based on clinical evidence and literature available at the time they are written and are intended to assist physicians in clinical decision making and identify questions and settings for further research. Because of the rapid flow of scientific information in oncology, new evidence may have emerged since the time a PCO was submitted for publication. PCOs are not continually updated and may not reflect the most recent evidence. PCOs cannot account for individual variation among patients and cannot be considered inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of other treatments. It is the responsibility of the treating physician or other health care provider, relying on independent experience and knowledge of the patient, to determine the best course of treatment for the patient. Accordingly, adherence to any PCO is voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding its application to be made by the physician in light of each patient's individual circumstances. ASCO PCOs describe the use of procedures and therapies in clinical practice and cannot be assumed to apply to the use of these interventions in the context of clinical trials. ASCO assumes no responsibility for any injury or damage to persons or property arising out of or related to any use of ASCO's PCOs, or for any errors or omissions.

Impact of p16 expression on induction taxotere-cisplatin-5 FU (TPF) followed by cetuximab-radiotherapy in N2b-N3 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): Results of GORTEC 2007-02 phase III randomized trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6070-6070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yungan Tao ◽  
Lionnel Geoffrois ◽  
Laurent Martin ◽  
Dominique De Raucourt ◽  
Joelle Miny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hpv Status ◽  
Nodal Spread ◽  
To Receive ◽  
P16 Expression

6070 Background: TPF is a reference induction chemotherapy regimen in non-operated locally advanced (LA) HNSCC. GORTEC 2007-02 phase III randomized trial was restricted to HNSCC patients with large nodal spread (N2b-N3). Results showed no benefit of 3 cycles of induction TPF followed by cetuximab-radiotherapy (RT), as compared to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (Geoffrois et al ASCO 2016). Methods: Patients were randomized to receive concurrent CRT (arm A) or induction TPF followed by cetuximab-RT (arm B). RT was 70 Gy/35F/7 weeks. Concurrent chemotherapy was 3 cycles of carboplatin-5FU as previously described (Calais JNCI 1999). About 2/3 of patients had oropharyngeal cancers (OPC) and HPV status was determined in these patients using p16 expression as a surrogate (immunohistochemistry). Smoking status was also collected. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Results: Between May 2009 and Aug 2013, 360 eligible patients were randomized including 231 (64%) OPC. Overall, p16 expression could be assessed in 172 / 231 OPC patients (74%) with 84 in arm A and 88 in arm B. 26 patients were found p16+ in arm A (31%) and 19 in arm B (22%). Only 8 out 45 (18%) p16+ patients were non-smokers showing that the large majority of OPC patients randomized were p16- (127/172) and smokers (117/129). A significant improvement in PFS was found in p16+ compared to p16- OPC (p < 0.0001). The absence of benefit in PFS associated with TPF + cetux-RT compared with CRT was suggested both in p16+ (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.28 – 2.20) and in p16- OPC (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.84 – 1.93), and the interaction between p16 and treatment modality was not significant (p = 0.35). A significant benefit was observed in favor of arm B regarding distant metastasis, but this effect was not different between the p16+ and p16- OPC, while there was no benefit of TPF + cetux-RT compared with CRT for loco-regional control, regardless of p16 status. Conclusions: The OPC p16 subpopulations were small. No benefit of induction TPF chemotherapy followed by cetuximab-RT compared with CRT in OPC patients regardless of p16 status. Clinical trial information: NCT01233843.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document